Assessment of Storage-Induced Microplastic Generation, Polymer Characteristics, and Human Exposure Risks in Bottled and Sachet Drinking Water Under Different Environmental Conditions in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

References

[1] Ahmad M., and Bajahlan A.S. (2009). Quality comparison of tap water vs. bottled water in the industrial city of Yanbu (Saudi Arabia). Environ. Monit. Assess., 159, 1.

[2] Ahmed F., Khan T.A., Fakhruddin A.N.M., Rahman M.M., Mazumdar R.M., Ahmed S., Imam M.T., Kabir M., and Abdullah A.T.M. (2019). Estimation and exposure concentration of trihalomethanes (THMs) and its human carcinogenic risk in supplied pipeline water of Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 16316.

[3] Aisha H., Ogboeli G. P. & Ibama B. (2025). A Systematic Review of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) Management in IDP Camps in Borno State, Nigeria. Environmental Reports: An International Journal.7(2), 1-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51470/ER.2025.7.2.01

[4] Borenstein, S. (2024). Scientists find about a quarter million invisible nanoplastic particles in a liter of bottled water. Associated Press.

[5] Bradley P.M., LeBlanc D.R., Romanok K.M., Smalling K.L., Focazio M.J., Cardon M.C., Clark J.M., Conley J.M., Evans N., Givens C.E., Gray J.L., Gray L.E., Hartig P.C., Higgins C.P., Hladik M.L., Iwanowicz L.R., Loftin K.A., McCleskey R.B., McDonough C.A., Medlock-Kakaley E.K., Weis C.P., and Wilson V.S. (2021). Public and private tapwater: Comparative analysis of contaminant exposure and potential risk, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, USA. Environ. Int. 152, 106487.

[6] Campanale C., Massarelli C., Savino I., Locaputo V., and Uricchio V.F. (2020). A detailed review study on potential effects of microplastics and additives of concern on human health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 1212.

[7] Chowdhury S. (2013). Exposure assessment for trihalomethanes in municipal drinking water and risk reduction strategy. Sci. Total Environ. 463, 922.

[8] Gambino, I., Bagordo, F., Grassi, T., Panico, A., & De Donno, A. (2022). Occurrence of Microplastics in Tap and Bottled Water: Current Knowledge. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 5283. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095283

[9] Grassie, N., & Scott, G. (1985). Polymer degradation and stabilisation. Cambridge University Press.

[10] Igbudu, O., Ogan, A. C., & Ogboeli, G. P. (2025). Assessment of Ingested Radionuclide Dose from Groundwater Sources in Rumuekpe, Rivers State, Nigeria. FNAS Journal of Applied and Physical Sciences,2(2), 84-94.

[11] Koelmans, A. A., Mohamed Nor, N. H., Hermsen, E., Kooi, M., Mintenig, S. M., & De France, J. (2021). Microplastics in drinking water? Present state of knowledge and open questions. Current Opinion in Food Science, 41, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2021.02.011

[12] Malak, H. (2021). Detecting micro-plastics in bottled water (Master's thesis). American University of Beirut.

[13] Mastrodomenico, P. (2024). Bottled water contains hundreds of thousands of microscopic plastic pieces, research shows. Health.com.

[14] National Research Council (NRC). (1991). Human exposure assessment for airborne pollutants: Advances and opportunities. National Academies Press.

[15] Parveen, N., Ranjan, V. P., Chowdhury, S., & Goel, S. (2022). Occurrence and potential health risks due to trihalomethanes and microplastics in bottled water. Environmental Engineering Science, 39(6), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2021.0295

[16] Sarlin, P. J., Morris, S., Savitha, G., Gopan, A., & Radhakrishnan, E. K. (2024). Occurrence and characterization of microplastics in bottled drinking water. Discover Environment, 2(102). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00129-y

[17] United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). (1989). Risk assessment guidance for Superfund: Human health evaluation manual (Part A). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

[18] Weisser, J., Beer, I., Hufnagl, B., Hofmann, T., Lohninger, H., Ivleva, N. P., & Glas, K. (2021). From the Well to the Bottle: Identifying Sources of Microplastics in Mineral Water. Water, 13(6), 841. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13060841

@article{1718899,
      author = {Ogboeli Goodluck Prince, Okechukwu Cosmos, Amos-Bein Ebiere Berly, Avwerosuo Peace Edile},
      title = {Assessment of Storage-Induced Microplastic Generation, Polymer Characteristics, and Human Exposure Risks in Bottled and Sachet Drinking Water Under Different Environmental Conditions in Port Harcourt, Nigeria},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {12},
      pages = {2362-2374},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718899.pdf},
      abstract = {Microplastic contamination of drinking water is an emerging environmental and public health concern, especially in tropical regions where packaged water is often exposed to high temperatures and sunlight. This study investigated the effects of storage conditions and duration on microplastic generation in bottled and sachet drinking water commonly consumed in Port Harcourt Metropolis, Rivers State, Nigeria. Ten popular brands (five bottled and five sachet) were subjected to four storage conditions: indoor control (25 ± 2°C), ambient market storage (28–32°C), direct sunlight exposure (30–40°C), and elevated temperature (45 ± 2°C). Samples were analysed at 0, 30, 60, and 90 days using membrane filtration, stereomicroscopy, and FTIR spectroscopy. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, t-test, Pearson correlation, one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA, and multiple regression at p < 0.05. Results showed a progressive and significant increase in microplastic concentrations with storage duration and harsher conditions. At 90 days, the highest concentrations were recorded under elevated temperature storage (58.7 ± 18.2 particles/L in bottled water and 78.5 ± 22.7 particles/L in sachet water), while the lowest levels occurred under indoor control conditions (11.8 ± 3.2 particles/L in bottled water and 15.0 ± 5.8 particles/L in sachet water). One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences among storage conditions (F = 58.42, p < 0.001). Sachet water exhibited higher microplastic levels than bottled water, though the difference was not statistically significant at Day 90 (p = 0.085). Fragments (40.3%) and fibers (34.4%) dominated the microplastics, with over 72% of particles smaller than 500 μm. FTIR analysis identified PET (38.0%), PE (27.6%), and PP (20.6%) as the predominant polymers. Strong positive correlations were observed between storage temperature and microplastic concentration (r = 0.842, p < 0.001) and storage duration (r = 0.791, p < 0.001). Multiple regression confirmed temperature and duration as significant predictors (R² = 0.998). The study concludes that prolonged storage under elevated temperatures and direct sunlight significantly accelerates microplastic release from packaging materials into drinking water, with sachet water being more vulnerable. These findings highlight the urgent need for improved storage practices, better packaging standards, and regulatory guidelines to reduce human exposure to microplastics in tropical environments.},
      keywords = {Microplastics, Storage Conditions, Plastic Degradation, Polymer Characterization, Drinking Water Quality, Human Exposure Assessment, Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET), Environmental Health.},
      month = {June},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1718899}
  }