Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718925
Human Wildlife Conflict in a Developing India: Projections, Mitigation Strategies, and Legislative Needs by 2047
Subject area: Biological & Medical Sciences · Area of research: Zoology and Governance
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I12-1718925
Abstract
Human-wildlife conflict has become a central ecological, livelihood, public safety and governance challenge in India. By 2047, the pressure points are expected to intensify because economic expansion, linear infrastructure, peri-urban growth, changing cropping systems, climate variability and the recovery of some large mammals will increasingly overlap in shared landscapes. This paper examines the contemporary Indian conflict landscape, with particular attention to elephants, tigers, leopards, wild pigs, blue bulls, bears, crocodiles, snakes and urban-adapted wildlife. It uses a scenario-based method to project conflict pathways to 2047 and argues that India cannot rely only on compensation, capture or relocation after an incident has occurred. A national transition is required from episodic conflict response to statutory coexistence planning. The analysis finds that the existing framework has important strengths, including the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Project Tiger and Elephant, the National Wildlife Action Plan 2017-2031, the National Human-Wildlife Conflict Mitigation Strategy and Action Plan, and the recent species-specific guidelines issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. However, it also identifies major gaps: fragmented data systems, uneven compensation delivery, weak corridor protection outside protected areas, inadequate integration of agriculture and insurance policy, limited legal status for rapid response teams and insufficient recognition of local communities as co-managers of coexistence. The paper recommends a 2047 legal and institutional package built around a National Human-Wildlife Coexistence Mission, a statutory conflict registry, legally secured ecological corridors, time-bound compensation and insurance, district-level rapid response units, infrastructure impact audits, local coexistence committees and a clearer procedure for handling dangerous individual animals while preserving the high protection standard of Indian wildlife law. The conclusion is that human safety and wildlife conservation need not be treated as opposing goals. They can be reconciled through landscape planning, accountable governance and community-centered risk reduction.
Keywords
Human Wildlife Conflict, Coexistence, India 2047, Wildlife Protection Act, Elephant Conflict, Leopard Conflict, Wildlife Corridors, Compensation, Conservation Governance
References
[1] International Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Human-Wildlife Conflict and Coexistence Specialist Group, IUCN SSC Guidelines on Human-Wildlife Conflict and Coexistence, First Edition, IUCN, 2023. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2023-009-En.pdf
[2] Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, National Human-Wildlife Conflict Mitigation Strategy and Action Plan of India, 2021. https://moef.gov.in/uploads/2022/01/National-Human-Wildlife-Conflict-Mitigation-Strategy-and-Action-Plan-of-India-2.pdf
[3] Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, Parliament Question: Management of Human-Wildlife Conflicts, 21 July 2025. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2146354
[4] Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, Wild Animal Attacks, 22 July 2024. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleseDetailm.aspx?PRID=2035046&lang=2®=3
[5] National Tiger Conservation Authority, Wildlife Institute of India, Status of Tigers, Co-predators and Prey in India, 2022, 2023. https://ntca.gov.in/assets/uploads/Reports/AITM/status_of_tiger-copredators-2022.pdf
[6] Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, India Tiger Estimation 2022: Release of the Detailed Report, 29 July 2023. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1943922
[7] Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, India Conducts Fifth Cycle Leopard Population Estimation, 29 February 2024. https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2010001
[8] Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Project Elephant Division, Proceedings of the 3rd Meeting of the CPEMC, 2023. https://moef.gov.in/uploads/2023/05/Proceeding-of-the-3rd-meeting-of-the-CPEMC.pdf
[9] Forest Survey of India, India State of Forest Report 2023, Volume 1, 2024. https://fsi.nic.in/uploads/isfr2023/isfr_book_eng-vol-1_2023.pdf
[10] Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, National Wildlife Action Plan 2017-2031, 2017. https://ntca.gov.in/assets/uploads/Reports/Others/Wildlife_Action_Plan_2017_31.pdf
[11] Government of India, The Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, as amended. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/6198/1/the_wild_life_%28protection%29_act%2C_1972.pdf
[12] PRS Legislative Research, The Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2022, 2022. https://prsindia.org/files/bills_acts/acts_parliament/2022/The%20Wild%20Life%20%28Protection%29%20Amendment%20Act%2C%202022.pdf
[13] Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India, Forest Rights Act, 2006. https://tribal.nic.in/fra.aspx
[14] Gazette of India, The Biological Diversity (Amendment) Act, 2023, 3 August 2023. https://egazette.gov.in/WritereadData/2023/247815.pdf
[15] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Cross-Chapter Paper 1: Biodiversity Hotspots, 2022. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/chapter/ccp1/
[16] Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, 2019. https://files.ipbes.net/ipbes-web-prod-public-files/inline/files/ipbes_global_assessment_report_summary_for_policymakers.pdf
[17] United Nations Environment Programme, Human-Wildlife Conflict One of the Greatest Threats to Wildlife Species, WWF and UNEP Report, 8 July 2021. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/human-wildlife-conflict-one-greatest-threats-wildlife-species-wwf
[18] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Human-Wildlife Conflict, Protected Areas Portal, 2023. https://www.fao.org/wildlife-protected-areas/main-themes/human-wildlife-conflict/en
[19] Dickman A.J., Complexities of Conflict: The Importance of Considering Social Factors for Effectively Resolving Human-Wildlife Conflict, Animal Conservation, 2010, 13 (5), 458-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x
[20] Braczkowski A.R., et al., The Unequal Burden of Human-Wildlife Conflict, Communications Biology, 2023, 6, 182. https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-023-04493-y
[21] Ghosh S., et al., Facilitating Human-Wildlife Cohabitation Through Conflict Prediction, arXiv, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.10637
[22] Purathekandy A., Oommen M.A., Wikelski M., Subramani D.N., An Agent-Based Model of Elephant Crop Raid Dynamics in the Periyar-Agasthyamalai Complex, India, arXiv, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09024
[23] Jiang W., Yang Y., Isukapalli Y., Elephant-Human Conflict Mitigation: An Autonomous UAV Approach, arXiv, 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02584
[24] United Nations Population Fund, India Population 2025, World Population Dashboard, 2025. https://www.unfpa.org/data/world-population/IN
[25] Jain A.K., Urban Transformation for India @ 2047, Indian Institute of Public Administration, 2023. https://www.iipa.org.in/publication/public/uploads/article/27911712048129.pdf
How to cite this paper
@article{1718925,
author = {Dr. Mukul Baijal, Rachit Baijal},
title = {Human Wildlife Conflict in a Developing India: Projections, Mitigation Strategies, and Legislative Needs by 2047},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {12},
pages = {1648-1663},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718925.pdf},
abstract = {Human-wildlife conflict has become a central ecological, livelihood, public safety and governance challenge in India. By 2047, the pressure points are expected to intensify because economic expansion, linear infrastructure, peri-urban growth, changing cropping systems, climate variability and the recovery of some large mammals will increasingly overlap in shared landscapes. This paper examines the contemporary Indian conflict landscape, with particular attention to elephants, tigers, leopards, wild pigs, blue bulls, bears, crocodiles, snakes and urban-adapted wildlife. It uses a scenario-based method to project conflict pathways to 2047 and argues that India cannot rely only on compensation, capture or relocation after an incident has occurred. A national transition is required from episodic conflict response to statutory coexistence planning. The analysis finds that the existing framework has important strengths, including the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Project Tiger and Elephant, the National Wildlife Action Plan 2017-2031, the National Human-Wildlife Conflict Mitigation Strategy and Action Plan, and the recent species-specific guidelines issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. However, it also identifies major gaps: fragmented data systems, uneven compensation delivery, weak corridor protection outside protected areas, inadequate integration of agriculture and insurance policy, limited legal status for rapid response teams and insufficient recognition of local communities as co-managers of coexistence. The paper recommends a 2047 legal and institutional package built around a National Human-Wildlife Coexistence Mission, a statutory conflict registry, legally secured ecological corridors, time-bound compensation and insurance, district-level rapid response units, infrastructure impact audits, local coexistence committees and a clearer procedure for handling dangerous individual animals while preserving the high protection standard of Indian wildlife law. The conclusion is that human safety and wildlife conservation need not be treated as opposing goals. They can be reconciled through landscape planning, accountable governance and community-centered risk reduction.},
keywords = {Human Wildlife Conflict, Coexistence, India 2047, Wildlife Protection Act, Elephant Conflict, Leopard Conflict, Wildlife Corridors, Compensation, Conservation Governance},
month = {June},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1718925}
}