Romanticizing AI: A Study on AI as an Emotional Comforter for Gen Z

References

[1] Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

[2] Banks, J. (2024). Deletion, departure, death: Experiences of AI companion loss. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

[3] Bickmore, T., & Picard, R. (2005). Establishing and maintaining long-term human–computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer- Human Interaction, 12(2), 293–327.

[4] Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. 1). Basic Books.

[5] Brandtzaeg, P. B., Skjuve, M., & Folstad, A. (2022). My AI friend: How users of a social chatbot understand their human–AI friendship. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 149.

[6] Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30(6), 625–648.

[7] Chaturvedi, R., Verma, S., Das, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. Social companionship with artificial intelligence: Recent trends and future avenues.

[8] Chen & Hartanto. Potential and pitfalls of romantic artificial intelligence companions: Systematic review.

[9] Cirielli, R. F., & Hannon, O. (2024). Ethical tensions in human-AI companionship: A dialectical inquiry into Replika.

[10] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

[11] De Freitas, J., & Cohen, I. G. The humanising and disclosure and contextual vulnerability of generative AI chatbots.

[12] Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

[13] Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886.

[14] Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann.

[15] Folk, D., & Dunn, E. (2026). How does turning to AI for companionship predict loneliness and vice versa? Psychological Science, 37(4).

[16] Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.

[17] Kang, E., & Kang, Y. A. (2024). Counseling chatbot design: The effect of anthropomorphic chatbot characteristics on user self-disclosure and companionship. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(11), 2781– 2795.

[18] Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523.

[19] Khairi bin Khairuddin, Mohamad Hafifi bin Jamri, Nur Shazana binti Abdul Rani, & Noor Afzaliza Nazira binti Ibrahim. The rise of AI girlfriends: A content analysis of digital companionship and its cultural implications.

[20] Liu, A. R., Pataranutaporn, P., & Maes, P. (2024). Chatbot companionship: A mixed- methods study of companion chatbot usage patterns and their relationship to loneliness. arXiv.

[21] Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000). Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 81–103.

[22] Nowak, K. L., & Biocca, F. (2003). The effect of agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence. Presence, 12(5), 481–494.

[23] Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

[24] Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press.

[25] Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.

[26] Strohmann, T., Siemon, D., Khosrawi-Rad, B., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2023). Toward a design theory for virtual companionship. Human– Computer Interaction, 38(3–4), 194–234.

[27] Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). MIT Press.

[28] Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.

[29] Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Press.

[30] Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2009). Social consequences of the internet for adolescents. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 1–5.

[31] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

@article{1718952,
      author = {Ananya Sipra, Dr. Jesus Milton Rousseau S.},
      title = {Romanticizing AI: A Study on AI as an Emotional Comforter for Gen Z},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {12},
      pages = {1675-1683},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718952.pdf},
      abstract = {This study explores Gen Z's emotional engagement with AI chatbots, examining (1) how Gen Z perceives romantic relationships with AI and whether these are seen as emotional support, (2) whether such engagement affects real-life relationships, and (3) the potential risks of emotional dependence on AI. A survey of 152 Gen Z respondents combined with qualitative analysis was used to assess their experiences and emotional reactions. The findings indicate that while AI chatbots may offer temporary emotional relief, most respondents do not consider them emotionally understanding or a substitute for human relationships, though excessive reliance on AI could, over time, affect personal and social relationships.},
      keywords = {AI, Romanticising AI, Emotion, Attachment, Gen Z},
      month = {June},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1718952}
  }