Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718961
Compensation Equity and Employee Commitment in the Digital Workplace: Examining the Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction and Employee Engagement
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Human Resource Management
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I12-1718961
Abstract
The digital transformation of employment relations has generated significant theoretical and practical questions regarding how compensation structures influence employee attitudes and behaviours in technology-mediated work environments. This study examines the relationship between compensation equity and organisational commitment among employees in digitally enabled service organisations, with particular attention to the mediating roles of job satisfaction and employee engagement. Grounded in Adams's (1963) Equity Theory and Blau's (1964) Social Exchange Theory, the study adopts a quantitative survey research design. Data were collected from a stratified random sample of 342 employees drawn from banks, telecommunications firms, and technology companies in Rivers State, Nigeria, using validated psychometric instruments. Structural equation modelling (SEM) with the bootstrapping procedure was employed for mediation analysis. Findings reveal that compensation equity exerts a significant positive direct effect on organisational commitment (β = 0.31, p < .001), and that this relationship is substantially mediated by both job satisfaction (indirect effect = 0.19, 95% CI [0.12, 0.27]) and employee engagement (indirect effect = 0.16, 95% CI [0.09, 0.24]). The study contributes to employment relations theory by demonstrating that perceptions of compensatory fairness operate through attitudinal and motivational pathways before translating into committed behaviour, and offers actionable recommendations for human resource practitioners navigating the challenges of compensation governance in the digital workplace.
Keywords
Compensation Equity, Organisational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, Digital Workplace, Equity Theory, Social Exchange Theory, Employment Relations, Mediation Analysis
References
[1] Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040968
[2] Albrecht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A. M. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1), 7–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-08-2014-0042
[3] American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.
[4] Bakker, A. B., Albrecht, S. L., & Leiter, M. P. (2011). Key questions regarding work engagement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.485352
[5] Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863
[6] Bhave, D. P. (2014). The invisible eye? Electronic performance monitoring and employee job performance. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 605–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12046
[7] Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
[8] British Psychological Society. (2021). Code of human research ethics (3rd ed.). BPS.
[9] Caesens, G., Stinglhamber, F., & Marmier, V. (2020). The curvilinear effect of work engagement on employees' intentions to leave: The moderating role of work-related rumination. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(7/8), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-05-2019-0277
[10] Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x
[11] Cloutier, O., Felusiak, L., Hill, C., & Pemberton-Jones, E. J. (2015). The importance of developing strategies for employee retention. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 12(2), 119–128.
[12] Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958
[13] Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
[14] Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
[15] Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
[16] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
[17] Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
[18] Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.5465/256422
[19] Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
[20] Gerhart, B., & Fang, M. (2014). Pay for (individual) performance: Issues, claims, evidence and the role of sorting effects. Human Resource Management Review, 24(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2013.08.010
[21] Greenberg, J. (1990). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.561
[22] Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford.
[23] Heneman, H. G., III, & Schwab, D. P. (1985). Pay satisfaction: Its multidimensional nature and measurement. International Journal of Psychology, 20(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598508247727
[24] Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
[25] Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4307799
[26] Igalens, J., & Roussel, P. (1999). A study of the relationships between compensation package, work motivation and job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(7), 1003–1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199912)20:7<1003::AID-JOB941>3.0.CO;2-K
[27] Islam, T., Khan, M., & Bukhari, F. (2022). The role of organizational learning culture and psychological empowerment in reducing turnover intention. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 32(3), 372–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2021.1948490
[28] Jha, S. (2022). Compensation fairness, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: Testing a mediation model. South Asian Journal of Management, 29(1), 78–101.
[29] Kaur, P., & Sharma, S. (2021). Digital HRM and compensation transparency: Exploring the mediating role of fairness perceptions. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(14), 2985–3012. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1810741
[30] Lau, C. M., & Chong, J. (2002). The effect of budget emphasis, participation and task difficulty on managerial performance and job satisfaction. Managerial Finance, 28(8), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350210768170
[31] Lawler, E. E., III. (1971). Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view. McGraw-Hill.
[32] Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 91–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60059-3
[33] Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Rand McNally.
[34] Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior: An evidence-based approach (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
[35] Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
[36] Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
[37] Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
[38] Milkovich, G. T., Newman, J. M., & Gerhart, B. (2024). Compensation (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
[39] Moore, P., & Robinson, A. (2016). The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2774–2792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604328
[40] Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (2020). Trust, psychological contract breach, and the employment relationship. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 143–159). SAGE.
[41] National Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Nigerian labour force statistics Q4 2022. NBS.
[42] Obasan, K. A., & Hassan, A. S. (2021). Effect of compensation strategy on employee performance: Evidence from Nigerian firms. Journal of Management Research, 13(2), 1–9.
[43] Okafor, C., Nwosu, I., & Okeke, J. (2023). Talent retention in Nigeria's fintech sector: The role of compensation, growth opportunities, and organisational culture. African Journal of Business and Management, 17(1), 45–63.
[44] Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
[45] Raosoft. (2004). Sample size calculator. http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html
[46] Rawlinson, M., Kersley, H., & Anderson, T. (2022). Pay transparency, employee voice, and organizational commitment in remote-work environments. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 60(3), 628–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12630
[47] Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690169
[48] Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two-sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
[49] Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
[50] Shan, S., Li, C., Yao, W., Shi, J., & Ren, J. (2015). An empirical study on the relationships among organizational justice, organizational commitment and job satisfaction in Chinese universities. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 3(2), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2015.32008
[51] Sluss, D. M., Klimchak, M., & Holmes, J. J. (2008). Perceived organizational support as a mediator between relational exchange and organizational identification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(3), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.09.001
[52] Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1993). Workers' evaluations of the "ends" and the "means": An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1993.1022
[53] Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_07
[54] Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. University of Minnesota, Industrial Relations Center, Work Adjustment Project.
How to cite this paper
@article{1718961,
author = {Dr Helen Nneka Ofor, Collins Vincent Tamunoseipriye},
title = {Compensation Equity and Employee Commitment in the Digital Workplace: Examining the Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction and Employee Engagement},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {12},
pages = {1832-1844},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718961.pdf},
abstract = {The digital transformation of employment relations has generated significant theoretical and practical questions regarding how compensation structures influence employee attitudes and behaviours in technology-mediated work environments. This study examines the relationship between compensation equity and organisational commitment among employees in digitally enabled service organisations, with particular attention to the mediating roles of job satisfaction and employee engagement. Grounded in Adams's (1963) Equity Theory and Blau's (1964) Social Exchange Theory, the study adopts a quantitative survey research design. Data were collected from a stratified random sample of 342 employees drawn from banks, telecommunications firms, and technology companies in Rivers State, Nigeria, using validated psychometric instruments. Structural equation modelling (SEM) with the bootstrapping procedure was employed for mediation analysis. Findings reveal that compensation equity exerts a significant positive direct effect on organisational commitment (β = 0.31, p < .001), and that this relationship is substantially mediated by both job satisfaction (indirect effect = 0.19, 95% CI [0.12, 0.27]) and employee engagement (indirect effect = 0.16, 95% CI [0.09, 0.24]). The study contributes to employment relations theory by demonstrating that perceptions of compensatory fairness operate through attitudinal and motivational pathways before translating into committed behaviour, and offers actionable recommendations for human resource practitioners navigating the challenges of compensation governance in the digital workplace.},
keywords = {Compensation Equity, Organisational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, Digital Workplace, Equity Theory, Social Exchange Theory, Employment Relations, Mediation Analysis},
month = {June},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1718961}
}