Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718964
Comparative Assessment of Background Ionizing Radiation Levels and Public Safety Limits in Modern and Traditional Buildings of Kurudu, Abuja
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Radiation and Medical Physics
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I12-1718964
Abstract
This study evaluated and compared background ionizing radiation (BIR) levels within modern and traditional buildings in Kurudu. The assessment targeted twenty locations per building category, computing the Indoor Annual Effective Dose Rate (IAEDR) and Outdoor Annual Effective Dose Rate (OAEDR) to establish the total effective dose rate. For modern structures, the background radiation dose rate ranges yielded an overall mean IAEDR of 1.32 ± 0.01 mSv/yr, and OAEDR of 0.27 ± 0.01 mSv/yr, and a total effective dose rate of 1.59 ± 0.01 mSv/yr. Conversely, traditional structures exhibited lower background values, maintaining an overall mean IAEDR of 1.02 ± 0.01 mSv/yr, and OAEDR of 0.34 ± 0.01 mSv/yr, and a total effective dose rate of 1.37 ± 0.02 mSv/yr. While the majority of isolated readings remain safely bounded, the accumulated total effective dose rates in both building types exceeded the standard public safety limit of 1.0 mSv/yr established by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). However, the values fall well within the broader global background radiation safety ceiling of 2.4 to 3.0 mSv/yr outlined by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR).
Keywords
Background Ionizing Radiation, Annual Effective Dose Rate (AEDR), Modern and Traditional Buildings, Public Safety Limits, Kurudu
References
[1] Chen, X., Wang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2023). Risk assessment of lung cancer caused by indoor radon exposure in contemporary residential architecture. International Journal of Environmental Public Health, 2023, Article 6943333.
[2] Chiegwu, H. U., Onyeka, J. O., Ugwuanyi, D. C., Odunk, D. D., Ogolodom, M. P., & Mbaba, A. N. (2022). Assessment of background ionizing radiation exposure levels in industrial buildings in Nnewi, Anambra State, Nigeria. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 10(2), 305–315
[3] Environmental Protection Agency. (2025). Radiation sources and doses. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/radiation/radiation-sources-and-doses
[4] Jammaz, A. M. (2024). Evaluation of the radiation emission of radon gas from various building materials using solid-state nuclear track detectors. Journal of King Saud University - Science, 36(6), 103214.
[5] Kim, S. H., Park, J. H., & Lee, K. W. (2025). Assessment of population exposure to terrestrial gamma radiation: National high-resolution mapping vs. global baselines. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 199(14), 1542–1551.
[6] Petrović, J., Milanović, S., & Ćujić, M. (2025). Assessment of terrestrial radionuclide exposure and topsoil accumulation dynamics in diverse geomorphological zones. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 268, Article 107119.
[7] Synnott, H., Fenton, D., & Organo, C. (2025). Integrating Radon/Thoron and Gamma Radiation Exposure for a Comprehensive Dose Estimation Model for Building Materials. Applied Sciences, 15(12), 6470
[8] United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2023). Ionizing radiation. https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basicref/glossary/ionizing-radiation.html
[9] Weerakkody, T., Williams, S., & Warnakulasuriya, T. (2022). Assessment of background radiation and associated dose rates for environmental emergency risk zoning. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 10(10), 12–25.
[10] World Nuclear Association. (2025). World Nuclear Outlook Report 2025. world-nuclear.org
[11] Yahaya, M. N., Emmanuel, C. C., Samaila, B., Bako, A., & Isa, H. (2024). Assessment of indoor and outdoor ambient radiation levels at Federal University Birnin Kebbi, Kebbi State. Savanna Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(2), 230–237.
How to cite this paper
@article{1718964,
author = { Joseph Teryima Iortile},
title = {Comparative Assessment of Background Ionizing Radiation Levels and Public Safety Limits in Modern and Traditional Buildings of Kurudu, Abuja},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {12},
pages = {2660-2665},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718964.pdf},
abstract = {This study evaluated and compared background ionizing radiation (BIR) levels within modern and traditional buildings in Kurudu. The assessment targeted twenty locations per building category, computing the Indoor Annual Effective Dose Rate (IAEDR) and Outdoor Annual Effective Dose Rate (OAEDR) to establish the total effective dose rate. For modern structures, the background radiation dose rate ranges yielded an overall mean IAEDR of 1.32 ± 0.01 mSv/yr, and OAEDR of 0.27 ± 0.01 mSv/yr, and a total effective dose rate of 1.59 ± 0.01 mSv/yr. Conversely, traditional structures exhibited lower background values, maintaining an overall mean IAEDR of 1.02 ± 0.01 mSv/yr, and OAEDR of 0.34 ± 0.01 mSv/yr, and a total effective dose rate of 1.37 ± 0.02 mSv/yr. While the majority of isolated readings remain safely bounded, the accumulated total effective dose rates in both building types exceeded the standard public safety limit of 1.0 mSv/yr established by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). However, the values fall well within the broader global background radiation safety ceiling of 2.4 to 3.0 mSv/yr outlined by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR).},
keywords = {Background Ionizing Radiation, Annual Effective Dose Rate (AEDR), Modern and Traditional Buildings, Public Safety Limits, Kurudu},
month = {June},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1718964}
}