Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718979
Circular Economy and Closed-loop Systems in Industrial Production: An Engineering Framework for Regenerative Manufacturing
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Industrial and Production Engineering
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I12-1718979
Abstract
This article presents a comprehensive review of recent advances in circular economy and closed-loop systems in industrial production, examining the ongoing transition from conventional linear throughput models to regenerative industrial systems designed to retain the value of materials, products, energy, and information across multiple life cycles through strategies such as product life extension, remanufacturing, reuse, recycling, industrial symbiosis, and circular business models; the review synthesizes evidence from recent life cycle assessment studies, international circularity standards, and industrial case studies to highlight the importance of integrating product design, manufacturing processes, reverse logistics, digital traceability, performance measurement, stakeholder collaboration, and governance mechanisms within a unified systems framework, while demonstrating how standardized circularity assessment, regional adaptation, and innovation-driven industrial ecosystems can enhance resource efficiency, reduce waste generation and carbon emissions, improve economic competitiveness, and strengthen the sustainability and resilience of industrial production systems in support of global sustainable development goals.
Keywords
Circular Economy, Closed-Loop Systems, Industrial Production, Industrial Symbiosis, Circularity Assessment, Regenerative Manufacturing
References
[1] A. De Pascale, R. Arbolino, K. Szopik-Depczyńska, M. Limosani, and G. Ioppolo, “A systematic review for measuring circular economy: The 61 indicators,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 281, p. 124942, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124942
[2] J. Azevedo, J. Henriques, M. Estrela, R. Dias, D. Vladimirova, K. Miller, and M. Iten, “Guidelines for industrial symbiosis—A systematic approach for content definition and practical recommendations for implementation,” Circular Economy and Sustainability, vol. 1, pp. 507–523, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s43615-021-00006-3.
[3] J. Henriques, P. Ferrão, R. Castro, and J. Azevedo, “Industrial symbiosis: A sectoral analysis on enablers and barriers,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–22, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13041723.
[4] K. Södergren and J. Palm, “The role of local governments in overcoming barriers to industrial symbiosis,” Cleaner Environmental Systems, vol. 2, p. 100014, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100014.
[5] A.-M. Järvenpää, V. Salminen, and J. Kantola, “Industrial symbiosis, circular economy and Industry 4.0—A case study in Finland,” Management and Production Engineering Review, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 111–121, 2021, doi: 10.24425/mper.2021.139999.
[6] S. Scipioni and F. Niccolini, “How to close the loop? Organizational learning processes and contextual factors for small and medium enterprises’ circular business models introduction,” Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 141–162, 2021, doi: 10.7433/s116.2021.08.
[7] I. E. Nikolaou, N. Jones, and A. Stefanakis, “Circular economy and sustainability: The past, the present and the future directions,” Circular Economy and Sustainability, vol. 1, pp. 1–20, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s43615-021-00030-3.
[8] E. Chertow, K. S. Kanaoka, and J. Park, “Tracking the diffusion of industrial symbiosis scholarship using bibliometrics: Comparing across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 913–931, 2021.
[9] S. Vanhamäki, S. Rinkinen, and K. Manskinen, “Adapting a circular economy in regional strategies of the European Union,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 1518, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13031518.
[10] E. Sonel, Ş. Gür, and T. Eren, “Analysis of factors affecting industrial symbiosis collaboration,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 29, pp. 8479–8486, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16213-2.
[11] I. Colpo, M. E. S. Martins, S. Buzuku, and M. A. Sellitto, “Industrial symbiosis in Brazil: A systematic literature review,” Waste Management & Research, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1462–1479, 2022, doi: 10.1177/0734242X221084065.
[12] F. Corsini, C. De Bernardi, and M. Frey, “Industrial symbiosis as a business strategy for the circular economy: Identifying regional firms’ profiles and barriers to their adoption,” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1148–1168, 2022, doi: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2154201.
[13] M. T. H. Taqi et al., “What are the challenges that make the journey towards industrial symbiosis complicated?,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 370, p. 133384, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133384.
[14] S. Noori, G. Korevaar, R. Stikkelman, and A. Ramírez, “Exploring the emergence of waste recovery and exchange in industrial clusters,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 937–950, 2023, doi: 10.1111/jiec.13381.
[15] A. Zhang, L. Duong, S. Seuring, and J. L. Hartley, “Circular supply chain management: A bibliometric analysis-based literature review,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 847–872, 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJLM-04-2022-0199.
[16] T. T. Le, A. Behl, and G. Graham, “The role of entrepreneurship in successfully achieving circular supply chain management,” Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 537–561, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s40171-023-00353-0.
[17] European Court of Auditors, Special Report 17/2023: Circular economy—Slow transition by member states despite EU action. Luxembourg, 2023, doi: 10.2865/36180.
[18] European Environment Agency, “Waste recycling in Europe,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/waste-recycling-in-europe.
[19] European Environment Agency, “Europe’s circular economy in facts and figures,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/europes-circular-economy-in-facts.
[20] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 59020:2024, Circular economy—Measuring and assessing circularity performance, Geneva, Switzerland, 2024.
[21] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 59004:2024, Circular economy—Vocabulary, principles and guidance for implementation, Geneva, Switzerland, 2024.
[22] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 59010:2024, Circular economy—Guidance on the transition of business models and value networks, Geneva, Switzerland, 2024.
[23] X. Xie, H. Fu, Q. Zhu, and S. Hu, “Integrated optimization modelling framework for low-carbon and green regional transitions through resource-based industrial symbiosis,” Nature Communications, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48249-6.
[24] H. M. M. T. H. Liddell et al., “A retrospective analysis of circular economy and industrial decarbonization metrics in the United States, 1998–2022,” Journal of Advanced Manufacturing and Processing, vol. 7, no. 3, p. e70013, 2025, doi: 10.1002/amp2.70013.
[25] C. Palagonia, L. Michelini, and C. Mattelin-Pierrard, “Spanning the industrial symbiosis within the circular economy: Critical issues and future research agenda,” Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 746–765, 2025, doi: 10.1111/jiec.70005.
[26] A. Falsafia, A. Togiani, A. Colley, J. Varis, and M. Horttanainen, “Review life cycle assessment in circular design process: A systematic literature review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 521, p. 146188, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146188.
[27] A. M. Cáceres Ruiz, A. Sanches Pereira, and A. Zam, “Regionalising the circular economy: A three-step integrative review and gap analysis,” Cleaner Environmental Systems, vol. 19, p. 100371, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100371.
[28] F. Charnley et al., “Retaining product value in post-consumer textiles: How to scale a closed-loop system,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 205, p. 107542, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107542.
[29] A. Jain et al., “Bioresources from biowaste for advancing manufacturing of packaging materials with modern circular economy towards a sustainable approach,” Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-05734-8.
[30] M. Zarreh et al., “Integrating perishables into closed-loop supply chains: A comprehensive review,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 15, p. 6705, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16156705.
[31] M. Almansour and M. Akrami, “Towards zero waste: An in-depth analysis of national policies, strategies, and case studies in waste minimisation,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 22, p. 10105, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su162210105.
[32] M. Saidani et al., “The future of circular economy metrics: Expert visions,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 205, p. 107565, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107565.
[33] T. Shevchenko et al., “Metrics in the circular economy: An inclusive research landscape of the thematic trends and future research agenda,” Ecological Indicators, vol. 165, p. 112182, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112182.
[34] S. Bobba et al., “Circular input rate: Novel indicator to assess circularity performances of materials in a sector—Application to rare earth elements in e-vehicle motors,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 197, p. 107037, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107037.
[35] S. Gause, H. Liddell, C. Dollinger, J. Steen, and J. Cresko, “Environmentally extended input-output (EEIO) modeling for industrial decarbonization opportunity analysis: A circular economy case study,” in Technology Innovation for the Circular Economy: Recycling, Remanufacturing, Design, System Analysis and Logistics, N. Nasr, Ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2024, pp. 739–753, doi: 10.1002/9781394214297.ch55.
[36] S. H. Sonar et al., “Navigating barriers to reverse logistics adoption in circular economy: An integrated approach for sustainable development,” Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, vol. 12, p. 100165, 2024.
[37] Q. Chen et al., “Comparative environmental impacts of different hydrometallurgical recycling and remanufacturing technologies of lithium-ion batteries considering multi-recycling-approach and temporal-geographical scenarios in China,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 324, p. 124642, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124642.
[38] C. C. Palagonia et al., “Exploring industrial symbiosis for circular economy: Investigating and comparing the anatomy and development strategies in Italy,” Management Decision, 2024.
[39] A. M. Parulian, T. M. Simatupang, and L. Okdinawati, “Exploring circular economy opportunities through industrial symbiosis in the coffee shop industries of emerging economies,” Sustainable Futures, vol. 11, p. 101828, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.sftr.2026.101828.
[40] A. D. Seweneta, Y. Boulaksil, and P. Pisano, “Circular economy, circularity, and sustainability: A systematic review and conceptual framework,” Cleaner Environmental Systems, vol. 20, p. 100405, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.cesys.2026.100405.
[41] P. N. et al., “Enabling circular economy transitions in ports: The role of innovation ecosystems in North Sea Port,” Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126816.
[42] X. et al., “Circularity potential identification for new bio-materials using material flow analysis,” Science of the Total Environment, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179649.
[43] W. W. Ingwersen et al., “USEEIO v2.0, the US environmentally-extended input-output model v2.0,” Scientific Data, vol. 9, p. 194, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01293-7.
[44] J. E. et al., “Tracing wastewater resources: Unravelling the circularity of waste using source, destination, and quality analysis,” Water Research, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120901.
[45] J. et al., “A review on the enhancement of circular economy aspects focusing on nanocellulose composites,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132052.
[46] J. et al., “Unpacking financial aspects of circular economy: A systematic literature review,” Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125507.
[47] Y. et al., “The role of trophic, mutualistic, and competitive interactions in an industrial symbiosis process implementation: An ecological network perspective,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33454-z.
[48] J. et al., “A closed loop for polyurethane biofoams designed in line with the European Green Deal,” Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126855.
[49] J. et al., “New circularity indicator for decision making in the stockpile management of construction and demolition waste: Perspectives of Australian practitioners,” Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121345.
[50] M. et al., “Circular olefin copolymers made de novo from ethylene and α-olefins,” Nature Communications, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45219-w.
[51] C. et al., “Recommendations for life-cycle assessment of recyclable plastics in a circular economy,” Chemical Science, 2024, doi: 10.1039/d4sc01340a.
[52] S. et al., “From waste management to circular economy: Leveraging thermophiles for sustainable growth and global resource optimization,” Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121136.
How to cite this paper
@article{1718979,
author = {Ekerete Usak, Friday Aje Ovat, Minoru Sasaki, PhD, Joseph Abutu},
title = {Circular Economy and Closed-loop Systems in Industrial Production: An Engineering Framework for Regenerative Manufacturing},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {12},
pages = {2072-2082},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718979.pdf},
abstract = {This article presents a comprehensive review of recent advances in circular economy and closed-loop systems in industrial production, examining the ongoing transition from conventional linear throughput models to regenerative industrial systems designed to retain the value of materials, products, energy, and information across multiple life cycles through strategies such as product life extension, remanufacturing, reuse, recycling, industrial symbiosis, and circular business models; the review synthesizes evidence from recent life cycle assessment studies, international circularity standards, and industrial case studies to highlight the importance of integrating product design, manufacturing processes, reverse logistics, digital traceability, performance measurement, stakeholder collaboration, and governance mechanisms within a unified systems framework, while demonstrating how standardized circularity assessment, regional adaptation, and innovation-driven industrial ecosystems can enhance resource efficiency, reduce waste generation and carbon emissions, improve economic competitiveness, and strengthen the sustainability and resilience of industrial production systems in support of global sustainable development goals.},
keywords = {Circular Economy, Closed-Loop Systems, Industrial Production, Industrial Symbiosis, Circularity Assessment, Regenerative Manufacturing},
month = {June},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1718979}
}