Cultural Surrogacy and Its Influence on Kinship Ties Among the Pokot Community of West Pokot County, Kenya

References

[1] Adomako-Kwakye, C., & Owusu-Dapaa, E. (2020). The challenges for surrogate parents in Ghana: Recommendations for the legal protection of their rights. Medicine and Law, 39, 603-620.

[2] Alabi, O. J. (2020). Perceptions of surrogacy within the Yoruba socio-cultural context of Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. F1000Research, 9, 1-13.

[3] Alexandra Harland, J. (2021). Surrogacy, identity, parentage and children’s rights – Through the eyes of a child. Family Court Review, 59(1), 121-130.

[4] Balakian, S. (2023). Of aunts and mothers: Refugee resettlement, the nuclear family, and caring for “other” children in Kenya. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 46(2), 213-232.

[5] Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

[6] Boampong, O., Appiah-Boateng, S., Osei, N. Y., & Ametefe, R. (2023). Commercial surrogacy: Invisible reproductive workers in Ghana. Global Labour Journal, 14(2), 1-18.

[7] Dunn, W. W. (2020). Validity. In Developing norm-referenced standardized tests (pp. 149-168). New York: Routledge.

[8] Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335-362.

[9] Ferolino, A. P., Camposo, M. A. D., Estaño, K. C. L., & Tacbobo, J. M. R. (2020). Mothers for others: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of gestational surrogates’ child relinquishment experiences. Journal of Patient Experience, 7(6), 1336-1340.

[10] Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). The possible: A sociocultural theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

[11] Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597-606.

[12] Iwunze, V. (2024). Surrogacy in Nigeria: An emerging trend on an uncharted legal terrain. Novena University Law Journal, 9, 1-21.

[13] Kariuki, S. W. (2023). Role of communication in the surrogacy industry in Kenya: The case of Nairobi In-vitro Fertility Centre, Nairobi (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).

[14] Kavarić, M., & Djoković, R. (2023). Moral dilemmas of surrogate motherhood. European Journal of Health Law, 30(1), 1-22.

[15] Khvorostyanov, N., & Yeshua-Katz, D. (2020). Bad, pathetic and greedy women: Expressions of surrogate motherhood stigma in a Russian online forum. Sex Roles, 83(7), 474-484.

[16] Kneebone, E., Beilby, K., & Hammarberg, K. (2022). Experiences of surrogates and intended parents of surrogacy arrangements: A systematic review. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 45(4), 815-830.

[17] Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 33267.

[18] Lantolf, J. P., Poehner, M. E., & Thorne, S. L. (2020). Sociocultural theory and L2 development. In Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 223-247). New York: Routledge.

[19] Mande, W. M., & Akullo, E. (2024). Ethics and assisted reproductive technology in Uganda. Ugandan Journal of Management and Public Policy Studies, 24(2), 71-91.

[20] Muhonja, B. B. (2022). Dimensions of motherhood in an African world sense. In Gender and sexuality in Kenyan societies (p. 153). Lanham: Lexington Books.

[21] Olobo-Lalobo, J. H. (2022). Surrogacy legislation and Kenya’s ART Bill 2019: Reproductive uhuru a myth or a reality for infertile citizens? African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 30, 1-20.

[22] Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

[23] Pheme, M. J., Sithole, S. L., & Malema, R. N. (2020). The perceptions of childless women on surrogacy as an assisted reproductive technique in Lebowakgomo, Capricorn District, Limpopo Province. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 24(2), 1-12.

[24] Powis, R. (2020). Relations of reproduction: Men, masculinities, and pregnancy in Dakar, Senegal. St. Louis: Washington University.

[25] Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1952). Structure and function in primitive society. London: Cohen & West.

[26] Shaw, I. (2023). Ethics and the practice of qualitative research. In Research and social work in time and place (pp. 277-288). New York: Routledge.

[27] Shayo, E. (2015). Surrogacy and its social implications. Dar es Salaam: Mkuki na Nyota Publishers.

[28] Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8-12.

[29] Sürücü, L., & Maslakçı, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694-2726.

[30] Swanson, K., Ayala, N. K., Barnes, R. B., Desai, N., Miller, M., & Yee, L. M. (2020). Understanding gestational surrogacy in the United States: A primer for obstetricians and gynecologists. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 222(4), 330-337.

[31] Taherdoost, H. (2022). What are different research approaches? A comprehensive review of qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method research. Journal of Management Science & Engineering Research, 5(1), 53-63.

[32] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[33] Whittaker, A., Gerrits, T., & Manderson, L. (2025). The divine in the clinic: Assisted reproduction and religious practice in Ghana and South Africa. Journal of Religion and Health, 64, 1-16.

@article{1719090,
      author = {Chepkwemoi Sharon Shenge Kamoet, Margaret Nanjala Matisi, Edith Naliaka Simiyu},
      title = {Cultural Surrogacy and Its Influence on Kinship Ties Among the Pokot Community of West Pokot County, Kenya},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {12},
      pages = {2239-2250},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719090.pdf},
      abstract = {Surrogacy, a form of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), is increasingly visible across the globe, yet its acceptance within kinship-based African societies such as the Pokot of Kenya remains contested. This paper examines cultural surrogacy and its influence on kinship ties among the Pokot community of West Pokot County. Grounded in Structural-Functionalism, Social Exchange Theory and Socio-cultural Theory, the study employed a mixed-methods design. A sample of 200 respondents, surrogate mothers, intended parents, church leaders and community elders, was drawn from five sub-counties using purposive and snowball sampling, and 196 (98%) participated. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) in SPSS, while qualitative interview data were analysed thematically. Cultural surrogacy was understood primarily as a practice for preserving family lineage (35.0%) and was legitimised through the involvement of elders (33.3%) and blessing rituals (23.3%). It was widely perceived to reinforce kinship ties and lineage (36.7%) and to strengthen family bonds through shared responsibility (31.7%), while also introducing new family dynamics (25.0%) and, for a minority, strain, jealousy and exclusion. The community itself was almost evenly divided between strong support (26.7%) and opposition from some leaders (25.0%). Thematically, four themes were identified: lineage preservation, communal sanctioning and ritual, reconfiguration of kinship roles, and community ambivalence. The study concludes that cultural surrogacy among the Pokot operates as a communal, lineage-affirming institution whose sustainability depends on emotional support, clear cultural protocols and supportive legal recognition.},
      keywords = {Cultural Surrogacy, Kinship Ties, Lineage, Family Structure, Pokot Community, Assisted Reproductive Technology},
      month = {June},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1719090}
  }