Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719125
An Integrated Cost–Quality–Time Project Control Framework for Saudi Infrastructure Projects
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Civil Engineering
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I12-1719125
Abstract
The increased development of infrastructure in connection with Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 initiative makes it necessary to utilize advanced project control systems that could assist in reducing cost risks, guaranteeing quality, and minimizing schedule risks amid very complicated construction settings. Despite this, many projects still face numerous problems connected with disintegrated reporting, reactive decision-making, the absence of data integration, and insufficient deviation management. This review paper covers the latest literature from 2020 to 2025 about advanced project control systems for Saudi Arabia infrastructure projects with a special emphasis on earned value analysis, 4D/5D BIM, common data environments, digital twins, forecasting with artificial intelligence, lean production control, integrated quality management, and governance structures that promote alignment between field performance and top management decisions. The literature review is conducted through a systematic review process involving problem identification, study selection, coding, and comparison instead of a meta-analysis because the source material consists of theoretical papers, empirical research, case studies, and technology adoption studies. As a result of the review, it becomes evident that advanced project controls have to be used in an integrated managerial framework rather than as standalone software solutions. In terms of cost performance, there will be benefits when quantity, productivity, procurement, and change management information become consistently integrated into forecasting models and earned value analysis. As far as quality performance goes, the advantages will be achieved if inspection, non-conformance management, design coordination, and supplier management processes become automated and integrated into work planning. Concerning schedule performance, the improvements will come with the integration of look-ahead planning, progress sensing, predictive delay analysis, and fast decision-making procedures. It should be noted that the Saudi Arabian infrastructure projects face certain difficulties, such as being giga-projects, multi-stakeholder governance, dynamic scope development, localization, and different organizational maturity levels. This paper offers a model where advanced project controls function at five levels of integration: baseline determination, data gathering, analytics, decision-making, and corrective learning. . This model is referred to as the Integrated Cost–Quality–Time Control Framework for Saudi Infrastructure Projects (ICQTCF-SIP).It concludes that Saudi infrastructure clients and contractors should prioritize interoperable data environments, control-led governance, role clarity, and phased capability building to convert digital tools into measurable project outcomes.
Keywords
Project Control Systems, Saudi Infrastructure, Cost Performance, Quality Performance, Schedule Performance, BIM, Digital Twins, Earned Value, Construction Analytics, Vision 2030
References
[1] Abdulfattah, B. S., Abdelsalam, H. A., Abdelsalam, M., Bolpagni, M., Thurairajah, N., Perez, L. F., & Butt, T. E. (2023). Predicting implications of design changes in BIM-based construction projects through machine learning. Automation in Construction, 153, 105057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105057
[2] Alhumaid, A. M., Bin Mahmoud, A. A., & Almohsen, A. S. (2024). Value engineering adoption’s barriers and solutions: The case of Saudi Arabia’s construction industry. Buildings, 14(4), 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14041017
[3] Alnaser, A. A., & Elmousalami, H. (2025). Benefits and challenges of AI-based digital twin integration in the Saudi Arabian construction industry: A correspondence analysis approach. Applied Sciences, 15(9), 4675. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15094675
[4] Alotaibi, R., Sohail, M., & Soetanto, R. (2025). Modelling project control system effectiveness in Saudi Arabian construction project delivery. Buildings, 15(18), 3426. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183426
[5] Alsulamy, S. (2025). Predicting construction delay risks in Saudi Arabian projects: A comparative analysis of CatBoost, XGBoost, and LGBM. Expert Systems with Applications, 268, 126268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.126268
[6] Alshammari, A., et al. (2024). A comprehensive review of the factors and strategies to mitigate construction project delays in Saudi Arabia. The Open Construction & Building Technology Journal, 18, e18748368318470. https://doi.org/10.2174/0118748368318470240821112857
[7] Alshibani, A., Aldossary, M. S., Hassanain, M. A., Hamida, H., Aldabbagh, H., & Ouis, D. (2024). Investigation of the driving power of the barriers affecting BIM adoption in construction management through ISM. Results in Engineering, 24, 102987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102987
[8] Ateş, B., et al. (2025). Proactive and data-driven decision-making using earned value analysis in construction projects. Buildings, 15(14), 2388. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15142388
[9] Jacobsen, E. L., Teizer, J., Wandahl, S., & Brilakis, I. (2024). Probabilistic forecasting of construction labor productivity metrics. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 29, 58–83. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2024.004
[10] Jawad, S., Ledwith, A., & Khan, R. (2022). Project control system implementation in engineering and construction projects: An empirical study in Saudi’s petroleum and chemical industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 31(13), 181–207. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2022-0114
[11] Kammouh, O., Nogal, M., Binnekamp, R., & Dyer, M. (2022). Dynamic control for construction project scheduling on-the-run. Automation in Construction, 140, 104370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104370
[12] Lünig, J. N., et al. (2025). Reducing construction quality costs through ontology-based inspection planning. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 65, 102971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2025.102971
[13] Ni, X. R., Pan, P., & Lin, J. R. (2024). What makes a good BIM design: Quantitative linking between design behavior and quality. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.09481
[14] Nassereddine, H., et al. (2021). BIM in the Saudi Arabian construction industry: State of the art, benefit perception, and challenges. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 39(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-04-2020-0038
[15] Sacks, R., Brilakis, I., Pikas, E., Xie, H. S., & Girolami, M. (2020). Construction with digital twin information systems. Data-Centric Engineering, 1, e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2020.16
[16] Serugga, J. (2025). Digital twins and AI decision models: Advancing cost modelling in off-site construction. Eng, 6(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng6020022
[17] Soliman, E., et al. (2024). Integrating risk management and earned value framework for managing mega infrastructure projects. Journal of Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2024.100181
[18] Torres, K., et al. (2025). Perceptions of the influence of BIM digital models in cost variance reduction and project control. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-025-5288-8
[19] Waqar, A., et al. (2024). Examining the impact of BIM implementation on external project environment and construction management practices. Discover Civil Engineering, 4, 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-024-00028-0
[20] Zhang, Y., Mo, Y., & Chen, X. (2024). Intelligent building construction cost optimization and prediction by integrating BIM and Elman neural network. Heliyon, 10(19), e37525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37525
[21] Zhu, H., et al. (2023). Building a digital transformation maturity evaluation model for construction enterprises. Buildings, 14(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14010091
[22] Borges, D. B., et al. (2025). Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2024.2397626
[23] Alsolami, B. M. (2022). Identifying and assessing critical success factors of value management implementation in Saudi Arabia building construction industry. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(6), 101804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101804
[24] Le, A. T. H., et al. (2024). PLS-SEM approach and importance-performance map analysis for digital construction performance improvement. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2023-0884
[25] Meng, X., Das, S., & Meng, J. (2023). Integration of digital twin and circular economy in the construction industry. Sustainability, 15(17), 13186. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713186
[26] Pantović, V., Vidojević, D., Vujičić, S., Sofijanić, S., & Jovanović-Milenković, M. (2024). Data-driven decision making for sustainable IT project management excellence. Sustainability, 16(7), 3014. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073014
[27] Sacks, R., Girolami, M., & Brilakis, I. (2020). Building information modelling, artificial intelligence and construction digital twin systems. Data-Centric Engineering, 1, e14. https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2020.16
[28] Kassem, M., & Succar, B. (2020). Macro BIM adoption: Comparative market analysis. Automation in Construction, 117, 103256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103256
[29] Hamdi, O., Leite, F., & Tomek, R. (2021). BIM and lean interactions from the BIM capability maturity model perspective: A case study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(4), 05021001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002014
How to cite this paper
@article{1719125,
author = {Syed Mohammad Danish Jafri},
title = {An Integrated Cost–Quality–Time Project Control Framework for Saudi Infrastructure Projects},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {12},
pages = {3120-3129},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719125.pdf},
abstract = {The increased development of infrastructure in connection with Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 initiative makes it necessary to utilize advanced project control systems that could assist in reducing cost risks, guaranteeing quality, and minimizing schedule risks amid very complicated construction settings. Despite this, many projects still face numerous problems connected with disintegrated reporting, reactive decision-making, the absence of data integration, and insufficient deviation management. This review paper covers the latest literature from 2020 to 2025 about advanced project control systems for Saudi Arabia infrastructure projects with a special emphasis on earned value analysis, 4D/5D BIM, common data environments, digital twins, forecasting with artificial intelligence, lean production control, integrated quality management, and governance structures that promote alignment between field performance and top management decisions. The literature review is conducted through a systematic review process involving problem identification, study selection, coding, and comparison instead of a meta-analysis because the source material consists of theoretical papers, empirical research, case studies, and technology adoption studies. As a result of the review, it becomes evident that advanced project controls have to be used in an integrated managerial framework rather than as standalone software solutions. In terms of cost performance, there will be benefits when quantity, productivity, procurement, and change management information become consistently integrated into forecasting models and earned value analysis. As far as quality performance goes, the advantages will be achieved if inspection, non-conformance management, design coordination, and supplier management processes become automated and integrated into work planning. Concerning schedule performance, the improvements will come with the integration of look-ahead planning, progress sensing, predictive delay analysis, and fast decision-making procedures. It should be noted that the Saudi Arabian infrastructure projects face certain difficulties, such as being giga-projects, multi-stakeholder governance, dynamic scope development, localization, and different organizational maturity levels. This paper offers a model where advanced project controls function at five levels of integration: baseline determination, data gathering, analytics, decision-making, and corrective learning. . This model is referred to as the Integrated Cost–Quality–Time Control Framework for Saudi Infrastructure Projects (ICQTCF-SIP).It concludes that Saudi infrastructure clients and contractors should prioritize interoperable data environments, control-led governance, role clarity, and phased capability building to convert digital tools into measurable project outcomes.},
keywords = {Project Control Systems, Saudi Infrastructure, Cost Performance, Quality Performance, Schedule Performance, BIM, Digital Twins, Earned Value, Construction Analytics, Vision 2030},
month = {June},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1719125}
}