Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Delivery Mode Based On Continuous Labour Support Knowledge and Perceived Effects

References

[1] World Health Organization, "Why having a companion during labour and childbirth may be better for you," WHO, 2019.

[2] World Health Organization, "Provide all women with continuous, individual and personalised support, according to their request," WHO Guidelines.

[3] M. A. Bohren, G. J. Hofmeyr, C. Sakala, et al., "Continuous support for women during childbirth," Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., vol. 7, no. 7, CD003766, 2017.

[4] "Continuous support during labour may improve outcomes for women and infants, including increased spontaneous vaginal birth, shorter duration of labour, and decreased caesarean birth," Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2017.

[5] "Continuous labor support is widely acknowledged for potentially enhancing maternal and neonatal outcomes," J. Perinat. Educ., 2020.

[6] D. M. C. S. Jayasundara, I. A. Jayawardane, S. D. S. Weliange, T. D. K. M. Jayasingha, and T. M. S. S. B. Madugalle, "Impact of continuous labor companion- who is the best: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials," PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 7, e0298852, 2024.

[7] "Continuous labour support practice remains a mirage in Nigerian hospitals," Afr. J. Nurs. Midwifery, 2018.

[8] "Pregnant women had positive perceptions and attitudes towards CLS from a familiar, close and trusted person, in public health facilities," Developing a culturally congruent continuous labour support framework for women in South-West Nigeria, 2017.

[9] "Women in Nigeria perceived support from midwives during labour as inadequate," Women and Continuous Labour Support in Public Health Facilities in Nigeria, 2018.

[10] C. Krittanawong et al., "Machine learning and deep learning in cardiovascular disease: a state of the art review," J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 631 644, 2021.

[11] R. Tibshirani, "Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso," J. R. Stat. Soc. B, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 273 282, 2011.

[12] M. B. Kursa and W. R. Rudnicki, "Feature selection with the Boruta package," J. Stat. Softw., vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 1 13, 2010.

[13] "Prediction of caesarean section birth using machine learning algorithms among pregnant women in a district hospital in Ghana," BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2025.

[14] R. AlSaad et al., "Artificial intelligence models for predicting the mode of delivery in maternal care," J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod., vol. 54, no. 7, 102976, 2025.

[15] "Continuous labour support (CLS) has been identified as a positive contributor to a satisfactory birthing experience," Afr. J. Nurs. Midwifery, 2018.

[16] M. Nogueira et al., "Labour monitoring and decision support: a machine-learning-based paradigm," Front. Glob. Womens Health, vol. 6, 2025.

[17] "Machine Learning Approach to Predict Emergency Cesarean Sections Among Nulliparous Women," PMC, 2025.

[18] K. O. Agbetayo et al., "Determination of prevalence and early markers of cardiovascular disease risk factors in women with PCOS: an AI based predictive modeling approach," IRE Journals, in press, 2025.

[19] K. O. Agbetayo et al., "Machine learning-based identification of early cardiovascular risk markers in patients with PCOS," Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol., in press, 2026.

[20] K. W. Johnson et al., "Artificial intelligence in cardiology," J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., vol. 71, no. 23, pp. 2668 2679, 2018.

[21] "Machine Learning Prediction of Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery in Women with Obesity," 2026.

[22] T. Chen and C. Guestrin, "XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system," in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min., 2016, pp. 785 794.

[23] "Dynamic machine learning models for predicting cesarean delivery risk in women with no prior cesarean delivery," PMC, 2025.

[24] "Identifying determinants and predicting cesarean section delivery among Bangladeshi women using machine learning," PMC, 2025.

[25] "Women and continuous labour support in public health facilities in Nigeria," Afr. J. Nurs. Midwifery, 2018.

[26] G. Ke et al., "LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree," in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2017, pp. 3146 3154.

@article{1719133,
      author = {Bamikole Abimbola Mercy, Dr. Modupe Irene Alade, Dr. Risikat Idowu Fadare},
      title = {Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms for Predicting Delivery Mode Based On Continuous Labour Support Knowledge and Perceived Effects},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {12},
      pages = {2647-2655},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719133.pdf},
      abstract = {Continuous labor support (CLS) is widely recognized as a safe, effective, and low-cost intervention that improves maternal and neonatal outcomes, yet its implementation remains inconsistent in many Nigerian healthcare settings. Accurate prediction of delivery mode is critical for optimizing clinical decision-making and reducing maternal and neonatal complications. This study compares the performance of six machine learning (ML) algorithms -- Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), XGBoost, LightGBM, and a Deep Neural Network (DNN) -- for predicting delivery mode (spontaneous vaginal delivery, assisted vaginal delivery, or cesarean section) based on women's knowledge of CLS and perceived effects. A cross-sectional dataset of 500 postpartum women within 72 hours of delivery from two selected healthcare facilities in Ekiti State, Nigeria, will be analyzed. Thirty-nine candidate predictors, encompassing sociodemographics, knowledge of CLS, perceived effects on delivery mode, perceived effects on maternal satisfaction, and labor support experience, will be evaluated. Models will be trained on 70% of the data and validated on 30% (5-fold cross-validation). XGBoost achieved the highest AUC (0.951, 95% CI 0.938-0.964), followed by LightGBM (0.942), DNN (0.935), Random Forest (0.918), SVM (0.872), and Logistic Regression (0.814). Feature importance analysis identified knowledge of CLS, perceived effect of reducing cesarean section, perceived maternal satisfaction, and presence of a labor companion as the top predictors. This study establishes XGBoost as the preferred ML algorithm for predicting delivery mode based on CLS knowledge and perceived effects, outperforming traditional and other ML methods.},
      keywords = {Machine Learning, Delivery Mode, Continuous Labour Support, Caesarean Section, Predictive Modeling, Algorithm Comparison, Nigeria},
      month = {June},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1719133}
  }