Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719143
Fast-Track Courts in India: Legislative Intent Vs. Ground Reality
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Criminal Law
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1719143
Abstract
Fast-track courts (FTCs) were introduced in India as a structural remedy to the chronic pendency crisis plaguing its judicial system. Born from the 11th Finance Commission's recommendation and catalysed by rising crimes against women and children, these specialised courts were designed to fast-forward justice. This paper examines the legislative architecture underpinning India's fast-track courts, traces their evolution from the general Fast-Track Courts (2000) to the present Fast-Track Special Courts (FTSCs) scheme (2019), and critically evaluates whether the ground reality mirrors the Parliament's intent. Drawing on official government data, Supreme Court pronouncements, and reported cases including the RG Kar Medical College rape-murder case (2024), the paper argues that while FTCs have made measurable progress, structural deficiencies—including judicial vacancies, inadequate infrastructure, uneven state compliance, and backlog replacement—continue to undermine their foundational promise. The paper concludes with reform recommendations anchored in the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
Keywords
Fast-Track Courts, Speedy Trial, Article 21, POCSO Act, FTSC Scheme
How to cite this paper
@article{1719143,
author = {Rupinder Singh, Dr. Priyanka},
title = {Fast-Track Courts in India: Legislative Intent Vs. Ground Reality},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {12},
pages = {2473-2478},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719143.pdf},
abstract = {Fast-track courts (FTCs) were introduced in India as a structural remedy to the chronic pendency crisis plaguing its judicial system. Born from the 11th Finance Commission's recommendation and catalysed by rising crimes against women and children, these specialised courts were designed to fast-forward justice. This paper examines the legislative architecture underpinning India's fast-track courts, traces their evolution from the general Fast-Track Courts (2000) to the present Fast-Track Special Courts (FTSCs) scheme (2019), and critically evaluates whether the ground reality mirrors the Parliament's intent. Drawing on official government data, Supreme Court pronouncements, and reported cases including the RG Kar Medical College rape-murder case (2024), the paper argues that while FTCs have made measurable progress, structural deficiencies—including judicial vacancies, inadequate infrastructure, uneven state compliance, and backlog replacement—continue to undermine their foundational promise. The paper concludes with reform recommendations anchored in the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.},
keywords = {Fast-Track Courts, Speedy Trial, Article 21, POCSO Act, FTSC Scheme},
month = {June},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1719143}
}