Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719255
Early-Grade Literacy and Numeracy Recovery in Diverse Elementary Classrooms: A Practical MTSS Framework for Assessment, Differentiation, and Intervention Fidelity
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Education
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I12-1719255
Abstract
Early-grade learning recovery remains one of the most consequential instructional challenges facing elementary schools. National evidence from the 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress shows that fourth-grade reading performance remains below pre-pandemic levels and that 40% of fourth-grade students performed below NAEP Basic in reading, while only 31% performed at or above NAEP Proficient. Mathematics has shown partial recovery, with 39% of fourth-grade students at or above NAEP Proficient and 24% below NAEP Basic, but performance remains below 2019 levels. Florida's 2025 FAST data similarly show improvement in Grades 3-5 ELA/Reading and Mathematics while preserving large absolute gaps for English learners, students with disabilities, and economically disadvantaged students. This article develops a practical multi-tiered system of support (MTSS) model for diverse elementary classrooms, centred on four linked routines: universal assessment, differentiated instruction, targeted intervention, and fidelity-monitored progress review. The manuscript synthesises research on foundational reading instruction, early numeracy, English learner literacy, data-based decision-making, and intervention fidelity. It also presents public-data analysis tables and heat maps to translate broad achievement signals into classroom-level decision rules. The proposed Assessment-Differentiation-Fidelity model argues that recovery is most credible when teachers connect standards, diagnostics, small-group intervention, accommodation fidelity, parent communication, and progress-monitoring evidence in a repeatable 6- to 12-week cycle. The article concludes that early-grade recovery should not be treated as generic remediation. It should be organised as a disciplined instructional improvement system that protects Tier 1 quality, accelerates Tier 2 support, intensifies Tier 3 intervention when growth is insufficient, and uses fidelity evidence to distinguish ineffective instruction from inadequate dosage or access.
Keywords
Early Literacy, Early Numeracy, MTSS, Response to Intervention, Differentiated Instruction, English Learners, Students with Disabilities, Progress Monitoring, Intervention Fidelity, Florida FAST, NAEP.
References
[1] Anderson, S., Jungjohann, J. and Gebhardt, M. (2020) "Effects of using curriculum-based measurement for progress monitoring in reading and mathematics", Frontiers in Education, 5, pp. 1-12.
[2] August, D. and Shanahan, T. (eds.) (2006) Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[3] Bryant, D.P., Bryant, B.R., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Pfannenstiel, K.H., Porterfield, J. and Gersten, R. (2011) "Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties", Exceptional Children, 78(1), pp. 7-23.
[4] Chitengu, B.M. and Mupa, M.N. (2026) "Hybrid Learning for Social Sciences: An Evidence-Informed Model for Improving Outcomes Among Multilingual Learners in Geography and History", Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 9(10), pp. 530-538.
[5] Clarke, B., Doabler, C.T., Nelson, N.J., Kosty, D.B., Fien, H., Baker, S.K. and Smolkowski, K. (2016) "Testing the efficacy of a kindergarten mathematics intervention by small-group size", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(2), pp. 152-164.
[6] Connor, C.M., Morrison, F.J., Fishman, B., Schatschneider, C. and Underwood, P. (2007) "Algorithm-guided individualized reading instruction", Science, 315(5811), pp. 464-465.
[7] Deno, S.L. (1985) "Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative", Exceptional Children, 52(3), pp. 219-232.
[8] Florida Department of Education (2024) English Language Arts and Mathematics: 2024 Assessment Results. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education.
[9] Florida Department of Education (2025) English Language Arts and Mathematics: 2025 Assessment Results. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Education.
[10] Foorman, B., Beyler, N., Borradaile, K., Coyne, M., Denton, C.A., Dimino, J., Furgeson, J., Hayes, L., Henke, J., Justice, L., Keating, B., Lewis, W., Sattar, S. and Wissel, S. (2016) Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse.
[11] Fuchs, L.S. and Fuchs, D. (2011) Using curriculum-based measurement for progress monitoring in reading. Washington, DC: National Center on Student Progress Monitoring.
[12] Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J.R. and Witzel, B. (2009b) Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention for elementary and middle schools. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse.
[13] Gersten, R., Chard, D.J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S.K., Morphy, P. and Flojo, J. (2009a) "Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components", Review of Educational Research, 79(3), pp. 1202-1242.
[14] Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C.M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S. and Tilly, W.D. (2009) Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to Intervention and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse.
[15] Hall, C., Dahl-Leonard, K., Cho, E., Solari, E.J., Capin, P., Conner, C.L., Henry, A.R. and Cook, L. (2023) "Forty years of reading intervention research for elementary students with or at risk for dyslexia: A systematic review and meta-analysis", Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), pp. 285-312.
[16] Hill, D.R., King, S.A., Lemons, C.J. and Partanen, J.N. (2012) "Fidelity of implementation and instructional alignment in Response to Intervention research", Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(3), pp. 116-124.
[17] Ludwig, C., Guo, K. and Georgiou, G.K. (2019) "Are reading interventions for English language learners effective? A meta-analysis", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(3), pp. 220-231.
[18] Mukundwi, B., Vengesai, D.T., Mupa, M.N., Chiwanga, R., Hove, T.L. and Gezah, F.Y. (2026) "Bridging Data Fragmentation: A Unified Data Activation Platform for AI-ready Healthcare Systems in Africa", ResearchGate preprint/publication record.
[19] Mupa, M.N. (2026a) ResearchGate profile: Munashe Naphtali Mupa. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Munashe-Naphtali-Mupa/research (Accessed: 7 June 2026).
[20] Mupa, M.N. (2026b) Google Scholar profile: Munashe Naphtali Mupa. Available at: https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=JmqqLHQAAAAJ (Accessed: 7 June 2026).
[21] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2017) Promoting the educational success of children and youth learning English: Promising futures. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[22] National Center for Education Statistics (2025a) NAEP Report Card: 2024 Reading Assessment, Grade 4. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
[23] National Center for Education Statistics (2025b) NAEP Report Card: 2024 Mathematics Assessment, Grade 4. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
[24] National Center on Intensive Intervention (2024) Data-based individualization and progress monitoring resources. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
[25] National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008) Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
[26] Petscher, Y., Cummings, K.D., Biancarosa, G. and Fien, H. (2013) "Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement in reading", Assessment for Effective Intervention, 38(2), pp. 71-83.
[27] Powell, S.R. and Fuchs, L.S. (2018) "Effective word-problem instruction: Using schemas to facilitate mathematical reasoning", Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(1), pp. 31-42.
[28] Slavin, R.E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A. and Davis, S. (2009) "Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis", Review of Educational Research, 79(4), pp. 1391-1466.
[29] Solari, E.J., Petscher, Y. and Fien, H. (2022) "Effectiveness of interventions for English learners with reading difficulties: A meta-analysis", Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 37(3), pp. 194-208.
[30] Stecker, P.M., Fuchs, L.S. and Fuchs, D. (2005) "Using curriculum-based measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research", Psychology in the Schools, 42(8), pp. 795-819.
[31] Tomlinson, C.A. (2014) The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. 2nd edn. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
[32] Vaughn, S. and Wanzek, J. (2014) "Intensive interventions in reading for students with reading disabilities: Meaningful impacts", Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(2), pp. 46-53.
[33] Wanzek, J. and Vaughn, S. (2007) "Research-based implications from extensive early reading interventions", School Psychology Review, 36(4), pp. 541-561.
[34] Wanzek, J., Stevens, E.A., Williams, K.J., Scammacca, N., Vaughn, S. and Sargent, K. (2018) "Current evidence on the effects of intensive early reading interventions", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), pp. 612-624.
How to cite this paper
@article{1719255,
author = {Honest Tirivavengi, Bothwell Mussett Chitengu, Felistus N Madzivire, Munashe Naphtali Mupa},
title = {Early-Grade Literacy and Numeracy Recovery in Diverse Elementary Classrooms: A Practical MTSS Framework for Assessment, Differentiation, and Intervention Fidelity},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {12},
pages = {3293-3306},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719255.pdf},
abstract = {Early-grade learning recovery remains one of the most consequential instructional challenges facing elementary schools. National evidence from the 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress shows that fourth-grade reading performance remains below pre-pandemic levels and that 40% of fourth-grade students performed below NAEP Basic in reading, while only 31% performed at or above NAEP Proficient. Mathematics has shown partial recovery, with 39% of fourth-grade students at or above NAEP Proficient and 24% below NAEP Basic, but performance remains below 2019 levels. Florida's 2025 FAST data similarly show improvement in Grades 3-5 ELA/Reading and Mathematics while preserving large absolute gaps for English learners, students with disabilities, and economically disadvantaged students. This article develops a practical multi-tiered system of support (MTSS) model for diverse elementary classrooms, centred on four linked routines: universal assessment, differentiated instruction, targeted intervention, and fidelity-monitored progress review. The manuscript synthesises research on foundational reading instruction, early numeracy, English learner literacy, data-based decision-making, and intervention fidelity. It also presents public-data analysis tables and heat maps to translate broad achievement signals into classroom-level decision rules. The proposed Assessment-Differentiation-Fidelity model argues that recovery is most credible when teachers connect standards, diagnostics, small-group intervention, accommodation fidelity, parent communication, and progress-monitoring evidence in a repeatable 6- to 12-week cycle. The article concludes that early-grade recovery should not be treated as generic remediation. It should be organised as a disciplined instructional improvement system that protects Tier 1 quality, accelerates Tier 2 support, intensifies Tier 3 intervention when growth is insufficient, and uses fidelity evidence to distinguish ineffective instruction from inadequate dosage or access.},
keywords = {Early Literacy, Early Numeracy, MTSS, Response to Intervention, Differentiated Instruction, English Learners, Students with Disabilities, Progress Monitoring, Intervention Fidelity, Florida FAST, NAEP.},
month = {June},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1719255}
}