Thermal Forecasting of Wireless Earbuds Using Time-Series Machine Learning: Implications for Prolonged Auditory Safety

References

[1] Adeniran, A. O., et al. (2024). Exploring the effects of electromagnetic radiation from earbuds of different brands. Journal of Research in Environmental and Earth Sciences, 10(11), 1–8.

[2] Dasdag, S., & Akdag, M. Z. (2016). The link between radiofrequencies emitted from wireless technologies and oxidative stress. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, 75, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.09.001

[3] Fernández, C., et al. (2018). Absorption of wireless radiation in the child versus adult brain and eye. Environmental Research, 167, 694–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.09.008

[4] International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. (2020). Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Physics, 118(5), 483–524. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001210

[5] Karipidis, K., et al. (2024). The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk (Part I). Environment International, 191, 108983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108983

[6] Karipidis, K., et al. (2025). The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk (Part II). Environment International, 196, 109274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109274

[7] Kim, S., Sharif, Y. A., & Nasim, I. (2024). Human electromagnetic field exposure in wearable communication systems: A review. e-Prime, 8, 100508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eprime.2024.100508

[8] Makinistian, L., et al. (2022). Static magnetic field exposure from in-ear earphones. Bioelectromagnetics, 43(3), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.22460

[9] Meenu, L., et al. (2025). Electromagnetic radiation exposure from wireless devices. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances, 17, 100548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100548

[10] Pennes, H. H. (1948). Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1(2), 93–122.

[11] Seetharaman, R., et al. (2022). SAR and heat transfer in the human head due to EM radiation. Materials Today: Proceedings, 51, 2365–2374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.275

[12] Vatsalaya, P. (2020). Effects of EMF exposure from wearable devices. International Journal of Advanced Research in Basic Engineering Sciences and Technology, 6(10), 7–12.

[13] Wiart, J., et al. (2016). Analysis of RF exposure in the head tissues of children and adults. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 53(13), 3681–3695. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/13/013

[14] Yuldasheva, F. U., et al. (2025). Wireless headphones and central nervous system effects. Journal of Medical Practice and Nursing, 3(5).

[15] Zhou, N., et al. (2024). Bluetooth headset usage duration and thyroid nodule risk. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 14354. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-14354-0

@article{1719297,
      author = {Emmanuel Wisdom Obinor, Giroh Gideon Yuniyus, Anita Franklin Akpolile, Godwin Kparobo Agbajor},
      title = {Thermal Forecasting of Wireless Earbuds Using Time-Series Machine Learning: Implications for Prolonged Auditory Safety},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {12},
      pages = {3222-3229},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719297.pdf},
      abstract = {The integration of machine-learning-assisted thermal forecasting into radiofrequency (RF) safety assessment represents a critical methodological advance for consumer wearable devices. This study applies time-series modelling—including autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and biophysical Pennes Bioheat Equation (BHE) frameworks—to infrared-thermographic temperature datasets collected during 120-minute trials of six commercially available Bluetooth earbud models in Warri, Nigeria (n = 50 participants, aged 12–35 years). RF power density, electric field, and magnetic flux density were measured using a GQ EMF-390 multi-field meter at 2.402–2.480 GHz. Estimated SAR values ranged from 0.00408 to 0.00718 W/kg—less than 0.4% of the ICNIRP 2 W/kg limit—while ear canal temperatures reached peak rises of 3.1–4.9°C during call mode. ARIMA models (R² = 0.93–0.97) accurately forecasted thermal plateaus and post-use cooling trajectories, with RMSE < 0.31°C. Budget-tier devices (Oraimo FreePods 3, Tecno Hipods H2) exhibited the highest EMF emissions and sustained thermal burdens, with plateau durations of 68–70 minutes. Teenagers reported significantly greater symptom severity than adults across all domains (p < .001), consistent with physiological vulnerability in younger users. These findings establish thermal forecasting as a viable safety tool and provide device-specific, age-stratified evidence supporting precautionary usage guidelines.},
      keywords = {Wireless Earbuds, RF-EMF Exposure, Thermal Forecasting, ARIMA Time Series, SAR Assessment, Adolescent Safety},
      month = {June},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I12-1719297}
  }