International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719338

1719338 Vol 9 · Issue 11 Download Paper

Impact of Karnataka Grameen Bank and Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank on Rural Development in Karnataka: An Empirical Study of Credit Access, Income Generation, and Financial Inclusion among Rural Households

Ravikumar Kuranal Prof. Ravikumar K

Subject area: Management and Commerce  ·  Area of research: Commerce

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1719338

Abstract

By offering rural and semi-urban populations institutional credit, savings options, agricultural finance, microenterprise loans, insurance access, pension enrollment, remittance services, and digital banking capabilities, regional rural banks play a critical role in fostering inclusive rural development. With a focus on credit availability, income generation, and financial inclusion among rural households, the current empirical study investigates the effects of Karnataka Grameen Bank and Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank on rural development in Karnataka. Primary data from rural households, farmers, members of self-help groups, agricultural laborers, artisans, and micro-entrepreneurs who have utilized the banking and credit services provided by these regional rural banks forms the basis of the study. Since Karnataka Gramin Bank and Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank merged into Karnataka Grameena Bank on May 1, 2025, the research also takes into account the post-amalgamation context. Indicators including access to formal credit, loan utilization, household income, employment creation, agricultural investment, savings behavior, use of digital banking, participation in government financial schemes, women's financial participation, and a decrease in reliance on unofficial moneylenders are some of the ways the study plans to measure rural development. Data may be gathered using a structured questionnaire, and the relationship between bank services and rural development outcomes may be investigated using statistical methods like percentage analysis, mean score analysis, correlation, regression, chi-square test, ANOVA, and factor analysis. The study is anticipated to demonstrate that when credit is available, timely, affordable, productively utilized, and backed by institutional guidance and financial literacy, Regional Rural Banks have a positive impact on rural development. Policymakers, banks, NABARD, government agencies, and rural development organizations may find the findings useful in bolstering livelihood-based banking interventions, financial inclusion, credit delivery, and support for Self-Help Groups in Karnataka.

Keywords

Regional Rural Banks, Karnataka Grameen Bank, Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank, Rural Development, Credit Access, Income Generation, Financial Inclusion, SHG Finance, Agricultural Credit.

References

[1] Al-Kubati, N. A. A., & Selvaratnam, D. P. (2023). Empowering women through the Self-Help Group Bank Linkage Programme as a tool for sustainable development: Lessons from India. Community Development Journal, 58(2), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsab036

[2] Armendáriz, B., & Morduch, J. (2010). The economics of microfinance (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

[3] Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. (2015). The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(1), 22–53. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20130533

[4] Basu, P. (2006). Improving access to finance for India’s rural poor. World Bank.

[5] Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2007). Finance, inequality and the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-007-9010-6

[6] Bharti, N., & Kumari, S. (2022). Regional Rural Banks’ contribution to agriculture finance: A critical analysis of the performance of RRBs in India using DEA and structural equation modeling. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(5), 154–169.

[7] Binswanger, H. P., & Khandker, S. R. (1995). The impact of formal finance on the rural economy of India. The Journal of Development Studies, 32(2), 234–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389508422413

[8] Burgess, R., & Pande, R. (2005). Do rural banks matter? Evidence from the Indian social banking experiment. American Economic Review, 95(3), 780–795. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054201242

[9] Chavan, P. (2007). Access to bank credit: Implications for Dalit rural households. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(31), 3219–3224.

[10] Cole, S., Sampson, T., & Zia, B. (2011). Prices or knowledge? What drives demand for financial services in emerging markets? The Journal of Finance, 66(6), 1933–1967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01696.x

[11] Collins, D., Morduch, J., Rutherford, S., & Ruthven, O. (2009). Portfolios of the poor: How the world’s poor live on $2 a day. Princeton University Press.

[12] Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S., & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1259-0

[13] Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., & Ansar, S. (2022). The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial inclusion, digital payments, and resilience in the age of COVID-19. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1897-4

[14] Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.

[15] Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

[16] Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

[17] Honohan, P. (2008). Cross-country variation in household access to financial services. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(11), 2493–2500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.05.004

[18] Hulme, D. (2000). Impact assessment methodologies for microfinance: Theory, experience and better practice. World Development, 28(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00119-9

[19] Ibrahim, M. S. (2010). Performance evaluation of Regional Rural Banks in India. International Business Research, 3(4), 203–211.

[20] Kabeer, N. (2001). Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh. World Development, 29(1), 63–84.

[21] Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2011). Microcredit in theory and practice: Using randomized credit scoring for impact evaluation. Science, 332(6035), 1278–1284. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200138

[22] Khandker, S. R. (2005). Microfinance and poverty: Evidence using panel data from Bangladesh. The World Bank Economic Review, 19(2), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhi008

[23] Kothari, C. R., & Garg, G. (2014). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (3rd ed.). New Age International Publishers.

[24] Kumar, N. (2013). Financial inclusion and its determinants: Evidence from India. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 5(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/17576381311317754

[25] Ledgerwood, J. (1999). Microfinance handbook: An institutional and financial perspective. World Bank.

[26] Malhotra, A., Schuler, S. R., & Boender, C. (2002). Measuring women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. World Bank.

[27] Misra, B. S. (2006). The performance of Regional Rural Banks in India: Has past anything to suggest for future? Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers.

[28] Mohan, R. (2006). Agricultural credit in India: Status, issues and future agenda. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(11), 1013–1023.

[29] Morduch, J. (1999). The microfinance promise. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1569–1614. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.4.1569

[30] Nayak, A. K., Panigrahi, P. K., & Swain, B. (2020). Self-help groups in India: Challenges and a roadmap for sustainability. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(7), 1013–1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2019-0054

[31] Pitt, M. M., & Khandker, S. R. (1998). The impact of group-based credit programs on poor households in Bangladesh: Does the gender of participants matter? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 958–996. https://doi.org/10.1086/250037

[32] Puhazhendi, V., & Badatya, K. C. (2002). SHG-bank linkage programme for rural poor: An impact assessment. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development.

[33] Rajeev, M., Vani, B. P., & Veerashekharappa. (2020). Group lending through an SHG bank-linkage programme in India: Transaction costs and social benefits. Development in Practice, 30(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2018.1508418

[34] Ranganatha, J., & Nayak, P. B. (2024). An exploration into the growth and performance of Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank. PRAGATI: Journal of Indian Economy, 11(1), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.17492/jpi.pragati.v11i1.1112408

[35] Rangarajan, C. (2008). Report of the Committee on Financial Inclusion. Government of India.

[36] Robinson, M. S. (2001). The microfinance revolution: Sustainable finance for the poor. World Bank.

[37] Sarma, M. (2008). Index of financial inclusion (Working Paper No. 215). Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations.

[38] Sarma, M., & Pais, J. (2011). Financial inclusion and development. Journal of International Development, 23(5), 613–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1698

[39] Seibel, H. D., & Dave, H. R. (2002). Commercial aspects of self-help group banking in India: A study of bank transaction costs. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development.

[40] Serrao, M., Sequeira, A., & Varambally, K. V. M. (2021). Impact of financial inclusion on the socio-economic status of rural and urban households of vulnerable sections in Karnataka. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.11716

[41] Shylendra, H. S. (1996). Institutional reform and rural poor: A study on the distributional performance of a Regional Rural Bank. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(3), 301–314.

[42] Sriram, M. S. (2005). Information asymmetry and trust: A framework for studying microfinance in India. Vikalpa, 30(4), 77–86.

[43] Suresh, R. (2015). Regional Rural Banks and their performance: An empirical study. Journal of Rural Development, 34(3), 285–303.

[44] Swain, R. B., & Wallentin, F. Y. (2009). Does microfinance empower women? Evidence from self-help groups in India. International Review of Applied Economics, 23(5), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692170903007540

[45] Tankha, A. (2012). Banking on self-help groups: Twenty years on. Sage Publications.

[46] Tigari, H., & Gaganadeepa, M. G. (2019). Regional Rural Banks and rural development: A case of Pragathi Krishna Gramin Bank. Shanlax International Journal of Economics, 7(2), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.34293/economics.v7i2.315

[47] Yadav, A. N., Singh, S., & Jaiswal, A. (2023). A study of Regional Rural Banks: The conundrum of managing inclusion with sustainability. Indian Journal of Finance, 17(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2023/v17i1/172602

[48] Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row.

[49] Zeller, M., & Sharma, M. (2000). Many borrow, more save, and all insure: Implications for food and micro-finance policy. Food Policy, 25(2), 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(99)00065-2

How to cite this paper

Ravikumar Kuranal, Prof. Ravikumar K "Impact of Karnataka Grameen Bank and Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank on Rural Development in Karnataka: An Empirical Study of Credit Access, Income Generation, and Financial Inclusion among Rural Households" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 11 2026 Page 5681-5701 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1719338
Ravikumar Kuranal, Prof. Ravikumar K "Impact of Karnataka Grameen Bank and Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank on Rural Development in Karnataka: An Empirical Study of Credit Access, Income Generation, and Financial Inclusion among Rural Households" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 11, May. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1719338
Ravikumar Kuranal, Prof. Ravikumar K (2026). Impact of Karnataka Grameen Bank and Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank on Rural Development in Karnataka: An Empirical Study of Credit Access, Income Generation, and Financial Inclusion among Rural Households. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(11). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1719338
Ravikumar Kuranal, Prof. Ravikumar K "Impact of Karnataka Grameen Bank and Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank on Rural Development in Karnataka: An Empirical Study of Credit Access, Income Generation, and Financial Inclusion among Rural Households" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 11, May. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1719338
@article{1719338,
      author = {Ravikumar Kuranal, Prof. Ravikumar K},
      title = {Impact of Karnataka Grameen Bank and Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank on Rural Development in Karnataka: An Empirical Study of Credit Access, Income Generation, and Financial Inclusion among Rural Households},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {11},
      pages = {5681-5701},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719338.pdf},
      abstract = {By offering rural and semi-urban populations institutional credit, savings options, agricultural finance, microenterprise loans, insurance access, pension enrollment, remittance services, and digital banking capabilities, regional rural banks play a critical role in fostering inclusive rural development. With a focus on credit availability, income generation, and financial inclusion among rural households, the current empirical study investigates the effects of Karnataka Grameen Bank and Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank on rural development in Karnataka. Primary data from rural households, farmers, members of self-help groups, agricultural laborers, artisans, and micro-entrepreneurs who have utilized the banking and credit services provided by these regional rural banks forms the basis of the study. Since Karnataka Gramin Bank and Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank merged into Karnataka Grameena Bank on May 1, 2025, the research also takes into account the post-amalgamation context. Indicators including access to formal credit, loan utilization, household income, employment creation, agricultural investment, savings behavior, use of digital banking, participation in government financial schemes, women's financial participation, and a decrease in reliance on unofficial moneylenders are some of the ways the study plans to measure rural development. Data may be gathered using a structured questionnaire, and the relationship between bank services and rural development outcomes may be investigated using statistical methods like percentage analysis, mean score analysis, correlation, regression, chi-square test, ANOVA, and factor analysis. The study is anticipated to demonstrate that when credit is available, timely, affordable, productively utilized, and backed by institutional guidance and financial literacy, Regional Rural Banks have a positive impact on rural development. Policymakers, banks, NABARD, government agencies, and rural development organizations may find the findings useful in bolstering livelihood-based banking interventions, financial inclusion, credit delivery, and support for Self-Help Groups in Karnataka.},
      keywords = {Regional Rural Banks, Karnataka Grameen Bank, Karnataka Vikas Grameena Bank, Rural Development, Credit Access, Income Generation, Financial Inclusion, SHG Finance, Agricultural Credit.},
      month = {May},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1719338}
  }