Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719383
Checklist Based Evaluation of User Centred Re-design of Website of Bhagwandas Central Library, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, Varanasi
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: library & Information Science
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I1-1719383
Abstract
The website of an academic library has become a crucial component of higher education, serving as the primary access point for both physical and digital information resources. The efficacy of information dissemination and user contentment are significantly influenced by the caliber of a library website, particularly given the increasing dependence on electronic databases, institutional repositories, online public access catalogs, and remote library services. A well-designed website not only facilitates access to academic resources but also demonstrates the institution's technological expertise and customer-centric philosophy. The present paper examined the MGKVP Library website using a specified checklist. The checklist methodology provides a systematic assessment of the presence, organization, and availability of essential website features, as opposed to complex usability testing. The evaluation proposes a user-centric redesign approach to enhance digital library services, identifying areas for development alongside strengths and deficiencies
Keywords
Centered Design, Academic Library Website, Checklist Evaluation, Website Usability, Digital Library Services, SOUL 3.0, MGKVP, User Experience (UX).
References
[1] Battleson, B., Booth, A., & Weintrop, J. (2001). Usability testing of an academic library web site: A case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(3), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(01)00188-4
[2] Campbell, N. (2001). Usability assessment of library-related web sites: Methods and case studies. American Library Association.
[3] Chowdhury, G. G. (2010). Introduction to modern information retrieval (3rd ed.). Facet Publishing.
[4] Dumas, J. S., & Redish, J. C. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing (Rev. ed.). Intellect Books.
[5] Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28(3), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1145/3166.3170
[6] Head, A. J. (1999). Web redemption and the promise of usability. Online, 23(6), 20–29.
[7] International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 9241-11:2018 Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. ISO.
[8] Jeng, J. (2005). What is usability in the context of the digital library and how can it be measured? Information Technology and Libraries, 24(2), 47–56.
[9] Krueger, J., Ray, R. L., & Knight, L. (2004). Applying web usability techniques to assess student awareness of library web resources. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(4), 285–293.
[10] Manzari, L., & Trinidad-Christensen, J. (2006). User-centered design of a web site for library and information science students: Heuristic evaluation and usability testing. Information Technology and Libraries, 25(3), 163–169.
[11] Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Academic Press.
[12] Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability inspection methods (pp. 25–62). John Wiley & Sons.
[13] Nielsen, J. (2000). Why you only need to test with 5 users. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/
[14] Palmquist, R. A. (2001). An overview of usability for the study of users' web-based information retrieval behavior. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 42(2), 123–136.
How to cite this paper
@article{1719383,
author = {Dr. Amrita Majumdar},
title = {Checklist Based Evaluation of User Centred Re-design of Website of Bhagwandas Central Library, Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, Varanasi},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {43-47},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719383.pdf},
abstract = {The website of an academic library has become a crucial component of higher education, serving as the primary access point for both physical and digital information resources. The efficacy of information dissemination and user contentment are significantly influenced by the caliber of a library website, particularly given the increasing dependence on electronic databases, institutional repositories, online public access catalogs, and remote library services. A well-designed website not only facilitates access to academic resources but also demonstrates the institution's technological expertise and customer-centric philosophy. The present paper examined the MGKVP Library website using a specified checklist. The checklist methodology provides a systematic assessment of the presence, organization, and availability of essential website features, as opposed to complex usability testing. The evaluation proposes a user-centric redesign approach to enhance digital library services, identifying areas for development alongside strengths and deficiencies},
keywords = {Centered Design, Academic Library Website, Checklist Evaluation, Website Usability, Digital Library Services, SOUL 3.0, MGKVP, User Experience (UX).},
month = {July},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719383}
}