Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719542
A Review of the Safe Third Country Agreement and the Right to Seek Asylum: A Critical Review of Legal Frameworks, Human Rights Standards, and Access to Protection
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Legal Frameworks
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719542
Abstract
The Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) is a bilateral arrangement between Canada and the United States that determines where asylum seekers may submit refugee claims at the shared land border. This review paper critically examines the STCA in relation to the internationally recognized right to seek asylum. Drawing on legislation, court decisions, policy documents, academic scholarship, and recent human rights reports, the paper reviews the legal foundations of the Agreement, its consistency with international human rights standards, and its practical impact on access to protection. The review finds that while the STCA is legally justified as a border-management tool, serious concerns remain regarding procedural fairness, access to exceptions, and the risk of indirect refoulement. Recent policy expansions and enforcement trends further challenge the balance between state sovereignty and refugee protection. The paper concludes that the STCA continues to restrict meaningful access to asylum and requires sustained legal scrutiny and policy reform to ensure compliance with human rights obligations.
Keywords
Safe Third Country Agreement; right to seek asylum; non-refoulement; procedural fairness; Canada–United States border
References
[1] Arbel, E. (2024). Border trouble: Critical reflections on the Canada–US Safe Third Country Agreement litigation. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, 8(3–4), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMBS.2024.145491
[2] Braun, V., and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
[3] Canadian Council for Refugees. (2023). Why the United States is not safe for refugees. CCR.
[4] Foster, M. (2019). International refugee law and the protection of asylum seekers. Oxford University Press.
[5] García Hernández, C. C. (2023). Crimmigration law and immigrant detention. Oxford University Press.
[6] Government of Canada. (2024). Canada–United States Safe Third Country Agreement: Policy overview. Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada. https://www.canada.ca
[7] Grant, M. J., and Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–101.
[8] Harris, K., and Albo, G. (2023). Expanding the Safe Third Country Agreement: Legal and humanitarian consequences. Journal of Migration Studies, 11(2), 88–104.
[9] Khaitan, P., and Krishan, J. (2022). The obligation of non-refoulement and its erga omnes character. Harvard International Law Journal.
[10] LegalClarity. (2025). US–Canada Safe Third Country Agreement explained. https://legalclarity.org
[11] Reuters. (2025, September 18). Canada turns back more asylum seekers to U.S. despite third-country deportation risk.
[12] Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
[13] Supreme Court of Canada. (2023). Canadian Council for Refugees v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship).
[14] The Guardian. (2026, May 23). ‘Canada is handing people over to ICE’: refugees rejected at border face U.S. detention.
[15] UN General Assembly. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations.
[16] UNHCR. (2022). Access to territory and non-refoulement: Legal framework and guidance. https://emergency.unhcr.org
[17] UNHCR. (2022). Advisory opinion on non-refoulement obligations. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.
[18] UNHCR. (2022). Asylum and refugee status: Frequently asked questions. https://help.unhcr.org
How to cite this paper
@article{1719542,
author = {Oghenehoro Evi Eni},
title = {A Review of the Safe Third Country Agreement and the Right to Seek Asylum: A Critical Review of Legal Frameworks, Human Rights Standards, and Access to Protection},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {1112-1119},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719542.pdf},
abstract = {The Safe Third Country Agreement (STCA) is a bilateral arrangement between Canada and the United States that determines where asylum seekers may submit refugee claims at the shared land border. This review paper critically examines the STCA in relation to the internationally recognized right to seek asylum. Drawing on legislation, court decisions, policy documents, academic scholarship, and recent human rights reports, the paper reviews the legal foundations of the Agreement, its consistency with international human rights standards, and its practical impact on access to protection. The review finds that while the STCA is legally justified as a border-management tool, serious concerns remain regarding procedural fairness, access to exceptions, and the risk of indirect refoulement. Recent policy expansions and enforcement trends further challenge the balance between state sovereignty and refugee protection. The paper concludes that the STCA continues to restrict meaningful access to asylum and requires sustained legal scrutiny and policy reform to ensure compliance with human rights obligations.},
keywords = {Safe Third Country Agreement; right to seek asylum; non-refoulement; procedural fairness; Canada–United States border},
month = {July},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719542}
}