Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719638
Bridging the Gap: A Comparative Assessment of India's Science and Technology Standing Relative to China and Japan
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Technology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719638
Abstract
India, China, and Japan represent three distinct trajectories of science, technology, and innovation (STI) development in Asia, each shaped by different histories, political economies, and policy choices. This paper offers a comparative, evidence-based assessment of how far India lags behind China and Japan across key STI indicators, including research and development (R&D) expenditure, patent output, scientific publication volume and impact, innovation ecosystem rankings, semiconductor and advanced manufacturing capability, and higher-education research infrastructure. Drawing on data from the World Bank, UNESCO, the World Intellectual Property Organization's Global Innovation Index (GII), and the Clarivate/Institute for Scientific Information G20 Research and Innovation Scorecard, the analysis finds that India has made substantial gains in research output and start-up-driven innovation, rising to third place globally in scientific publication volume and improving steadily in the GII. However, India continues to trail China and Japan by wide margins in R&D intensity (spending as a share of GDP), private-sector R&D participation, high-value patent filings, semiconductor fabrication capacity, and the commercialisation of research into scalable products. The paper argues that India's gap is less a deficit of scientific talent than a structural one, rooted in chronically low R&D investment, weak industry-academia linkages, and a shortfall in translating early-stage research into market-ready technology. The paper concludes with a review of recent Indian policy responses, including the Anusandhan National Research Foundation and the Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) Scheme, and situates these within the broader question of whether India can narrow the gap over the coming decade.
Keywords
India Science and Technology; China Innovation Policy; Japan R&D; Comparative Technology Development; Global Innovation Index; Research and Development Expenditure; Patent Filings; Scientific Publications; Innovation Ecosystem; Asia Technology Gap
References
[1] Clarivate Institute for Scientific Information. (2025). G20 Research and Innovation Scorecard 2025: Insights into India's research performance. Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/academia-government/blog/insights-from-the-g20-scorecard-indias-research-performance-in-focus/
[2] Forbes India. (2026, January 29). India's expenditure on R&D just 0.6 percent of GDP: Economic Survey. Retrieved from https://www.forbesindia.com/article/budget-2026/
[3] Government of India, Press Information Bureau. (2025). Parliament Question: R&D Investment in India. Ministry of Science and Technology. Retrieved from https://www.pib.gov.in/
[4] Lexology / S.S. Rana & Co. (2025, September 18). WIPO Global Innovation Index (GII) 2025: India ranks 38th globally. Retrieved from https://www.lexology.com/
[5] Lowy Institute. (2025). Asia Power Index: R&D spending (% of GDP). Retrieved from https://power.lowyinstitute.org/data/economic-capability/technology/rnd-spending-of-gdp/
[6] Security Risks Monitor. (2025, January 24). India: To keep pace with China, invest in R&D. Retrieved from https://www.security-risks.com/post/india-to-keep-pace-with-china-invest-in-r-d
[7] Wikipedia contributors. (2026). List of sovereign states by research and development spending. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_by_research_and_development_spending
[8] World Bank. (2025). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP) — China, India [Data set]. World Bank Open Data / UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
[9] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2025). Global Innovation Index 2025: Innovation as a Catalyst for Growth (17th ed.). Geneva: WIPO. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/global-innovation-index-2025/
[10] World Intellectual Property Organization. (2025). Global Innovation Index 2025 — Cluster ranking. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/global-innovation-index-2025/en/cluster-ranking.html
How to cite this paper
@article{1719638,
author = {Prashant Kumar Dixit},
title = {Bridging the Gap: A Comparative Assessment of India's Science and Technology Standing Relative to China and Japan},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {1068-1073},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719638.pdf},
abstract = {India, China, and Japan represent three distinct trajectories of science, technology, and innovation (STI) development in Asia, each shaped by different histories, political economies, and policy choices. This paper offers a comparative, evidence-based assessment of how far India lags behind China and Japan across key STI indicators, including research and development (R&D) expenditure, patent output, scientific publication volume and impact, innovation ecosystem rankings, semiconductor and advanced manufacturing capability, and higher-education research infrastructure. Drawing on data from the World Bank, UNESCO, the World Intellectual Property Organization's Global Innovation Index (GII), and the Clarivate/Institute for Scientific Information G20 Research and Innovation Scorecard, the analysis finds that India has made substantial gains in research output and start-up-driven innovation, rising to third place globally in scientific publication volume and improving steadily in the GII. However, India continues to trail China and Japan by wide margins in R&D intensity (spending as a share of GDP), private-sector R&D participation, high-value patent filings, semiconductor fabrication capacity, and the commercialisation of research into scalable products. The paper argues that India's gap is less a deficit of scientific talent than a structural one, rooted in chronically low R&D investment, weak industry-academia linkages, and a shortfall in translating early-stage research into market-ready technology. The paper concludes with a review of recent Indian policy responses, including the Anusandhan National Research Foundation and the Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) Scheme, and situates these within the broader question of whether India can narrow the gap over the coming decade.},
keywords = {India Science and Technology; China Innovation Policy; Japan R&D; Comparative Technology Development; Global Innovation Index; Research and Development Expenditure; Patent Filings; Scientific Publications; Innovation Ecosystem; Asia Technology Gap},
month = {July},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719638}
}