Busbar Protection Schemes: Centralized Vs Distributed, And Dependability/Security Assessment

References

[1] Akbarzadeh, A., Rueda, J. L., Palensky, P., & others. (2024). Two-stage advanced persistent threat (APT) attack on an IEC 61850 power grid substation. International Journal of Information Security. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-024-00856-6

[2] Alonso, F., Cilleruelo, I., & De La Torre, A. (2024). Analysis of cryptographic algorithms to improve cybersecurity in the industrial electrical sector. Applied Sciences, 14(7), 2964. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072964

[3] Ayello, M., & Lopes, Y. (2023). Interoperability based on IEC 61850 standard: Systematic literature review, certification method proposal, and case study. Electric Power Systems Research, 220, 109355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2023.109355

[4] Bhattacharjee, T., Jamil, M., Alotaibi, M. A., Malik, H., & Nassar, M. E. (2022). Hardware development and interoperability testing of a multivendor-IEC-61850-based digital substation. Energies, 15(5), 1785. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15051785

[5] Cao, H., Feng, F., Zheng, A., & others. (2024). Intelligent substation virtual circuit verification method combining knowledge graph and deep learning. Frontiers in Energy Research, 12, 1395621. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1395621

[6] Chen, L., Li, H., Charton, T., & Zhang, R. (2021). Virtual digital substation test system and interoperability assessments. Energies, 14(8), 2337. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14082337

[7] Diaz, F. F., Guerrero, F. G., & Barandica, A. (2020). Technical-economic evaluation model for a process bus based on IEC 61850. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 21, 100288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2019.100288

[8] Gaggero, G. B., Girdinio, P., & Marchese, M. (2025). Cybersecurity issues in electrical protection relays: A systematic review. Energies, 18(14), 3796. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18143796

[9] Gaspar, J., Cruz, T., Lam, C.-T., & Simões, P. (2023). Smart substation communications and cybersecurity: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 25(4), 2456-2493. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2023.3305468

[10] IEC. (2020). IEC 61850-9-2: Communication networks and systems for power utility automation-Part 9-2: Specific communication service mapping (SCSM)-Sampled values over ISO/IEC 8802-3. International Electrotechnical Commission.

[11] IEC. (2020). IEC 62351-6: Power systems management and associated information exchange-Data and communications security-Part 6: Security for IEC 61850. International Electrotechnical Commission.

[12] IEC. (2020). IEC 62439-3: Industrial communication networks-High availability automation networks-Part 3: Parallel redundancy protocol (PRP) and high-availability seamless redundancy (HSR). International Electrotechnical Commission.

[13] Jiang, X., Cao, H., Zhou, C., Ren, X., Shen, J., & Yu, J. (2024). Busbar fault diagnosis method based on multi-source information fusion. Frontiers in Energy Research, 12, 1443570. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1443570

[14] Joband, M., Homayounifar, S., & Sarlak, M. (2023). A superimposed current based busbar protection scheme using slope degree of grey incidence analysis model. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 17(3), 161-180. https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12671

[15] Kabbara, N., Nait Belaid, M. O., Gibescu, M., Camargo, L. R., Cantenot, J., Coste, T., Audebert, V., & Morais, H. (2022). Towards software-defined protection, automation, and control in power systems: Concepts, state of the art, and future challenges. Energies, 15(24), 9362. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249362

[16] Kabbara, N., Rueda Torres, J. L., Gibescu, M., & Palensky, P. (2025). A cybersecurity assessment for hybrid virtualized-physical digital substations. Proceedings/technical paper, Delft University of Technology repository.

[17] Kazme, H. Z., Westerlund, P., & Bollen, M. H. J. (2025). Evaluating 5G communication for IEC 61850 digital substations: Historical context and latency challenges. Energies, 18(16), 4387. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18164387

[18] Lima, D. A. C., Bernardon, D. P., Morais, A. P., Oliveira, A. L., Hokama, W. S., Conceição, J. B. R., & Sartori, Â. F. (2022). Review of bus differential protection using IEC 61850. Energies, 15(24), 9537. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249537

[19] Liu, D., Li, Y., & others. (2024). Strategy for evaluating the status of relay protection equipment for the new generation of intelligent substations. Frontiers in Energy Research, 12, 1342793. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1342793

[20] Liu, Y., Sun, B., Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, J., Wang, W., Thotakura, N. L., Liu, Q., & Liu, Y. (2025). Time synchronization techniques in the modern smart grid: A comprehensive survey. Energies, 18(5), 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18051163

[21] Mathebula, V. C., & Saha, A. K. (2022). Reliability of IEC 61850 based substation communication network architecture considering quality of repairs and common cause failures. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 7, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41601-022-00234-1

[22] Mathew, J. M., Hunt, R., Mendez, J., & Smith, T. (2022). Lessons learned from commissioning of IEC 61850-9-2 process-bus-based busbar protection system. Technical conference paper/industry report.

[23] Muhammad, A. M., & Saha, A. K. (2024). A review reliability and availability analysis of IEC 61850 based substation communication architectures. American Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 9(3), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajset.20240903.13

[24] Nhung-Nguyen, H., Girdhar, M., Kim, Y.-H., & Hong, J. (2024). Machine-learning-based anomaly detection for GOOSE in digital substations. Energies, 17(15), 3745. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153745

[25] Nomandela, S., Mnguni, M. E. S., & Raji, A. K. (2025). Systematic development and hardware-in-the-loop testing of an IEC 61850 standard-based monitoring and protection system for a modern power grid point of common coupling. Energies, 18(19), 5281. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18195281

[26] Rubio, S., Bogarra, S., Nunes, M., & Gomez, X. (2025). Smart grid protection, automation and control: Challenges and opportunities. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 3186. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063186

[27] Samkari, H. S. (2025). Enhancing substation protection reliability through economical redundancy schemes. Electronics, 14(20), 4097. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14204097

[28] Santos, G. R., & Zancul, E. (2023). A framework to assess the impacts of digital electrical substations. Smart Energy, 12, 100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segy.2023.100125

[29] Santos, G. R., Zancul, E., & Rego, E. E. (2025). Pathways to digital substations: A comparative case study. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 23(12), 1297-1304. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLA.2025.11231215

[30] Santos, G. R., Zancul, E., Manassero, G., & Spinola, M. (2024). From conventional to smart substations: A classification model. Electric Power Systems Research, 226, 109887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2023.109887

[31] Sarlak, M. (2024). A Lissajous curve-based method for busbar protection. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2024, 8834200. https://doi.org/10.1155/etep/8834200

[32] Shin, S.-H., Kim, J., & others. (2024). Architecture for enhancing communication security with RBAC IoT protocol-based microgrids. Sensors, 24(18), 6000. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24186000

[33] Silveira, P., Silva, E. F., Galletta, A., & Lopes, Y. (2023). Security analysis of digitized substations: A systematic review of GOOSE messages. Internet of Things, 22, 100760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2023.100760

[34] Song, M.-H., Kang, S.-H., Lee, N.-H., & Nam, S.-R. (2020). IEC 61850-based centralized busbar differential protection with data desynchronization compensation. Energies, 13(4), 967. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13040967

[35] Teoh, C.-P., Lloyd, G., Richards, S., Newman, P., Qin, H., Hunt, R., Mendez, J., Smith, T., & Abdulla, A. (2020). Process bus busbar protection - A stepping stone towards digital substation. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Developments in Power System Protection (DPSP 2020). IET.

[36] Tobar-Rosero, O. A., Díaz-Mendoza, O. D., Díaz-Vargas, P. A., Candelo-Becerra, J. E., Florez-Célis, H. A., & Quintero-Henao, L. F. (2025). Digital substations: Optimization opportunities from communication architectures and emerging technologies. Sci, 7(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci7020063

[37] Vásquez, F. A. M., & Silva, K. M. (2021). Busbar differential protection using an alternative generalized alpha plane. Electric Power Systems Research, 196, 107284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107284

[38] Wu, X., Zhao, H., Xu, W., Pan, W., Ji, Q., & Hua, X. (2024). Fault diagnosis of the distribution network based on the D-S evidence theory Bayesian network. Frontiers in Energy Research, 12, 1422639. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1422639

[39] Xue, C., Zhang, L., & others. (2025). INFO-RF-based fault diagnosis and analysis method for busbar faults in power systems. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 7402.

@article{1719675,
      author = {Humayun Rafis},
      title = {Busbar Protection Schemes: Centralized Vs Distributed, And Dependability/Security Assessment},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1162-1174},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719675.pdf},
      abstract = {Busbar protection is among the most critical functions in substation protection because a bus fault can interrupt multiple circuits at once, damage primary equipment, and rapidly escalate into a wide-area outage. At the same time, substation digitalization has changed the engineering basis of busbar protection. Modern schemes may be hardwired, IEC 61850-enabled, process-bus-based, centralized, distributed, or virtualized, and each architectural choice reshapes not only speed and selectivity but also maintainability, interoperability, and cyber exposure. This review compares centralized and distributed busbar protection schemes and develops a structured framework for dependability and security assessment. The study follows a protocol-driven review methodology focused on literature published between 2020 and 2025, with attention to bus differential protection, process bus design, synchronization, redundancy, interoperability, virtual IEDs, testing, and cybersecurity. The paper finds that centralized architectures provide a coherent system-wide view and simplify some forms of protection coordination, but they concentrate timing, software, and cyber risks. Distributed architectures improve modularity, support phased retrofit, and often degrade more gracefully under isolated failures, but they increase configuration-management burden and interoperability demands. The review argues that architecture alone does not determine performance. Dependability and security emerge from the interaction of differential algorithms, current-transformer behavior, topology processing, network redundancy, sampled-value quality, time synchronization, cyber controls, and maintenance practice. For most utilities, the most resilient pathway is not purely centralized or purely distributed but hybrid: distributed acquisition, deterministic communication, redundant timing and networking, disciplined configuration governance, and hardware-in-the-loop validation supported by IEC 62351-aligned cyber protections. The paper concludes by identifying research gaps and by proposing a practical assessment framework for procurement, FAT/SAT, commissioning, and lifecycle review.},
      keywords = {Busbar Protection, Differential Protection, Centralized Protection, Distributed Protection, IEC 61850, Digital Substation, Process Bus, Dependability, Security, Cybersecurity},
      month = {July},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719675}
  }