Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719693
A Conceptual Framework for Risk-Based Decision-Making in Good Manufacturing Practice Environments
Subject area: Biological & Medical Sciences · Area of research: Good Manufacturing Practice
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV4I6-1719693
Abstract
Decision-making in Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) environments is increasingly expected to be risk-based, yet the regulatory expectation is articulated far more clearly than the means of meeting it. Practitioners are instructed to manage risk and to allocate effort in proportion to the threat posed to product quality and patient safety, but the published guidance describes principles and tools rather than an integrated account of how risk evidence becomes a defensible decision. This paper develops a conceptual framework that links established quality risk management practice to the wider theory of decision-making under uncertainty. The framework is organized as five interacting layers. A contextual foundation grounds every decision in regulatory mandate, product and process knowledge, and organizational culture. A risk intelligence layer converts hazards into characterized, evaluated risk. A decision logic layer applies explicit criteria, tolerance thresholds, and a principle of proportionality to appraise options. A governance layer assigns decision rights, escalation routes, and documented rationale. A learning layer feeds outcomes back into knowledge and recalibrates the framework over time. The framework treats the risk matrix not as the decision itself but as one input to a structured judgement, and it incorporates well-documented limits on human reasoning so that decisions remain auditable and resistant to bias. The result is a coherent, lifecycle-oriented structure that practitioners can use to design decision processes, that quality leaders can use to evaluate the maturity of those processes, and that researchers can use as a basis for empirical study. The framework is conceptual and is offered as a foundation for subsequent validation in operating manufacturing settings.
Keywords
Quality Risk Management, Risk-Based Decision-Making, Good Manufacturing Practice, Pharmaceutical Quality System, Proportionality, Decision Under Uncertainty, Conceptual Framework
References
[1] Adegbite, M. P., Adebayo, A., & Ahmed, M. O. (2020). Securing operational technology networks in electric utilities: A systematic review of NERC CIP compliance and architectural threat mitigation. International Journal of Engineering and Modern Technology, 6(3), 103-146. https://doi.org/10.56201/ijemt.vol.6.no3.2020.pg103.146
[2] Agbabiaka, J., Okonkwo, C. S., Ogunwole, O., Mayo, W., & Okeke, O. T. (2019). Supply chain risk management model for EPC and gas processing projects. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 3(2), 968-980. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV3I2-1713124
[3] Ahiaeke Patrick, M. C., Okonkwo, C. S., Mayo, W., & Okeke, O. T. (2020). A GIS enabled framework for modern ERP procurement processes. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 1(5), 499-508. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMRGE.2020.1.5.499-508
[4] Aifuwa, S. E., Oshoba, T. O., Ogbuefi, E., Ike, P. N., Nnabueze, S. B., & Olatunde-Thorpe, J. (2020). Predictive analytics models enhancing supply chain demand forecasting accuracy and reducing inventory management inefficiencies. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 1(3), 171-181. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2020.1.3.171-181
[5] Akomolafe, O., & Agu, M. U. (2018). A conceptual model for enhancing internal audit quality through technology-enabled risk assessment frameworks. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 1(9), 458-475.
[6] Akomolafe, O., & Agu, M. U. (2019a). A conceptual framework for developing risk-based internal control models in the insurance and banking sectors. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(8), 335-354.
[7] Akomolafe, O., & Agu, M. U. (2019b). A review of data-driven risk evaluation models for emerging market financial institutions. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 3(6), 433-448.
[8] Akomolafe, O., & Agu, M. U. (2019c). Advances in financial resilience through integrated governance and compliance strategies. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(10), 607-620.
[9] Aminu-Ibrahim, A. Y., Ogbete, J. C., & Ambali, K. B. (2018). Developing sustainable diagnostic laboratory infrastructure models for emerging and resource constrained health systems. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 1(8), 118-132. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV1I8-1713586
[10] Aminu-Ibrahim, A. Y., Ogbete, J. C., & Ambali, K. B. (2019). Capital project delivery models for high risk healthcare infrastructure in developing national health systems. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(10), 626-649. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I10-1713588
[11] Aminu-Ibrahim, A. Y., Ogbete, J. C., & Ambali, K. B. (2020). Infrastructure driven expansion of diagnostic access across underserved and rural healthcare regions. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 1(5), 691-706. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMRGE.2020.1.5.691-706
[12] Apostolakis, G. E. (2004). How useful is quantitative risk assessment? Risk Analysis, 24(3), 515-520.
[13] Arumosoye, O. M., & Obriki, O. D. (2018). Development of an integrated heat stress risk conceptual model for industrial operations in extreme environments. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 1(12), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV1I12-1714415
[14] Arumosoye, O. M., & Obriki, O. D. (2019). Systematic review of near-miss and hazard observation data utilization in industrial safety management. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 3(2), 981-999. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV3I2-1714417
[15] Arumosoye, O. M., & Obriki, O. D. (2020). A governance-oriented conceptual model for contractor safety performance in multi-contract industrial projects. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 1(5), 728-740. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2020.1.5.728-740
[16] Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1-13.
[17] Aven, T., & Renn, O. (2009). On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. Journal of Risk Research, 12(1), 1-11.
[18] Bedford, T., & Cooke, R. (2001). Probabilistic risk analysis: Foundations and methods. Cambridge University Press.
[19] Calnan, N., Lipa, M. J., Kane, P. E., & Menezes, J. C. (Eds.). (2017). A lifecycle approach to knowledge excellence in the biopharmaceutical industry. CRC Press.
[20] Charoo, N. A., & Ali, A. A. (2013). Quality risk management in pharmaceutical development. Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy, 39(7), 947-960.
[21] Cox, L. A. (2008). What's wrong with risk matrices? Risk Analysis, 28(2), 497-512.
[22] Dogbatsey, E. A., & Ebhojie, O. (2018). Budget compliance and statutory reporting in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review of frameworks, gaps, and reform pathways. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20446859 [Originally numbered 2(6); journal name not captured in source.]
[23] Dogbatsey, E. A., Ebhojie, O., & Oyeleye, A. O. (2019). Reconciliation control and financial workflow redesign in emerging market organizations: A conceptual framework. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20447103 [Originally numbered 3(5); journal name not captured in source.]
[24] Dosunmu, A. A., & Ogundele, P. O. (2019). Security audit and enterprise risk assessment frameworks for resilient information systems. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 3(5), 434-447. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV3I5-1713225
[25] Dosunmu, A. A., & Ogundele, P. O. (2020). Intrusion detection and prevention models for enhancing organizational cyber defense effectiveness. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 4(6), 310-324. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV4I6-1713226
[26] Duijm, N. J. (2015). Recommendations on the use and design of risk matrices. Safety Science, 76, 21-31.
[27] European Commission. (2015). EudraLex Volume 4: Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines for medicinal products for human and veterinary use. Publications Office of the European Union.
[28] Eyetsemitan, R. A., Ambali, K. B., Oyeleye, A. O., & Fadayomi, O. (2020). Multi-stakeholder governance alignment in joint venture operations: A conceptual framework for coordinating business processes in highly regulated environments. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 4(4), 418-441. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV4I4-1716955
[29] Food and Drug Administration. (2004). Pharmaceutical CGMPs for the 21st century: A risk-based approach. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
[30] Food and Drug Administration. (2006). Guidance for industry: Quality systems approach to pharmaceutical CGMP regulations. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
[31] Food and Drug Administration. (2011). Guidance for industry: Process validation: General principles and practices. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
[32] International Council for Harmonisation. (2005). Q9: Quality risk management. ICH.
[33] International Council for Harmonisation. (2008). Q10: Pharmaceutical quality system. ICH.
[34] International Council for Harmonisation. (2009). Q8(R2): Pharmaceutical development. ICH.
[35] International Council for Harmonisation. (2019). Q12: Technical and regulatory considerations for pharmaceutical product lifecycle management. ICH.
[36] International Organization for Standardization & International Electrotechnical Commission. (2019). IEC 31010:2019 Risk management: Risk assessment techniques. ISO/IEC.
[37] International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management: Guidelines. ISO.
[38] Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
[39] Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1(1), 11-27.
[40] Klein, G. (2008). Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors, 50(3), 456-460.
[41] Ladapo, O. O., Jooda, D., Dosunmu, A. A., & Abolaji, T. O. (2019). Implementation of Active Directory for efficient management of enterprise networks. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 3(4), 608-627. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV3I4-1717206
[42] Mbonu, I. S., Aliliele, C., Iwuanyanwu, U., & Oluoha, O. M. (2018). A conceptual framework for legal and ethical risk modeling in enterprise data protection governance systems. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I2-1714911
[43] Mbonu, I. S., Aliliele, C., Iwuanyanwu, U., & Uzoka, E. (2020). A review of identity and access management integration strategies in hybrid and multi cloud environments. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 1(5), 795-810. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2020.1.5.795-810
[44] Mbonu, I. S., Aliliele, C., Uzoka, E., & Oluoha, O. M. (2019). A review of comparative data protection regulations and secure cloud implementation strategies across jurisdictions. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(9), 482-501. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I9-1714912
[45] Mbonu, I. S., Iwuanyanwu, U., Aliliele, C., & Uzoka, E. (2020a). A conceptual framework for agile supply chain digital transformation with embedded IT risk and ISO compliance controls. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 3(11), 566-593. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV3I11-1714916
[46] Mbonu, I. S., Iwuanyanwu, U., Aliliele, C., & Uzoka, E. (2020b). Advances in infrastructure as code governance for secure terraform based enterprise cloud deployments. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 1(5), 811-828. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2020.1.5.811-828
[47] Mbonu, I. S., Iwuanyanwu, U., Uzoka, E., & Oluoha, O. M. (2019). Advances in enterprise log analytics and automated incident response architectures using Python and SIEM platforms. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 3(2), 1000-1019. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV3I2-1714915
[48] O'Donnell, K., & Greene, A. (2011). A risk management solution designed to facilitate risk-based qualification, validation, and change control activities. Journal of Validation Technology, 17(1), 24-36.
[49] Obogo, S. F., Arumosoye, O. M., & Obriki, O. D. (2020a). Advances in internal QHSE audit systems for industrial engineering operations. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 4(4), 399-417. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV4I4-1715499
[50] Obogo, S. F., Arumosoye, O. M., & Obriki, O. D. (2020b). Conceptual risk management model for heavy lifting and crane installation engineering operations. Shodhshauryam, International Scientific Refereed Research Journal, 3(4), 122-144. https://doi.org/10.32628/SHISRRJ214441
[51] Obogo, S. F., Arumosoye, O. M., & Obriki, O. D. (2020c). Critical review of occupational safety management systems in oil and gas maintenance projects. Shodhshauryam, International Scientific Refereed Research Journal, 3(4), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.32628/SHISRRJ214442
[52] Obogo, S. F., Ozobu, C. O., & Uduokhai, D. O. (2019a). Advances in leadership driven safety culture transformation in large construction workforces. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 3(5), 507-523. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV3I5-1715497
[53] Obogo, S. F., Ozobu, C. O., & Uduokhai, D. O. (2019b). Development of a construction safety risk governance model for multi contractor high rise projects. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(9), 502-522. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I9-1715495
[54] Obogo, S. F., Uduokhai, D. O., & Ozobu, C. O. (2019). Systematic review of hazard identification and risk control practices in urban construction projects. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(12), 666-681. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I12-1715496
[55] Obriki, O. D., & Arumosoye, O. M. (2018). Conceptual modeling of data-driven occupational safety risk control in large-scale energy infrastructure projects. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 1(7), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV1I7-1714414
[56] Obriki, O. D., & Arumosoye, O. M. (2019). A conceptual framework linking management safety walkthrough frequency and coverage to safety culture outcomes in mega projects. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(8), 355-374. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I8-1714416
[57] Obriki, O. D., & Arumosoye, O. M. (2020). Conceptual framework for human error causation in high-risk construction and industrial activities. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 1(5), 715-727. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2020.1.5.715-727
[58] Ogbete, J. C., Aminu-Ibrahim, A. Y., & Ambali, K. B. (2018). Optimizing laboratory spatial planning strategies to improve diagnostic accuracy, safety, and clinical throughput. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(1), 87-113. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV1I7-1713587
[59] Ogbete, J. C., Aminu-Ibrahim, A. Y., & Ambali, K. B. (2019). Regulatory compliant design systems for molecular and pathology laboratories in highly controlled environments. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 3(4), 607-631. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV3I4-1713589
[60] Ogbete, J. C., Aminu-Ibrahim, A. Y., & Ambali, K. B. (2020). Sustainable materials selection and energy efficiency strategies for modern medical laboratory facilities. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 1(5), 674-690. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMRGE.2020.1.5.674-690
[61] Okonkwo, C. S., Agbabiaka, J., Ogunwole, O., Mayo, W., & Okeke, O. T. (2020). Model for demurrage elimination and port logistics efficiency in emerging economies. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 1(5), 552-562. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMRGE.2020.1.5.552-562
[62] Okonkwo, C. S., Ogunwole, O., & Okeke, O. T. (2018a). Framework for strategic procurement optimization in oil and gas operations. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 1(7), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV1I7-1713119
[63] Okonkwo, C. S., Ogunwole, O., & Okeke, O. T. (2018b). Model for inventory availability and plant uptime improvement in energy facilities. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(4), 160-172. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I4-1713120
[64] Okonkwo, C. S., Ogunwole, O., Okeke, O. T., & Mayo, W. (2019). Conceptual framework for cost reduction through contract negotiation and vendor governance. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(9), 468-482. https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I9-1713121
[65] Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme. (2018). Guide to good manufacturing practice for medicinal products (PE 009-14). PIC/S.
[66] Rasmussen, J. (1997). Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem. Safety Science, 27(2-3), 183-213.
[67] Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge University Press.
[68] Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate.
[69] Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan.
[70] Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99-118.
[71] Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493-513.
[72] Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280-285.
[73] Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68-76.
[74] Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution (2nd ed.). ASQ Quality Press.
[75] Sunday, E. A., Omoegun, G. O., Essien, M. A., & Oluokun, O. A. (2020). Transitioning from reactive to predictive maintenance in mechanical systems. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 6(6), 425-447.
[76] Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
[77] Vesper, J. L. (2006). Risk assessment and risk management in the pharmaceutical industry: Clear and simple. PDA and DHI Publishing.
[78] World Health Organization. (2013). WHO guidelines on quality risk management. In WHO Technical Report Series No. 981, Annex 2. WHO.
[79] World Health Organization. (2014). WHO good manufacturing practices for pharmaceutical products: Main principles. In WHO Technical Report Series No. 986, Annex 2. WHO.
How to cite this paper
@article{1719693,
author = {Oluchi Beatrice Aneke, Abimbola Caleb Adesemoye},
title = {A Conceptual Framework for Risk-Based Decision-Making in Good Manufacturing Practice Environments},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2020},
volume = {4},
number = {6},
pages = {325-342},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719693.pdf},
abstract = {Decision-making in Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) environments is increasingly expected to be risk-based, yet the regulatory expectation is articulated far more clearly than the means of meeting it. Practitioners are instructed to manage risk and to allocate effort in proportion to the threat posed to product quality and patient safety, but the published guidance describes principles and tools rather than an integrated account of how risk evidence becomes a defensible decision. This paper develops a conceptual framework that links established quality risk management practice to the wider theory of decision-making under uncertainty. The framework is organized as five interacting layers. A contextual foundation grounds every decision in regulatory mandate, product and process knowledge, and organizational culture. A risk intelligence layer converts hazards into characterized, evaluated risk. A decision logic layer applies explicit criteria, tolerance thresholds, and a principle of proportionality to appraise options. A governance layer assigns decision rights, escalation routes, and documented rationale. A learning layer feeds outcomes back into knowledge and recalibrates the framework over time. The framework treats the risk matrix not as the decision itself but as one input to a structured judgement, and it incorporates well-documented limits on human reasoning so that decisions remain auditable and resistant to bias. The result is a coherent, lifecycle-oriented structure that practitioners can use to design decision processes, that quality leaders can use to evaluate the maturity of those processes, and that researchers can use as a basis for empirical study. The framework is conceptual and is offered as a foundation for subsequent validation in operating manufacturing settings.},
keywords = {Quality Risk Management, Risk-Based Decision-Making, Good Manufacturing Practice, Pharmaceutical Quality System, Proportionality, Decision Under Uncertainty, Conceptual Framework},
month = {December},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV4I6-1719693}
}