International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719703

1719703 Vol 10 · Issue 1 Download Paper

Techno-Economic Feasibility of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Incineration for Electricity Generation in Kaduna Metropolis, Nigeria

Modibbo Saleh Haruna Sani Umar Muhammad Atiku Ibrahim Abdulrahman

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Thermofluid and Energy Engineering

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719703

Abstract

Kaduna Metropolis faces escalating municipal solid waste (MSW) challenges driven by rapid urbanization and population growth, projected to exceed 1.7 million by 2040. This study presents a comprehensive techno-economic feasibility assessment of incineration as the primary waste-to-energy (WtE) technology for electricity generation. Leveraging secondary data, the analysis employs an exponential population growth model (base population of 1,133,600 in 2022 at 2.5% annual growth rate) and a per capita waste generation rate of 0.44 kg/capita/day with 40% collection efficiency. Consequently, total MSW generation is forecasted to increase from approximately 182,056 tons in 2022 to 283,945 tons in 2040, with collected volumes rising from 72,822 tons to 113,578 tons annually. Proximate and ultimate analyses of Kaduna’s MSW reveal a high organic fraction (~53.5% food waste) and a low lower heating value (LHV) of approximately 4.12 MJ/kg. Energy recovery modeling for a grate-fired incineration plant coupled with a steam turbine (electrical efficiency ~22%, capacity factor 80%) estimates potential electricity generation of 12.19 GWh in 2022, scaling to 19.13 GWh by 2040. Exergy analysis indicates an overall system efficiency of ~3.56%, with the incinerator responsible for approximately 91% of total exergy destruction, primarily due to combustion irreversibilities. Economic evaluation using net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and levelized cost of energy (LCOE) under base-case assumptions (capital investment of USD 80–120 million for a 10–20 MW facility, electricity tariff of USD 0.12/kWh, 20-year lifespan, and 10% discount rate) suggests marginal viability. However, incorporating co-combustion with local agricultural residues, tipping fees, and carbon credits substantially enhances financial performance. Sensitivity analysis underscores collection efficiency and feedstock LHV as the most influential variables. The study concludes that MSW incineration offers a viable pathway for addressing Kaduna’s intertwined waste management and energy security challenges when integrated with source separation, pre-treatment, and supportive policies. Recommendations include pilot-scale implementation, public-private partnerships, and regulatory incentives to promote sustainable WtE deployment in medium-sized Nigerian cities.

Keywords

Municipal Solid Waste, Incineration, Waste-To-Energy, Techno-Economic Feasibility, Exergy Analysis, Kaduna Metropolis, Nigeria

References

[1] Ugwoke, B., Gershon, O., Becchio, C., Corgnati, S. P., & Leone, P. (2020). A review of Nigerian energy access studies: the story told so far. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 120, p. 109646.

[2] International Energy Agency (IEA). (2022). Nigeria. Retrieved March 25, 2023, from https://www.iea.org/countries/nigeria.

[3] The Economist. (2022, November 3). Africa will remain poor unless it uses more energy. Retrieved March 12, 2023 from https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2022/11/03/africa-will-remain-poor-unless-it-uses-more-energy.

[4] Somorin, T. O., Adesola, S., & Kolawole, A. (2017). State-level assessment of the waste-to-energy potential (via incineration) of municipal solid wastes in Nigeria. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 164, pp. 804-815.

[5] Hoornweg, D., & Bhada-Tata, P. (2012). What a Waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management. Washington, DC, USA: Urban Development & Local Government Unit, World Bank.

[6] Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., & Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.

[7] Guoyan, S., Khaskheli, A., Raza, S. A., & Ahmed, M. (2022). Nonlinear impact of municipal solid waste recycling and energy efficiency on environmental performance and economic growth: evidence from non-parametric causality-in-quantiles. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 29, pp. 16066-16081.

[8] Onwosi, C., Igbokwe, V., Odimba, J., Eke, I., Nwankwoala, M., Iroh, I., & Ezeogu, L. (2017). Composting technology in waste stabilization: on the methods, challenges and future prospects. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 190, pp. 140-157.

[9] Adipah, S., & Kwame, O. N. (2019). A novel introduction of municipal solid waste management. Journal of Environmental Science and Public Health, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 147-157.

[10] Harvey, F. (2019, May 14). Mismanaged waste 'kills up to a million people a year globally'. Retrieved February 21, 2024 from https://amp.theguardian.com/environment/2019/may/14/mismanaged-waste-kills-up-to-a-million-people-a-year-globally

[11] Jaunich, M. K., Levis, J. W., De Carolis, J. F., Barlaz, M. A., Bartelt-Hunt, S. L., Jones, E. G., & Jaikumar, R. (2016). Characterization of municipal solid waste collection operations. Resources, no. 114, pp. 92-102.

[12] Nhubu, T., Muzenda, E., Mbohwa, C., & Agbenyeku, E. O. (2019). Comparative assessment of composting and anaerobic digestion of municipal biodegradable waste in Harare, Zimbabwe. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, vol. 14, p. 13293.

[13] Amuda, O. S., Adebisi, S. A., Ajimoda, L. A., & Alade, A. O. (2014). Challenges and possible panacea to the municipal solid wastes management in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Studies, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 64-70.

[14] Ezeah, C., & Roberts, C. L. (2012). Analysis of barriers and success factors affecting the adoption of sustainable management of municipal solid waste in Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 103, pp. 9-14.

[15] Nnaji, C. (2015). Status of municipal solid waste generation and disposal in Nigeria. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 53-71.

[16] Nzeadibe, T. C., & Ejike-Alieje, A. U. (2020). Solid waste management during COVID-19 pandemic: policy gaps and prospects for inclusive waste governance in Nigeria. Local Environment, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 527–535.

[17] Jones, G. A., & Hollier, G. (1997). Resources, Society and Environmental Management. SAGE Publications Ltd.

[18] Hadidi, L. A., & Omer, M. M. (2016). A financial feasibility model of gasification and anaerobic digestion waste-to-energy (WTE) plants in Saudi Arabia. Waste Management, Vol. 59, pp. 90-101.

[19] Yao, Z., Qi, W., & Francisco Alves, J. L. (2023). Editorial for the special issue on the environmentally friendly management and treatment of solid waste to approach zero waste city. Sustainability, vol. 15, p. 826.

[20] Iqbal, A., Yasar, A., Nizami, A.-S., Sharif, F., Tabinda, A. B., Sultan, I. A., . . . Ahmad, M. (2023). Evolution of solid waste management system in Lahore: A step towards sustainability of the sector in Pakistan. Applied Sciences, vol. 13, p. 983.

[21] Gour, A. A., & Singh, S. K. (2023). Solid waste management in India: a state-of-the-art review. Environmental Engineering Research, vol. 28, no. 4, p. 220249.

[22] Kumar, A., & Agrawal, A. (2020). Recent trends in solid waste management status, challenges, and potential for the future Indian cities-a review. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 2, p. 100011.

[23] Zhao, X.-g., Jiang, G.-w., Li, A., & Wang, L. (2015). Economic analysis of waste-to-energy industry in China. Waste Management, vol. 68, pp. 604-618.

[24] Purmessur, B., & Surroop, D. (2019). Power generation using landfill gas generated from new cell at the existing landfill site. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 7, p. 103060.

[25] Andriani, D., & Atmaja, T. D. (2019). The potentials of landfill gas production: a review of municpal solid waste management in Indonesia. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, vol. 21, pp. 1572–1586

How to cite this paper

Modibbo Saleh Haruna, Sani Umar Muhammad, Atiku Ibrahim Abdulrahman "Techno-Economic Feasibility of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Incineration for Electricity Generation in Kaduna Metropolis, Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 1 2026 Page 1142-1149 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719703
Modibbo Saleh Haruna, Sani Umar Muhammad, Atiku Ibrahim Abdulrahman "Techno-Economic Feasibility of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Incineration for Electricity Generation in Kaduna Metropolis, Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 1, Jul. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719703
Modibbo Saleh Haruna, Sani Umar Muhammad, Atiku Ibrahim Abdulrahman (2026). Techno-Economic Feasibility of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Incineration for Electricity Generation in Kaduna Metropolis, Nigeria. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719703
Modibbo Saleh Haruna, Sani Umar Muhammad, Atiku Ibrahim Abdulrahman "Techno-Economic Feasibility of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Incineration for Electricity Generation in Kaduna Metropolis, Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 1, Jul. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719703
@article{1719703,
      author = {Modibbo Saleh Haruna, Sani Umar Muhammad, Atiku Ibrahim Abdulrahman},
      title = {Techno-Economic Feasibility of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Incineration for Electricity Generation in Kaduna Metropolis, Nigeria},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1142-1149},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719703.pdf},
      abstract = {Kaduna Metropolis faces escalating municipal solid waste (MSW) challenges driven by rapid urbanization and population growth, projected to exceed 1.7 million by 2040. This study presents a comprehensive techno-economic feasibility assessment of incineration as the primary waste-to-energy (WtE) technology for electricity generation. Leveraging secondary data, the analysis employs an exponential population growth model (base population of 1,133,600 in 2022 at 2.5% annual growth rate) and a per capita waste generation rate of 0.44 kg/capita/day with 40% collection efficiency. Consequently, total MSW generation is forecasted to increase from approximately 182,056 tons in 2022 to 283,945 tons in 2040, with collected volumes rising from 72,822 tons to 113,578 tons annually. Proximate and ultimate analyses of Kaduna’s MSW reveal a high organic fraction (~53.5% food waste) and a low lower heating value (LHV) of approximately 4.12 MJ/kg. Energy recovery modeling for a grate-fired incineration plant coupled with a steam turbine (electrical efficiency ~22%, capacity factor 80%) estimates potential electricity generation of 12.19 GWh in 2022, scaling to 19.13 GWh by 2040. Exergy analysis indicates an overall system efficiency of ~3.56%, with the incinerator responsible for approximately 91% of total exergy destruction, primarily due to combustion irreversibilities. Economic evaluation using net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and levelized cost of energy (LCOE) under base-case assumptions (capital investment of USD 80–120 million for a 10–20 MW facility, electricity tariff of USD 0.12/kWh, 20-year lifespan, and 10% discount rate) suggests marginal viability. However, incorporating co-combustion with local agricultural residues, tipping fees, and carbon credits substantially enhances financial performance. Sensitivity analysis underscores collection efficiency and feedstock LHV as the most influential variables. The study concludes that MSW incineration offers a viable pathway for addressing Kaduna’s intertwined waste management and energy security challenges when integrated with source separation, pre-treatment, and supportive policies. Recommendations include pilot-scale implementation, public-private partnerships, and regulatory incentives to promote sustainable WtE deployment in medium-sized Nigerian cities.},
      keywords = {Municipal Solid Waste, Incineration, Waste-To-Energy, Techno-Economic Feasibility, Exergy Analysis, Kaduna Metropolis, Nigeria},
      month = {July},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719703}
  }