Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719750
Principals’ Capacity Building Strategies and Students’ Academic Performance in Public Secondary Schools in Bungoma Central Sub-County, Kenya
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Educational Planning and Management
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719750
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate principals’ capacity building strategies on students’ academic performance in public secondary schools in Bungoma Central Sub-County, Kenya. Persistent poor performance in the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) in the sub-county, despite the emphasis placed on quality education under the National Education Sector Strategic Plan (2023-2024), prompted an inquiry into how principals’ professional development initiatives for teachers influenced learner outcomes. The study adopted a descriptive survey design anchored on the Human Relations Theory and targeted a population of 11,238 respondents comprising 47 principals, 699 teachers and 10,492 students in 47 public secondary schools. Using Cochran and Yamane’s (1967) formula at a 95% confidence level, a sample of 386 respondents was drawn, and data were collected using questionnaires and interview schedules, achieving a 94% response rate (321 respondents). Descriptive findings established that 83.2% of respondents confirmed that principals organized professional development programmes for teachers, with in-service training workshops (87.6%) and peer learning sessions (79.4%) being the most common activities, while 86.6% of respondents reported that capacity building had improved academic performance. Simple linear regression results revealed that capacity building had a statistically significant positive effect on students’ academic performance (β=0.468, t=9.649, p=0.000), explaining 21.9% of the variance in performance (R²=0.219, F=93.103, p=0.000). The null hypothesis that capacity building has no significant effect on students’ academic performance was consequently rejected. The study concluded that principals’ investment in structured, regular, and practice-oriented professional development for teachers is a critical lever for improving students’ academic achievement, and recommended that principals institutionalize termly capacity building programmes supported by adequate resources and follow-up mentorship.
Keywords
Academic Performance, Capacity Building, Professional Development, Staff Management Approaches, Teacher Training.
References
[1] D. Demers, Human resource management in educational institutions, Int. J. Educ. Manage., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 890-902, 2016.
[2] R. Eisenberger, R. Huntington, S. Hutchison, and D. Sowa, Perceived organizational support, J. Appl. Psychol., vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 500-507, 1986.
[3] L. Bierman, N. Fondas, and G. T. Milkovich, Human resource strategies for career development, Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 231-249, 2001.
[4] K. Leithwood and D. Jantzi, A review of transformational school leadership research, Leadership Policy Sch., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 177-199, 2005.
[5] M. Fullan, The Principal: Three Keys to Maximizing Impact. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2014.
[6] W. Wanjala, Principals' management strategies and teacher professional growth in Kenyan secondary schools, Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 121-133, 2019.
[7] L. Ogutu, Leadership styles and student academic performance in Gatundu North Sub-County, J. Educ. Hum. Develop., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 88-99, 2021.
[8] P. Sahlberg, Finnish Lessons: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press, 2011.
[9] D. Adams and C. Osei, Teacher performance appraisal and student outcomes in Ghanaian schools, Afr. J. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 112-124, 2016.
[10] S. Adeniyi, Teacher registration, certification and quality assurance in Nigerian secondary education, Niger. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 34-47, 2017.
[11] K. Leithwood, K. S. Louis, S. Anderson, and K. Wahlstrom, How Leadership Influences Student Learning. New York: Wallace Foundation, 2004.
[12] Teachers Service Commission (TSC), Report on teacher professional development in rural schools, Government of Kenya, 2018.
[13] F. Mugambi and R. Ochieng, Teacher deployment challenges in rural Kenyan schools, Kenya J. Educ. Plan., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 45-58, 2016.
[14] R. Achieng, Principal leadership and teacher motivation in Bungoma County secondary schools, J. Educ. Pract., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 55-63, 2019.
[15] J. Likoko, Resource mobilization and academic performance in secondary schools, Kenya, 2022.
[16] P. Njoroge, C. Wanjiru, and S. Kimani, Principal performance evaluation and students' academic achievement in Kenya, East Afr. J. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 66-77, 2019.
[17] L. R. Gay, G. E. Mills, and P. Airasian, Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications, 10th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2012.
[18] J. W. Best and J. V. Kahn, Research in Education, 10th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2016.
[19] C. R. Kothari, Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, 3rd ed. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers, 2016.
[20] T. Bush and D. Glover, School leadership models: What do we know?, Sch. Leadership Manage., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 553-571, 2014.
[21] J. Hattie, Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge, 2009.
[22] K. Leithwood, K. S. Louis, S. Anderson, and K. Wahlstrom, How leadership influences student learning, Wallace Found., 2004.
[23] O. M. Mugenda and A. G. Mugenda, Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press, 2003.
[24] L. Darling-Hammond, M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner, Effective teacher professional development, Learning Policy Inst., 2020.
[25] L. M. Desimone and M. S. Garet, Best practices in teachers' professional development in the United States, Psychol. Soc. Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 25-39, 2021.
[26] A. Popova, D. K. Evans, M. E. Breeding, and V. Arancibia, Teacher professional development around the world, World Bank Res. Obs., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 107-136, 2021.
[27] T. R. Guskey, Professional development and teacher change, Teachers Teach., vol. 27, no. 1-4, pp. 3-17, 2021.
[28] S. K. Mulwa and D. N. Kyalo, Human resource management practices and school performance in Kenya, Kenya J. Educ. Manage., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 40-55, 2020.
[29] P. Ndambuki, Instructional leadership and academic achievement in Kenyan secondary schools, East Afr. J. Educ. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 22-35, 2020.
[30] E. Omolo, Instructional supervision and teaching quality in Makueni County secondary schools, J. Educ. Leadership, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 78-90, 2021.
[31] E. Mayo, The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. New York: Macmillan, 1933.
[32] M. Ngware, P. Ndirangu, and G. Oketch, Teacher professional development and student achievement in Kenyan secondary schools, Int. J. Educ. Develop., vol. 42, pp. 1-10, 2015.
[33] W. Wanjala, Teacher collaboration and student performance in Kenyan secondary schools, Kenya J. Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 66-79, 2016.
[34] G. Oduro, Principal mentorship, evaluation, and student engagement in Kenya, Afr. J. Sch. Leadership, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 15-27, 2009.
How to cite this paper
@article{1719750,
author = {Masika Mectilidah, Dr. Simon Kipkenei, Dr. Peter Wamalwa},
title = {Principals’ Capacity Building Strategies and Students’ Academic Performance in Public Secondary Schools in Bungoma Central Sub-County, Kenya},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {1422-1430},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719750.pdf},
abstract = {The purpose of this study was to evaluate principals’ capacity building strategies on students’ academic performance in public secondary schools in Bungoma Central Sub-County, Kenya. Persistent poor performance in the Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) in the sub-county, despite the emphasis placed on quality education under the National Education Sector Strategic Plan (2023-2024), prompted an inquiry into how principals’ professional development initiatives for teachers influenced learner outcomes. The study adopted a descriptive survey design anchored on the Human Relations Theory and targeted a population of 11,238 respondents comprising 47 principals, 699 teachers and 10,492 students in 47 public secondary schools. Using Cochran and Yamane’s (1967) formula at a 95% confidence level, a sample of 386 respondents was drawn, and data were collected using questionnaires and interview schedules, achieving a 94% response rate (321 respondents). Descriptive findings established that 83.2% of respondents confirmed that principals organized professional development programmes for teachers, with in-service training workshops (87.6%) and peer learning sessions (79.4%) being the most common activities, while 86.6% of respondents reported that capacity building had improved academic performance. Simple linear regression results revealed that capacity building had a statistically significant positive effect on students’ academic performance (β=0.468, t=9.649, p=0.000), explaining 21.9% of the variance in performance (R²=0.219, F=93.103, p=0.000). The null hypothesis that capacity building has no significant effect on students’ academic performance was consequently rejected. The study concluded that principals’ investment in structured, regular, and practice-oriented professional development for teachers is a critical lever for improving students’ academic achievement, and recommended that principals institutionalize termly capacity building programmes supported by adequate resources and follow-up mentorship.},
keywords = {Academic Performance, Capacity Building, Professional Development, Staff Management Approaches, Teacher Training.},
month = {July},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719750}
}