International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719865

1719865 Vol 10 · Issue 1 Download Paper

Global Islamic Terrorism and Its Implications: A Cautionary Framework for Nigeria’s Security and Governance

Joel Bulus Daniel Nandom Joel Gushi

Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities  ·  Area of research: Religious Philosophy and Ethics

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719865

Abstract

Global Islamic terrorism, as exemplified by al-Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban, and their regional affiliates, continues to pose severe challenges to state security, governance, and human rights in the 21st century. This paper examines the structural dynamics of global Islamic terrorism and their implications for Nigeria, with a particular focus on Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP). Using a qualitative document-analysis methodology, the study draws on peer-reviewed scholarship, institutional reports, and policy documents to develop a theoretically grounded comparative framework. The analysis is guided by two complementary theories: State Fragility Theory, which explains how weak institutions and governance deficits create conditions for extremist exploitation, and Relative Deprivation Theory, which accounts for the socioeconomic grievances that fuel radicalization. Through comparative case studies of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, the paper demonstrates that military-centric counterterrorism strategies are insufficient without parallel governance reforms and socioeconomic inclusion. Applied to Nigeria, these findings reveal that the persistence of Boko Haram and ISWAP reflects institutional weakness, corruption, and entrenched inequality rather than ideological factors alone. Nigeria's 2025 redesignation as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) by the United States further underscores the reputational and diplomatic consequences of governance failure. The paper concludes with a holistic policy framework emphasizing regional intelligence cooperation, institutional accountability, expanded deradicalization programs, and socioeconomic investment as essential pillars of a sustainable counterterrorism strategy.

Keywords

Islamic Terrorism, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram, ISWAP, Nigeria.

How to cite this paper

Joel Bulus Daniel, Nandom Joel Gushi "Global Islamic Terrorism and Its Implications: A Cautionary Framework for Nigeria’s Security and Governance" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 1, Jul. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719865
Joel Bulus Daniel, Nandom Joel Gushi (2026). Global Islamic Terrorism and Its Implications: A Cautionary Framework for Nigeria’s Security and Governance. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719865
Joel Bulus Daniel, Nandom Joel Gushi "Global Islamic Terrorism and Its Implications: A Cautionary Framework for Nigeria’s Security and Governance" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 1, Jul. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719865
@article{1719865,
      author = {Joel Bulus Daniel, Nandom Joel Gushi},
      title = {Global Islamic Terrorism and Its Implications: A Cautionary Framework for Nigeria’s Security and Governance},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1708-1720},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719865.pdf},
      abstract = {Global Islamic terrorism, as exemplified by al-Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban, and their regional affiliates, continues to pose severe challenges to state security, governance, and human rights in the 21st century. This paper examines the structural dynamics of global Islamic terrorism and their implications for Nigeria, with a particular focus on Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP). Using a qualitative document-analysis methodology, the study draws on peer-reviewed scholarship, institutional reports, and policy documents to develop a theoretically grounded comparative framework. The analysis is guided by two complementary theories: State Fragility Theory, which explains how weak institutions and governance deficits create conditions for extremist exploitation, and Relative Deprivation Theory, which accounts for the socioeconomic grievances that fuel radicalization. Through comparative case studies of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, the paper demonstrates that military-centric counterterrorism strategies are insufficient without parallel governance reforms and socioeconomic inclusion. Applied to Nigeria, these findings reveal that the persistence of Boko Haram and ISWAP reflects institutional weakness, corruption, and entrenched inequality rather than ideological factors alone. Nigeria's 2025 redesignation as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) by the United States further underscores the reputational and diplomatic consequences of governance failure. The paper concludes with a holistic policy framework emphasizing regional intelligence cooperation, institutional accountability, expanded deradicalization programs, and socioeconomic investment as essential pillars of a sustainable counterterrorism strategy.},
      keywords = {Islamic Terrorism, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram, ISWAP, Nigeria.},
      month = {July},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719865}
  }