Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719865
Global Islamic Terrorism and Its Implications: A Cautionary Framework for Nigeria’s Security and Governance
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Religious Philosophy and Ethics
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719865
Abstract
Global Islamic terrorism, as exemplified by al-Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban, and their regional affiliates, continues to pose severe challenges to state security, governance, and human rights in the 21st century. This paper examines the structural dynamics of global Islamic terrorism and their implications for Nigeria, with a particular focus on Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP). Using a qualitative document-analysis methodology, the study draws on peer-reviewed scholarship, institutional reports, and policy documents to develop a theoretically grounded comparative framework. The analysis is guided by two complementary theories: State Fragility Theory, which explains how weak institutions and governance deficits create conditions for extremist exploitation, and Relative Deprivation Theory, which accounts for the socioeconomic grievances that fuel radicalization. Through comparative case studies of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, the paper demonstrates that military-centric counterterrorism strategies are insufficient without parallel governance reforms and socioeconomic inclusion. Applied to Nigeria, these findings reveal that the persistence of Boko Haram and ISWAP reflects institutional weakness, corruption, and entrenched inequality rather than ideological factors alone. Nigeria's 2025 redesignation as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) by the United States further underscores the reputational and diplomatic consequences of governance failure. The paper concludes with a holistic policy framework emphasizing regional intelligence cooperation, institutional accountability, expanded deradicalization programs, and socioeconomic investment as essential pillars of a sustainable counterterrorism strategy.
Keywords
Islamic Terrorism, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram, ISWAP, Nigeria.
References
[1] Aghedo, I., & Osumah, O. (2012). The Boko Haram uprising: How should Nigeria respond? Third World Quarterly, 33(5), 853–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.674701
[2] Bukarti, A. B. (2022, March). It’s a bit tricky: Exploring ISIS’s ties with Boko Haram.George Washington University Program on Extremism. https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/ISIS-Ties-with-Boko- Haram_Bukarti_March-2022.pdf
[3] Byman, D. (2015). Al Qaeda, the Islamic State, and the global jihadist movement: What Everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.
[4] Crenshaw, M. (2011). Explaining terrorism: Causes, processes, and consequences. Routledge.
[5] Gerges, F. A. (2016). ISIS: A history. Princeton University Press.
[6] Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton University Press.
[7] Human Rights Watch. (2019). Nigeria: Events of 2019. In World Report 2020. https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2020/country-chapters/nigeria
[8] Institute for Economics and Peace. (2023). Global terrorism index 2023: Measuring the impact of terrorism. Institute for Economics and Peace. https://www.visionofhumanity.org/maps/global-terrorism-index/
[9] International Crisis Group. (2023). Mitigating communal violence in Nigeria’s Middle Belt. https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/west-africa/nigeria
[10] Lister, C. (2015). The Syrian jihad: Al-Qaeda, the Islamic State and the evolution of an insurgency. Oxford University Press.
[11] Moghadam, A. (2017). Nexus of global jihad: Understanding cooperation among terrorist actors. Columbia University Press, New York.
[12] Ogunnubi, O., & Aja, U. (2022). Counterterrorism and governance in Nigeria: Rethinking the military-centric approach. African Security, 15(2), 112–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392206.2022.2057841
[13] Onuoha, F. (2014). Boko Haram and the evolving Salafi jihadist threat in Nigeria. Conflict, Security & Development, 14(2), 199–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2014.893575
[14] Open Doors. (2024). World watch list 2024: Nigeria country profile. https://www.opendoors.org/en-US/persecution/countries/nigeria
[15] Rotberg, R. I. (2004). When states fail: Causes and consequences. Princeton University Press.
[16] Sowale, A. O., & Aduloju, A. A. (2023). Deradicalization of repentant Boko Haram militants: Institutional dilemma between the victims and villains in northeast Nigeria. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 59(3), 847–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/09735984231184005
[17] Transparency International. (2023). Corruption Perceptions Index 2023. Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023
[18] Ugwueze, M. I., Ngwu, E. C., & Onuoha, F. C. (2022). Operation Safe Corridor program and Reintegration of ex-Boko Haram fighters in Nigeria. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 57(4), 712–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096211047996
[19] United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2020). Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene.http://hdr.undp.org/en/2020-report
[20] U.S. Department of State. (2025). Designation of countries of particular concern under the International Religious Freedom Act. https://www.state.gov/religiousfreedom
[21] Weimann, G. (2016). Terrorism in cyberspace: The next generation. Columbia University Press.
[22] Zenn, J. (2020). Unmasking Boko Haram: Exploring global jihad in Nigeria. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[23] Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. Wiley-Interscience.
[24] Zartman, I. W. (Ed.). (1995). Collapsed states: The disintegration and restoration of legitimate authority. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
How to cite this paper
@article{1719865,
author = {Joel Bulus Daniel, Nandom Joel Gushi},
title = {Global Islamic Terrorism and Its Implications: A Cautionary Framework for Nigeria’s Security and Governance},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {1708-1720},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719865.pdf},
abstract = {Global Islamic terrorism, as exemplified by al-Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban, and their regional affiliates, continues to pose severe challenges to state security, governance, and human rights in the 21st century. This paper examines the structural dynamics of global Islamic terrorism and their implications for Nigeria, with a particular focus on Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP). Using a qualitative document-analysis methodology, the study draws on peer-reviewed scholarship, institutional reports, and policy documents to develop a theoretically grounded comparative framework. The analysis is guided by two complementary theories: State Fragility Theory, which explains how weak institutions and governance deficits create conditions for extremist exploitation, and Relative Deprivation Theory, which accounts for the socioeconomic grievances that fuel radicalization. Through comparative case studies of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, the paper demonstrates that military-centric counterterrorism strategies are insufficient without parallel governance reforms and socioeconomic inclusion. Applied to Nigeria, these findings reveal that the persistence of Boko Haram and ISWAP reflects institutional weakness, corruption, and entrenched inequality rather than ideological factors alone. Nigeria's 2025 redesignation as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) by the United States further underscores the reputational and diplomatic consequences of governance failure. The paper concludes with a holistic policy framework emphasizing regional intelligence cooperation, institutional accountability, expanded deradicalization programs, and socioeconomic investment as essential pillars of a sustainable counterterrorism strategy.},
keywords = {Islamic Terrorism, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram, ISWAP, Nigeria.},
month = {July},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719865}
}