Global Islamic Terrorism and Its Implications: A Cautionary Framework for Nigeria’s Security and Governance

• Author(s): Joel Bulus Daniel; Nandom Joel Gushi
• Paper ID: 1719865
• Page: 1708-1720
• Published Date: 18-07-2026
• Published In: Iconic Research And Engineering Journals
• Publisher: IRE Journals
• e-ISSN: 2456-8880
• Volume/Issue: Volume 10 Issue 1 July-2026
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719865

Abstract

Global Islamic terrorism, as exemplified by al-Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban, and their regional affiliates, continues to pose severe challenges to state security, governance, and human rights in the 21st century. This paper examines the structural dynamics of global Islamic terrorism and their implications for Nigeria, with a particular focus on Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP). Using a qualitative document-analysis methodology, the study draws on peer-reviewed scholarship, institutional reports, and policy documents to develop a theoretically grounded comparative framework. The analysis is guided by two complementary theories: State Fragility Theory, which explains how weak institutions and governance deficits create conditions for extremist exploitation, and Relative Deprivation Theory, which accounts for the socioeconomic grievances that fuel radicalization. Through comparative case studies of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, the paper demonstrates that military-centric counterterrorism strategies are insufficient without parallel governance reforms and socioeconomic inclusion. Applied to Nigeria, these findings reveal that the persistence of Boko Haram and ISWAP reflects institutional weakness, corruption, and entrenched inequality rather than ideological factors alone. Nigeria's 2025 redesignation as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) by the United States further underscores the reputational and diplomatic consequences of governance failure. The paper concludes with a holistic policy framework emphasizing regional intelligence cooperation, institutional accountability, expanded deradicalization programs, and socioeconomic investment as essential pillars of a sustainable counterterrorism strategy.

Keywords

Islamic Terrorism, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram, ISWAP, Nigeria.

Citations

IRE Journals:
Joel Bulus Daniel, Nandom Joel Gushi "Global Islamic Terrorism and Its Implications: A Cautionary Framework for Nigeria’s Security and Governance" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 1 2026 Page 1708-1720 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719865

IEEE:
Joel Bulus Daniel, Nandom Joel Gushi "Global Islamic Terrorism and Its Implications: A Cautionary Framework for Nigeria’s Security and Governance" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 1, Jul. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719865

APA:
Joel Bulus Daniel, Nandom Joel Gushi (2026). Global Islamic Terrorism and Its Implications: A Cautionary Framework for Nigeria’s Security and Governance. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719865

MLA:
Joel Bulus Daniel, Nandom Joel Gushi "Global Islamic Terrorism and Its Implications: A Cautionary Framework for Nigeria’s Security and Governance" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 1, Jul. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719865

BibTeX

@article{1719865,
author = {Joel Bulus Daniel, Nandom Joel Gushi},
title = {Global Islamic Terrorism and Its Implications: A Cautionary Framework for Nigeria’s Security and Governance},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {1708-1720},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719865.pdf},
abstract = {Global Islamic terrorism, as exemplified by al-Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban, and their regional affiliates, continues to pose severe challenges to state security, governance, and human rights in the 21st century. This paper examines the structural dynamics of global Islamic terrorism and their implications for Nigeria, with a particular focus on Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP). Using a qualitative document-analysis methodology, the study draws on peer-reviewed scholarship, institutional reports, and policy documents to develop a theoretically grounded comparative framework. The analysis is guided by two complementary theories: State Fragility Theory, which explains how weak institutions and governance deficits create conditions for extremist exploitation, and Relative Deprivation Theory, which accounts for the socioeconomic grievances that fuel radicalization. Through comparative case studies of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, the paper demonstrates that military-centric counterterrorism strategies are insufficient without parallel governance reforms and socioeconomic inclusion. Applied to Nigeria, these findings reveal that the persistence of Boko Haram and ISWAP reflects institutional weakness, corruption, and entrenched inequality rather than ideological factors alone. Nigeria's 2025 redesignation as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC) by the United States further underscores the reputational and diplomatic consequences of governance failure. The paper concludes with a holistic policy framework emphasizing regional intelligence cooperation, institutional accountability, expanded deradicalization programs, and socioeconomic investment as essential pillars of a sustainable counterterrorism strategy.},
keywords = {Islamic Terrorism, Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Boko Haram, ISWAP, Nigeria.},
month = {July}
}