International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719893

1719893 Vol 10 · Issue 1 Download Paper

Dissecting The Structural Constraints On Ecowas as A Regional Security Provider, 2010-2025

Muhammad Idris JAPA Prof. P. T. Vande Dr. Z. B. Peterside

Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities  ·  Area of research: Political Science

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719893

Abstract

This article examines the structural constraints that have persistently limited the effectiveness of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) as a regional security provider between 2010 and 2025. The period under review culminated in an unprecedented institutional rupture: the formal withdrawal of Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger from ECOWAS in January 2025, following a cascade of military coups and the formation of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES). Drawing on qualitative data from twenty-five semi-structured interviews conducted at ECOWAS headquarters in Abuja with officials, government representatives, academics, and civil society actors, supplemented by thematic documentary analysis and current scholarship, the article maps three interrelated structural constraints and their interactive effects. These are: the resilience of state sovereignty norms that resist collective enforcement; chronic financing deficits that generate strategic dependence on external donors; and weak or inconsistent political will among member states. The article traces how these constraints operate as a mutually reinforcing cycle that produces the 'capability expectations gap' characterising ECOWAS's peace and security operations. It situates the ECOWAS experience within a comparative analysis of the African Union and the European Union, drawing on their respective experiences with internal financing and institutional design. The article concludes with a reform agenda centred on financial autonomy through innovative financing, incentive-differentiated compliance mechanisms, institutional mandate rationalisation, and pragmatic re-engagement with the AES states reforms that represent necessary, if not sufficient, conditions for ECOWAS to remain a credible and effective regional security architecture.

Keywords

Regional Security, ECOWAS, Financing Deficit, Political Will, Institutional Reform.

References

[1] Aning, K. (2024). Balancing the Economic Community of West African States: A tightrope between democracy and security (Occasional Paper 60). Accra: KAIPTC.

[2] Aning, K., & Bjarnesen, J. (2024). ECOWAS' dilemma: Balancing principles and pragmatism. NAI Policy Notes, No. 1. Uppsala: Nordic Africa Institute.

[3] Bowen, G. A. (2019). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

[4] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. London: SAGE.

[5] Breslawski, J., Cunningham, D., & Fleishman, M. (2023). Regional approaches to conflict prevention: The effectiveness of rhetorical and diplomatic tools. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 41(6), 627–648.

[6] Brooke-Holland, L. (2023). House of Commons Library. 2023 Niger Coup.

[7] de Coning, C. (2020). Adaptive peacebuilding in Africa. International Affairs, 96(2), 339–358.

[8] Deutsch, K. (1957). Political community and the North Atlantic area. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

[9] Ebimnamaonye, H. C. & Owhor, G. C. (2025). Regional security and state stability in West Africa 2011-2023. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD), 9(5), 393-464.

[10] ECOWAS Peace Fund. (2024). Five-Year Strategic Plan 2024–2028. Abuja: ECOWAS Commission.

[11] ECOWAS. (1975). Treaty of the Economic Community of West African States. Lagos: ECOWAS.

[12] ECOWAS. (1993). Revised Treaty of ECOWAS. Cotonou: ECOWAS.

[13] ECOWAS. (1999). Protocol Relating to the Mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Management, Resolution, Peacekeeping and Security. Lomé: ECOWAS.

[14] ECOWAS. (2001). Supplementary Protocol on Democracy and Good Governance. Dakar: ECOWAS.

[15] ECOWAS. (2008). ECOWAS Conflict Prevention Framework. Abuja: ECOWAS Commission.

[16] FAO. (2022). Forecast-based financing: Reducing disaster risk through early action. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.

[17] Haas, E. B. (1958). The uniting of Europe: Political, social, and economic forces. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

[18] Hettne, B., & Söderbaum, F. (2000). Theorising the rise of regionness. New Political Economy, 5(3), 457–473.

[19] IJRISS. (2026). From ECOWAS to the Alliance of Sahel States: Shifting security architectures in West Africa. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science.

[20] International Crisis Group. (2024). A splinter in the Sahel: Can the divorce with ECOWAS be averted? Brussels: ICG.

[21] ISS Africa. (2025, January 31). Africa's private sector boosts AU Peace Fund. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies.

[22] Megwalu, U., & Garba, A. (2024). Regional security cooperation for peace, stability and security: The ECOWAS experience. Journal of African Union Studies, 13(3), 123–146.

[23] Mitrany, D. (1943). A working peace system. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.

[24] Musa, A. (2009). West Africa: Governance and Security in a changing region. 1P1 Publications International Peace Institute.

[25] Obinna, G. S. & Okeh, G. C. (2025). ECOWAS and military interventions and political instability in West Africa: The Burkina Faso experience. Journal of Political Science and Leadership Research, 11(11), 21-32.

[26] Olubiyo, K. G., & Ayodele, I. A. (2024). Beyond sanctions: ECOWAS and the resurgence of military coups in West Africa. ABUAD Journal of Social and Management Sciences, 5(2), 341–357.

[27] Ronnback, A. (2008). ECOWAS and West Africa’s future problems and possibilities? Department of Political Science, Umea University Press.

[28] Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. (2026). The Sahel seeks sovereignty. Retrieved from https://thetricontinental.org

[29] UNU-CRIS. (2024). The EU's financing of regional peace and security architecture: Through the lens of ECOWAS. Bruges: United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies.

[30] USIP. (2024). Sahel coup regimes' split from ECOWAS risks instability in coastal West Africa. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.

[31] Williams, C. D. D. & Suryo, E. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of the ECOWAS protocol on democracy and good governance in preventing the resurgence of military coups in West Africa International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS) 15(1), 255-264.

[32] Williams, P. D. (2020). African regional organisations and security: Capacity, resources, and political will. Abingdon: Routledge.

[33] Zondi, S. (2020). Sovereignty, intervention, and ECOWAS: The evolving normative framework. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 14(3), 87–99.

How to cite this paper

Muhammad Idris JAPA, Prof. P. T. Vande, Dr. Z. B. Peterside "Dissecting The Structural Constraints On Ecowas as A Regional Security Provider, 2010-2025" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 1 2026 Page 3518-3526 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719893
Muhammad Idris JAPA, Prof. P. T. Vande, Dr. Z. B. Peterside "Dissecting The Structural Constraints On Ecowas as A Regional Security Provider, 2010-2025" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 1, Jul. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719893
Muhammad Idris JAPA, Prof. P. T. Vande, Dr. Z. B. Peterside (2026). Dissecting The Structural Constraints On Ecowas as A Regional Security Provider, 2010-2025. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719893
Muhammad Idris JAPA, Prof. P. T. Vande, Dr. Z. B. Peterside "Dissecting The Structural Constraints On Ecowas as A Regional Security Provider, 2010-2025" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 1, Jul. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719893
@article{1719893,
      author = {Muhammad Idris JAPA, Prof. P. T. Vande, Dr. Z. B. Peterside},
      title = {Dissecting The Structural Constraints On Ecowas as A Regional Security Provider, 2010-2025},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {1},
      pages = {3518-3526},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719893.pdf},
      abstract = {This article examines the structural constraints that have persistently limited the effectiveness of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) as a regional security provider between 2010 and 2025. The period under review culminated in an unprecedented institutional rupture: the formal withdrawal of Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger from ECOWAS in January 2025, following a cascade of military coups and the formation of the Alliance of Sahel States (AES). Drawing on qualitative data from twenty-five semi-structured interviews conducted at ECOWAS headquarters in Abuja with officials, government representatives, academics, and civil society actors, supplemented by thematic documentary analysis and current scholarship, the article maps three interrelated structural constraints and their interactive effects. These are: the resilience of state sovereignty norms that resist collective enforcement; chronic financing deficits that generate strategic dependence on external donors; and weak or inconsistent political will among member states. The article traces how these constraints operate as a mutually reinforcing cycle that produces the 'capability expectations gap' characterising ECOWAS's peace and security operations. It situates the ECOWAS experience within a comparative analysis of the African Union and the European Union, drawing on their respective experiences with internal financing and institutional design. The article concludes with a reform agenda centred on financial autonomy through innovative financing, incentive-differentiated compliance mechanisms, institutional mandate rationalisation, and pragmatic re-engagement with the AES states reforms that represent necessary, if not sufficient, conditions for ECOWAS to remain a credible and effective regional security architecture.},
      keywords = {Regional Security, ECOWAS, Financing Deficit, Political Will, Institutional Reform. },
      month = {July},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719893}
  }