Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719944
A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models for ESG Index Volatility Prediction
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Finance (ESG)
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I1-1719944
Abstract
The inclusion of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors has achieved recognition in investment strategies, influencing market dynamics and investor behavior. However, predicting the volatility of ESG indices presents additional complexities due to heightened sensitivity to various external macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. This study develops an structured computational framework by utilizing deep learning architectures namely Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to enhance ESG index volatility prediction. The models were rigorously evaluated using standard performance metrics and statistical validation through Welch’s t-tests to ensure robustness and reliability of outcomes. Experimental results indicate that the GRU model achieved superior performance compared to both LSTM and CNN, while achieving superior accuracy and interpretability. These results provide meaningful insights for both investors and researchers looking for data-driven strategies for ESG market forecasting.
Keywords
ESG Investing, ESG Indices, Deep Learning, Volatility Prediction, Machine Learning
References
[1] Akhtaruzzaman, M., Boubaker, S., & Umar, Z. (2022). COVID–19 media coverage and ESG leader indices. Finance Research Letters, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102170
[2] Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., & Zhang, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science, 65(10), 4451–4469. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043
[3] Behl, A., Kumari, P. S. R., Makhija, H., & Sharma, D. (2022). Exploring the relationship of ESG score and firm value using cross-lagged panel analyses: case of the Indian energy sector. Annals of Operations Research, 313(1), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04189-8
[4] Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T. W., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
[5] Cho, P., & Lee, M. (2022). Forecasting the Volatility of the Stock Index with Deep Learning Using Asymmetric Hurst Exponents. Fractal and Fractional, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6070394
[6] Dalal, K. K., & Thaker, N. (2019). ESG and Corporate Financial Performance: A Panel Study of Indian Companies.
[7] Endri, E., Aipama, W., Razak, A., Sari, L., & Septiano, R. (2021). Stock price volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic: The GARCH model. In Investment Management and Financial Innovations (Vol. 18, Issue 4, pp. 12–20). LLC CPC Business Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(4).2021.02
[8] Espahbodi, L., Espahbodi, R., Juma, N., & Westbrook, A. (2019). Sustainability priorities, corporate strategy, and investor behavior. Review of Financial Economics, 37(1), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1052
[9] Gangi, F., Varrone, N., Daniele, L. M., & Coscia, M. (2022). Mainstreaming socially responsible investment: Do environmental, social and governance ratings of investment funds converge? Journal of Cleaner Production, 353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131684
[10] Guo, T., Jamet, N., Betrix, V., Piquet, L.-A., & Hauptmann, E. (2020). ESG2Risk: A Deep Learning Framework from ESG News to Stock Volatility Prediction. http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02527
[11] Khalil, M. A., & Nimmanunta, K. (2023). Conventional versus green investments: advancing innovation for better financial and environmental prospects. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 13(3), 1153–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1952822
[12] Khan, M. (2019). Corporate Governance, ESG, and Stock Returns around the World. Financial Analysts Journal, 75(4), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1654299
[13] Kim, H. Y., & Won, C. H. (2018). Forecasting the volatility of stock price index: A hybrid model integrating LSTM with multiple GARCH-type models. Expert Systems with Applications, 103, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.002
[14] Koo, E., & Kim, G. (2022). A Hybrid Prediction Model Integrating GARCH Models With a Distribution Manipulation Strategy Based on LSTM Networks for Stock Market Volatility. IEEE Access, 10, 34743–34754. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3163723
[15] Koo, E., & Kim, G. (2023). A New Neural Network Approach for Predicting the Volatility of Stock Market. Computational Economics, 61(4), 1665–1679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-022-10261-7
[16] Lin, S. L., & Jin, X. (2023). Does ESG Predict Systemic Banking Crises? A Computational Economics Model of Early Warning Systems with Interpretable Multi-Variable LSTM based on Mixture Attention. Mathematics, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020410
[17] Lin, Z. (2018). Modelling and forecasting the stock market volatility of SSE Composite Index using GARCH models. Future Generation Computer Systems, 79, 960–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2017.08.033
[18] Lu, X., Ma, F., Wang, J., & Dong, D. (2022). Singlehanded or joint race? Stock market volatility prediction. International Review of Economics and Finance, 80, 734–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.03.007
[19] Mittnik, S., Robinzonov, N., & Spindler, M. (2015). Stock market volatility: Identifying major drivers and the nature of their impact. Journal of Banking and Finance, 58, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.04.003
[20] Mousa, M., Saleem, A., & Sági, J. (2022). Are esg shares a safe haven during covid-19? Evidence from the arab region. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010208
[21] Nabipour, M., Nayyeri, P., Jabani, H., Shahab, S., & Mosavi, A. (2020). Predicting Stock Market Trends Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms Via Continuous and Binary Data; A Comparative Analysis. IEEE Access, 8, 150199–150212. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3015966
[22] Raman, N., Bang, G., & Nourbakhsh, A. (2020). Mapping ESG Trends by Distant Supervision of Neural Language Models. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 2(4), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.3390/make2040025
[23] Sen, J. (2018). Stock Price Prediction Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Frameworks XXX-X-XXXX-XXXX-X/XX/$XX.00 ©20XX IEEE Stock Price Prediction Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Frameworks. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328873189
[24] Sultana, S., Zulkifli, N., & Zainal, D. (2018). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) and investment decision in Bangladesh. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061831
[25] Umar, Z., & Gubareva, M. (2021). The relationship between the Covid-19 media coverage and the Environmental, Social and Governance leaders equity volatility: a time-frequency wavelet analysis. Applied Economics, 53(27), 3193–3206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1877252
[26] Wang, Z., Hong, T., & Piette, M. A. (2020). Building thermal load prediction through shallow machine learning and deep learning. Applied Energy, 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114683
[27] Yong, J. N. C., Ziaei, S. M., & Szulczyk, K. R. (2021). The impact of covid-19 pandemic on stock market return volatility: Evidence from Malaysia and Singapore. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 11(3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.18488/JOURNAL.AEFR.2021.113.191.204
[28] Yu, X., & Xiao, K. (2022). Does ESG Performance Affect Firm Value? Evidence from a New ESG-Scoring Approach for Chinese Enterprises. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416940
[29] Zhou, D., & Zhou, R. (2022). Esg performance and stock price volatility in public health crisis: Evidence from covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010202
How to cite this paper
@article{1719944,
author = {Priya Rani},
title = {A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models for ESG Index Volatility Prediction},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {2317-2329},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719944.pdf},
abstract = {The inclusion of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors has achieved recognition in investment strategies, influencing market dynamics and investor behavior. However, predicting the volatility of ESG indices presents additional complexities due to heightened sensitivity to various external macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. This study develops an structured computational framework by utilizing deep learning architectures namely Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to enhance ESG index volatility prediction. The models were rigorously evaluated using standard performance metrics and statistical validation through Welch’s t-tests to ensure robustness and reliability of outcomes. Experimental results indicate that the GRU model achieved superior performance compared to both LSTM and CNN, while achieving superior accuracy and interpretability. These results provide meaningful insights for both investors and researchers looking for data-driven strategies for ESG market forecasting.},
keywords = {ESG Investing, ESG Indices, Deep Learning, Volatility Prediction, Machine Learning},
month = {July},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719944}
}