Home / Current Issue / Paper 1720090
Comprehensive in Name, Selective in Practice: A Policy-Implementation Gap Analysis of Primary Health Care Service Delivery in Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
Subject area: Biological & Medical Sciences · Area of research: Public Health Policy Implementation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1720090
Abstract
Nigeria's adoption of the Comprehensive Primary Health Care (CPHC) framework at Alma-Ata (1978) committed the country to a universal, equitable package of integrated health services at the community level. The National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA) subsequently codified this commitment into minimum service standards mandating delivery of fifteen discrete PHC components across all facility types. Despite this comprehensive policy architecture, persistent gaps between policy mandate and service reality raise fundamental questions about implementation fidelity and governance quality. This study applies a policy-implementation gap framework to secondary data from a cross-sectional appraisal of 642 health workers across six Area Councils of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, Nigeria. Drawing on Pressman and Wildavsky's (1973) implementation gap theory, Rosenbloom's (2015) Trialectic of Public Administration, and Grindle's (1980) context of implementation, the study develops an original Service Gap Index (SGI) to categorize and explain differential implementation outcomes across all fifteen mandated PHC services. Results reveal a pronounced and systematic implementation gradient: eight services mandated by NPHCDA achieve near-full implementation (>90%), while mental health care (23.7%) and care of the elderly (43.0%) exhibit critical gaps of 76.3 and 57.0 percentage points respectively. The study argues that this gradient is not random but follows an institutional logic in which quantifiable, politically visible, and KPI-tracked services attract disproportionate managerial and political attention, while non-quantifiable and stigmatized services are systematically neglected. This constitutes a de facto reversion to Selective PHC despite official commitment to comprehensiveness. Policy recommendations center on revised performance management frameworks, dedicated budget lines for neglected services, and strengthened accountability mechanisms aligned with New Public Governance principles.
Keywords
Primary Health Care, Policy Implementation Gap, NPHCDA, Mental Health, Elderly Care, New Public Governance
References
[1] Abdulraheem, I.S. (2005). An opinion survey of caregivers concerning caring for the elderly in Ilorin metropolis, Nigeria. Public Health, 119(12), 1138-1144.
[2] Abdulraheem, I.S., & Parakoyi, D.B. (2005). Improving attitude towards elderly people: Evaluation of an intervention programme for caregivers. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 12(4), 280-285.
[3] Abdulraheem, I.S., Olapipo, A.R., & Amodu, M.O. (2012). Primary health care services in Nigeria: Critical issues and strategies for enhancing the use by the rural communities. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology, 4(1), 5-13.
[4] Adeyemo, D.O. (2005). Local government and health care delivery in Nigeria: A case study. Journal of Human Ecology, 18(2), 149-160.
[5] Asuzu, M.C., & Ogundeji, M.O. (2006). Minimum standards for primary health care services in Nigeria: Report of a consultancy assignment by the National Primary Health Care Development Agency. NPHCDA Draft Report.
[6] Baum, F. (2007). Health for all now: Reviving the spirit of Alma-Ata in the twenty-first century. Social Science, 2(1), 34-41.
[7] Bisht, R. (2013). Universal health care: The changing international discourse. Indian Journal of Public Health, 57(4), 236-241.
[8] Boslaugh, S. (2007). Secondary data sources for public health: A practical guide. Cambridge University Press.
[9] Buse, K., & Hawkes, S. (2015). Health in the sustainable development goals: Ready for a paradigm shift. Global Health, 11, 13.
[10] Dungy, C.I. (1979). Basic health services in Nigeria: Models for primary care in America. Journal of the National Medical Association, 71(7), 693-695.
[11] Goddard, M., Mannion, R., & Smith, P. (2000). Enhancing performance in health care: A theoretical perspective on agency and the role of information. Health Economics, 9(2), 95-107.
[12] Grindle, M.S. (1980). Politics and policy implementation in the Third World. Princeton University Press.
[13] Gureje, O., Nortje, G., Makanjuola, V., Oladeji, B., Seedat, S., & Jenkins, R. (2015). The role of global traditional and complementary systems of medicine in treating mental health problems. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2(2), 168-177.
[14] Hayday, S. (2003). Questions to measure commitment and job satisfaction. IES HR Network Paper MP19. Institute for Employment Studies.
[15] Iheanacho, T., Obiefune, M., Ezeanolue, C.O., Ogedegbe, G., Nwanyanwu, O.C., Ehiri, J.E. et al. (2015). Integrating mental health screening into routine community maternal and child health activity: Experience from Prevention of Mother-to-child HIV Transmission (PMTCT) trial in Nigeria. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 50(3), 489-495.
[16] Labonte, R., Sanders, D., Packer, C., & Schaay, N. (2014). Is the Alma-Ata vision of comprehensive primary health care viable: Findings from an international project. Global Health Action, 7(24997), 1-16.
[17] NURHI (2013). Rapid Abuja FCT: Building a thriving city that contributes to Nigeria's development success. Nigeria Urban Reproductive Health Initiative.
[18] Obembe, T.A., Osungbade, K.O., & Ibrahim, C. (2017). Appraisal of primary health care services in Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria: How committed are the health workers? Pan African Medical Journal, 28, 134.
[19] Osborne, S.P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387.
[20] Pressman, J.L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.
[21] Rao, M., & Pilot, E. (2014). The missing link: The role of primary care in global health. Global Health Action, 7(23693), S9-S12.
[22] Rosenbloom, D.H. (2015). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
[23] Sanders, D., Schaay, N., & Mohamed, S. (2008). Primary health care. In K. Heggenhougen & S. Quah (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Public Health, 5, 306.
[24] Scott-Emuakpor, A. (2010). The evolution of health care systems in Nigeria: Which way forward in the twenty-first century. Nigerian Medical Journal, 51(2), 53-65.
[25] Serneels, P., Montalvo, J.G., Pettersson, G., Lievens, T., Butera, J.D., & Kidanu, A. (2010). Who wants to work in a rural health post: The role of intrinsic motivation, rural background and faith-based institutions in Ethiopia and Rwanda. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 88(5), 342-349.
[26] Tangcharoensathien, V., Mills, A., & Palu, T. (2015). Accelerating health equity: The key role of universal health coverage in the sustainable development goals. BMC Medicine, 13, 101.
[27] Waage, J., Yap, C., Bell, S., Levy, C., Mace, G., & Pegram, T. et al. (2015). Governing the UN sustainable development goals: Interactions, infrastructures and institutions. The Lancet Global Health, 3(5), e251-252.
[28] WHO (2008). Integrating mental health into primary care: A global perspective. World Health Organization.
How to cite this paper
@article{1720090,
author = {Ekwugha, Uche Onyx},
title = {Comprehensive in Name, Selective in Practice: A Policy-Implementation Gap Analysis of Primary Health Care Service Delivery in Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {4144-4158},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1720090.pdf},
abstract = {Nigeria's adoption of the Comprehensive Primary Health Care (CPHC) framework at Alma-Ata (1978) committed the country to a universal, equitable package of integrated health services at the community level. The National Primary Health Care Development Agency (NPHCDA) subsequently codified this commitment into minimum service standards mandating delivery of fifteen discrete PHC components across all facility types. Despite this comprehensive policy architecture, persistent gaps between policy mandate and service reality raise fundamental questions about implementation fidelity and governance quality. This study applies a policy-implementation gap framework to secondary data from a cross-sectional appraisal of 642 health workers across six Area Councils of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja, Nigeria. Drawing on Pressman and Wildavsky's (1973) implementation gap theory, Rosenbloom's (2015) Trialectic of Public Administration, and Grindle's (1980) context of implementation, the study develops an original Service Gap Index (SGI) to categorize and explain differential implementation outcomes across all fifteen mandated PHC services. Results reveal a pronounced and systematic implementation gradient: eight services mandated by NPHCDA achieve near-full implementation (>90%), while mental health care (23.7%) and care of the elderly (43.0%) exhibit critical gaps of 76.3 and 57.0 percentage points respectively. The study argues that this gradient is not random but follows an institutional logic in which quantifiable, politically visible, and KPI-tracked services attract disproportionate managerial and political attention, while non-quantifiable and stigmatized services are systematically neglected. This constitutes a de facto reversion to Selective PHC despite official commitment to comprehensiveness. Policy recommendations center on revised performance management frameworks, dedicated budget lines for neglected services, and strengthened accountability mechanisms aligned with New Public Governance principles.},
keywords = {Primary Health Care, Policy Implementation Gap, NPHCDA, Mental Health, Elderly Care, New Public Governance},
month = {July},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1720090}
}