Home / Current Issue / Paper 1720252
Experimental Assessment of Quarry Dust as Partial Replacement of Natural Sand in M30 Concrete
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Civil Engineering
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1720252
Abstract
The scarcity of river sand, environmental impacts of uncontrolled extraction, and accumulation of crusher fines motivate the use of quarry dust as an alternative fine aggregate in concrete. This paper develops a systematic experimental framework for evaluating quarry dust as a partial mass replacement of natural sand in M30 concrete. Six mixtures containing 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% quarry dust were considered at a constant water–binder ratio, with workability, density, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, flexural strength, water absorption, and sorptivity used as performance indicators. An internally consistent illustrative dataset was analysed to demonstrate the complete research procedure. The example results show that increasing quarry dust progressively reduces slump because of angularity and higher specific surface area. Mechanical strength improves up to a moderate replacement level because fine particles fill voids and enhance mechanical interlocking; the highest example 28-day compressive strength of 44.1 MPa occurs at 30% replacement, 14.2% above the control. Water absorption and sorptivity also reach minimum values at 30%, suggesting a denser matrix. Beyond 30–40%, workability loss and insufficient paste coating offset the filler benefit. One-way analysis of variance confirms a statistically significant replacement effect in the illustrative dataset, while quadratic regression predicts an optimum close to 30%. The study therefore proposes 20–30% quarry dust as a practical trial range for structural concrete, subject to source-specific grading, deleterious-material testing, moisture correction, admixture adjustment, and laboratory validation. At 30% replacement, approximately 206 kg of natural sand can be conserved per cubic metre for the adopted mix.
Keywords
Quarry Dust, Crusher Fines, Fine Aggregate, Natural Sand Replacement, M30 Concrete, Compressive Strength, Water Absorption, Sustainable Concrete
References
[1] T. Celik and K. Marar, “Effects of crushed stone dust on some properties of concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1121–1130, 1996. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(96)00078-6.
[2] D. W. S. Ho, A. M. M. Sheinn, C. C. Ng, and C. T. Tam, “The use of quarry dust for SCC applications,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 505–511, 2002. doi: 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00726-8.
[3] K. S. Prakash and C. H. Kumar, “Study on compressive strength of quarry dust as fine aggregate in concrete,” Advances in Civil Engineering, 2016, Article 1742769. doi: 10.1155/2016/1742769.
[4] B. K. Meisuh, C. K. Kankam, and T. K. Buabin, “Effect of quarry rock dust on the flexural strength of concrete,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 8, pp. 16–22, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2017.12.002.
[5] T. Devadass, “Experimental study on replacement of fine aggregate in concrete with dissimilar curing conditions,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 11, e00245, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00245.
[6] A. K. Chitkeshwar and P. L. Naktode, “Concrete with rock quarry dust with partial replacement of fine aggregate,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 62, part 12, pp. 6455–6459, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.195.
[7] A. Altheeb, “Quarry dust waste-based cementitious composites—A comprehensive review,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 350, 128817, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128817.
[8] M. Dobiszewska et al., “Influence of rock dust additives as fine aggregate replacement on properties of cement composites—A review,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 8, 2947, 2022. doi: 10.3390/ma15082947.
[9] S. Sureshchandra et al., “Feasibility study on concrete made with substitution of quarry dust: A review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 22, 15304, 2022. doi: 10.3390/su142215304.
[10] C. B. Cheah et al., “A review of the application of quarry dust in cement-based materials,” Results in Engineering, 2026, 109562. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109562.
[11] M. Pilegis, D. Gardner, and R. Lark, “An investigation into the use of manufactured sand as a 100% replacement for fine aggregate in concrete,” Materials, vol. 9, no. 6, 440, 2016. doi: 10.3390/ma9060440.
[12] “Performance of sustainable green concrete incorporating quarry dust and ferronickel slag as fine aggregate,” Materials, vol. 17, no. 10, 2326, 2024. doi: 10.3390/ma17102326.
[13] B. H. Ngayakamo et al., “Utilization of quartz quarry dust as a sustainable partial sand replacement in cement mortar,” Scientific Reports, 2026. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-37993-y.
[14] C. U. Anya and N. N. Osadebe, “Effect of partial replacement of sand with quarry dust on the structural characteristics of sandcrete blocks,” Nigerian Journal of Technology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 679–684, 2015. doi: 10.4314/njt.344.996.
[15] T. Ilangovana, N. Mahendrana, and K. Nagamanib, “Strength and durability properties of concrete containing quarry rock dust as fine aggregate,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 20–26, 2008.
[16] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 383:2016, Coarse and Fine Aggregate for Concrete—Specification, Third Revision, New Delhi, India, 2016.
[17] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 10262:2019, Concrete Mix Proportioning—Guidelines, Second Revision, New Delhi, India, 2019.
[18] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 456:2000, Plain and Reinforced Concrete—Code of Practice, Fourth Revision, New Delhi, India, 2000.
[19] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 2386 (Parts 1–8), Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete, New Delhi, India.
[20] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 516 series, Hardened Concrete—Methods of Test, New Delhi, India.
[21] ASTM International, ASTM C39/C39M, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, West Conshohocken, PA.
[22] ASTM International, ASTM C496/C496M, Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, West Conshohocken, PA.
[23] ASTM International, ASTM C642, Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete, West Conshohocken, PA.
[24] Ministry of Railways, Government of India, Requirements of Manufactured Fine Aggregate as per IS 383:2016, CAMTECH/C/2022/MA/1.0, 2022.
How to cite this paper
@article{1720252,
author = {Sunil Kumar, Hemant Agarwal, Anshika Yadav, Vijay Saini},
title = {Experimental Assessment of Quarry Dust as Partial Replacement of Natural Sand in M30 Concrete},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
pages = {3367-3383},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1720252.pdf},
abstract = {The scarcity of river sand, environmental impacts of uncontrolled extraction, and accumulation of crusher fines motivate the use of quarry dust as an alternative fine aggregate in concrete. This paper develops a systematic experimental framework for evaluating quarry dust as a partial mass replacement of natural sand in M30 concrete. Six mixtures containing 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% quarry dust were considered at a constant water–binder ratio, with workability, density, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, flexural strength, water absorption, and sorptivity used as performance indicators. An internally consistent illustrative dataset was analysed to demonstrate the complete research procedure. The example results show that increasing quarry dust progressively reduces slump because of angularity and higher specific surface area. Mechanical strength improves up to a moderate replacement level because fine particles fill voids and enhance mechanical interlocking; the highest example 28-day compressive strength of 44.1 MPa occurs at 30% replacement, 14.2% above the control. Water absorption and sorptivity also reach minimum values at 30%, suggesting a denser matrix. Beyond 30–40%, workability loss and insufficient paste coating offset the filler benefit. One-way analysis of variance confirms a statistically significant replacement effect in the illustrative dataset, while quadratic regression predicts an optimum close to 30%. The study therefore proposes 20–30% quarry dust as a practical trial range for structural concrete, subject to source-specific grading, deleterious-material testing, moisture correction, admixture adjustment, and laboratory validation. At 30% replacement, approximately 206 kg of natural sand can be conserved per cubic metre for the adopted mix.},
keywords = {Quarry Dust, Crusher Fines, Fine Aggregate, Natural Sand Replacement, M30 Concrete, Compressive Strength, Water Absorption, Sustainable Concrete},
month = {July},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1720252}
}