Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722118
Post-Pandemic Adaptive Reuse: Transforming Underutilized Commercial Buildings into Affordable Housing in Ibadan, Nigeria: Office-to-Housing Conversion in Nigeria
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Sustainable Architecture
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I2-1722118
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated structural changes in workplace organization, resulting in sustained vacancy in commercial buildings across many urban centres. At the same time, Nigerian cities continue to experience severe housing deficits, particularly for low- and lower-middle-income households. This coexistence of underutilized commercial space and unmet residential demand presents a critical urban planning challenge. Despite growing international interest in office-to-residential conversion, limited research has examined the feasibility of such adaptive reuse strategies within rapidly urbanizing African contexts characterized by infrastructural instability, regulatory rigidity, and constrained development finance. This study evaluates the architectural feasibility, economic viability, regulatory constraints, and affordability implications of converting commercial buildings into residential housing in Lagos, Abuja, and Ibadan. Using a mixed-methods approach that integrates survey data, comparative case analysis, and policy evaluation, the research examines building adaptability, service retrofitting requirements, zoning limitations, and financing barriers. Findings indicate that while many reinforced concrete office buildings possess structural capacity for conversion, high retrofitting costs, approval delays, and limited incentive frameworks significantly restrict scalability. Furthermore, market-driven conversion alone is unlikely to deliver affordable housing without targeted public-sector intervention. By engaging with this case, readers will be able to assess the practical viability of commercial-to-residential adaptive reuse in Nigerian cities and evaluate the policy reforms necessary to align post-pandemic vacancy with inclusive housing delivery.
Keywords
adaptive reuse; office-to-residential conversion; post-pandemic urban restructuring; affordable housing; inclusive housing delivery; nigeria
References
[1] Armstrong, G., Wilkinson, S., & Cilliers, E. J. (2023). A framework for sustainable adaptive reuse: Understanding vacancy and underuse in existing urban buildings. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 5, 985656. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2023.985656
[2] Aydemir, A. Z., & Akın, T. (2024). Adaptive reuse of high-rise buildings for housing: A study of Istanbul central business district. Urban Planning, 9. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.7698
[3] Obakin, O. A., Afolami, S. K., & Akande, O. K. (2024). Causative factors of abandoned urban housing projects and strategies for revitalization in Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal of Contemporary Urban Affairs, 8(2), 582–602. https://doi.org/10.25034/ijcua.2024.v8n2-17
[4] Jiboye, A. D., Adebayo, J. A., & Obakin, O. A. (2020). Urban housing in Nigeria for sustainable development: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 7(7), 478-491.
[5] Forsberg, M. (2024). The conversion of commercial real estate to housing: Environmental benefits and costs. Independent Thesis (Master’s), Dalarna University. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1876028/FULLTEXT01.pdf
[6] Sobieraj, J., Fernandez, M., & Metelski, D. (2025). The economics of adaptive reuse—Comparative cost analysis of revitalization vs. demolition and reconstruction at Radex Park Marywilska. Buildings, 15(16), 2828. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15162828
[7] Szopińska-Mularz, M. (2025). Adaptive reuse of urban structures as a driver of sustainable development: A systematic review (2018–2024). Sustainability, 17(11), 4963. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17114963
[8] Stiernon, D., Böhlke, A., Stephan, A., Bos, M., & Marino, G. (2023). Office-to-housing conversion: Estimating life cycle environmental and financial performance. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2600. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2600/1/012017
[9] Altan, H., Kim, Y. K., Zahiri, S., & Ozarisoy, B. (2023). Adaptive design solutions for buildings and the built environment after the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, 1201139. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1201139
[10] Addison, C., & Kim, J. (2022). Remote work, hybrid offices, and post-COVID city planning. Urban Futures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uf.2022.10.003
[11] CBRE Research. (2023). Office markets after the pandemic: Vacancy trends and strategic reuse. CBRE Global Research.
[12] PwC. (2021). Emerging Trends in Real Estate 2022. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/emerging-trends
[13] Okosun, S. E. (2024). Building conversion in cities: Evaluating residential land-use change in Nigeria. African Journal of Architecture & Regional Studies, 7(2), 112–133.
[14] Olutoge, F. A., & Obakin, O. A. (2017). Strength analysis of corn cob ash and kenaf fibre composites. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 8(8), 389-397.
[15] Ankeli, A. I. (2022). Influencing factors of property use conversion and residential rental performance in Ikeja, Nigeria. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 10(1), 45–61.
[16] Sharifi, A., & Khavarian-Garmsir, A. R. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management. Science of the Total Environment, 749, 142391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142391
[17] Olugbamila, A., & Ojo, A. (2021). Urban land-use regulations and redevelopment challenges in Lagos. Journal of African Urban Studies, 5(2), 103–119.
[18] UN-Habitat. (2022). World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities. United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
[19] Aigbavboa, C., & Thwala, W. D. (2019). Housing delivery challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Nigeria perspective. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 37(3), 489–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-04-2019-0027
[20] Mkonyi, A., & Macha, M. (2022). Vacancy in buildings in growing African cities: The case of Dar es Salaam. International Journal of Development Studies, 11(1), 21–38.
[21] Liu, C., & Liu, X. (2022). Adaptive reuse of religious heritage and its impact on house prices. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 64, 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-020-09798-X
[22] Song, J., Chen, J., Yang, X., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Research on adaptive reuse strategies of industrial heritage based on social network analysis. Land, 13(3), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13030383
[23] Ayumu, M. T., & Ohakawa, T. C. (2023). Adaptive reuse financial strategies: Converting underutilised commercial properties into affordable housing. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 4(6), 72–89.
[24] Conejos, S., Langston, C., Chan, E. H. W., & Chew, M. Y. L. (2013). Learning from the past: Analysis of sustainable adaptive reuse projects. Facilities, 31(5/6), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-03-2012-0019
[25] Mehan, A. (2025). Adaptive reuse as a catalyst for post-2030 urban sustainability. Discover Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01462-9
[26] Vuscan, S. (2025). Building conversion: Enhancing sustainability through adaptive reuse. Sustainability, 17(7), 3182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073182
How to cite this paper
@article{1722118,
author = {Olufunmilola Adetayo Obakin, Olarinde Adams, Amata Esther, Adams Micheal; Onilude Oluwatomiwa, Adesina Babalade; Joel Babawale Taiwo},
title = {Post-Pandemic Adaptive Reuse: Transforming Underutilized Commercial Buildings into Affordable Housing in Ibadan, Nigeria: Office-to-Housing Conversion in Nigeria},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {2764-2783},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722118.pdf},
abstract = {The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated structural changes in workplace organization, resulting in sustained vacancy in commercial buildings across many urban centres. At the same time, Nigerian cities continue to experience severe housing deficits, particularly for low- and lower-middle-income households. This coexistence of underutilized commercial space and unmet residential demand presents a critical urban planning challenge. Despite growing international interest in office-to-residential conversion, limited research has examined the feasibility of such adaptive reuse strategies within rapidly urbanizing African contexts characterized by infrastructural instability, regulatory rigidity, and constrained development finance. This study evaluates the architectural feasibility, economic viability, regulatory constraints, and affordability implications of converting commercial buildings into residential housing in Lagos, Abuja, and Ibadan. Using a mixed-methods approach that integrates survey data, comparative case analysis, and policy evaluation, the research examines building adaptability, service retrofitting requirements, zoning limitations, and financing barriers. Findings indicate that while many reinforced concrete office buildings possess structural capacity for conversion, high retrofitting costs, approval delays, and limited incentive frameworks significantly restrict scalability. Furthermore, market-driven conversion alone is unlikely to deliver affordable housing without targeted public-sector intervention.
By engaging with this case, readers will be able to assess the practical viability of commercial-to-residential adaptive reuse in Nigerian cities and evaluate the policy reforms necessary to align post-pandemic vacancy with inclusive housing delivery.},
keywords = {adaptive reuse; office-to-residential conversion; post-pandemic urban restructuring; affordable housing; inclusive housing delivery; nigeria},
month = {August},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722118}
}