Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722132
Utilisation of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools as Correlates of Physics Student-Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Perceived Teaching Practice Performance During Secondary School Teaching Practice
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Physics Education
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722132
Abstract
This study investigated the relationships among the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, physics student-teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and their perceived teaching performance during teaching practice in secondary schools. Specifically, the study examined the interrelationships among these variables, explored the relationship between pedagogical content knowledge and perceived teaching practice performance, and determined the predictive roles of Generative AI tool usage and pedagogical content knowledge on perceived teaching practice performance. The study adopted a correlational survey research design. The population comprised physics student-teachers in the Department of Science and Technology Education, Lagos State University, who were undertaking their teaching practice. A sample of 50 student-teachers was selected using a simple random sampling technique. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire containing 30 items on the use of Generative AI tools, pedagogical content knowledge, and perceived teaching practice performance. The instrument was validated by experts, and its reliability was established using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Data were analysed using mean, standard deviation, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation, and multiple linear regression at the 0.05 level of significance. The findings revealed significant positive relationships among the study variables. The use of Generative AI tools was positively correlated with pedagogical content knowledge (r = .367, p = .010) and perceived teaching practice performance (r = .314, p = .028). A strong positive relationship was also found between pedagogical content knowledge and perceived teaching practice performance (r = .783, p < .001). Furthermore, the multiple regression analysis showed that 61.4% of the variance in perceived teaching practice performance was jointly explained by the use of Generative AI tools and pedagogical content knowledge (R² = .614, F(2, 46) = 36.509, p < .001). The study concluded that although the use of Generative AI tools was positively associated with both pedagogical content knowledge and perceived teaching practice performance, pedagogical content knowledge emerged as the stronger predictor of teaching practice performance. The study recommends the integration of Generative AI tools into teacher education programmes, particularly in physics teacher training, and the continuous enhancement of student-teachers' pedagogical content knowledge to improve teaching effectiveness.
Keywords
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Perceived Teaching Practice Performance, Physics Student-Teachers, Teacher Education.
References
[1] Adebola, O. O. (2022). Pre-service teachers experiences during teaching practice. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 7(1). https://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/JETL/article/view/3146
[2] Akanzire, B. N. (2025). Generative AI in teacher education: Teacher educators’ perception and preparedness. Journal of Digital Educational Technology. https://www.jdet.net/download/generative-ai-in-teacher-education-teacher-educators-perception-and-preparedness-15887.pdf
[3] Alreiahi, N. J. (2025). Integrating AI tools into preservice mathematics teacher education: A qualitative study of lesson planning with AI-generated content. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2). https://www.cedtech.net/article/integrating-ai-tools-into-preservice-mathematics-teacher-education-a-qualitative-study-of-lesson-17549
[4] Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1986-00500-000
[5] Brandão, A. (2024). Teacher professional development for a future with generative AI. Digital Education Review. https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/46517
[6] Chaitidou, M. (2026). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education. Encyclopedia, 6(2), Article 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia6020043
[7] Henriksen, D. (2025). Social-emotional learning and Generative AI: A critical literature review and framework for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 76(3), 312-328. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00224871251325058
[8] Hlaela, N. (2025). Comparing pedagogical content knowledge on-action and in-action in physics teaching in Lesotho. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https://www.ejmste.com/article/comparing-pedagogical-content-knowledge-on-action-and-in-action-in-physics-teaching-in-lesotho-16509
[9] Kolhatin, A. O. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in teacher training: A narrative scoping review. CTE Workshop Proceedings. https://acnsci.org/journal/index.php/cte/article/view/920
[10] Marake, M. (2025). Exploring science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge based on instructional approaches. https://www.scimath.net/download/exploring-science-teachers-pedagogical-content-knowledge-based-on-instructional-approaches-used-to-17624.pdf
[11] Melo, L. (2020). Exploring Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) of physics teachers. Education Sciences, 10(12), 362. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/10/12/362
[12] Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=12112
[13] Moosa, M. (2026). Guiding growth: Deciphering the nature of feedback to preservice teachers during teaching practice. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2026.2629299
[14] Onyefulu, C. (2018). Assessing the performance of student teachers in a Nigerian university. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6(12). https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=92948
[15] Park, J. (2025). A systematic literature review of generative artificial intelligence in education. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X25001274
[16] Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://www.wcu.edu/webfiles/pdfs/shulman.pdf
[17] Tuncel, O. (2025). Teaching literature reviews in the age of generative artificial intelligence. https://educate.apsanet.org/teaching-literature-reviews-in-the-age-of-generative-artificial-intelligence-ai
[18] UNESCO. (n.d.). An AI-powered system transforming teacher capacity at scale: Naija Teacher AI. https://www.unesco.org/sdg4education2030/en/knowledge-hub/naija-teacher-ai-ai-powered-system-transforming-teacher-capacity-scale
How to cite this paper
@article{1722132,
author = {Abdulazeez Aliyu Umar},
title = {Utilisation of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools as Correlates of Physics Student-Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Perceived Teaching Practice Performance During Secondary School Teaching Practice},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {768-782},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722132.pdf},
abstract = {This study investigated the relationships among the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, physics student-teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), and their perceived teaching performance during teaching practice in secondary schools. Specifically, the study examined the interrelationships among these variables, explored the relationship between pedagogical content knowledge and perceived teaching practice performance, and determined the predictive roles of Generative AI tool usage and pedagogical content knowledge on perceived teaching practice performance. The study adopted a correlational survey research design. The population comprised physics student-teachers in the Department of Science and Technology Education, Lagos State University, who were undertaking their teaching practice. A sample of 50 student-teachers was selected using a simple random sampling technique. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire containing 30 items on the use of Generative AI tools, pedagogical content knowledge, and perceived teaching practice performance. The instrument was validated by experts, and its reliability was established using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Data were analysed using mean, standard deviation, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation, and multiple linear regression at the 0.05 level of significance. The findings revealed significant positive relationships among the study variables. The use of Generative AI tools was positively correlated with pedagogical content knowledge (r = .367, p = .010) and perceived teaching practice performance (r = .314, p = .028). A strong positive relationship was also found between pedagogical content knowledge and perceived teaching practice performance (r = .783, p < .001). Furthermore, the multiple regression analysis showed that 61.4% of the variance in perceived teaching practice performance was jointly explained by the use of Generative AI tools and pedagogical content knowledge (R² = .614, F(2, 46) = 36.509, p < .001). The study concluded that although the use of Generative AI tools was positively associated with both pedagogical content knowledge and perceived teaching practice performance, pedagogical content knowledge emerged as the stronger predictor of teaching practice performance. The study recommends the integration of Generative AI tools into teacher education programmes, particularly in physics teacher training, and the continuous enhancement of student-teachers' pedagogical content knowledge to improve teaching effectiveness.},
keywords = {Generative Artificial Intelligence, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Perceived Teaching Practice Performance, Physics Student-Teachers, Teacher Education.},
month = {August},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722132}
}