Retinal Imaging Biomarkers for Predicting Outcomes after Vitreoretinal Surgery

References

[1] Chatziralli I, et al. Optical coherence tomography biomarkers as predictive factors for postoperative visual acuity in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(2):213. PMCID: PMC7852424.

[2] Tuğan BY, et al. Correlation of visual recovery and increased ellipsoid zone reflectivity after macular hole surgery. 2020. PMCID: PMC7610054.

[3] Mehta N, et al. Assessing the ability of preoperative quantitative spectral-domain optical coherence tomography characteristics to predict visual outcome in idiopathic macular hole surgery. Retina. 2021;41(1):29–36. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002797. PMID: 32251240; PMCID: PMC7529763.

[4] Sevgi DD, Yee PS, Srivastava SK, et al. Longitudinal ellipsoid zone dynamics after macular hole repair in the DISCOVER Study: structure-function assessment. Retina. 2021;41(5):915–920. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002983. PMID: 33887747; PMCID: PMC8074992

[5] Karasavvidou EM, Panos GD, Koronis S, Kozobolis VP, Tranos PG. Optical coherence tomography biomarkers for visual acuity in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. European Journal of Ophthalmology. 2021;31(6):3203–3213. doi:10.1177/1120672120980951. PMID: 33307784.

[6] Guan I, Gupta MP, Papakostas T, et al. Role of optical coherence tomography for predicting postoperative visual outcomes after repair of macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2021;41(10):2017–2025. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000003162. PMID: 33734189

[7] Mahmoudzadeh R, Israilevich R, Salabati M, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: OCT biomarkers of visual outcomes in 322 eyes. Ophthalmology Retina. 2022;6(4):308–317. doi:10.1016/j.oret.2021.10.008. PMID: 34718218.

[8] Yang X, et al. Effects of ectopic inner foveal layers on foveal configuration and visual function after idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina. 2022;42(8):1472–1478. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000003495. PMID: 35502976

[9] Yanagida K, Wakabayashi Y, Usui Y, et al. Ectopic inner foveal layer as a factor associated with metamorphopsia after vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane. Acta Ophthalmologica. 2022;100(7):775–780. doi:10.1111/aos.15092. PMID: 35076169.

[10] Jhaveri A, Martins Melo I, Pecaku A, et al. Outer retinal hyperreflective dots: a potential imaging biomarker in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmology Retina. 2023;7(12):1087–1096. doi:10.1016/j.oret.2023.07.016. PMID: 37481035

[11] Jong JLZ, et al. Surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy in complex vitreoretinal disease. 2023. PMID: 37418640.

[12] Iwasaki M, Ando R, Aoki S, Miyamoto H. Restoration process of the outer retinal layers after surgical macular hole closure. Retina. 2022;42(2):313–320. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000003323. PMID: 34723901.

[13] Chang YH, Tan GSW, Chou HD, Tsai ASH. Reshaping vitreoretinal surgery: intraoperative optical coherence tomography as a tool for enhancing surgical decision-making in complex cases. Taiwan Journal of Ophthalmology. 2025. doi: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00060. PMID: 39803398; PMCID: PMC11717328.

[14] Lee WW, Francisconi CLM, Marafon SB, et al. Imaging predictors of functional outcomes after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retina. 2024;44(10):1758–1765. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000004172. PMID: 39287538

[15] Lippera M, et al. Volumetric biomarkers of visual outcome after surgical treatment of lamellar macular holes. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2024; 14:755.

[16] Chaturvedi S, Paul A, Singh S, Akduman L, Saxena S. The ellipsoid zone is a structural biomarker for visual outcomes in diabetic macular edema and macular hole management. Vision (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39846620; PMCID: PMC11755456.

[17] Singh S, Saxena S, Meyer CH, Chandra A, Akduman L. Retinal photoreceptor ellipsoid zone is a structural biomarker for visual outcome after successful macular hole surgery: a novel grading system-based study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2025;73(Suppl 1):S126–S131. doi:10.4103/IJO.IJO_1031_24. PMID: 39141486; PMCID: PMC11834914.

[18] Ferro Desideri L, Hinrichsen L, Eldridge N, et al. Artificial intelligence analysis of OCT biomarkers to predict visual outcomes following vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous. 2025;11(1):106. doi:10.1186/s40942-025-00735-9. PMID: 41088490.

[19] Chu X, et al. Baseline structural OCT biomarkers for visual outcomes following epiretinal membrane surgery. 2025. PMCID: PMC12707667.

[20] Gelormini F, et al. Visual performance and predictive OCT biomarkers in idiopathic epiretinal membrane. 2025. PMCID: PMC11734757.

[21] Mansilla R, et al. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of structural changes in idiopathic epiretinal membrane. 2025. PMID: 39173025.

[22] Lin HL, Tseng PC, Hsu MH, Peng SJ. Using a deep learning model to predict postoperative visual outcomes of idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2025; 272:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2025.01.003. PMID: 39814096.

[23] Horie S, et al. Current topics in OCT applications in vitreoretinal surgery. 2025. PMCID: PMC12467528.

[24] Zaidi H, et al. Optical coherence tomography in retinal detachment: current applications and prognostic biomarkers. Diagnostics. 2025; 15:871.

[25] Chereji G, et al. Prognostic factors for visual postsurgical outcome in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. 2025. PMCID: PMC11943250.

[26] Carlà MM, et al. Preoperative OCT biomarkers predicting visual outcomes after macula-off retinal detachment surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. 2025. PMID: 41106581.

[27] Patel R, Delhiwala K, Khamar B. Indistinct retinal outer layers in the walls of the idiopathic full-thickness macular hole—a potential predictive biomarker for surgical outcomes. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2022;70(12):4383–4389. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1215_22. PMID: 36453349; PMCID: PMC9940550.

[28] Baumann C, Iannetta D, Sultan Z, et al. Predictive association of pre-operative defect areas in the outer retinal layers with visual acuity in macular hole surgery. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021;10(4):7. doi:10.1167/tvst.10.4.7. PMID: 34003987; PMCID: PMC8054630.

[29] Lin HL, et al. Predicting visual outcome after surgery in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane using a novel convolutional neural network. Retina. 2023. PMID: 36727822.

[30] Kamnig R, Robatsch N, Hillenmayer A, et al. A neural network for the prediction of the visual acuity gained from vitrectomy and peeling for epiretinal membrane. Ophthalmology Science. 2025;5(4):100762. doi:10.1016/j.xops.2025.100762. PMID: 40291394; PMCID: PMC12022697.

@article{1722213,
      author = {Muhammad Qasim},
      title = {Retinal Imaging Biomarkers for Predicting Outcomes after Vitreoretinal Surgery},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {724-736},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722213.pdf},
      abstract = {Vitreoretinal surgery often achieves anatomical success; however, functional recovery differs markedly among eyes with similar disease presentations. Retinal imaging biomarkers help reduce this uncertainty by characterizing tissue composition, photoreceptor integrity, traction, perfusion, inflammation, and postoperative remodeling before these changes are evident in visual acuity. This structured review compiles evidence from 2020 to 2025 regarding optical coherence tomography, optical coherence tomography angiography, wide-field imaging, fundus autofluorescence, and emerging computational evaluations for predicting outcomes after surgery for epiretinal membrane, macular hole, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, and tractional diabetic retinal disease. A translational framework is used, distinguishing preoperative risk stratification, intraoperative confirmation, early postoperative assessment, and longitudinal recovery. Across indications, the most consistent favorable prognostic indicators include preserved ellipsoid-zone and external-limiting-membrane continuity, limited inner retinal disorganization, reduced chronicity-related tissue deformation, smaller or more favorable lesion geometry, and early restoration of normal foveal architecture. In contrast, ectopic inner foveal layers, extensive disorganization of retinal inner layers, persistent subretinal fluid, outer retinal corrugation, hyperreflective inflammatory deposits, severe macular ischemia, and segmentation-unstable edema are associated with slower or incomplete recovery. No single metric demonstrates sufficient robustness across diseases, devices, and surgical techniques. The most effective prognostic approach merges with structural condition, lesion geometry, perfusion, symptom-relevant function, and temporal change. Standardized acquisition, masked grading, artifact reporting, external validation, and outcome definitions extending beyond distance acuity are necessary before imaging-derived scores can independently guide consent, timing, or individualized follow-up.},
      keywords = {Vitreoretinal Surgery, Optical Coherence Tomography, Imaging Biomarkers, Epiretinal Membrane, Macular Hole, Retinal Detachment, Visual Outcome},
      month = {August},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722213}
  }