Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722215
Thermal Performance Optimization of a Phase Change Material (PCM)-Based Thermal Energy Storage System
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Thermal Energy Storage System
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I2-1722215
Abstract
The mismatch between the availability of thermal energy and demand for it is a principal obstacle to the wider adoption of solar-thermal and waste-heat-recovery systems. Latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) using phase change materials (PCMs) offers compact, near-isothermal storage, yet the organic PCMs that store energy well conduct it poorly (0.15–0.25 W/m·K), which throttles charging and discharging power. This study addresses that limitation through a combined numerical, experimental and data-driven optimization of a vertical shell-and-tube LHTES module charged by hot water. A commercial paraffin wax (measured melting range 40.2–44.1 °C, latent heat 178.4 kJ/kg) was characterised by differential scanning calorimetry. Two enhancement strategies—longitudinal copper fins and dispersion of aluminium-oxide nanoparticles—were investigated jointly rather than in isolation. A transient conjugate model using the enthalpy-porosity formulation with buoyancy-driven convection was developed in ANSYS Fluent, made grid- and time-step-independent, and validated against fifteen calibrated thermocouples to within 6.8%. A Box–Behnken design was expanded to 180 cases to train a 4-12-8-2 artificial neural network that predicts complete melting time and stored energy with a testing coefficient of determination of 0.9921. Coupling the surrogate to a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) generated the melting-time–stored-energy Pareto front, from which a preferred design was selected by TOPSIS. The optimum—eight fins of 22.5 mm height with 2.0% nanoparticle loading at 70 °C inlet—reduced complete melting time from 218.0 to 74.6 min (a 65.8% reduction) for only a 4.1% loss of stored energy, raised average charging power from 62 to 173 W, and improved exergy efficiency from 41.2% to 52.7%. Fin geometry and nanoparticle loading interact sub-additively, and the nanoparticle benefit saturates near 2% by mass.
Keywords
Phase Change Material, Latent Heat Thermal Energy Storage, Enthalpy-Porosity Method, Nano-Enhanced PCM, Multi-Objective Optimization
References
[1] International Energy Agency, "Renewables 2023: Analysis and forecast to 2028," IEA, Paris, France, 2023.
[2] International Renewable Energy Agency, "Innovation outlook: Thermal energy storage," IRENA, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2020.
[3] A. de Gracia and L. F. Cabeza, "Phase change materials and thermal energy storage for buildings," Energy and Buildings, vol. 103, pp. 414–419, 2015.
[4] N. I. Ibrahim, F. A. Al-Sulaiman, S. Rahman, B. S. Yilbas, and A. Z. Sahin, "Heat transfer enhancement of phase change materials for thermal energy storage applications: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 74, pp. 26–50, 2017.
[5] M. K. Rathod and J. Banerjee, "Thermal performance enhancement of shell and tube latent heat storage unit using longitudinal fins," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 75, pp. 1084–1092, 2015.
[6] A. M. Abdulateef, S. Mat, J. Abdulateef, K. Sopian, and A. A. Al-Abidi, "Geometric and design parameters of fins employed for enhancing thermal energy storage systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 82, pp. 1620–1635, 2018.
[7] H. Nazir et al., "Recent developments in phase change materials for energy storage applications: A review," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 129, pp. 491–523, 2019.
[8] Y. Yuan, X. Cao, B. Xiang, and Y. Du, "Effect of installation angle of fins on melting characteristics of annular unit for latent heat thermal energy storage," Solar Energy, vol. 136, pp. 365–378, 2016.
[9] J. M. Khodadadi, L. Fan, and H. Babaei, "Thermal conductivity enhancement of nanostructure-based colloidal suspensions utilized as phase change materials for thermal energy storage: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 24, pp. 418–444, 2013.
[10] M. H. Ahmadi et al., "Thermal conductivity ratio prediction of Al₂O₃/water nanofluid by applying connectionist methods," Colloids and Surfaces A, vol. 541, pp. 154–164, 2018.
[11] G. Mahdavi, M. Ghalambaz, and A. J. Chamkha, "Machine learning approaches in thermal energy storage systems: A review," Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 55, art. 105702, 2022.
[12] B. Zalba, J. M. Marín, L. F. Cabeza, and H. Mehling, "Review on thermal energy storage with phase change: Materials, heat transfer analysis and applications," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 251–283, 2003.
[13] S. Kahwaji and M. A. White, "Organic phase change materials for thermal energy storage: Influence of molecular structure on properties," Molecules, vol. 26, no. 21, art. 6635, 2021.
[14] M. Kenisarin and K. Mahkamov, "Salt hydrates as latent heat storage materials: Thermophysical properties and costs," Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 145, pp. 255–286, 2016.
[15] A. Sharma, V. V. Tyagi, C. R. Chen, and D. Buddhi, "Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 318–345, 2009.
[16] P. K. S. Rathore and S. K. Shukla, "Potential of macroencapsulated PCM for thermal energy storage in buildings: A comprehensive review," Construction and Building Materials, vol. 225, pp. 723–744, 2019.
[17] M. K. Rathod and J. Banerjee, "Thermal stability of phase change materials used in latent heat energy storage systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 18, pp. 246–258, 2013.
[18] L. Yang, X. Jin, Y. Zhang, and K. Du, "Recent development on heat transfer and various applications of phase-change materials," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 287, art. 124432, 2021.
[19] B. K. Purohit and V. S. Sistla, "Inorganic salt hydrate for thermal energy storage application: A review," Energy Storage, vol. 3, no. 2, art. e212, 2021.
[20] R. Kumar and D. J. Krishna, "Influence of mushy zone constant on thermohydraulics of a PCM," Energy Procedia, vol. 109, pp. 314–321, 2017.
[21] A. M. Abdulateef et al., "Experimental and numerical study of solidifying phase-change material in a triplex-tube heat exchanger with longitudinal/triangular fins," International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 90, pp. 73–84, 2018.
[22] J. M. Mahdi, S. Lohrasbi, D. D. Ganji, and E. C. Nsofor, "Accelerated melting of PCM in energy storage systems via novel configuration of fins in the triplex-tube heat exchanger," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 124, pp. 663–676, 2018.
[23] S. Deng, C. Nie, G. Wei, and W. B. Ye, "Improving the melting performance of a horizontal shell-tube latent-heat thermal energy storage unit using local enhanced finned tube," Energy and Buildings, vol. 183, pp. 161–173, 2019.
[24] X. Sun, Q. Mahdi, H. A. Almsater, and B. M. Sundén, "Melting temperature and enhanced heat transfer of a latent heat storage unit," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 137, pp. 328–339, 2018.
[25] Y. Tian et al., "Bionic topology optimization of fins for rapid latent heat thermal energy storage," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 194, art. 117104, 2021.
[26] S. Zhang, Z. Pu, L. Xu, and Y. Yang, "A review of phase change heat transfer in shell-and-tube latent heat thermal energy storage with graded fins," Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 62, art. 106907, 2023.
[27] M. E. Nakhchi and J. A. Esfahani, "Improving the melting performance of PCM thermal energy storage with novel stepped fins," Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 30, art. 101424, 2020.
[28] M. Kirincic, A. Trp, and K. Lenic, "Numerical evaluation of the latent heat thermal energy storage performance enhancement by installing longitudinal fins," Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 42, art. 103085, 2021.
[29] B. Kalidasan et al., "Phase change materials integrated solar thermal energy systems: Global trends and current practices," Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 53, art. 105145, 2022.
[30] R. K. Sharma et al., "Developments in organic solid–liquid phase change materials and their applications in thermal energy storage," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 95, pp. 193–228, 2015.
[31] M. Arıcı, E. Tütüncü, C. Kan, and H. Karabay, "Melting of nanoparticle-enhanced PCM inside an enclosure," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 104, pp. 7–17, 2017.
[32] T. Rehman, H. M. Ali, M. M. Janjua, U. Sajjad, and W. M. Yan, "A critical review on heat transfer augmentation of phase change materials embedded with porous/nano media," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 108, pp. 654–674, 2019.
[33] M. M. Sarafraz et al., "Experimental investigation on thermal performance of a PCM-based heat sink with CNT nanoparticles," Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 134, pp. 1975–1987, 2018.
[34] M. Sheikholeslami et al., "Variable magnetic forces impact on magnetizable hybrid nanofluid heat transfer through a circular cavity," Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 277, pp. 388–396, 2019.
[35] V. R. Voller and C. Prakash, "A fixed grid numerical modelling methodology for convection–diffusion mushy region phase-change problems," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1709–1719, 1987.
[36] M. Fadl and P. C. Eames, "Numerical investigation of the influence of mushy zone parameter on melting of a PCM," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 151, pp. 90–99, 2019.
[37] G. S. Sodhi and P. Muthukumar, "Compound charging and discharging enhancement in a multi-PCM latent heat store," Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 178, art. 115633, 2020.
[38] S. Motahar and R. Khodabandeh, "Experimental study on the melting and solidification of a phase change material enhanced by heat pipe," International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 73, pp. 1–6, 2016.
[39] M. Ghalambaz et al., "Machine-learning-assisted optimization of phase-change thermal energy storage," Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 61, art. 106776, 2023.
[40] K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, "A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II," IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2002.
How to cite this paper
@article{1722215,
author = {Ayushh Kumar, Dr. Raghvendra Kumar Khedle},
title = {Thermal Performance Optimization of a Phase Change Material (PCM)-Based Thermal Energy Storage System},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {737-753},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722215.pdf},
abstract = {The mismatch between the availability of thermal energy and demand for it is a principal obstacle to the wider adoption of solar-thermal and waste-heat-recovery systems. Latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) using phase change materials (PCMs) offers compact, near-isothermal storage, yet the organic PCMs that store energy well conduct it poorly (0.15–0.25 W/m·K), which throttles charging and discharging power. This study addresses that limitation through a combined numerical, experimental and data-driven optimization of a vertical shell-and-tube LHTES module charged by hot water. A commercial paraffin wax (measured melting range 40.2–44.1 °C, latent heat 178.4 kJ/kg) was characterised by differential scanning calorimetry. Two enhancement strategies—longitudinal copper fins and dispersion of aluminium-oxide nanoparticles—were investigated jointly rather than in isolation. A transient conjugate model using the enthalpy-porosity formulation with buoyancy-driven convection was developed in ANSYS Fluent, made grid- and time-step-independent, and validated against fifteen calibrated thermocouples to within 6.8%. A Box–Behnken design was expanded to 180 cases to train a 4-12-8-2 artificial neural network that predicts complete melting time and stored energy with a testing coefficient of determination of 0.9921. Coupling the surrogate to a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) generated the melting-time–stored-energy Pareto front, from which a preferred design was selected by TOPSIS. The optimum—eight fins of 22.5 mm height with 2.0% nanoparticle loading at 70 °C inlet—reduced complete melting time from 218.0 to 74.6 min (a 65.8% reduction) for only a 4.1% loss of stored energy, raised average charging power from 62 to 173 W, and improved exergy efficiency from 41.2% to 52.7%. Fin geometry and nanoparticle loading interact sub-additively, and the nanoparticle benefit saturates near 2% by mass.},
keywords = {Phase Change Material, Latent Heat Thermal Energy Storage, Enthalpy-Porosity Method, Nano-Enhanced PCM, Multi-Objective Optimization},
month = {August},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722215}
}