Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722282
Beyond the Geoportal: Reconsidering Spatial Data Infrastructure for Planning Information Governance in Lagos, Nigeria
Subject area: Physical Sciences and Environment · Area of research: GIS, Remote Sensing and Land Use Planning
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722282
Abstract
The growth of electronic land services and map portals has renewed interest in spatial data infrastructure (SDI) across African cities. Yet a portal, however useful, does not, by itself, establish the institutional conditions under which geographic information becomes dependable for planning. This article revisits a 2014 assessment of SDI use in Lagos planning agencies and considers what has changed following the introduction of electronic title workflows, the Lagos e-GIS portal, enterprise coordination and reported state-wide digital mapping. It adopts a critical narrative review, drawing on the author's earlier Lagos studies, African SDI research, current land-administration evidence, the United Nations Integrated Geospatial Information Framework and recent thinking on the wider geospatial information ecosystem. The review finds that the technical environment has advanced considerably since 2014. However, public evidence is much clearer about systems procured and services announced than about common identifiers, metadata, update responsibilities, local-government participation, data-quality assurance and the routine movement of authoritative records between agencies. These less visible matters determine whether an SDI can support development planning, planning permit administration, building control, infrastructure coordination and environmental management. A federated planning-SDI arrangement is proposed in which the e-GIS office provides shared services and coordination, while legally competent agencies retain and discharge custodial responsibility for authoritative datasets. The article also reconsiders the earlier proposal for a Lagos Urban Observatory, positioning it as a metropolitan monitoring and accountability node rather than another data warehouse. The central conclusion is that Lagos has moved beyond the need to demonstrate GIS technology. Its present task is to govern planning information as a continuing public infrastructure whose reliability, accessibility and use can be independently assessed.
Keywords
Spatial Data Infrastructure, Planning Information, Data Governance, Interoperability, Urban Observatory, E-GIS, Lagos
References
[1] Makanga, P., & Smit, J. (2010). A review of the status of spatial data infrastructure implementation in Africa. South African Computer Journal, 45, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.18489/sacj.v45i0.36
[2] Mwange, C., Mulaku, G. C., & Siriba, D. N. (2018). Reviewing the status of national spatial data infrastructures in Africa. Survey Review, 50(360), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2016.1259720
[3] United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management. (2025a). Positioning the future geospatial information ecosystem. United Nations. https://ggim.un.org/meetings/GGIM-committee/15th-session/documents/25-00062_UNGGIM_GeospatialEcosystem_report.pdf
[4] Dekolo, S. O. (2001, October). Implementing GIS for land use planning and management in Lagos State [Conference paper]. URISA Annual Conference, Long Beach, CA, United States.
[5] Dekolo, S. O., & Oduwaye, L. (2011). Managing the Lagos megacity and its geospatial imperative. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXXVIII-4/C21, 121–128. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-4-C21-121-2011
[6] Dekolo, S. O., & Oduwaye, L. (2014, October 6–8). Building spatial data infrastructures for spatial planning in African cities: The Lagos experience [Conference paper]. Third International Conference on Urban and Regional Planning, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2978.6889
[7] Budhathoki, N. R., & Nedović-Budić, Z. (2007). Expanding the spatial data infrastructure knowledge base. In H. Onsrud (Ed.), Research and theory in advancing spatial data infrastructure concepts (pp. 7–31). ESRI Press.
[8] United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management. (2023). United Nations Integrated Geospatial Information Framework: Overarching strategy (2nd ed.). United Nations. https://ggim.un.org/UN-IGIF/documents/Part_1_UN-IGIF_Overarching_Strategy_Second_Edition_27Feb2023.pdf
[9] High-Level Group of the Integrated Geospatial Information Framework. (2024). Global survey on the use and implementation of the UN-IGIF. United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management. https://ggim.un.org/UN-IGIF/documents/Report_Global_Survey.pdf
[10] Barbero, M., Lopez Potes, M., Vancauwenberghe, G., Vandenbroucke, D., & Nunes de Lima, V. (Ed.). (2019). The role of spatial data infrastructures in the digital government transformation of public administrations. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/324167
[11] Open Geospatial Consortium. (2019). OGC API—Features—Part 1: Core (Version 1.0, OGC 17-069r4). https://docs.ogc.org/is/17-069r4/17-069r4.html
[12] Lagos State Ministry of Justice. (2022, September 27). Honourable Attorney General, Lagos State begins electronic signing of title documents. https://lagosstatemoj.org/tag/egis/
[13] Channels Television. (2024, January 27). Lagos launches automated application portal for land acquisition. https://www.channelstv.com/2024/01/27/lagos-launches-automated-application-portal-for-land-acquisition/
[14] Lagos State Government. (n.d.). Housing and lands services. Retrieved August 10, 2026, from https://lagosstate.gov.ng/services/housingandlands
[15] ThisDay Newspapers. (2025, May 28). Lagos advances digital innovations in land management, urban development. https://www.thisdaylive.com/2025/05/28/lagos-advances-digital-innovations-in-land-management-urban-development/
[16] Alagbe, A. O., & Ojo, O. (2021). Level of use of GIS for land registration, Lagos State, Nigeria. African Journal on Geospatial Sciences and Land Governance, 4(4), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.48346/IMIST.PRSM/ajlp-gs.v4i4.22929
[17] Srinivasan, J., Karkanitsa, N., & Deininger, K. (2026). Modernizing land administration: A coverage-first agenda for digital transformation (Policy Indicators Briefs No. 44). World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099620204242674624/pdf/IDU-36f5bae8-11b4-4a6a-8eab-069536d214e5.pdf
[18] Guigoz, Y., Giuliani, G., Nonguierma, A., Lehmann, A., Mlisa, A., & Ray, N. (2017). Spatial data infrastructures in Africa: A gap analysis. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 30(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.201500325
[19] Atumane, A. A. P., & Cabral, P. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for spatial data infrastructure development in Mozambique. Journal of Map & Geography Libraries, 15(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15420353.2019.1661932
[20] Siebritz, L.-A., Desai, A., Coetzee, S., & Cooper, A. K. (2021). Capacitating local governments for the digital earth vision: Lessons learnt from the role of municipalities in the South African spatial data infrastructure. International Journal of Digital Earth, 14(12), 1897–1917. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2021.1998680
[21] United Nations Economic Commission for Africa. (2022). Guidelines for the implementation of national spatial data infrastructure in Africa. https://www.uneca.org/sites/default/files/ACS/un-ggim-2022/policy-guideline-on-the-implementation-of-nsdi-in-africa_english.pdf
[22] Ansah, R. O., Abubakari, Z., Quaye, B., Todorovski, D., Chipofya, M. C., & Lemmen, C. (2024). Navigating the terrain of digital transition: Ghana's journey of developing a digital land information system. Land, 13(4), 528. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13040528
[23] Chigbu, U. E., Bendzko, T., Mabakeng, M. R., Kuusaana, E. D., & Tutu, D. O. (2021). Fit-for-purpose land administration from theory to practice: Three demonstrative case studies of local land administration initiatives in Africa. Land, 10(5), 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050476
[24] Coetzee, S., Ivánová, I., Mitasova, H., & Brovelli, M. A. (2020). Open geospatial software and data: A review of the current state and a perspective into the future. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020090
[25] African Union. (2022). AU data policy framework. https://au.int/en/documents/20220728/au-data-policy-framework
[26] Nigeria Data Protection Commission. (2023). Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023. https://ndpc.gov.ng/download/nigeria-data-protection-act-2023
[27] Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
[28] United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2022). A guide to setting up an urban observatory. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/06/guide_to_setting_up_an_urban_observatory_-_popular_version.pdf
[29] Wolf, K., Stiles, J., Miller, H. J., Dawson, R. J., Mills, J. P., Blythe, P., & Morley, J. (2025). Building enduring smart city data platforms to provide urban management support: Lessons learnt from UK Urban Observatories and the US Smart Columbus Operating System. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 7, 1512847. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2025.1512847
[30] United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management. (2025b). The Global Statistical Geospatial Framework (2nd ed.). United Nations. https://ggim.un.org/meetings/GGIM-committee/15th-Session/documents/GSGF_v2_GGIM.pdf
[31] Agrawal, A. (2025). State of National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) globally (Version 1.0). Open Geospatial Consortium. https://sdimodernization.ogc.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/State-of-NSDI-Research-Paper-edited-v1.0.pdf
[32] Rahman, M. M., & Szabó, G. (2023). Assessing the status of national spatial data infrastructure (NSDI) of Bangladesh. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(6), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12060236
How to cite this paper
@article{1722282,
author = {Samuel Oritsetimeyin Dekolo},
title = {Beyond the Geoportal: Reconsidering Spatial Data Infrastructure for Planning Information Governance in Lagos, Nigeria},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {980-995},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722282.pdf},
abstract = {The growth of electronic land services and map portals has renewed interest in spatial data infrastructure (SDI) across African cities. Yet a portal, however useful, does not, by itself, establish the institutional conditions under which geographic information becomes dependable for planning. This article revisits a 2014 assessment of SDI use in Lagos planning agencies and considers what has changed following the introduction of electronic title workflows, the Lagos e-GIS portal, enterprise coordination and reported state-wide digital mapping. It adopts a critical narrative review, drawing on the author's earlier Lagos studies, African SDI research, current land-administration evidence, the United Nations Integrated Geospatial Information Framework and recent thinking on the wider geospatial information ecosystem. The review finds that the technical environment has advanced considerably since 2014. However, public evidence is much clearer about systems procured and services announced than about common identifiers, metadata, update responsibilities, local-government participation, data-quality assurance and the routine movement of authoritative records between agencies. These less visible matters determine whether an SDI can support development planning, planning permit administration, building control, infrastructure coordination and environmental management. A federated planning-SDI arrangement is proposed in which the e-GIS office provides shared services and coordination, while legally competent agencies retain and discharge custodial responsibility for authoritative datasets. The article also reconsiders the earlier proposal for a Lagos Urban Observatory, positioning it as a metropolitan monitoring and accountability node rather than another data warehouse. The central conclusion is that Lagos has moved beyond the need to demonstrate GIS technology. Its present task is to govern planning information as a continuing public infrastructure whose reliability, accessibility and use can be independently assessed.},
keywords = {Spatial Data Infrastructure, Planning Information, Data Governance, Interoperability, Urban Observatory, E-GIS, Lagos},
month = {August},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722282}
}