Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722299
Operationalizing National Space Assets: A Framework for a Sovereign Satellite Data Hub and Marketplace
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Data Hub and Marketplace
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722299
Abstract
Space agencies in emerging economies face a structural transition: shifting from historical data acquisition paradigms to the delivery of high-value, automated geospatial services while ensuring infrastructure sustainability. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for a sovereign Satellite Data Hub and Marketplace—a reference architecture designed to transition space assets from siloed storage environments into a centralised, API-driven ecosystem. Aligned with the United Nations Integrated Geospatial Information Framework (UN-IGIF) and National Geospatial Data Infrastructure (NGDI) specifications, the framework leverages an open-source, cloud-native technology stack compliant with Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) and ISO/TC 211 standards, including SpatioTemporal Asset Catalogs (STAC v1.1.0), GeoNode, and Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs (COGs). Furthermore, it introduces a tiered "Free Data, Fee for Processing" economic model engineered to monetise automated compute cycles and internal analytical expertise without compromising public-good access requirements. By consolidating technical architecture with sector-specific socio-economic impact modelling, this blueprint provides a scalable roadmap for emerging space nations to achieve international interoperability alongside domestic financial self-sufficiency.
Keywords
Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI), Cloud-Native Geospatial, SpatioTemporal Asset Catalog (STAC), Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF (COG), Geospatial Economics, Earth Observation, Satellite Technology, Public-Good Data, Financial Sustainability, Data Governance, UN-IGIF
References
[1] ANZLIC - The Spatial Information Council. (2015). Cost benefit analysis of alternative models for pricing fundamental data. PwC Australia. https://www.anzlic.org.au/
[2] Adepoju, M., Adeluyi, O., Victor, S., Justin, I., & Feyishayo, A. (2026). Soil suitability and mapping of cocoa and cassava in North Ondo using proximal remote sensing technologies. In K. Labbassi, S. Tesfamichael, J. Oloukoi, A. B. H. M. Mobio, & K. Affian (Eds.), Earth observation: Pillar of socioeconomic development of Africa (pp. 105–115). Springer.
[3] Behera, B. K. (2026). Space Programs and the Global South: Opportunities, Challenges and Emerging Pathways. IUP Journal of International Relations, 20(1), 56-66.
[4] Coote, A., Belson, M., & Jackson, M. (2016). The economic impact of open spatial data. Deloitte Access Economics & Consulting.
[5] Enemark, S. (2013). Building fit-for-purpose spatial frameworks for sustainable land governance in sub-Saharan Africa. Proceedings of the FIG Working Week 2013: Environment for Sustainability, Abuja, Nigeria.
[6] Gaia-X. (2022). Gaia-X architecture document 22.04. Gaia-X European Association for Data and Cloud AISBL. https://gaia-x.eu/
[7] Group on Earth Observations. (2026, March 5). How Africa uses Earth Intelligence to combat infectious disease [Contribution from Dr. Tubolayefa Warekuromor on operationalising the Environmental Health Intelligence Hub in Nigeria]. GEO Health Community of Practice. https://earthobservations.org/about-us/news/how-africa-uses-earth-intelligence-to-combat-infectious-disease
[8] Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., & Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
[9] Holmes, C., Couwenberg, B., de la Beaujardiere, J., Evans, B., Fitzpatrick, J., Gabriel, P., & Milcinski, G. (2021). The SpatioTemporal Asset Catalog (STAC) specification. Cloud Native Geospatial Foundation. https://stacspec.org/
[10] International Organization for Standardization. (2013). Geographic information — Data quality (ISO Standard No. 19157:2013). https://www.iso.org/standard/32575.html
[11] International Organization for Standardization. (2014). Geographic information — Metadata — Part 1: Fundamentals (ISO Standard No. 19115-1:2014). https://www.iso.org/standard/53798.html
[12] Kebede, E. A., Xie, Y., Laboy, G., Bhimani, K., Boser, A., Urfels, A., Khan, B., Adepoju, M., Adeluyi, O., Brauman, K. A., Casirati, S., Chandrasekaran, S., Deines, J. M., Flach, R., Hansen, M. C., Hartman, S., Jobbagy, E., Khan, A., Kurapati, V., ... Davis, K. F. (2026). GMIA-NEXT: Next-generation global map of irrigated areas [Data set]. Ag Data Commons, USDA. https://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/32755521
[13] Kempeneers, P., De Medici, D., Martin Jiménez, J. M., Marletta, L., Pešek, O., & Wojda, P. (2026). EU data sovereignty in practice: an explanatory case study of the SAIS agricultural data platform. International Journal of Digital Earth, 19(1), 2691929.
[14] Kganyago, M., & Mhangara, P. (2019). The role of African emerging space agencies in earth observation capacity building for facilitating the implementation and monitoring of the African development agenda: The case of African earth observation program. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(7), 292.
[15] Kotsev, A., Minghini, M., Tomas, R., Cetl, V., & Lutz, M. (2020). From spatial data infrastructures to data spaces—A technological perspective on the evolution of European SDIs. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(3), 176.
[16] Kufoniyi, O., & Akinyede, J. O. (2004). Mainstreaming geospatial information in national development in Nigeria. Proceedings of the XXth ISPRS Congress: Geo-Imagery Bridging Continents, Istanbul, Turkey.
[17] Macauley, M. K. (2015). The value of information: Measuring the economic benefits of Earth science data. Space Policy, 34, 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2015.05.007
[18] NASA. (2024). ESDIS STAC API implementation status. NASA Earth Science Data and Information System Project. https://earthdata.nasa.gov/
[19] Ohunene, I. H., Adepoju, M. O., James, G. K., Salami, V. T., Oyewumi, A., Afogbon, E., Odia, B., Mahmood, M. M., Shehu, I., Adama, M. B., Abdulazeez, S. K., Sanusi, M., Galadima, A. M., Kpanja, A. S., Udya, A., Abah, O. A., Isah, Z., Fatima, S., Ibrahim, B., ... Ismailu, A. T. (2026). Assessment of forest reserve deforestation in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nigeria. Open Access Library Journal, 13, e14961. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1114961
[20] National Space Research and Development Agency Act of 2010, § 6(k), Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette (2010).
[21] Open Data Commons. (2023). Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By) v1.0. Open Knowledge Foundation. https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1-0/
[22] Oxera. (2006). The economic contribution of the Ordnance Survey: 1999–2006. Oxera Consulting Ltd. https://www.oxera.com/
[23] Pira International. (2019). Commercial exploitation of Europe's public sector information: Final report for the European Commission. European Commission Directorate-General for the Information Society.
[24] Salami, A. T. (2006). Monitoring Nigerian forest with NigeriaSat-1 and other satellites. In A. T. Salami (Ed.), Imperatives of space technology for sustainable forest management in Nigeria (pp. 22–41). Obafemi Awolowo University Press.
[25] Satellogic. (2023). Virtual constellations-as-a-service and virtual image catalogs. Presentation delivered at FOSS4G 2023, Prizren, Kosovo.
[26] Sudmanns, M., Augustin, H., Killough, B., Cherry, J., & Tiede, D. (2023). Evaluating open-source cloud-native architectures for Earth observation data cubes in developing space economies. International Journal of Digital Earth, 16(1), 412–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2023.2189401
[27] Ueberschar, B., Wallentin, G., & Blaschke, T. (2021). Business models for open spatial data infrastructures: Balancing public good and financial sustainability. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(4), 215. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10040215
[28] UN-GGIM. (2018). Integrated Geospatial Information Framework: A strategic guide to develop and strengthen national geospatial information management (Part 1: Overarching Strategic Framework). United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management. https://ggim.un.org/IGIF/
[29] UN-GGIM. (2025a). Introduction to the United Nations Integrated Geospatial Information Framework and the development of Country-level Action Plans. United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management. https://ggim.un.org/
[30] United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, & United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2023). Global geospatial information management in Africa: Financial appropriation framework and the economic benefits of geospatial information in Africa (Contributors: Kufoniyi, O., & Warekuromor, T.). United Nations. https://hdl.handle.net/10855/50655
[31] United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. (2025). Compendium of space technologies for disaster risk reduction and spatial data management. UNOOSA / UN-SPIDER Secretariat. https://www.unoosa.org/
[32] Von Scherenberg, F., Hellmeier, M., & Otto, B. (2024). Data sovereignty in information systems. Electronic Markets, 34(1), 15.
[33] Warekuromor, T. (2026, February). Operationalising the Environmental Health Intelligence Hub in Nigeria [Project showcase]. GEO Health Community of Practice. Group on Earth Observations. https://earthobservations.org/about-us/news/how-africa-uses-earth-intelligence-to-combat-infectious-disease
[34] Warekuromor, T., James, A., Anifowose, B., & Trodd, N. (2017). A distributed, scalable and provenance-enabled data access protocol for spatial data infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 21st International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) (pp. 180–185). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCWD.2017.8066691
[35] World Bank. (2019). Doing Business 2020: Comparing business regulation in 190 economies. World Bank Group. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/32436
[36] Yue, P., & Wang, K. (2025). Towards an AI Cube for EO data inference in a distributed infrastructure. Big Earth Data, 1-39.
How to cite this paper
@article{1722299,
author = {Warekuromor Tubolayefa (PhD), Umar Tanimu Yakubu, Ashibuogwu Kevin},
title = {Operationalizing National Space Assets: A Framework for a Sovereign Satellite Data Hub and Marketplace},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {1359-1371},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722299.pdf},
abstract = {Space agencies in emerging economies face a structural transition: shifting from historical data acquisition paradigms to the delivery of high-value, automated geospatial services while ensuring infrastructure sustainability. This paper proposes a conceptual framework for a sovereign Satellite Data Hub and Marketplace—a reference architecture designed to transition space assets from siloed storage environments into a centralised, API-driven ecosystem. Aligned with the United Nations Integrated Geospatial Information Framework (UN-IGIF) and National Geospatial Data Infrastructure (NGDI) specifications, the framework leverages an open-source, cloud-native technology stack compliant with Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) and ISO/TC 211 standards, including SpatioTemporal Asset Catalogs (STAC v1.1.0), GeoNode, and Cloud Optimized GeoTIFFs (COGs). Furthermore, it introduces a tiered "Free Data, Fee for Processing" economic model engineered to monetise automated compute cycles and internal analytical expertise without compromising public-good access requirements. By consolidating technical architecture with sector-specific socio-economic impact modelling, this blueprint provides a scalable roadmap for emerging space nations to achieve international interoperability alongside domestic financial self-sufficiency.},
keywords = {Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI), Cloud-Native Geospatial, SpatioTemporal Asset Catalog (STAC), Cloud Optimized GeoTIFF (COG), Geospatial Economics, Earth Observation, Satellite Technology, Public-Good Data, Financial Sustainability, Data Governance, UN-IGIF},
month = {August},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722299}
}