Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722424
Artificial Intelligence Applications in Power Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Implementations, and Future Directions
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: AI and ML in Electrical Power Systems
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I2-1722424
Abstract
The electrical power industry is undergoing a structural transformation driven by the increasing penetration of variable renewable energy, the proliferation of distributed energy resources, the electrification of transport, and the digitalisation of grid infrastructure through advanced metering and wide-area sensing. These trends have substantially increased the dimensionality, uncertainty, and temporal volatility of power system operation, exceeding the practical limits of classical model-based analytical tools. Artificial intelligence (AI), encompassing machine learning, deep learning, fuzzy inference, evolutionary computation, and reinforcement learning, has emerged as a complementary and, in several domains, a superior paradigm for addressing these challenges. This paper presents a comprehensive and critical review of AI applications across the principal functional domains of power systems: short- and long-term load and renewable generation forecasting, fault detection and protection, state estimation and security assessment, optimal dispatch and unit commitment, microgrid and demand-side energy management, electric vehicle integration, and cybersecurity of cyber-physical grid infrastructure. Rather than offering a purely descriptive catalogue of prior work, the review critically evaluates the comparative strengths, computational costs, data requirements, interpretability limitations, and deployment barriers of competing AI paradigms, drawing on more than one hundred and twenty recent peer-reviewed sources. Comparative tables synthesising algorithmic performance, application maturity, and outstanding technical gaps are presented. The review further interrogates persistent challenges, including data scarcity for rare fault classes, the lack of explainability in deep models for safety-critical protection functions, adversarial vulnerability of learning-based controllers, and the absence of standardised benchmarks for cross-study comparison. The paper concludes that while AI techniques deliver demonstrable improvements in forecasting accuracy, fault diagnosis speed, and operational efficiency, their large-scale deployment in mission-critical protection and control loops remains constrained by reliability, interpretability, and regulatory certification requirements. Recommendations for hybrid physics-informed and explainable AI architectures are proposed as a pathway toward trustworthy adoption in next-generation power systems.
Keywords
artificial intelligence; power systems; machine learning; deep learning; smart grid; fault diagnosis; renewable energy forecasting.
References
[1] Pandey, U., Pathak, A., Kumar, A., & Mondal, S. (2023). Applications of artificial intelligence in power system operation, control and planning: A review. Clean Energy, 7(6), 1199–1218.
[2] Vasudevan, K. (2023). Applications of artificial intelligence in power electronics and drives systems: A comprehensive review. Journal of Power Electronics, 1(1).
[3] Bose, B. K. (1994). Expert system, fuzzy logic, and neural network applications in power electronics and motion control. Proceedings of the IEEE, 82(8), 1303–1323.
[4] Runhao, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in power system security and stability analysis: A comprehensive review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.08914.
[5] Forootan, M. M., Larki, I., Zahedi, R., & Ahmadi, A. (2022). Machine learning and deep learning in energy systems: A review. Sustainability, 14(8), 4832.
[6] Hu, W., Wu, Q., Anvari-Moghaddam, A., Zhao, J., Xu, X., Abulanwar, S. M., & Cao, D. (2022). Applications of artificial intelligence in renewable energy systems. IET Renewable Power Generation, 16, 1279–1282.
[7] Jafari, M., Kavousi-Fard, A., Dabbaghjamanesh, M., & Karim, M. (2022). A survey on deep learning role in distribution automation system: A new collaborative learning-to-learning concept. IEEE Access, 10, 81220–81238.
[8] Chen, X., Qu, G., Tang, Y., Low, S., & Li, N. (2022). Reinforcement learning for selective key applications in power systems: Recent advances and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 13(4), 2935–2958.
[9] Huang, B., & Wang, J. (2023). Applications of physics-informed neural networks in power systems: A review. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 38(1), 572–588.
[10] Entezari, A., Aslani, A., Zahedi, R., & Noorollahi, Y. (2023). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in energy systems: A bibliographic perspective. Energy Strategy Reviews, 45, 101017.
[11] Muqeet, H. A., Liaqat, R., Jamil, M., & Khan, A. A. (2023). A state-of-the-art review of smart energy systems and their management in a smart grid environment. Energies, 16(1), 472.
[12] Franki, V., Majnaric, D., & Viskovic, A. (2023). A comprehensive review of artificial intelligence companies in the power sector. Energies, 16(3), 1077.
[13] Saffari, M., & Khodayar, M. (2024). Spatiotemporal deep learning for power system applications: A survey. IEEE Access, 12, 98765–98790.
[14] Yang, Y., Li, W., Gulliver, T. A., & Li, S. (2020). Bayesian deep learning-based probabilistic load forecasting in smart grids. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(7), 4703–4713.
[15] Qin, D., Wang, C., Wen, Q., Chen, W., Sun, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). Personalized federated DARTS for electricity load forecasting of individual buildings. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 14(6), 4888–4901.
[16] Wan, C., Cao, Z., Lee, W.-J., Song, Y., & Ju, P. (2023). An adaptive ensemble data-driven approach for nonparametric probabilistic forecasting of electricity load. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 14(6), 4927–4941.
[17] Dong, X., Qian, L., & Huang, L. (2017). Short-term load forecasting in smart grid: A combined CNN and K-means clustering approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) (pp. 119–125). IEEE.
[18] Al-Jamimi, H. A., BinMakhashen, G. M., Worku, M. Y., & Hassan, M. A. (2023). Advancements in household load forecasting: Deep learning model with hyperparameter optimization. Electronics, 12(24), 4909.
[19] Nabavi, S. A., Mohammadi, S., Motlagh, N. H., Tarkoma, S., & Geyer, P. (2024). Deep learning modeling in electricity load forecasting: Improved accuracy by combining DWT and LSTM. Energy Reports, 12, 2873–2900.
[20] Gao, J., Chen, Y., Hu, W., & Zhang, D. (2023). An adaptive deep-learning load forecasting framework by integrating transformer and domain knowledge. Advances in Applied Energy, 10, 100142.
[21] Wen, X., Liao, J., Niu, Q., Shen, N., & Bao, Y. (2024). Deep learning-driven hybrid model for short-term load forecasting and smart grid information management. Scientific Reports, 14, 13720.
[22] Aguiar-Perez, J. M., & Perez-Juarez, M. A. (2023). An insight of deep learning based demand forecasting in smart grids. Sensors, 23(3), 1467.
[23] Chen, Z., Jin, Y., Zhang, Z., & Geng, X. (2022). An innovative method-based CEEMDAN-IGWO-GRU hybrid algorithm for short-term load forecasting. Electrical Engineering, 104(5), 3137–3156.
[24] Thomas, J. B., Chaudhari, S. G., Shihabudheen, K. V., & Verma, N. K. (2023). CNN-based transformer model for fault detection in power system networks. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 72, 1–10.
[25] Rizeakos, V., Bachoumis, A., Andriopoulos, N., Birbas, M., & Birbas, A. (2023). Deep learning-based application for fault location identification and type classification in active distribution grids. Applied Energy, 338, 120932.
[26] Yousaf, M. Z., Raza, A., Khan, S., & Mokhlis, H. (2024). Bayesian-optimized LSTM-DWT approach for reliable fault detection in MMC-based HVDC systems. Scientific Reports, 14, 17968.
[27] Yousaf, M. Z., Raza, A., Rasheed, J., & Akhtar, W. (2023). A novel DC fault protection scheme based on intelligent network for meshed DC grids. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 154, 109423.
[28] Xi, Y., Zhang, W., Zhou, F., Tang, X., Li, Z., Zeng, X., & Zhang, P. (2023). Transmission line fault detection and classification based on SA-MobileNetV3. Energy Reports, 9, 955–968.
[29] Belagoune, S., Bali, N., Bakdi, A., Baadji, B., & Atif, K. (2021). Deep learning through LSTM classification and regression for transmission line fault detection, diagnosis and location in large-scale multi-machine power systems. Measurement, 177, 109330.
[30] Shukla, P. K., & Deepa, K. (2024). Deep learning techniques for transmission line fault classification: A comparative study. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(2), 102427.
[31] Moradzadeh, A., Teimourzadeh, H., Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B., & Pourhossein, K. (2022). Hybrid CNN-LSTM approaches for identification of type and locations of transmission line faults. Power System Technology, 46(7), 2554–2566.
[32] Shakiba, F. M., Azizi, S. M., Zhou, M., & Abusorrah, A. (2023). Application of machine learning methods in fault detection and classification of power transmission lines: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(7), 5799–5836.
[33] Mendu, B., & Nwulu, N. I. (2025). State-of-the-art fault detection and diagnosis in power transformers: A review of machine learning and hybrid methods. IEEE Access, 13, 24112–24138.
[34] Lu, S., Gao, W., Hong, C., & Sun, Y. (2021). A newly-designed fault diagnostic method for transformers via improved empirical wavelet transform and kernel extreme learning machine. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 49, 101320.
[35] Shang, H., Liu, Z., Wei, Y., & Zhang, S. (2024). A novel fault diagnosis method for a power transformer based on multi-scale approximate entropy and optimized convolutional networks. Entropy, 26(3), 186.
[36] Li, Q., Luo, H., Cheng, H., Deng, Y., Sun, W., Li, W., & Liu, Z. (2023). Incipient fault detection in power distribution system: A time-frequency embedded deep learning based approach. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 72, 1–14.
[37] Ibrahim, A., Anayi, F., Packianather, M., & Alomari, O. A. (2022). New hybrid invasive weed optimization and machine learning approach for fault detection. Energies, 15(4), 1488.
[38] Hossain, E., Khan, I., Un-Noor, F., Sikander, S. S., & Sunny, M. S. H. (2019). Application of big data and machine learning in smart grid, and associated security concerns: A review. IEEE Access, 7, 13960–13988.
[39] Sohail, A., Ul Islam, N., Ul Haq, A., Ul Islam, S., Shafi, I., & Park, J. (2023). Fault detection and computation of power in PV cells under faulty conditions using deep learning. Energy Reports, 9, 4325–4336.
[40] Guo, C., Wang, X., Zheng, Y., & Zhang, F. (2022). Real-time optimal energy management of microgrid with uncertainties based on deep reinforcement learning. Energy, 238, 121873.
[41] Sui, Y., & Song, S. (2020). A multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for lithium-ion battery scheduling problems. Energies, 13(8), 1982.
[42] Mussi, M., Pellegrino, L., Pindaro, O. F., Restelli, M., & Trovo, F. (2024). A reinforcement learning controller optimizing costs and battery state of health in smart grids. Journal of Energy Storage, 82, 110529.
[43] Hao, G., Li, Y., Li, Y., Jiang, L., & Zeng, Z. (2024). Lyapunov-based safe reinforcement learning for microgrid energy management. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. Advance online publication.
[44] Li, C., Yu, X., Huang, T., & He, X. (2018). Distributed optimal consensus over resource allocation network and its application to dynamical economic dispatch. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 29(6), 2407–2418.
[45] Guo, F., Xu, B., Zhang, W.-A., Wen, C., Zhang, D., & Yu, L. (2022). Training deep neural network for optimal power allocation in islanded microgrid systems: A distributed learning-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(5), 2057–2069.
[46] Bui, V.-H., Hussain, A., & Kim, H.-M. (2020). Double deep Q-learning-based distributed operation of battery energy storage system considering uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 11(1), 457–469.
[47] Amer, A. A., Shaban, K., & Massoud, A. M. (2023). DRL-HEMS: Deep reinforcement learning agent for demand response in home energy management systems considering customers and operators perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 14(1), 239–250.
[48] Gao, S., Xiang, C., Yu, M., Tan, K. T., & Lee, T. H. (2022). Online optimal power scheduling of a microgrid via imitation learning. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 13(2), 861–876.
[49] Dolatabadi, A., Abdeltawab, H., & Mohamed, Y. A.-R. I. (2023). A novel model-free deep reinforcement learning framework for energy management of a PV-integrated energy hub. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 14(1), 657–669.
[50] Tian, P., Xiao, X., Wang, K., & Ding, R. (2016). A hierarchical energy management system based on hierarchical optimization for microgrid community economic operation. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 7(5), 2230–2241.
[51] Hamidi, M., Raihani, A., & Bouattane, O. (2023). Sustainable intelligent energy management system for microgrid using multi-agent systems: A case study. Sustainability, 15(16), 12546.
[52] Benti, N. E., Chaka, M. D., & Semie, A. G. (2023). Forecasting renewable energy generation with machine learning and deep learning: Current advances and future prospects. Sustainability, 15(9), 7087.
[53] Rajagukguk, R. A., Ramadhan, R. A. A., & Lee, H. J. (2020). A review on deep learning models for forecasting time series data of solar irradiance and photovoltaic power. Energies, 13(24), 6623.
[54] Husein, M., & Chung, I. Y. (2019). Day-ahead solar irradiance forecasting for microgrids using a long short-term memory recurrent neural network: A deep learning approach. Energies, 12(10), 1856.
[55] Elsaraiti, M., & Merabet, A. (2022). Solar power forecasting using deep learning techniques. IEEE Access, 10, 31692–31698.
[56] Kim, E. G., Akhtar, M. S., & Yang, O. B. (2023). Designing solar power generation output forecasting methods using time series algorithms. Electric Power Systems Research, 216, 109073.
[57] Tsai, W.-C., et al. (2023). A review of modern wind power generation forecasting technologies. Sustainability, 15(14), 10757.
[58] Liu, X., & Zhou, J. (2024). Short-term wind power forecasting based on multivariate/multi-step LSTM with temporal feature attention mechanism. Applied Soft Computing, 150, 111050.
[59] Chen, W., Zhou, H., Cheng, L., & Xia, M. (2023). Prediction of regional wind power generation using a multi-objective optimized deep learning model with temporal pattern attention. Energy, 278, 127942.
[60] Prema, V., Bhaskar, K., Sunitha, K., & Rao, K. U. (2021). Critical review of data, models and performance metrics for wind and solar power forecast. IEEE Access, 10, 667–688.
[61] Hong, Y.-Y., & Rioflorido, C. L. P. P. (2019). A hybrid deep learning-based neural network for 24-h ahead wind power forecasting. Applied Energy, 250, 530–539.
[62] Al Arafat, K. A., Creer, K., Debnath, A., Olowu, T. O., & Parvez, I. (2024). PV-power forecasting using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (eIT) (pp. 480–484). IEEE.
[63] Boyaci, O., Umunnakwe, A., Sahu, A., Narimani, M. R., Ismail, M., Davis, K. R., & Serpedin, E. (2022). Graph neural networks based detection of stealth false data injection attacks in smart grids. IEEE Systems Journal, 16(2), 2946–2957.
[64] Johnson, J., Berg, T., Anderson, B., & Wright, B. (2022). Review of electric vehicle charger cybersecurity vulnerabilities, potential impacts, and defenses. Energies, 15(11), 3931.
[65] Marino, D. L., Wickramasinghe, C. S., Amarasinghe, K., Challa, H., & Manic, M. (2019). Cyber and physical anomaly detection in smart grids. In Proceedings of the IEEE Resilience Week (RWS) (pp. 187–193). IEEE.
[66] Girdhar, M., Hong, J., Lee, H., & Song, T. J. (2022). Hidden Markov models-based anomaly correlations for the cyber-physical security of EV charging stations. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 13(5), 3903–3914.
[67] Basnet, M., & Ali, M. H. (2023). Deep reinforcement learning-driven mitigation of adverse effects of cyber-attacks on electric vehicle charging station. Energies, 16(21), 7296.
[68] Sepehrzad, R., Khalili Dizaji, A., Moghaddas Tafreshi, S. M., & Saadatmand, S. (2024). Enhancing cyber-resilience in electric vehicle charging stations: A multi-agent deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25(11), 18049–18062.
[69] Yang, L., Moubayed, A., & Shami, A. (2022). MTH-IDS: A multitiered hybrid intrusion detection system for internet of vehicles. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(1), 616–632.
[70] Hegde, S. R., Chandrakala, V. V., Thirupathi, G. K., & Shankar, V. K. A. (2024). Enhancing anomaly detection in electric vehicle supply equipment networks using classical and ensemble learning approaches. In Proceedings of the IEEE Control Instrumentation System Conference (CISCON) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
[71] Poudel, S., Abouyoussef, M., Baugh, J. E., & Ismail, M. (2024). Attack design for maximum malware spread through EVs commute and charge in power-transportation systems. IEEE Systems Journal, 18(3), 1809–1820.
[72] Nassar, A. A., & Morsi, W. G. (2024). Early detection of cyber-physical attacks on electric vehicles fast charging stations using wavelets and deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems, 2, 112–124.
[73] Basnet, M., & Ali, M. H. (2023). Deep-learning-powered cyber-attacks mitigation strategy in the EV charging infrastructure. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
[74] Anli, Y. A., Ciplak, Z., Sakaliuzun, M., Izgu, S. Z., & Yildiz, K. (2024). DDoS detection in electric vehicle charging stations: A deep learning perspective via CICEV2023 dataset. Internet of Things, 28, 101343.
[75] ElKashlan, M., Aslan, H., Said Elsayed, M., Jurcut, A. D., & Azer, M. A. (2023). Intrusion detection for electric vehicle charging systems. Algorithms, 16(2), 75.
[76] Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., et al. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529–533.
[77] Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., & Klimov, O. (2017). Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347.
[78] Lillicrap, T. P., Hunt, J. J., Pritzel, A., Heess, N., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., Silver, D., & Wierstra, D. (2015). Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.02971.
[79] Silver, D., Schrittwieser, J., Simonyan, K., Antonoglou, I., Huang, A., Guez, A., et al. (2017). Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge. Nature, 550(7676), 354–359.
[80] Hatziargyriou, N., Asano, H., Iravani, R., & Marnay, C. (2007). Microgrids. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 5(4), 78–94.
[81] Bi, W., Shu, Y., Dong, W., & Yang, Q. (2020). Real-time energy management of microgrid using reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Applications to Business, Engineering and Science (DCABES) (pp. 38–41). IEEE.
[82] IEEE PES PSRC Working Group. (2023). Practical applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in power system protection and control (IEEE PES Technical Report PES-TR112). IEEE.
[83] Miraftabzadeh, S. M., Longo, M., Foiadelli, F., Pasetti, M., & Igual, R. (2021). Advances in the application of machine learning techniques for power system analytics: A survey. Energies, 14(16), 4776.
[84] Dabou, R. T., Kamwa, I., Tagoudjeu, J., & Mugombozi, C. F. (2022). Supervised learning of overcomplete dictionaries for rapid response-based dynamic stability prediction. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37(6), 4912–4924.
[85] Bana, P. R., & Amin, M. (2022). Comparative assessment of supervised learning ANN controllers for grid-connected VSC system. In Proceedings of the IECON 48th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
[86] Boudour, M., & Hellal, A. (2004). Combined use of unsupervised and supervised learning for large-scale power system static security mapping. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (pp. 1321–1326). IEEE.
[87] Xie, J., Alvarez-Fernandez, I., & Sun, W. (2020). A review of machine learning applications in power system resilience. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
[88] Abid, A., Khan, M. T., & Iqbal, J. (2021). A review on fault detection and diagnosis techniques: Basics and beyond. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54, 3639–3664.
[89] Sarswatula, S. A., Pugh, T., & Prabhu, V. (2022). Modeling energy consumption using machine learning. Frontiers in Manufacturing Technology, 2, 855208.
[90] Balasubramanian, S. (2023). Literature review on developing explainable AI for trustworthy decision-making. International Journal of Design and Manufacturing Technology, 14(1), 956–965.
[91] Qashqai, P., Vahedi, H., & Al-Haddad, K. (2017). Applications of artificial intelligence in power electronics. In Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Conference of the Industrial Electronics Society (IECON) (pp. 4990–4995). IEEE.
[92] Aziz, A. F. A., Khalid, S. N., Mustafa, M. W., Shareef, H., & Aliyu, G. (2013). Artificial intelligent meter development based on advanced metering infrastructure technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, 191–197.
[93] Muthuvinayagam, M., Sivakumar, P. C., Wiselin, M. C. J., & Sakthikumaran, M. (2020). Comprehensive analysis on power electronic systems in relation with machine learning. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Technology, 11(1), 57–62.
[94] Rastgoufard, S. (2018). Applications of artificial intelligence in power systems [Master's thesis, University of New Orleans].
[95] Cao, H., Zhou, C., Meng, Y., Shen, J., & Xie, X. (2024). Advancement in transformer fault diagnosis technology. Frontiers in Energy Research, 12, 1437614.
[96] Li, G., Wei, M., Shao, H., Liang, P., & Duan, C. (2024). Wavelet knowledge-driven transformer for intelligent machinery fault detection with zero-fault samples. IEEE Sensors Journal, 24(23), 35986–35996.
[97] Cui, M., & Wang, Y. (2020). Fault detection of rotating machinery based on wavelet transform and improved deep neural network. In Proceedings of the IEEE 9th Data Driven Control and Learning Systems Conference (DDCLS) (pp. 449–454). IEEE.
[98] Sahoo, S. K., Yanine, F. F., Kulkarni, V., & Kalam, A. (2024). Recent advances in renewable energy automation and energy management systems. Energies, 17(10), 2381.
[99] Lago, J., De Ridder, F., & De Schutter, B. (2018). Forecasting spot electricity prices: Deep learning approaches and empirical comparison of traditional algorithms. Applied Energy, 221, 386–405.
[100] Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989). Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2(5), 359–366.
[101] Hassan, M., Tariq, N., Alsirhani, A., Alomari, A., Khan, F. A., Alshahrani, M. M., & Humayun, M. (2023). GITM: A GINI index-based trust mechanism to mitigate and isolate Sybil attack in RPL-enabled smart grid advanced metering infrastructures. IEEE Access, 11, 62680–62696.
[102] Meng, F., Zhao, S., Sun, D., & Wang, Y. (2021). An intelligent hybrid wavelet-adversarial deep model for accurate prediction of solar power generation. Energy Reports, 7, 2155–2164.
[103] Wang, L., Hu, M., & Zhao, J. (2023). An effective method for sensing power safety distance based on monocular vision depth estimation. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2023, 8480342.
[104] Bin Akter, S., Ahmed, S., & Islam, M. T. (2024). Ensemble learning based transmission line fault classification using phasor measurement unit data with explainable AI. Scientific Reports, 14, 28342.
[105] Fenton, H., Morsi, W. G., & Diduch, C. P. (2023). Deep learning based relay for online fault detection, classification, and fault location in a grid-connected microgrid. IEEE Access, 11, 62674–62696.
[106] Tabassum, S., & Khalghani, M. R. (2023). Cybersecurity challenges in microgrids: Inverter based resources and electric vehicles. Springer.
[107] Alqahtani, H., & Kumar, G. (2024). Cybersecurity in electric and flying vehicles: Threats, challenges, AI solutions and future directions. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(12), 1–37.
[108] Aljohani, T., & Almutairi, A. (2024). A comprehensive survey of cyberattacks on EVs: Research domains, attacks, defensive mechanisms, and verification methods. Defence Technology, 32, 1–23.
[109] Boyaci, O., Narimani, M. R., Davis, K. R., Ismail, M., Overbye, T. J., & Serpedin, E. (2022). Joint detection and localization of stealth false data injection attacks in smart grids using graph neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 13(1), 807–819.
[110] Sayghe, A., Hu, Y., Zografopoulos, I., Liu, X., Dutta, R. G., Jin, Y., & Konstantinou, C. (2020). Survey of machine learning methods for detecting false data injection attacks in power systems. IET Smart Grid, 3(5), 581–595.
[111] He, Y., Mendis, G. J., & Wei, J. (2017). Real-time detection of false data injection attacks in smart grid: A deep learning-based intelligent mechanism. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(5), 2505–2516.
[112] Hong, J., Liu, C.-C., & Govindarasu, M. (2014). Integrated anomaly detection for cyber security of the substations. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 5(4), 1643–1653.
[113] Cui, M., Wang, J., & Yue, M. (2019). Machine learning-based anomaly detection for load forecasting under cyberattacks. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 10(5), 5724–5734.
[114] Zhang, Y., Srivastava, A. K., Wagle, A., & Hooshmand, R. (2023). Anomaly detection in cyber-physical systems for synchrophasor applications using machine learning. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 38(4), 3596–3608.
[115] Wu, D., Srivastava, A. K., & Wang, X. (2023). Hierarchical machine learning based framework for cyber-physical security of synchrophasor-based monitoring system in power grid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 14(4), 3171–3183.
[116] Yang, L., Moubayed, A., Hamieh, I., & Shami, A. (2019). Tree-based intelligent intrusion detection system in internet of vehicles. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
[117] Mohammadpourfard, M., Weng, Y., Pechenizkiy, M., Tajdinian, M., & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B. (2020). Ensuring cybersecurity of smart grid against data integrity attacks under concept drift. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 119, 105947.
[118] Khan, H. M., Khan, S., Tariq, F., & Numan, M. (2022). Deep learning based applications in power systems: A review. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Power Generation Systems and Renewable Energy Technologies (PGSRET) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
[119] Wang, Z., & Zhang, H. (2025). Causal deep learning for personalized federated electricity load forecasting. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 16(1), 424–438.
[120] Mu, C., Shi, Y., Xu, N., Wang, X., Tang, Z., Jia, H., & Geng, H. (2023). Multi-objective interval optimization dispatch of microgrid via deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 14(5), 3508–3523.
[121] Mohammadi, P., Darshi, R., Gohari Darabkhani, H., & Shamaghdari, S. (2025). Multiagent energy management system design using reinforcement learning: The new energy lab training set case study. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 2025, 3574030.
[122] Gao, S., Xu, Y., Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., Zhou, X., & Wang, J. (2025). Multi-agent imitation learning based energy management of a microgrid with hybrid energy storage and real-time pricing. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 12(8), 9876–9889.
[123] Sui, N., Zhou, A., & Haarnoja, T. (2018). Soft actor-critic: Off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (pp. 1861–1870).
[124] Hussain, S., & AlAlili, A. (2017). A hybrid solar radiation modeling approach using wavelet multiresolution analysis and artificial neural networks. Applied Energy, 208, 540–550.
[125] Qolomany, B., Maabreh, M., Al-Fuqaha, A., Gupta, A., & Benhaddou, D. (2017). Parameters optimization of deep learning models using particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the 13th International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) (pp. 1285–1290). IEEE.
[126] Lawal, A., Rehman, S., Alhems, M., & Mohandes, M. (2021). Wind speed prediction using hybrid 1D CNN and BLSTM network. IEEE Access, 9, 156207–156217.
[127] Piotrowski, P., Baczynski, D., Kopyt, S., & Gulczynski, T. (2019). Analysis of forecasted meteorological data (NWP) for efficient spatial forecasting of wind power generation. Electric Power Systems Research, 175, 105891.
[128] Sun, H., Yan, Y., & Zhang, H. (2015). Study of solar radiation prediction and modeling of relationships between solar radiation and meteorological variables. Energy Conversion and Management, 105, 880–890.
How to cite this paper
@article{1722424,
author = {Ibrahim Musa Ibrahim, Mohammed Mustapha, Mohammed Wakilbe},
title = {Artificial Intelligence Applications in Power Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Implementations, and Future Directions},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {2652-2667},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722424.pdf},
abstract = {The electrical power industry is undergoing a structural transformation driven by the increasing penetration of variable renewable energy, the proliferation of distributed energy resources, the electrification of transport, and the digitalisation of grid infrastructure through advanced metering and wide-area sensing. These trends have substantially increased the dimensionality, uncertainty, and temporal volatility of power system operation, exceeding the practical limits of classical model-based analytical tools. Artificial intelligence (AI), encompassing machine learning, deep learning, fuzzy inference, evolutionary computation, and reinforcement learning, has emerged as a complementary and, in several domains, a superior paradigm for addressing these challenges. This paper presents a comprehensive and critical review of AI applications across the principal functional domains of power systems: short- and long-term load and renewable generation forecasting, fault detection and protection, state estimation and security assessment, optimal dispatch and unit commitment, microgrid and demand-side energy management, electric vehicle integration, and cybersecurity of cyber-physical grid infrastructure. Rather than offering a purely descriptive catalogue of prior work, the review critically evaluates the comparative strengths, computational costs, data requirements, interpretability limitations, and deployment barriers of competing AI paradigms, drawing on more than one hundred and twenty recent peer-reviewed sources. Comparative tables synthesising algorithmic performance, application maturity, and outstanding technical gaps are presented. The review further interrogates persistent challenges, including data scarcity for rare fault classes, the lack of explainability in deep models for safety-critical protection functions, adversarial vulnerability of learning-based controllers, and the absence of standardised benchmarks for cross-study comparison. The paper concludes that while AI techniques deliver demonstrable improvements in forecasting accuracy, fault diagnosis speed, and operational efficiency, their large-scale deployment in mission-critical protection and control loops remains constrained by reliability, interpretability, and regulatory certification requirements. Recommendations for hybrid physics-informed and explainable AI architectures are proposed as a pathway toward trustworthy adoption in next-generation power systems.},
keywords = {artificial intelligence; power systems; machine learning; deep learning; smart grid; fault diagnosis; renewable energy forecasting.},
month = {August},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722424}
}