An AI-Resilient Cybersecurity Framework for 5G Telecommunications Networks: Detecting Adversarial Machine Learning, Autonomous Intrusions, and Intelligent Edge Threats in Critical Infrastructure

References

[1] Agyei, K.G., Nemure, T., Samushonga, C. and Mupa, M.N. (2026a) “Governance-driven security automation for municipal and SMB cloud modernization: A NIST CSF 2.0-aligned remediation operating model”, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Munashe -Naphtali-Mupa (Accessed: 21 June 2026).

[2] Agyei, K.G., Monjoma, M.B., Samushonga, C. and Mupa, M.N. (2026b) “Explainable risk- based vulnerability prioritization in hybrid cloud: Integrating CVSS, EPSS, and CISA KEV with asset criticality signals”, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Munashe -Naphtali-Mupa (Accessed: 21 June 2026).

[3] Barakabitze, A.A., Ahmad, A., Mijumbi, R. and Hines, A. (2020) “5G network slicing using SDN and NFV: A survey of taxonomy, architectures and future challenges”, Computer Networks, 167, 106984.

[4] Chisora, H.H., Mupa, M.N., Chitate, I.C. and Chiwanga, R. (2026) “Network security in 5G - threats, vulnerabilities and mitigation strategies”, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Munashe -Naphtali-Mupa (Accessed: 21 June 2026).

[5] De Alwis, C., Porambage, P., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T.R. and Liyanage, M. (2024) “A survey on network slicing security: Attacks, challenges, solutions and research directions”, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 26(1), pp. 534 -570. 10.1109/COMST.2023.3312349.

[6] Ghani, H., Salekzamankhani, S. and Virdee, B. (2023) “Critical analysis of 5G networks traffic intrusion using PCA, t-SNE and UMAP visualization and classifying attacks”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.04864.

[7] ITU (2024) 5G - fifth generation of mobile technologies. International Telecommunication Union. Available at: https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/backgroun ders/Pages/5G-fifth-generation-of-mobile- technologies.aspx (Accessed: 21 June 2026).

[8] Kaggle (2025a) 5G-NIDD dataset. Available at: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/humera11/5 g-nidd-dataset (Accessed: 21 June 2026).

[9] Kaggle (2025b) Global Cybersecurity Threats (2015-2024). Available at: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/atharvasoun dankar/global-cybersecurity-threats-2015- 2024 (Accessed: 21 June 2026).

[10] Khan, R., Kumar, P., Jayakody, D.N.K. and Liyanage, M. (2020) “A survey on security and privacy of 5G technologies: Potential solutions, recent advancements, and future directions”, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 22(1), pp. 196-248. 10.1109/COMST.2019.2933899.

[11] Li, J., Zhao, Z. and Li, R. (2017) “A machine learning based intrusion detection system for software defined 5G network”, arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.04571.

[12] Maglaras, L.A., Kim, K.H., Janicke, H., Ferrag, M.A., Rallis, S., Fragkou, P., et al. (2018) “Cyber security of critical infrastructures”, ICT Express, 4(1), pp. 42-45.

[13] Musser, M., Lohn, A., Dempsey, J.X., Spring, J., Kumar, R.S.S., Leong, B., Liaghati, C., et al. (2023) Adversarial Machine Learning and Cybersecurity: Risks, Challenges, and Legal Implications. Washington, DC: Center for Security and Emerging Technology. 10.51593/2022CA003.

[14] Nemure, T., Mupa, M.N., Agyei, K.G., Chisora, H.H., Mudzingwa, K. and Chiwanga, R. (2026) “Cybersecurity of critical infrastructures: Challenges and future perspectives”, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Munashe -Naphtali-Mupa (Accessed: 21 June 2026).

[15] NIST (2020) Zero Trust Architecture, Special Publication 800-207. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[16] NIST (2023) Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), NIST AI 100-1. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. 10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1.

[17] NIST (2024a) Module-Lattice-Based Key- Encapsulation Mechanism Standard, FIPS 203. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. 10.6028/NIST.FIPS.203.

[18] NIST (2024b) Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard, FIPS 204. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[19] NIST (2024c) Stateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Standard, FIPS 205. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[20] NIST (2025) Adversarial Machine Learning: A Taxonomy and Terminology of Attacks and Mitigations, NIST AI 100 -2e2025. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[21] Rose, S., Borchert, O., Mitchell, S. and Connelly, S. (2020) Zero Trust Architecture, NIST Special Publication 800 -207. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[22] Sagduyu, Y.E., Erpek, T. and Shi, Y. (2021) “Adversarial machine learning for 5G communications security”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.02656.

[23] Samarakoon, S., Siriwardhana, Y., Porambage, P., Liyanage, M., Chang, S.Y., Kim, J., Kim, J. and Ylianttila, M. (2022) “5G-NIDD: A comprehensive network intrusion detection dataset generated over 5G wireless network”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.01298.

[24] Siriwardhana, Y., Samarakoon, S., Porambage, P., Liyanage, M., Chang, S.Y., Kim, J., Kim, J. and Ylianttila, M. (2025) “Descriptor: 5G Wireless Network Intrusion Detection Dataset (5G-NIDD)”, IEEE Data Descriptions. 10.1109/IEEEDATA.2025.3592888.

[25] Usama, M., Mitra, R.N., Ilahi, I., Qadir, J. and Marina, M.K. (2020) “Examining machine learning for 5G and beyond through an adversarial lens”, arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.02473.

[26] Zhuwankinyu, E.K., Mupa, M.N. and Tafirenyika, S. (2025) “Graph-based security models for AI-driven data storage: A novel approach to protecting classified documents”, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 26(2), pp. 1108-1124. 10.30574/wjarr.2025.26.2.1631.

@article{1722431,
      author = {Ken Mudzingwa, Stewart Munyaradzi Nyamutswa, Admore Tafadzwa Mugwadzi, Panashe Yolanda Dhegwa, Munashe Naphtali Mupa},
      title = {An AI-Resilient Cybersecurity Framework for 5G Telecommunications Networks: Detecting Adversarial Machine Learning, Autonomous Intrusions, and Intelligent Edge Threats in Critical Infrastructure},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {2497-2514},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722431.pdf},
      abstract = {Fifth-generation telecommunications networks are becoming a strategic layer of critical infrastructure because they connect public safety, financial systems, healthcare, logistics, energy, industrial control systems and intelligent edge services. The same characteristics that make 5G valuable - ultra-low latency, dense device connectivity, software-defined network functions, network slicing, cloud-native service-based architecture and edge computing - also create an expanded attack surface for adversaries using artificial intelligence. This paper develops an AI-resilient cybersecurity framework for 5G telecommunications networks by integrating 5G security literature, adversarial machine learning research, zero-trust architecture, AI risk management and empirical cyber-incident analytics. The empirical component uses the Kaggle Global Cybersecurity Threats (2015-2024) dataset, comprising 3,000 incident records across 10 countries, 7 industries and 6 attack categories, to model sectoral exposure, telecommunications-specific risk, loss severity and incident-resolution burden. The sample records USD 151.48 billion in aggregate estimated financial loss, 1.51 billion affected-user records and a mean resolution time of 36.48 hours. Telecommunications incidents account for 403 records and USD 20,459.09 million in estimated loss, with man-in-the-middle, DDoS, phishing and malware attacks showing elevated relevance for AI-enabled 5G threat scenarios. Heat-map analysis identifies telecommunications man-in-the-middle attacks as one of the highest AI-5G exposure cells, while random-forest triage demonstrates that affected-user scale, resolution time, year and the constructed AI-5G Exposure Index are the strongest predictors of high-impact incidents in the analytical design. The paper contributes a practical AI-Resilient 5G Cybersecurity Framework built around adversarially robust intrusion detection, zero-trust identity, slice isolation, secure edge orchestration, model-risk governance, threat-informed vulnerability prioritisation, incident-response automation, post-quantum crypto-agility and continuous assurance. The central finding is that 5G security cannot be reduced to conventional perimeter defence; it requires a converged operating model that secures networks, data, machine-learning pipelines, identities, cloud-native functions and critical service continuity together.},
      keywords = {5G security; telecommunications; adversarial machine learning; AI-enabled cyber threats; critical infrastructure; intelligent edge; network slicing; zero trust; intrusion detection; post-quantum cryptography.},
      month = {August},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722431}
  }