Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722461
AI-Enabled Financial Risk Analytics: Reshaping Internal Audit and Enterprise Governance in Saudi Arabia
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Artificial Intelligence
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722461
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is moving from a peripheral analytics feature to the operating core of financial risk management in Saudi enterprises, embedded directly within SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Copilot, Google's Gemini Enterprise, and purpose-built risk-scoring engines — and, increasingly, within the internal audit function's own tooling such as TeamMate+ and TeamMate Analytics. This adoption is not incidental: it follows directly from Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 agenda, including the National Strategy for Data and AI, the Financial Sector Development Program, and the Human Capability Development Program, the last of which places a direct obligation on enterprises to build Saudi national capability alongside the technology itself. This creates a governance paradox for internal audit functions: the same AI capability that promises continuous, predictive assurance over credit risk, fraud, and control failure also introduces a new class of risk — model risk, algorithmic bias, and explainability gaps — that internal audit is not yet structurally equipped to test, including within the platforms auditors themselves rely on to produce evidence. Drawing on internal audit practice across diversified Saudi conglomerates spanning FMCG, QSR franchising, industrial distribution, energy, and real estate, this article examines how AI-enabled analytics are being applied to financial risk domains including expected credit loss estimation, fraud and anomaly detection, working capital forecasting, and continuous control monitoring. It maps these applications against the Kingdom's emerging AI governance architecture — SDAIA's Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) and generative AI guidelines, the National Cybersecurity Authority's Essential Cybersecurity Controls, and international reference points including ISACA's AI governance guidance, COSO ERM (2017), and the IIA's emerging guidance on AI in internal audit. The article proposes a practical AI assurance model for internal audit functions, a structured approach to coaching Saudi talent into AI-enabled audit roles, and concludes with recommendations for enterprises seeking to adopt AI-enabled risk analytics without eroding the independence, objectivity, and evidentiary rigor that internal audit exists to provide.
Keywords
Artificial intelligence, financial risk analytics, internal audit, enterprise governance, Saudi Arabia, Vision 2030, Human Capability Development Program, Saudi talent development, AI governance, algorithmic risk, model risk, SDAIA, PDPL, TeamMate+, Gemini Enterprise, continuous auditing, COSO ERM, machine learning, generative AI
How to cite this paper
@article{1722461,
author = {Syed Rizwan Shahid},
title = {AI-Enabled Financial Risk Analytics: Reshaping Internal Audit and Enterprise Governance in Saudi Arabia},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {2349-2356},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722461.pdf},
abstract = {Artificial intelligence is moving from a peripheral analytics feature to the operating core of financial risk management in Saudi enterprises, embedded directly within SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Copilot, Google's Gemini Enterprise, and purpose-built risk-scoring engines — and, increasingly, within the internal audit function's own tooling such as TeamMate+ and TeamMate Analytics. This adoption is not incidental: it follows directly from Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 agenda, including the National Strategy for Data and AI, the Financial Sector Development Program, and the Human Capability Development Program, the last of which places a direct obligation on enterprises to build Saudi national capability alongside the technology itself. This creates a governance paradox for internal audit functions: the same AI capability that promises continuous, predictive assurance over credit risk, fraud, and control failure also introduces a new class of risk — model risk, algorithmic bias, and explainability gaps — that internal audit is not yet structurally equipped to test, including within the platforms auditors themselves rely on to produce evidence. Drawing on internal audit practice across diversified Saudi conglomerates spanning FMCG, QSR franchising, industrial distribution, energy, and real estate, this article examines how AI-enabled analytics are being applied to financial risk domains including expected credit loss estimation, fraud and anomaly detection, working capital forecasting, and continuous control monitoring. It maps these applications against the Kingdom's emerging AI governance architecture — SDAIA's Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) and generative AI guidelines, the National Cybersecurity Authority's Essential Cybersecurity Controls, and international reference points including ISACA's AI governance guidance, COSO ERM (2017), and the IIA's emerging guidance on AI in internal audit. The article proposes a practical AI assurance model for internal audit functions, a structured approach to coaching Saudi talent into AI-enabled audit roles, and concludes with recommendations for enterprises seeking to adopt AI-enabled risk analytics without eroding the independence, objectivity, and evidentiary rigor that internal audit exists to provide.},
keywords = {Artificial intelligence, financial risk analytics, internal audit, enterprise governance, Saudi Arabia, Vision 2030, Human Capability Development Program, Saudi talent development, AI governance, algorithmic risk, model risk, SDAIA, PDPL, TeamMate+, Gemini Enterprise, continuous auditing, COSO ERM, machine learning, generative AI},
month = {August},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722461}
}