Microfinance and Its Impact on the Rural Sector- A Study of Mirzapur District, Uttar Pradesh

References

[1] CASHPOR Financial and Technical Services. Institutional literature and website.

[2] Government of India. (2007- 08). Report of the Working Group on Empowering the Scheduled Castes in India. Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi.

[3] Government of India. (2007- 08). Report of the Steering Committee on Empowering Scheduled Castes in India. Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi.

[4] Government of Uttar Pradesh. (2006- 07). Agricultural Census in U.P. Board of Revenue, Lucknow.

[5] Kurukshetra. (2009). Microfinance. Vol. 57, February 2009.

[6] NABARD. (2004). Report of the Task Force on Supportive Policy and Regulatory Framework for Micro-Finance. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Mumbai.

[7] Singh, Gurmeet. (2009). Microfinance- An Innovation in Rural Credit System. Kurukshetra.

[8] Singh, J. N. (2008). A New Approach to Rural Development. Kurukshetra.

[9] Singh, S. K., & Singh, A. K. (2004). Women Empowerment: Emerging Leadership in U.P. In Dubey & Padalia (Eds.), Democratic Decentralization: Panchayati Raj in India. Anamika Publishers, Delhi.

[10] Yojana; local and national newspapers.

[11] Burgess, R., & Pande, R. (2004). Do rural banks matter? Evidence from the Indian social banking experiment. American Economic Review, 95(3), 780–795.

[12] Harper, M. (2002, November). Promotion of self-help groups under the SHG bank linkage programme in India. Paper presented at the Seminar on SHG-Bank Linkage Programme, New Delhi.

[13] Kabeer, N. (2005). Is microfinance a 'magic bullet' for women's empowerment? Analysis of findings from South Asia. Economic and Political Weekly, 40(44/45), 4709- 4718.

[14] Morduch, J. (1999). The microfinance promise. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1569- 1614.

[15] NABARD. (2009). Status of Microfinance in India 2008–09. National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Mumbai.

[16] Nair, A. (2005). Sustainability of microfinance self-help groups in India: Would federating help? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3516.

[17] Puhazhendhi, V., & Badatya, K. C. (2002). SHG-Bank Linkage Programme for rural poor - An impact assessment. NABARD, Mumbai.

[18] Reserve Bank of India. (2005). Report of the Internal Group to Examine Issues Relating to Rural Credit and Microfinance. RBI, Mumbai.

[19] Sinha, F., Parida, P., & Baskar, N. (2012). The outreach/impact frontier: The Indian microfinance sector after the Andhra Pradesh crisis. EDA Rural Systems, Gurgaon.

[20] Yunus, M. (1999). Banker to the Poor: Micro- Lending and the Battle Against World Poverty. PublicAffairs, New York.

[21] Empowering women through the Self-Help Group Bank Linkage Programme as a tool for sustainable development: Lessons from India. (2023). Community Development Journal, 58(2), 283-308.

@article{1722470,
      author = {Dr. Harshita Kaushik},
      title = {Microfinance and Its Impact on the Rural Sector- A Study of Mirzapur District, Uttar Pradesh},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {2423-2429},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722470.pdf},
      abstract = {This paper investigates how microfinance, channelled chiefly through Self-Help Groups (SHGs), has affected household welfare in a poor, predominantly agrarian district of eastern Uttar Pradesh. Drawing on a field survey conducted in Mirzapur district in association with the microfinance institution CASHPOR, the study combines an exploratory research design with descriptive statistical analysis of primary data gathered from 100 SHG member-beneficiaries and 10 programme officials and non-officials, spread across 10 SHGs in 4 villages of two development blocks (Mirzapur City and Marihan). This is triangulated against secondary data drawn from CASHPOR's operational records and national-level microfinance statistics. The evidence points to a modest but tangible improvement in beneficiary households following SHG membership — higher savings discipline, wider use of institutional rather than informal credit, and additional annual income of roughly Rs. 2,000–4,000 that respondents directed mainly toward child nutrition and healthcare. At the same time, the study documents structural frictions that blunt this impact, including low female literacy, husband-dominated control over household spending, slow bank-linkage processing, and thin capacity-building support for members. The paper closes with a set of practical recommendations for deepening SHG outreach and strengthening the credit-delivery chain in the district.},
      keywords = {microfinance, self-help groups, shg-bank linkage programme, rural credit, women's empowerment, financial inclusion, mirzapur},
      month = {August},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722470}
  }