Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722472
Effects of Activity-Based and Guided-Discovery Teaching Strategies On Students’ Academic Performance and Retention in Geometry in Secondary Schools in Central Senatorial District of Kogi State
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Mathematics Education
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I2-1722472
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of activity-based and guided-discovery teaching strategies on students’ academic performance and retention in Geometry in secondary schools in the Central Senatorial District of Kogi State. The study was motivated by the persistent difficulty experienced by secondary school students in understanding and retaining geometrical concepts and the need to identify more effective learner-centred instructional strategies. The study adopted a quasi-experimental research design, specifically the pre-test, post-test and delayed post-test non-equivalent control group design. The study involved 300 Senior Secondary II students, comprising 110 students in the conventional teaching group, 90 students in the activity-based teaching group and 100 students in the guided-discovery teaching group. Data were collected using the Geometric Performance Test, which consisted of 40 multiple-choice items and had a reliability coefficient of 0.84. Mean and standard deviation were used to answer the research questions, while Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and two-way ANOVA were used to test the hypotheses at the 0.05 level of significance. The findings revealed that students taught using guided-discovery teaching strategy obtained the highest mean academic performance score of 74.87, followed by students taught using activity-based strategy with a mean of 68.18, while students taught using the conventional strategy recorded the lowest mean of 54.25. The difference among the three groups was statistically significant, F(2,297) = 189.423, p < .001. Similarly, guided discovery produced the highest retention mean of 74.87, followed by activity-based instruction with 68.18, while the conventional group recorded 53.74; the difference was statistically significant, F(2,297) = 266.941, p < .001. Gender and school location also had significant main effects on academic performance, although neither significantly interacted with teaching strategy. The study concluded that activity-based and guided-discovery teaching strategies were more effective than conventional teaching in improving students’ academic performance and retention in Geometry, with guided discovery producing the strongest outcomes. It was recommended that mathematics teachers should incorporate guided-discovery and activity-based strategies into Geometry instruction and that schools should provide the instructional materials and teacher training required for their effective implementation.
Keywords
activity-based teaching, guided discovery, academic performance, retention, geometry, secondary school students, kogi state.
References
[1] Abari, M. T., & Ikyule, P. U. (2021). Effect of guided-discovery approach on students' academic achievement in mathematics in senior secondary schools in Ushongo Local Government Area, Benue State. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, 6(12), 45–47.
[2] Adams, M., & Enu, J. (2023). Impact of activity-based instruction on Grade 11 learners’ achievement in plane geometry. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 19(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajesms.v19i1.2
[3] Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.
[4] Durojaiye, D. S., Jekayinfa, O. J., & Oloda, F. S. S. (2021). Effect of activity-based instructional strategy on senior secondary school students' retention in circle geometry in Abuja, Nigeria. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i10.3933
[5] Durojaiye, D. S., Salman, M. F., Jekayinfa, O. J., & Okwuoza, S. O. (2017). Effect of activity-based instructional strategy on senior school students' performance in circle geometry in Abuja, Nigeria. Journal of Mathematical Sciences Education, 3(1),102-113.
[6] Edoho, E. A., et al. (2021). Effect of guided-discovery instructional strategy on performance and interest of upper basic students towards geometry in Uyo Local Government Area, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.
[7] Iroko, G. A., Adesina, K. A., & Asanre, A. A. (2024). Examining the influence of gender and school location on academic achievement in algebra among senior secondary school students. Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 5(3), 36–42.
[8] Kajuru, Y. K., & Isah, E. A. (2014). Effects of constructivist teaching strategy on students' achievement and retention in mathematics. ABACUS: Journal of the Mathematical Association of Nigeria, 39(1), 1–10.
[9] Muhammed, U. M., Dajal, R. G., & Akuso, S. (2026). Effects of guided discovery teaching strategy on achievement and retention in concept energy among upper basic students in Abaji Area Council, Abuja, Nigeria. Federal University Gusau Faculty of Education
[10] Nwamaradi, T. A., & Arinze, C. D. (2024). Effect of activity-based method of instruction on secondary school students' academic achievement on circle geometry. UNIZIK Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies, 17(3),19-35.
[11] OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
[12] Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
[13] Rabiu, A. T., Jamilu, A. A., & Mukhtar, N. (2017). Effect of guided discovery method of teaching on retention and performance in geometry among senior secondary students two in Zaria Local Government, Kaduna State, Nigeria. ABACUS: Journal of the Mathematical Association of Nigeria, 42(2), 183–192.
[14] Rabiu, A., & Madagu, A. (2019). Effects of guided inquiry and cooperative learning methods on performance in mathematics among junior secondary school students in Katsina State. In K. O. Usman (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual National Conference of the Mathematical Association of Nigeria (pp. 762–767).
[15] Samron, S., & La Arua, A. (2022). The effect of guided discovery learning model towards the mathematics' critical thinking ability on secondary school students. Journal of Mathematical Pedagogy, 2(2), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.26740/jomp.v2n2.p59-67
[16] Stephen, L. (2018). Effects of Jigsaw II and guided discovery strategies on retention and academic performance in geometry among junior secondary school students in Zaria Metropolis, Nigeria [Master's thesis, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria]. (Kubanni)
[17] Ugwoke, S. C., Ede, M. O., Nwafor, C. E., Nwafor, B. U., & Amaka, E. (2020). Using guided discovery to improve students' retention and academic attitudes to financial accounting concepts. Education Research International, 2020, Article 6690082. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6690082
[18] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
How to cite this paper
@article{1722472,
author = {Salawu, Isah Sezuo},
title = {Effects of Activity-Based and Guided-Discovery Teaching Strategies On Students’ Academic Performance and Retention in Geometry in Secondary Schools in Central Senatorial District of Kogi State},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {2213-2232},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722472.pdf},
abstract = {This study investigated the effects of activity-based and guided-discovery teaching strategies on students’ academic performance and retention in Geometry in secondary schools in the Central Senatorial District of Kogi State. The study was motivated by the persistent difficulty experienced by secondary school students in understanding and retaining geometrical concepts and the need to identify more effective learner-centred instructional strategies. The study adopted a quasi-experimental research design, specifically the pre-test, post-test and delayed post-test non-equivalent control group design. The study involved 300 Senior Secondary II students, comprising 110 students in the conventional teaching group, 90 students in the activity-based teaching group and 100 students in the guided-discovery teaching group. Data were collected using the Geometric Performance Test, which consisted of 40 multiple-choice items and had a reliability coefficient of 0.84. Mean and standard deviation were used to answer the research questions, while Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and two-way ANOVA were used to test the hypotheses at the 0.05 level of significance. The findings revealed that students taught using guided-discovery teaching strategy obtained the highest mean academic performance score of 74.87, followed by students taught using activity-based strategy with a mean of 68.18, while students taught using the conventional strategy recorded the lowest mean of 54.25. The difference among the three groups was statistically significant, F(2,297) = 189.423, p < .001. Similarly, guided discovery produced the highest retention mean of 74.87, followed by activity-based instruction with 68.18, while the conventional group recorded 53.74; the difference was statistically significant, F(2,297) = 266.941, p < .001. Gender and school location also had significant main effects on academic performance, although neither significantly interacted with teaching strategy. The study concluded that activity-based and guided-discovery teaching strategies were more effective than conventional teaching in improving students’ academic performance and retention in Geometry, with guided discovery producing the strongest outcomes. It was recommended that mathematics teachers should incorporate guided-discovery and activity-based strategies into Geometry instruction and that schools should provide the instructional materials and teacher training required for their effective implementation.},
keywords = {activity-based teaching, guided discovery, academic performance, retention, geometry, secondary school students, kogi state.},
month = {August},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722472}
}