Enhancing Regional Development Project Delivery through Health, Safety, and Environmental Audit Systems

References

[1] Arifuddin, R., Latief, Y., Rachmawati, F., and colleagues. (2025). An audit system causality model for construction safety management system assessment in building projects using integrated design-build. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 15(2), 20748-20759.

[2] Associated Builders and Contractors. (2025). 2025 Health and Safety Performance Report. ABC.

[3] Bakkass, S., Semlali Aouragh Hassani, N., Ben Hachmi, M. K., & El Hilali, A. (2025). Implementation of an environmental management system (ISO 14001) on an underground gallery construction site in Casablanca Morocco. Cleaner Waste Systems, Article 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100259

[4] Benson, C., Obasi, I. C., Akinwande, D. V., & Ile, C. (2024). The impact of interventions on health, safety and environment in the process industry. Heliyon, 10(1).

[5] Chong, H. Y., and colleagues. (2025). Achieving sustainable construction safety management: The shift from compliance to intelligence via BIM-AI convergence. Sustainability, 17(10), 4454.

[6] Dahalan, N. H., Rahman, R. A., Ahmad, S. W., & Che Ibrahim, C. K. I. (2023). Public monitoring of environmental management plan implementation in road construction projects: Key performance indicators. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 23(3), 766-791. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-06-2023-0225

[7] Daniel, E. I., and colleagues. (2025). The use of digital technologies in construction safety: A systematic review. Buildings, 15(8), 1386.

[8] Fracasso, B. V., and colleagues. (2021). Performance indicators in occupational health and safety management systems: A systematic literature review. S&G Journal, 16(3), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.20985/1980-5160.2021.v16n3.1689

[9] Golabchi, H., Han, S., Seo, J., & Lee, S. (2024). A comprehensive systematic review of safety leading indicators in construction. Safety Science.

[10] Global Alliance for Buildings and Construction. (2025). Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2024/25. UNEP/GlobalABC.

[11] Horry, R. E., Booth, C. A., & Mahamadu, A.-M. (2022). Environmental management systems in the architecture, engineering and construction sectors: A roadmap to aid the delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 10585-10615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01874-3

[12] International Finance Corporation. (2025). Environmental and Social Management System Toolkit: General. IFC.

[13] International Labour Organization. (2024). Programme Implementation Report 2022-23. ILO.

[14] International Organization for Standardization. (2021). ISO 45003:2021 Occupational health and safety management - Psychological health and safety at work - Guidelines for managing psychosocial risks. ISO.

[15] Kineber, A. F., Antwi-Afari, M. F., Elghaish, F., Zamil, A. M. A., Alhusban, M., & Qaralleh, T. J. O. (2023). Benefits of implementing occupational health and safety management systems for the sustainable construction industry: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(17), 12697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712697

[16] Kong, F., and colleagues. (2024). Use of knowledge graphs for construction safety management. Information, 15(7), 390.

[17] Lingard, H., & Pirzadeh, P. (2025). Workplace health and safety performance at the client-contractor interface: Measurement, management and behaviour. Safety Science, 184, 106753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106753

[18] Luo, H., Xiong, C., Fang, W., Love, P. E. D., Zhang, B., & Ouyang, X. (2022). Digital technology for quality management in construction: A review and future research directions. Developments in the Built Environment.

[19] Marhavilas, P. K., Koulouriotis, D., Nikolaou, I., & Tsotoulidou, S. (2022). International management system standards related to occupational health and safety management: An updated literature survey. Sustainability, 14(20), 13282.

[20] Mrak, I., and colleagues. (2025). An overview of environmental performance indicators in the construction and building industry. Applied Sciences, 15(22), 12135.

[21] Newaz, M. T., Ershadi, M., Jefferies, M., Davis, P., & Pillay, M. (2023). A systematic review of contemporary safety management research in construction. Construction Management and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2124527

[22] Newaz, M. T., and colleagues. (2025). A critical analysis of construction incident trends and prevention strategies. Safety Science.

[23] Purushothaman, M. B., and colleagues. (2025). SMART technologies that influence construction health and safety factors risk reduction in the current digital era. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-09-2024-0400

[24] Saudi Vision 2030. (2025). Vision 2030 Annual Report 2025. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

[25] Trask, C., & Linderoth, H. C. J. (2023). Digital technologies in construction: A systematic mapping review of evidence for improved occupational health and safety. Journal of Building Engineering, 80, 108082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108082

[26] World Bank. (2020). Environmental and Social Framework Implementation Update, October 2020. World Bank.

[27] World Bank. (2024). Environmental and Social Framework. World Bank.

[28] World Bank. (2025). Environmental and Social Commitment Plan templates and project ESHS audit requirements. World Bank.

[29] Zhang, Z., Guo, B. H. W., Chang-Richards, A., Feng, Z., Jin, R., Zou, Y., & Goh, Y. M. (2023). Digital technology enhanced situation awareness for construction safety: Systematic review and future research directions. Safety Science, 167, 106280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106280

[30] Zeibak-Shini, R., and colleagues. (2024). Analytical hierarchy process for construction safety management and resource allocation. Applied Sciences, 14(20), 9265.

@article{1722502,
      author = {Vipin Morakandy Kooloth},
      title = {Enhancing Regional Development Project Delivery through Health, Safety, and Environmental Audit Systems},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {2386-2398},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722502.pdf},
      abstract = {Regional development programmes increasingly depend on complex portfolios of roads, utilities, housing, tourism assets, industrial zones and public facilities. Their delivery performance is often judged through cost, schedule and quality, yet the same projects also create high exposure to occupational injury, environmental degradation, community disruption and reputational loss. This review examines how health, safety and environmental audit systems can improve regional development project delivery by converting fragmented compliance checks into a structured governance mechanism for risk prevention, corrective action and organisational learning. The aim is to develop a practical evidence-based framework that links HSE audit maturity with project delivery outcomes. The objectives are to: identify the core components of effective HSE audit systems; synthesize recent literature on occupational health and safety management, environmental management, digital monitoring and client-contractor performance control; evaluate how audit findings influence time, cost, quality, stakeholder confidence and sustainable value; and propose a maturity model suitable for large regional development programmes aligned with Saudi Vision 2030. A narrative review methodology was applied, drawing on peer-reviewed studies and institutional guidance published from 2020 to 2025. The findings show that HSE audits enhance delivery when they are risk-based, integrated with planning and procurement, supported by leading indicators, verified through competent auditors, and closed through time-bound corrective action. Digital tools, including dashboards, BIM, sensors, mobile inspections and AI-assisted analytics, strengthen audit traceability but cannot replace leadership commitment, workforce participation and contractor accountability. The paper concludes that HSE audits should be positioned as delivery assurance systems rather than as post-event inspection tools. Such systems can reduce rework, improve productivity, protect communities, support environmental compliance, and enable more resilient regional development outcomes.},
      keywords = {HSE audit, regional development, project delivery, construction safety, environmental management, corrective action, Saudi Vision 2030, sustainable infrastructure.},
      month = {August},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722502}
  }