Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722507
Occupational Health Risks and Preventive Strategies for Scientists and Engineers in Nasrda Selected Facilities
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Occupational Health and Safety
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I2-1722507
Abstract
This study evaluates occupational health risks, individual risk awareness, and preventive strategies for scientists and engineers across five selected National Space Research and Development Agency (NASRDA) Facilities in Nigeria. Using a descriptive cross-sectional research design, a structured questionnaire was administered to fifty (N=50) technical personnel across the selected facilities including Centre for Space Innovation and Development (CSID) Abuja, Centre for Satellite Technology Development (CSTD), Abuja, Bola Ahmed Centre for Space Transport and Propulsion (BATCSTP) Epe, Ground Receiving Station Abuja, and Advanced Space Composite (ASCO) Laboratory, Ilorin. Demographic analysis reveals a highly educated, male-dominated workforce (66%, n=33) where engineers (72%, n=36) significantly outnumber scientists (28%, n=14). Key areas include Electrical/Electronic (32%, n=16), Chemical (18%, n=9), and Mechanical (14%, n=7) engineering units, with 48% (n=24) of the total population holding master’s degrees. A severe generational gap was identified, with only 4% (n=2) of personnel aged between 20 and 29 years. Regarding occupational health and safety (OHS) metrics, a systemic paradox emerged: while 70% (n=35) of respondents possess strong personal awareness of their work-related hazards, institutional support is seriously Lacking. Specifically, 44% (n=22) explicitly report a deficit in hazard and risk information delivery from their centres, while 20% (n=10) function without any formal safety training. These administrative communication gaps and training deficits directly expose NASRDA’s highly specialized engineering capital within Abuja to preventable physical hazards. The study recommends the integration of comprehensive occupational health and safety management systems tailored to space science facilities in Nigeria, centralized training frameworks to close the 20% training gaps, and structured graduate pipelines to address looming succession risks thereby enhancing workforce protection, productivity, and institutional sustainability.
Keywords
aerospace occupational health and safety, hazard risk awareness, preventive strategies, nasrda, engineering, workplace safety training, institutional communications
References
[1] Adeleke, A., & Ogunbanwo, O. (2019). Evaluation of occupational health infrastructure and safety management systems in specialized research settings. Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 12(3), 145–158.
[2] Aderaw, Z., Engdaw, D., & Tadesse, T. (2011). Determinants of occupational injury among workers in technical production sectors. Journal of Occupational Health and Epidemiology, 3(2), 77–86.
[3] Adewole, A. B., & Desalu, O. O. (2017). Advanced engineering controls and comprehensive monitoring instrumentation in high-technology laboratories. African Journal of Engineering Research, 5(3), 112–125.
[4] Abdulqasem Abdulmejeed, I., & colleagues. (2024). Occupational exposure to hazardous substances among laboratory and health safety technicians: A systematic review of health risk and compliance with safety regulation. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health Indicators, 18(2), 114–130.
[5] Barger, L. K., Sullivan, J. P., Vincent, A. S., Cade, B. E., Ayas, N. T., & Czeisler, C. A. (2014). Extended and irregular shifts during mission operations and their impact on fatigue and error rates. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(4), 398–407.
[6] Basner, M., Babisch, W., Davis, A., Brink, M., Clark, C., Janssen, S., & Stansfeld, S. (2014). Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. The Lancet, 383(9925), 1325–1332.
[7] Boroffice, R. A. (2017). The development and launch of Nigerian satellites: Achievements and capacity building in space technology. Space Policy Journal, 34(2), 112–121.
[8] Chen, L., Wang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Characterization of potentially toxic outgassing products from electronic components and composite materials in cleanroom environments. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 365, 412–425.
[9] Chigbu, C. I., & colleagues. (2019). the need for a new workplace safety and health strategy. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61(8), 645–658.
[10] European Space Agency (ESA). (2021). Occupational health and environmental safety protocols for advanced research operations (ESA-Safety Report No. 42). ESA Publications.
[11] Federal Ministry of Science and Technology. (2018). Strategic integration and acquisition frameworks for satellite data ground receiving stations. Federal Ministry of Science and Technology.
[12] Gander, P., Hartley, L., Powell, D., Cabon, P., Hitchcock, E., Mills, A., & Popkin, S. (2013). Fatigue risk management systems in aviation and mission-critical operations. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 84(6), 603–611.
[13] Garcia, M. A., Smith, J. R., & Johnson, K. L. (2017). Ergonomic risk factors and awkward postures in cleanroom assembly environments. Applied Ergonomics, 58, 214–222.
[14] Hofmann, D. A., & Morgeson, F. P. (2018). Safety culture and leadership transitions in high-stakes operating environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(4), 415–429.
[15] Holm, S., & Kalliokoski, P. (2020). Thermal discomfort from protective clothing and ergonomic stressors in specialized laboratories. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 76, 1029–1038.
[16] International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). (2020). Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz). Health Physics, 118(5), 483–524.
[17] International Labour Organization (ILO). (2018). Regulatory frameworks and enforcement mechanisms for occupational safety and health in developing economies. International Labour Office.
[18] Jones, R. H., Smith, T. L., & Davis, M. E. (2020). Managing psychological demands and mission-critical timelines in space sector facilities. International Journal of Aerospace Psychology, 30(4), 215–229.
[19] Kanas, N., & Manzey, D. (2008). Space psychology and psychiatry (2nd ed.). Springer.
[20] Kjellstrom, T., Briggs, D., Freyberg, C., Lemke, B., Otto, M., & Hyatt, O. (2016). Heat stress risks, workplace microclimate, and productivity profiles in sub-Saharan African contexts. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124(3), 265–277.
[21] Kumar, A., & Singh, R. (2018). Stress management and occupational hazards among technical personnel in advanced engineering environments. Journal of Ergonomics and Safety Research, 8(2), 89–102.
[22] Lambrozo, J., Souques, M., & Magne, I. (2018). Non-thermal biological effects of elevated electromagnetic fields among infrastructure operators. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 181(2), 95–104.
[23] Lie, A., Skogstad, M., Johannessen, H. A., Tynes, T., Mehlum, I. S., Nordby, K. C., ... & Tambs, K. (2016). Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss: A systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 89(3), 351–372.
[24] Magnavita, N. (2018). Medical surveillance, continuous health promotion and a participatory intervention in a small company. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5), 987–1001.
[25] Moeti, K., Diallo, A., & Mensah, B. (2021). Technological advancement and safety infrastructure in resource-limited space research settings. African Journal of Science, Technology and Development, 15(1), 64–78.
[26] National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). (2019). Health and safety handbook for extreme operational environments (NASA-TM-2019-2190). NASA Headquarters.
[27] National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (2020). Criteria for a recommended standard: Occupational exposure to adhesives, epoxy resins, and chemical solvents. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
[28] National Space Research and Development Agency (NASRDA). (2020). Mandate and strategic guidelines for space technology development and capacity building. NASRDA Publications.
[29] Okojie, O. H. (2010). Infrastructure challenges, environmental controls, and safety systems in tropical research settings. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology, 2(4), 85–94.
[30] Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). (2021). Generic versus tailored risk management approaches in technological industries (OSHA Fact Sheet Series No. 114). U.S. Department of Labor.
[31] Roquelaure, Y., Ha, C., Bodin, J., Chazelle, E., Descatha, A., Leclerc, A., ... & Imbernon, E. (2018). Visual fatigue and musculoskeletal complaints in the neck and shoulder regions among precision laboratory technicians. Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 62(4), 435–446.
[32] Santos Baptista, J., Castelo Branco, A., Duarte, A., & Perestrelo, G. (2025). Occupational and environmental safety and health: Occupational risk assessment, management and case studies. Springer.
[33] Schulte, P. A., Delclos, G. L., Felknor, S. A., & Chosewood, L. C. (2020). Potential scenarios and hazards in the work of the future. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62(10), 785–798.
[34] Schwela, D. (2000). Dust and particulate matter management in specialized cleanrooms and precision technical operations. Air Quality and Industrial Health, 16(2), 99–112.
[35] United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs (UNOOSA). (2022). The global expansion of dedicated space research programs and satellite technology in developing nations (UN-OOSA Annual Report). United Nations.
[36] Van Cutsem, J., Marcora, S., De Pauw, K., Bailey, S., Meeusen, R., & Roelands, B. (2017). The effects of mental fatigue on physical performance: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 47(8), 1569–1588.
[37] Williams, D. R., & Peterson, K. L. (2021). Acute and chronic health risks associated with hydrazine-based propellants and nitrogen tetroxide in propulsion research. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 92(5), 334–346.
How to cite this paper
@article{1722507,
author = {Nnali Gloria Chidiamara, Salamatu Inuwa, Mathew Felix Gabriel, Hadiza Jibrin, Dan’azumi Aisha Umar; Silas Samuel},
title = {Occupational Health Risks and Preventive Strategies for Scientists and Engineers in Nasrda Selected Facilities},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {2682-2694},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722507.pdf},
abstract = {This study evaluates occupational health risks, individual risk awareness, and preventive strategies for scientists and engineers across five selected National Space Research and Development Agency (NASRDA) Facilities in Nigeria. Using a descriptive cross-sectional research design, a structured questionnaire was administered to fifty (N=50) technical personnel across the selected facilities including Centre for Space Innovation and Development (CSID) Abuja, Centre for Satellite Technology Development (CSTD), Abuja, Bola Ahmed Centre for Space Transport and Propulsion (BATCSTP) Epe, Ground Receiving Station Abuja, and Advanced Space Composite (ASCO) Laboratory, Ilorin. Demographic analysis reveals a highly educated, male-dominated workforce (66%, n=33) where engineers (72%, n=36) significantly outnumber scientists (28%, n=14). Key areas include Electrical/Electronic (32%, n=16), Chemical (18%, n=9), and Mechanical (14%, n=7) engineering units, with 48% (n=24) of the total population holding master’s degrees. A severe generational gap was identified, with only 4% (n=2) of personnel aged between 20 and 29 years. Regarding occupational health and safety (OHS) metrics, a systemic paradox emerged: while 70% (n=35) of respondents possess strong personal awareness of their work-related hazards, institutional support is seriously Lacking. Specifically, 44% (n=22) explicitly report a deficit in hazard and risk information delivery from their centres, while 20% (n=10) function without any formal safety training. These administrative communication gaps and training deficits directly expose NASRDA’s highly specialized engineering capital within Abuja to preventable physical hazards. The study recommends the integration of comprehensive occupational health and safety management systems tailored to space science facilities in Nigeria, centralized training frameworks to close the 20% training gaps, and structured graduate pipelines to address looming succession risks thereby enhancing workforce protection, productivity, and institutional sustainability.},
keywords = {aerospace occupational health and safety, hazard risk awareness, preventive strategies, nasrda, engineering, workplace safety training, institutional communications},
month = {August},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722507}
}