Multi-Source Remote Sensing and Explainable Machine Learning for Cassava Yield Monitoring Across West Africa

References

[1] FAO, 2023. FAOSTAT: Food and Agriculture Organization Statistical Database. Available at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/ (Accessed 15 July 2024).

[2] Burns, A., Gleadow, R., Cliff, J., Zacarias, A., Cavagnaro, T., 2010. Cassava: the drought, war and famine crop in a changing world. Sustainability 2(11), 3572–3607. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2113572.

[3] Parmar, B., Sturm, B., Hensel, O., 2017. Crops that feed the world: production and improvement of cassava for food, feed, and industrial uses. Food Secur. 9(5), 907–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0717-8.

[4] El-Sharkawy, M.A., 2012. Stress-tolerant cassava: the role of integrative ecophysiology-breeding research in crop improvement. Open J. Soil Sci. 2(3), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2012.22022.

[5] Lobell, D.B., Thau, D., Seifert, C., Engle, E., Little, B., 2015. A scalable satellite-based crop yield mapper. Remote Sens. Environ. 164, 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.04.021.

[6] Didan, K., 2015. MOD13Q1 MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 250m SIN Grid V6. NASA EOSDIS. https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.061.

[7] Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E.P., Gao, X., Ferreira, L.G., 2002. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 83(1–2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2.

[8] Funk, C., Peterson, P., Landsfeld, M., et al., 2015. The Climate Hazards InfraRed Precipitation with Stations: a new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Sci. Data 2, 150066. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66.

[9] Kamilaris, A., Prenafeta-Boldú, F.X., 2018. Deep learning in agriculture: a survey. Comput. Electron. Agric. 147, 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.016.

[10] van Klompenburg, T., Kassahun, A., Catal, C., 2020. Crop yield prediction using machine learning: a systematic literature review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 177, 105898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105898.

[11] Drusch, M., Del Bello, U., Carlier, S., et al., 2012. Sentinel-2: ESA’s optical high-resolution mission for GMES operational services. Remote Sens. Environ. 120, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.026.

[12] Wulder, M.A., Coops, N.C., Roy, D.P., White, J.C., Hermosilla, T., 2018. Land cover 2.0. Int. J. Remote Sens. 39(12), 4254–4284. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1452075.

[13] Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., et al., 2020. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146(730), 1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803.

[14] Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.I., 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), pp. 4766–4775.

[15] Lobell, D.B., Asner, G.P., 2003. Climate and management contributions to recent trends in U.S. agricultural yields. Science 299(5609), 1032–1034. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1077539.

[16] Doraiswamy, P.C., Moulin, S., Cook, P.W., Stern, A., 2003. Crop yield assessment from remote sensing. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 69(6), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.69.6.665.

[17] Fermont, A.M., van Asten, P.J.A., Tittonell, P., 2009. Closing the cassava yield gap in East Africa. Field Crops Res. 112, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.01.009.

[18] Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.

[19] Chen, T., Guestrin, C., 2016. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD, pp. 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785.

[20] Raji, B., Shono, M., Desai, S., et al., 2023. Machine learning for smallholder agriculture: systematic review. Front. Artif. Intell. 6, 1087742. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1087742.

[21] Taravat, A., Rajaei, M., Emamifar, S., 2022. Ensemble methods for crop classification from multispectral imagery. Remote Sens. 14(7), 1672. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14071672.

[22] Funk, C.C., Peterson, P.J., et al., 2019. A climate trend analysis of sub-Saharan Africa. USGS Sci. Investig. Rep. 5182. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20195182.

[23] Schapire, R.E., Freund, Y., 2012. Boosting: Foundations and Algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. ISBN: 978-0-262-01718-3.

[24] Rudorff, B.F.T., Berka, L.M.S., Moreira, M.A., et al., 2010. Remote sensing monitoring of cassava crop area. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 45(10), 1142–1150. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2010001000016.

[25] Lobell, D.B., Schlenker, W., Costa-Roberts, J., 2011. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333(6042), 616–620. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204531.

[26] Caruana, R., Li, Y., et al., 2023. Open problems in deep learning for agriculture. ACM Comput. Surv. 56(3), 62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3570952.

[27] IFPRI, 2023. Global Food Policy Report: Building Better Food Systems. Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896296725.

[28] WFP, 2023. HungerMAP LIVE Monitoring System. Available at: https://hungermap.wfp.org/.

[29] Legg, J.P., Thresh, J.M., 2000. Cassava mosaic virus disease in East and Southern Africa. Plant Dis. 84(5), 541. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.5.541.

[30] Zheng, B., Myint, S.W., Thenkabail, P.S., Aggarwal, R.M., 2015. A support vector machine for irrigated crop identification. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 34, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2014.07.002.

[31] FAO, IFAD, WFP, 2021. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021. FAO, Rome. https://doi.org/10.4060/cb4474en.

[32] Prasad, A.K., Chai, L., Singh, R.P., Kafatos, M., 2006. Crop yield estimation model using remote sensing and surface parameters. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 138(1–4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.012.

[33] Maxwell, A.E., Warner, T.A., Fang, F., 2018. Machine-learning classification in remote sensing: an applied review. Int. J. Remote Sens. 39(9), 2784–2817. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1433343.

[34] Rodriguez, E., Coates, T., 2020. Crop phenology monitoring using remote sensing for cassava in Sub-Saharan Africa. Comput. Electron. Agric. 170, 105245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105245.

[35] Hedayat, S. J., & Yosufi, M. K., 2025. Analysis of Vegetation Change Trends Using Satellite Data and Remote Sensing Techniques (Case Study: BAGRAM-Afghanistan). https://doi.org/10.62810/jnsr.v3i1.158

@article{1722534,
      author = {Edith Ugochi. Omede, Ufuoma Kazeem Okpeki, Chika Lilian Onyagu, Blessing Ewoma Oyovwe, Veronica Uchechukwu  Ikenga},
      title = {Multi-Source Remote Sensing and Explainable Machine Learning for Cassava Yield Monitoring Across West Africa},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {3410-3422},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722534.pdf},
      abstract = {Accurate monitoring of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) yields in West Africa continues to be considerable issue faced by those working in food security also agricultural policy planners. Conventional methods of estimating yields suffer from poor scalability, high operational costs, and significant temporal delays that limit their practical usefulness. This 25-year investigation (2000–2024) presents an explainable Remote Sensing-Ensemble Machine Learning (RS-EML) framework that brings together multi-source geospatial observations—FAOSTAT production records, MODIS vegetation indices (NDVI, EVI), CHIRPS rainfall measurements, and ERA5 reanalysis temperature fields—into a unified prediction system covering ten West African nations. The proposed pipeline has three stages that operate. The first one is that a multi-source data must be harmonized and then standardized even though the data can have different time and space scales. Second selection occurs for the best ensemble configuration using three algorithms (Merit-Based Ranking, Pareto-Optimal Frontier Selection and an Adaptive Threshold Optimization) which have multi-objective optimization at their core; and third, applying Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to quantify each input feature's contribution to yield forecasts. Validation was done in three different agroecological areas. These were Guinea Savanna (R² counted as 0.8506), Transitional/Humid zone (R² is 0.8394) and Sudano-Sahelian region (R² ended at 0.8123).An independent ground-truthing using information from a 600 cassava farms showed solid ability to predict yield. Random Forest and XGBoost algorithms were put together for stacking ensemble, where the metrics were R² 0.8456 and RMSE estimated 1662.70 kg ha⁻¹ while MAPE was 18.2 percent against farmer-reported yields. SHAP result found vegetation changes (38 percent of total) and rainfall (about 35 percent) are main yield causes, temperature has 18 percent. The system does not need ground-truthing data to run. This framework makes crop monitoring tools transparent, repeatable and scalable for food security checking in the Sub-Saharan Africa.},
      keywords = {cassava yield prediction; ensemble machine learning; explainable ai; remote sensing; west africa},
      month = {August},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722534}
  }