International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722540

1722540 Vol 10 · Issue 2 Download Paper

Validating The Effectiveness of Individualized Education Plans (IEPS): Identifying Opportunities for Improvement

Arturo B. Bolledo, Jr. Rhona M. Apurador Thomas T. Travero Danilo L. Yare Dr. Julia T. Canonigo Dr. Rebecca Manalastas

Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities  ·  Area of research: Education

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722540

Abstract

This study evaluated the operational effectiveness of Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) for Learners with Special Educational Needs (LSENs) within the selected Senior High Schools (SHS) of the Second District of Leyte, namely Damulaan National High School, Dr. Geronimo B. Zaldivar Memorial School of Fisheries, Isabel National Comprehensive High School, and Matlang National High School. Utilizing a descriptive-evaluative research design, data were gathered from a balanced, purposive sample of 60 respondents (n = 20 teachers; n=40 students) alongside institutional inputs from school administrators and parents. Data collection was executed using a contextualized, 4-point Likert-scale research instrument assessing three core dimensions: Instructional Adaptation, Goal Attainment, and Transition Planning. The empirical findings revealed an unsatisfactory overall implementation mean (2.27), categorizing the current IEP system as Less Effective. While basic administrative compliance in written examination modifications was met (2.62), severe execution gaps were identified in practical workshop task adaptation (1.95) and post-graduation workforce transition planning (2.05). The primary institutional obstacles identified by local educators included a critical shortage of track-contextualized instructional materials (1.55), absolute scarcity of assistive technologies (1.68), and heavy daily workloads (1.72). Inferential testing (t-test and ANOVA) demonstrated highly significant differences in perceived effectiveness when respondents were grouped by school environment (t =3.42, p = .001) and curriculum tracks (t = 2.89, p = .006), revealing that standardized templates break down within specialized vocational strands such as fisheries and maritime laboratory simulations. Conversely, variance across parents' socio-economic status was not significant (p = .472), showing uniform dissatisfaction with transition outcomes across all income brackets. To bridge this systemic compliance-performance gap, the study developed The IEP Optimization Framework, a 10point structural action matrix embedding track-differentiated accommodation protocols, cloudbased progress tracking, and flexible home-school collaborative networks to secure sustainable post-secondary workforce and tertiary readiness for inclusive high school learners.

Keywords

Individualized Education Plans (IEPs), Inclusive Education, Transition planning, Technical-Vocational-Livelihood (TVL) track, and the IEP Optimization Framework.

References

[1] Books and Monographs

[2] Banks, J. A. (2020). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (6th ed.). Routledge.

[3] Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

[4] Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2017). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (8th ed.). Pearson.

[5] Gargiulo, R. M., & Bouck, E. C. (2021). Special education in contemporary society: An introduction to exceptionality (7th ed.). SAGE Publications.

[6] Kauffman, J. M., Hallahan, D. P., & Pullen, P. C. (2017). Handbook of special education (2nd ed.). Routledge.

[7] Mitchell, D. (2020). What really works in special and inclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies (3rd ed.). Routledge.

[8] Salend, S. J. (2016). Creating inclusive classrooms: Effective and reflective practices (8th ed.). Pearson.

[9] Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.

[10] Vaughn, S., & Bos, C. S. (2020). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems (10th ed.). Pearson.

[11] Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2018). Handbook of positive psychology in schools (2nd ed.). Routledge.

[12] Yell, M. L. (2019). The law and special education (5th ed.). Pearson.

[13] Journal Articles

[14] Blackwell, W. H., & Rossetti, Z. S. (2022). The development of Individualized

[15] Education Programs: An analysis of collaboration and compliance. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 35(1), 12–24.

[16] Bouck, E. C., & Park, J. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) for students with disabilities.

[17] Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 53(4), 345–358.

[18] Carrington, S., Soni, A., Smith, R., & Robinson, R. (2016). Leadership for inclusive education: Challenges and opportunities in secondary schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(3), 320–334.

[19] Cavendish, W., Connor, D., & Boardman, A. (2017). Examination of the involvement of students with disabilities in target transition planning in IEPs. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 27(4), 227–237.

[20] de Beco, G. (2018). The right to inclusive education for children with disabilities under international human rights law. International Journal of Children's Rights, 26(4), 654–679.

[21] Diliberto, J. A., & Brewer, D. (2015). Six tips for successful IEP meetings with parents of learners with special educational needs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(3), 128–135.

[22] Francis, G. L., Blue-Banning, M., Haines, S. J., Turnbull, A. P., & Gross, J. M. (2016). Building trust in parent-professional partnerships: Lessons from families of low income. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 54(3), 183–195.

[23] Grima-Farrell, C. (2017). The realities of translating inclusive education research into daily high school practice. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 13(1), 21–39.

[24] Haines, S. J., Francis, G. L., Mueller, T. G., Chiu, C. Y., Turnbull, A. P., Bandina, A., & Gross, J. M. (2017). Family-professional partnerships in special education: A state-of-the-art review of factors affecting parent attendance. Inclusion, 5(4), 227–238.

[25] Hirano, K. A., Rowe, D. A., Lindstrom, L., & Chan, P. (2018). Professional development needs of general and technical teachers in inclusive secondary settings. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 41(4), 242–253.

[26] Kurth, J. A., Ruppar, A. L., Toews, S. G., McCabe, K. M., McQueston, J. A., & Johnston, R. (2019). Considerations in implementing IEP accommodations during vocational hands-on sessions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(2), 92–108.

[27] Lovitt, T. C., & Cushing, S. (2015). High school students with disabilities evaluate their active IEP modifications and accommodations. Exceptionality, 23(1), 44–58.

[28] Maddox, G. S., & Monda-Amaya, L. (2016). Secondary teachers’ perceptions of transition planning on IEPs for vocational track students. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 39(1), 15–26.

[29] Mata, L. R., & Manguilimotan, E. P. (2023). Implementation challenges of special needs education programs in selected public secondary schools in the Visayas region. Philippine Journal of Science and Inclusive Education, 11(2), 104–119.

[30] McLean, M., & Wolery, M. (2015). Assessing the validity and monitoring progression of goals in the secondary special education environment. Journal of Early Intervention, 37(1), 45–62.

[31] Moreno, A. C., & Dela Cruz, C. B. (2021). Streamlining administrative tasks and paperwork in special education: A mobile tracking intervention. Philippine Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 8(1), 74–89.

[32] Prunty, L. (2015). Implementation of the Individualized Education Plan: A review of standard template limitations in technical curriculum areas. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 30(2), 224–238.

[33] Rodriguez, R. J., & Malabago, N. K. (2022). Localizing the K to 12 Technical- Vocational-Livelihood track for inclusive student populations in rural provinces. Journal of Education and Social Policy, 14(3), 45–59.

[34] Roser, R., & Rossetti, Z. (2019). Collaborative structures among multidisciplinary teams in comprehensive secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 95(1), 112–125.

[35] Rotter, K. (2019). IEP use by general and special education teachers: A bridge to inclusion. SAGE Open, https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019847651 9(2), 1–10.

[36] Rowe, D. A., Almgren, I., Lazar, M. D., & Laceiv, R. (2021). Predictors of postsecondary success for special education learners in technical tracks. Exceptional Children, 87(2), 143–160.

[37] Rubio, J. M., & Manalastas, R. D. (2020). Socio-economic status and parent non- attendance in rural school special education consultations. Visayas Academic Review, 17(2), 89–101.

[38] Sancho, M. A., & Cobrado, A. L. (2024). Operationalizing individualized educational protocols within regional public high schools. Journal of Philippine Education Outcomes, 19(1), 32–48.

[39] Shaddock, A., MacDonald, N., Hook, J., Giorcelli, L., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2021). Individualized Education Plans (IEPs): Review of the evidence of effectiveness. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(5), 582–597.

[40] Strogilos, V., & Stefanidis, A. (2015). Contextual barriers to multidisciplinary collaboration and parent inclusion during IEP conferences. International Journal of Educational Research, 71, 79–89.

[41] Tariman, M. A. (2019). Assessing the alignment of individual plans with senior high school work immersion requirements in Leyte. Eastern Visayas Research Journal, 13(4), 201–215.

[42] Tucker, V., & Schwartz, I. (2015). Parents’ perspectives of collaboration with school systems during initial IEP setups. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(1), 3–18.

[43] Van Dycke, J. L., Martin, J. E., & Lovett, D. L. (2016). Postsecondary outcome differences between academic and vocational tracks for special education graduates. Journal of Special Education Research, 22(3), 167–181.

[44] Yell, M. L., Katsiyannis, A., & Bradley, R. (2020). The legal requirement to provide an appropriate education to students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 86(3), 263–279.

[45] Laws, Administrative Issuances, and Other Dissertations/Monographs Cobrado, A. L. (2023). Evaluating secondary inclusive school resources in Region VII and Region VIII (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cebu Normal University, Cebu City, Philippines.

[46] Department of Education. (2015). Guidelines on the utilization of Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (MOOE) for special education allocations (DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2015). Pasig City, Philippines: Bureau of Learning Delivery.

[47] Department of Education. (2019). Procedural guidelines on the management and implementation of the Senior High School Work Immersion program (DepEd Order No. 30, s. 2017). Pasig City, Philippines: Bureau of Learning Delivery.

[48] Department of Education. (2021). Policy framework on inclusive education in basic education (DepEd Order No. 44, s. 2021). Pasig City, Philippines: Bureau of Learning Delivery.

[49] Philippine Government. (2012). The Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10173). Manila, Philippines: Malacañang Records Office.

[50] Philippine Government. (2013). The Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013 (K to 12 Program) (Republic Act No. 10533). Manila, Philippines: Malacañang Records Office.

[51] Philippine Government. (2016). An act expanding the benefits and privileges of persons with disability (PWD) (Republic Act No. 10754). Manila, Philippines: Malacañang Records Office.

[52] UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

[53] World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability. World Health Organization and World Bank Group.

How to cite this paper

Arturo B. Bolledo, Jr., Rhona M. Apurador, Thomas T. Travero, Danilo L. Yare, Dr. Julia T. Canonigo; Dr. Rebecca Manalastas "Validating The Effectiveness of Individualized Education Plans (IEPS): Identifying Opportunities for Improvement" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 2 2026 Page 2874-2900 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722540
Arturo B. Bolledo, Jr., Rhona M. Apurador, Thomas T. Travero, Danilo L. Yare, Dr. Julia T. Canonigo; Dr. Rebecca Manalastas "Validating The Effectiveness of Individualized Education Plans (IEPS): Identifying Opportunities for Improvement" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 2, Aug. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722540
Arturo B. Bolledo, Jr., Rhona M. Apurador, Thomas T. Travero, Danilo L. Yare, Dr. Julia T. Canonigo; Dr. Rebecca Manalastas (2026). Validating The Effectiveness of Individualized Education Plans (IEPS): Identifying Opportunities for Improvement. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722540
Arturo B. Bolledo, Jr., Rhona M. Apurador, Thomas T. Travero, Danilo L. Yare, Dr. Julia T. Canonigo; Dr. Rebecca Manalastas "Validating The Effectiveness of Individualized Education Plans (IEPS): Identifying Opportunities for Improvement" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 2, Aug. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722540
@article{1722540,
      author = {Arturo B. Bolledo, Jr., Rhona M. Apurador, Thomas T. Travero, Danilo L. Yare, Dr. Julia T. Canonigo; Dr. Rebecca Manalastas},
      title = {Validating The Effectiveness of Individualized Education Plans (IEPS): Identifying Opportunities for Improvement},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {2874-2900},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722540.pdf},
      abstract = {This study evaluated the operational effectiveness of Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) for Learners with Special Educational Needs (LSENs) within the selected Senior High Schools (SHS) of the Second District of Leyte, namely Damulaan National High School, Dr. Geronimo B. Zaldivar Memorial School of Fisheries, Isabel National Comprehensive High School, and Matlang National High School. Utilizing a descriptive-evaluative research design, data were gathered from a balanced, purposive sample of 60 respondents (n = 20 teachers; n=40 students) alongside institutional inputs from school administrators and parents. Data collection was executed using a contextualized, 4-point Likert-scale research instrument assessing three core dimensions: Instructional Adaptation, Goal Attainment, and Transition Planning. The empirical findings revealed an unsatisfactory overall implementation mean (2.27), categorizing the current IEP system as Less Effective. While basic administrative compliance in written examination modifications was met (2.62), severe execution gaps were identified in practical workshop task adaptation (1.95) and post-graduation workforce transition planning (2.05). The primary institutional obstacles identified by local educators included a critical shortage of track-contextualized instructional materials (1.55), absolute scarcity of assistive technologies (1.68), and heavy daily workloads (1.72). Inferential testing (t-test and ANOVA) demonstrated highly significant differences in perceived effectiveness when respondents were grouped by school environment (t =3.42, p = .001) and curriculum tracks (t = 2.89, p = .006), revealing that standardized templates break down within specialized vocational strands such as fisheries and maritime laboratory simulations. Conversely, variance across parents' socio-economic status was not significant (p = .472), showing uniform dissatisfaction with transition outcomes across all income brackets. To bridge this systemic compliance-performance gap, the study developed The IEP Optimization Framework, a 10point structural action matrix embedding track-differentiated accommodation protocols, cloudbased progress tracking, and flexible home-school collaborative networks to secure sustainable post-secondary workforce and tertiary readiness for inclusive high school learners.},
      keywords = {Individualized Education Plans (IEPs), Inclusive Education, Transition planning, Technical-Vocational-Livelihood (TVL) track, and the IEP Optimization Framework.},
      month = {August},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722540}
  }