International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722627

1722627 Vol 2 · Issue 3 Download Paper

An Offline-First Design Framework for Digital Learning in Low-Connectivity Environments

Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu Daniel Ajiga

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Offline Digital Learning Systems

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I3-1722627

Abstract

Digital learning initiatives in the Global South are frequently designed on the tacit assumption of continuous, affordable, and high-bandwidth connectivity, an assumption that does not hold for the learners such initiatives most aspire to reach. When connectivity is intermittent, metered, and expensive, “connected-by-default” designs degrade into unusable ones, widening rather than narrowing educational inequality. This paper argues that offline operation should be treated not as a degraded fallback but as the primary, first-class design condition for learning technology in low-connectivity environments. Grounded in the literatures of information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D), human–computer interaction for development (HCI4D), mobile learning, and delay-tolerant networking, we propose TIDAL, a Tolerant, Inclusive, Device-first, Adaptive Learning framework. TIDAL couples five design tenets with a four-layer reference architecture (a local-first content and data layer, an opportunistic synchronization layer, an adaptive experience layer, and a pedagogical continuity layer), bound together by a cross-cutting concern for data integrity, security, and sustainability. The framework reframes connectivity as an intermittent resource to be exploited opportunistically rather than a precondition to be assumed. We illustrate TIDAL through a worked scenario of teacher-mediated secondary-school delivery in a rural setting and discuss the framework’s strengths, limitations, and boundary conditions. TIDAL is offered as a conceptual scaffold for designers, implementers, and evaluators, and as a research agenda for empirically validating offline-first learning design.

Keywords

offline-first; digital learning; low-connectivity; ICT4D; mobile learning; delay-tolerant networking; progressive web apps; design framework; digital inclusion

References

[1] Gitau, S., Marsden, G., & Donner, J. (2010). After access: Challenges facing mobile-only Internet users in the developing world. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10) (pp. 2603–2606). ACM. Crossref

[2] Donner, J. (2015). After access: Inclusion, development, and a more mobile Internet. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262029926/after-access/

[3] Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The next phase of applying ICT for international development. Computer, 41(6), 26–33. Crossref

[4] Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262731737/technology-and-social-inclusion/

[5] Fall, K. (2003). A delay-tolerant network architecture for challenged internets. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM ’03) (pp. 27–34). ACM. Crossref

[6] Cerf, V., Burleigh, S., Hooke, A., Torgerson, L., Durst, R., Scott, K., Fall, K., & Weiss, H. (2007). Delay-tolerant networking architecture (RFC 4838). Internet Engineering Task Force. Crossref

[7] Ejofodomi, O. A., Gideon, E. N., Oladipo, G. O., & Oshomah, E. R. (2014). Automated detection of architectural detection in mammograms using template matching. International Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 2(1), 1–6.

[8] Ladapo, O. O., Dosunmu, A. A., Jooda, D., & Abolaji, T. O. (2018). Lessons learned from offline assessment of security-critical systems: The case of Microsoft Active Directory. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(6), 277-299. Crossref

[9] Toyama, K. (2011). Technology as amplifier in international development. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference (pp. 75–82). ACM. Crossref

[10] Toyama, K. (2015). Geek heresy: Rescuing social change from the cult of technology. PublicAffairs.

[11] Ho, M. R., Smyth, T. N., Kam, M., & Kotlarsky, A. (2009). Human-computer interaction for development: The past, present, and future. Information Technologies & International Development, 5(4), 1–18. https://itidjournal.org/index.php/itid/article/view/420

[12] Medhi, I., Sagar, A., & Toyama, K. (2007). Text-free user interfaces for illiterate and semiliterate users. Information Technologies & International Development, 4(1), 37–50. Crossref

[13] Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2005). Towards a theory of mobile learning. In Proceedings of mLearn 2005: 4th World Conference on mLearning. Cape Town, South Africa. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228346088_Towards_a_theory_of_mobile_learning

[14] Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2). Crossref

[15] Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Athabasca University Press. https://www.aupress.ca/books/120146-the-theory-and-practice-of-online-learning/

[16] West, M., & Vosloo, S. (2013). UNESCO policy guidelines for mobile learning. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000219641

[17] Kam, M., Kumar, A., Jain, S., Mathur, A., & Canny, J. (2009). Improving literacy in rural India: Cellphone games in an after-school program. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD 2009) (pp. 139–149). IEEE. Crossref

[18] Mitra, S. (2003). Minimally invasive education: A progress report on the “hole-in-the-wall” experiments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 367–371. Crossref

[19] Biørn-Hansen, A., Majchrzak, T. A., & Grønli, T.-M. (2017). Progressive web apps: The possible web-native unifier for mobile development. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2017) (pp. 344–351). SciTePress. Crossref

[20] Brewer, E., Demmer, M., Du, B., Ho, M., Kam, M., Nedevschi, S., Pal, J., Patra, R., Surana, S., & Fall, K. (2005). The case for technology in developing regions. Computer, 38(6), 25–38. Crossref

[21] Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

[22] Compaine, B. M. (Ed.). (2001). The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth? MIT Press.

[23] Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide. Georgetown University Press.

[24] Attewell, P. (2001). The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 252–259. Crossref

[25] Helsper, E. J. (2012). A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion. Communication Theory, 22(4), 403–426. Crossref

[26] van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). The third-level digital divide: Who benefits most from being online? Communication and Information Technologies Annual, 10, 29–52. Crossref

[27] Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2017). Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes: A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607–1624. Crossref

[28] Heeks, R. (2010). Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development? Journal of International Development, 22(5), 625–640. Crossref

[29] Walsham, G. (2017). ICT4D research: Reflections on history and future agenda. Information Technology for Development, 23(1), 18–41. Crossref

[30] Gunkel, D. J. (2003). Second thoughts: Toward a critique of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 5(4), 499–522. Crossref

[31] DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307–336. Crossref

[32] Wei, K.-K., Teo, H.-H., Chan, H. C., & Tan, B. C. Y. (2011). Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 170–187. Crossref

[33] Hilbert, M. (2011). The end justifies the definition: The manifold outlooks on the digital divide and their practical usefulness for policy-making. Telecommunications Policy, 35(8), 715–736. Crossref

[34] Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Polity Press.

[35] Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2010). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen (pp. 87–99). VS Verlag. Crossref

[36] Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ… The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2), 1–12. Crossref

[37] Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165. Crossref

[38] Donner, J. (2008). Research approaches to mobile use in the developing world: A review of the literature. The Information Society, 24(3), 140–159. Crossref

[39] Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and Learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16–32.

[40] Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1–14. Crossref

[41] Pittinsky, M. S. (2003). The wired tower: Perspectives on the impact of the Internet on higher education. Financial Times Prentice Hall.

[42] Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (Rev. ed.). Holden-Day.

[43] Armstrong, J. S. (Ed.). (2001). Principles of forecasting: A handbook for researchers and practitioners. Kluwer Academic. Crossref

[44] De Gooijer, J. G., & Hyndman, R. J. (2006). 25 years of time series forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(3), 443–473. Crossref

[45] Gardner, E. S. (2006). Exponential smoothing: The state of the art: Part II. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(4), 637–666. Crossref

[46] Holt, C. C. (2004). Forecasting seasonals and trends by exponentially weighted moving averages. International Journal of Forecasting, 20(1), 5–10. Crossref

[47] Fildes, R., Nikolopoulos, K., Crone, S. F., & Syntetos, A. A. (2008). Forecasting and operational research: A review. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(9), 1150–1172. Crossref

[48] Syntetos, A. A., Boylan, J. E., & Croston, J. D. (2005). On the categorization of demand patterns. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56(5), 495–503. Crossref

[49] Ahmed, N. K., Atiya, A. F., Gayar, N. E., & El-Shishiny, H. (2010). An empirical comparison of machine learning models for time series forecasting. Econometric Reviews, 29(5–6), 594–621. Crossref

[50] Crone, S. F., Hibon, M., & Nikolopoulos, K. (2011). Advances in forecasting with neural networks? Empirical evidence from the NN3 competition. International Journal of Forecasting, 27(3), 635–660. Crossref

[51] Makridakis, S., Wheelwright, S. C., & Hyndman, R. J. (1998). Forecasting: Methods and applications (3rd ed.). Wiley.

[52] Fildes, R., & Goodwin, P. (2007). Against your better judgment? How organizations can improve their use of management judgment in forecasting. Interfaces, 37(6), 570–576. Crossref

[53] Chatfield, C. (2000). Time-series forecasting. Chapman & Hall/CRC.

[54] Hyndman, R. J., Koehler, A. B., Snyder, R. D., & Grose, S. (2002). A state space framework for automatic forecasting using exponential smoothing methods. International Journal of Forecasting, 18(3), 439–454. Crossref

[55] Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press. Crossref

[56] Dogbatsey, E. A., & Ebhojie, O. (2018). Budget compliance and statutory reporting in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review of frameworks, gaps, and reform pathways. Zenodo. Crossref

[57] Mbonu, I. S., Aliliele, C., Iwuanyanwu, U., & Oluoha, O. M. (2018). A conceptual framework for legal and ethical risk modeling in enterprise data protection governance systems. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(2), 207-226. Crossref

[58] Badmus, O., Dosunmu, A. A., & Ozowara, D. E. (2018). A systematic review of CI/CD pipeline strategies in Salesforce DevOps: Tools, practices, and deployment outcomes. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(6).

[59] Akeju, B., Edivri, J., Ogbole, J. I., Okoruwa, P. O., Fadayomi, O., & Abolaji, T. O. (2018). Conceptual model for insider threat classification and risk modeling in complex digital systems. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 1(9), 476–492. Crossref

[60] Aminu-Ibrahim, A. Y., Ogbete, J. C., & Ambali, K. B. (2018). Developing sustainable diagnostic laboratory infrastructure models for emerging and resource constrained health systems. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 1(8), 118-132. Crossref

[61] Ogbete, J. C., Aminu-Ibrahim, A. Y., & Ambali, K. B. (2018). Optimizing laboratory spatial planning strategies to improve diagnostic accuracy, safety, and clinical throughput. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(1), 87-113. Crossref

[62] Arumosoye, O. M., & Obriki, O. D. (2018). Development of an integrated heat stress risk conceptual model for industrial operations in extreme environments. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 1(12), 141-160. Crossref

[63] Obriki, O. D., & Arumosoye, O. M. (2018). Conceptual modeling of data-driven occupational safety risk control in large-scale energy infrastructure projects. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 1(7), 169-189. Crossref

[64] Dagodzo, D. (2018b). A conceptual framework for UAV integration into national power grid inspection programs. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(5), 391-412. Crossref

[65] Dagodzo, D. (2018c). A review of UAV applications in electrical transmission line inspection: Methods, technologies, and challenges. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(6), 234-254. Crossref

[66] Sunday, E. A., & Omoegun, G. O. (2018). Integrating solar power solutions in small-scale manufacturing industries in Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(8), 832-853.

[67] Bobga, M. A., Boakye, K., Ogbona, C. S., & Yeboah, T. J. (2018). Pedagogical strategies for teaching students with learning difficulties in resource-constrained schools. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(4), 173-194. Crossref

[68] Amayo, E. B. (2017). Multi algorithm of loss objective function of a single phase induction motor. International Journal of Development Research, 7(5), 12805-12810.

[69] Amayo, E. B., & Popoola, T. T. (2017a). Multi algorithm of weight objective function of a single phase induction motor. International Journal of Trend in Research and Development, 4(2), 184-188.

[70] Amayo, E. B., & Popoola, T. T. (2017b). Scientific study of telecommunication deployment in achieving quality network. International Journal of Trend in Research and Development, 4(5), 311-314.

[71] Amayo, E. B., Ubeku, E., & Oshevire, P. (2015). Multi algorithm of a single objective function of a single phase induction motor. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, 2(12), 3400-3403.

[72] Oshevire, P., Eyenubo, O. J., & Amayo, B. (2017). Voltage control in the presence of distributed generation. ATBU Journal of Science, Technology and Education, 5(2), 165-173.

[73] Okonkwo, C. S., Ogunwole, O., & Okeke, O. T. (2018b). Framework for strategic procurement optimization in oil and gas operations. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 1(7), 153-168. Crossref

[74] Okonkwo, C. S., Ogunwole, O., & Okeke, O. T. (2018c). Model for inventory availability and plant uptime improvement in energy facilities. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(4), 160-172. Crossref

[75] Akomolafe, O., & Agu, M. U. (2018). A conceptual model for enhancing internal audit quality through technology-enabled risk assessment frameworks. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 1(9), 458-475.

[76] Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(7), 1483–1510. Crossref

[77] Susto, G. A., Schirru, A., Pampuri, S., McLoone, S., & Beghi, A. (2015). Machine learning for predictive maintenance: A multiple classifier approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 11(3), 812–820. Crossref

[78] Wang, J., Ma, Y., Zhang, L., Gao, R. X., & Wu, D. (2018). Deep learning for smart manufacturing: Methods and applications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 48, 144–156. Crossref

[79] Stouffer, K., Lightman, S., Pillitteri, V., Abrams, M., & Hahn, A. (2015). Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. NIST SP 800-82.

[80] Dragos, & Inc. (2017). TRISIS Malware: Analysis of Safety System Targeted Attack. Dragos Intelligence.

[81] Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Sinha, A., & Wellman, M. P. (2018). SoK: Security and privacy in machine learning. in Proc. IEEE EuroS&P, 399-414.

[82] Sproul, W. D., Christie, D. J., & Carter, D. C. (2005). Control of reactive sputtering processes. Thin Solid Films, 491(1), 1–17. Crossref

[83] Strijckmans, K., Schelfhout, R., & Depla, D. (2018). Tutorial: Hysteresis during the reactive magnetron sputtering process. Journal of Applied Physics, 124(24), 241101. Crossref

[84] Musil, J., Baroch, P., Vlček, J., Nam, K. H., & Han, J. G. (2005). Reactive magnetron sputtering of thin films: present status and trends. Thin Solid Films, 475(1), 208–218. Crossref

[85] Sarakinos, K., Alami, J., & Konstantinidis, S. (2010). High power pulsed magnetron sputtering: A review on scientific and engineering state of the art. Surface and Coatings Technology, 204(11), 1661–1684. Crossref

[86] Anders, A. (2017). Tutorial: Reactive high power impulse magnetron sputtering (R-HiPIMS). Journal of Applied Physics, 121(17), 171101. Crossref

[87] Anders, A. (2014). A review comparing cathodic arcs and high power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS). Surface and Coatings Technology, 257, 308–325. Crossref

[88] Negri, E., Fumagalli, L., & Macchi, M. (2017). A Review of the Roles of Digital Twin in CPS-based Production Systems. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 939–948. Crossref

[89] Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W. (2018). Digital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11), 1016–. Crossref

[90] Brunton, S. L., Proctor, J. L., & Kutz, J. N. (2016). Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(15), 3932–3937. Crossref

[91] Benner, P., Gugercin, S., & Willcox, K. (2015). A Survey of Projection-Based Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Dynamical Systems. SIAM Review, 57(4), 483–531. Crossref

[92] Evensen, G. (2003). The Ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dynamics, 53(4), 343–367. Crossref

[93] Mayne, D. Q. (2014). Model predictive control: Recent developments and future promise. Automatica, 50(12), 2967–2986. Crossref

[94] Dagodzo, D. (2018a). A conceptual framework for UAV integration into national power grid inspection programs. IRE Journals, 2(5), 391–412. Crossref

[95] Pflug, A., Siemers, M., Melzig, T., Schäfer, L., & Bräuer, G. (2014). Simulation of linear magnetron discharges in 2D and 3D. Surface and Coatings Technology, 260, 411–416. Crossref

[96] Berg, S., Särhammar, E., & Nyberg, T. (2014). Upgrading the ‘Berg-model’ for reactive sputtering processes. Thin Solid Films, 565, 186–192. Crossref

[97] Elebe, O. (2018). Conceptual model for insider threat classification and risk modeling in complex digital systems. and digital identity verification framework for.

[98] Srinidhi, B., Yan, J., & Bhargava, H. K. (2015). Effect of information security investments on firm performance. Decision Support Systems, 74, 1–15.

[99] McKone, K. E., Schroeder, R. G., & Cua, K. O. (2001). The impact of total productive maintenance practices on manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 19(1), 39–58. Crossref

[100] Dal, B., Tugwell, P., & Greatbanks, R. (2000). Overall equipment effectiveness as a measure of operational improvement: A practical analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(12), 1488–1502. Crossref

[101] Bamber, D., Sharp, C. J., & Hides, M. T. (1999). Factors affecting successful implementation of total productive maintenance: A UK manufacturing case study perspective. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 5(3), 162–181. Crossref

[102] McKone, K. E., Schroeder, R. G., & Cua, K. O. (1999). Total productive maintenance: A contextual view. Journal of Operations Management, 17(2), 123–144. Crossref

[103] Tezel, A., Koskela, L., & Tzortzopoulos, P. (2016). Visual management in production management: A literature synthesis. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 27(6), 766–799. Crossref

[104] Bagavathiappan, S., Lahiri, B. B., Saravanan, T., Philip, J., & Jayakumar, T. (2013). Infrared thermography for condition monitoring: A review. Infrared Physics & Technology, 60, 35–55. Crossref

[105] Lee, J., Wu, F., Zhao, W., Ghaffari, M., Liao, L., & Siegel, D. (2014b). Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems: Reviews, methodology and applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 42(1), 314–334. Crossref

[106] Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018). Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 104, 799–834. Crossref

[107] Saxena, A., Goebel, K., Simon, D., & Eklund, N. (2008). Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation. in Proc. Int. Conf. Prognostics and Health Management (PHM), 1–9. Crossref

[108] Lee, J., Kao, H.-A., & Yang, S. (2014a). Service innovation and smart analytics for Industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia CIRP, 16, 3–8. Crossref

[109] Tao, F., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2018b). Digital twin driven prognostics and health management for complex equipment. CIRP Annals, 67(1), 169–172. Crossref

[110] Selcuk, S. (2017). Predictive maintenance, its implementation and latest trends. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 231(9), 1670–1679. Crossref

[111] Okonkwo, C. S., Ogunwole, O., & Okeke, O. T. (2018a). Model for inventory availability and plant uptime improvement in energy facilities. IRE Journals, 2(4), 160–172. Crossref

[112] Peng, Y., Dong, M., & Zuo, M. J. (2010). Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: A review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 50(1), 297–313. Crossref

[113] Liu, H.-C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013). Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2), 828–838. Crossref

[114] Antoni, J. (2007). Fast computation of the kurtogram for the detection of transient faults. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 21(1), 108–124. Crossref

[115] Lei, Y., Lin, J., Zuo, M. J., & He, Z. (2014). Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of planetary gearboxes: A review. Measurement, 48, 292–305. Crossref

[116] Lei, Y., Jia, F., Lin, J., Xing, S., & Ding, S. X. (2016). An intelligent fault diagnosis method using unsupervised feature learning towards mechanical big data. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(5), 3137–3147. Crossref

[117] Wen, L., Li, X., Gao, L., & Zhang, Y. (2018). A new convolutional neural network-based data-driven fault diagnosis method. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 65(7), 5990–. Crossref

[118] Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Zhang, H., & Sui, F. (2018a). Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(9), 3563–3576. Crossref

[119] Lawal, O. A., & Oduleye, T. E. (2018a). A conceptual model for financial analytics driven enterprise value creation in technology firms. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(2).

[120] Lawal, O. A., & Oduleye, T. E. (2018b). A review and conceptual framework for tax governance and cross-border compliance analytics. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 2(5).

How to cite this paper

Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu, Daniel Ajiga "An Offline-First Design Framework for Digital Learning in Low-Connectivity Environments" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 2 Issue 3 2018 Page 192-211 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I3-1722627
Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu, Daniel Ajiga "An Offline-First Design Framework for Digital Learning in Low-Connectivity Environments" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 2, no. 3, Sep. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I3-1722627
Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu, Daniel Ajiga (2018). An Offline-First Design Framework for Digital Learning in Low-Connectivity Environments. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 2(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I3-1722627
Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu, Daniel Ajiga "An Offline-First Design Framework for Digital Learning in Low-Connectivity Environments" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 2, no. 3, Sep. 2018. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I3-1722627
@article{1722627,
      author = {Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma, Ifeanyichukwu Jeffrey Okwesa, Uzoamaka Iwuanyanwu, Daniel Ajiga},
      title = {An Offline-First Design Framework for Digital Learning in Low-Connectivity Environments},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2018},
      volume = {2},
      number = {3},
      pages = {192-211},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722627.pdf},
      abstract = {Digital learning initiatives in the Global South are frequently designed on the tacit assumption of continuous, affordable, and high-bandwidth connectivity, an assumption that does not hold for the learners such initiatives most aspire to reach. When connectivity is intermittent, metered, and expensive, “connected-by-default” designs degrade into unusable ones, widening rather than narrowing educational inequality. This paper argues that offline operation should be treated not as a degraded fallback but as the primary, first-class design condition for learning technology in low-connectivity environments. Grounded in the literatures of information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D), human–computer interaction for development (HCI4D), mobile learning, and delay-tolerant networking, we propose TIDAL, a Tolerant, Inclusive, Device-first, Adaptive Learning framework. TIDAL couples five design tenets with a four-layer reference architecture (a local-first content and data layer, an opportunistic synchronization layer, an adaptive experience layer, and a pedagogical continuity layer), bound together by a cross-cutting concern for data integrity, security, and sustainability. The framework reframes connectivity as an intermittent resource to be exploited opportunistically rather than a precondition to be assumed. We illustrate TIDAL through a worked scenario of teacher-mediated secondary-school delivery in a rural setting and discuss the framework’s strengths, limitations, and boundary conditions. TIDAL is offered as a conceptual scaffold for designers, implementers, and evaluators, and as a research agenda for empirically validating offline-first learning design.},
      keywords = {offline-first; digital learning; low-connectivity; ICT4D; mobile learning; delay-tolerant networking; progressive web apps; design framework; digital inclusion},
      month = {September},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV2I3-1722627}
  }