Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722714
Trustworthy and Adversarial-Resilient AI for Financial Crime Defense: A Unified Framework for Fraud Detection, Anti-Money Laundering, Credit Risk, and Secure Payments
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: AI for Financial Crime Detection
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722714
Abstract
Financial institutions face an increasingly interconnected set of threats spanning transaction fraud, money laundering, adversarial manipulation of scoring models, payment-system exploitation, and network-level intrusions against the infrastructure that hosts these services. Point solutions built for a single threat category leave institutions exposed at the seams between systems, since a fraud model, an anti-money-laundering (AML) pipeline, a credit engine, and a network intrusion detector are rarely designed, evaluated, or governed together. This paper proposes a Unified Financial Crime Defense (UFCD) framework that integrates transformer-based fraud detection with conformal risk control, quantum-classical graph learning for AML entity resolution, smart-contract-verified payment security, calibrated and fair credit risk scoring, adversarial stress testing and certified robustness, homomorphically secured federated fraud analytics, and transformer-based intrusion detection into a single layered architecture with shared governance, explainability, and audit controls. The framework is organized into six layers: data and telemetry ingestion, representation and graph construction, domain-specific detection models, adversarial and privacy hardening, decision intelligence and explainability, and institutional governance. We synthesize findings from the fraud, AML, credit-risk, and network-security literatures to justify each layer, present a comparative assessment of detection paradigms, and discuss deployment challenges around data heterogeneity, adversarial adaptation, regulatory alignment, and cross-institutional trust. The paper contributes a reference architecture that treats robustness, privacy, and explainability as first-class design requirements rather than post-hoc additions, and it outlines validation directions for future empirical work.
Keywords
fraud detection, anti-money laundering, adversarial robustness, federated learning, graph neural networks, credit risk, intrusion detection, financial cybersecurity, explainable ai.
References
[1] S. A. Abdulkareem, C. H. Foh, M. Shojafar, F. Carrez, and K. Moessner, "Network intrusion detection: An IoT and non-IoT-related survey," IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 147167–147191, 2024. Crossref
[2] A. Alhasawi et al., "A federated approach to scalable and trustworthy financial fraud detection," Security and Privacy, Wiley, 2025.
[3] A. N. Angelopoulos and S. Bates, "A gentle introduction to conformal prediction and distribution-free uncertainty quantification," arXiv:2107.07511, 2021.
[4] S. Baviskar, "Adversarial robustness in financial machine learning: Defenses, economic impact, and governance evidence," arXiv:2512.15780, 2025.
[5] R. H. Chowdhury, "Advancing fraud detection through deep learning: A comprehensive review," World J. Adv. Eng. Technol. Sci., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 606–613, 2024.
[6] R. R. Devi, J. E. Raja, and Y. B. Chin, "Reinforcement learning with graph neural network (RL-GNN) fusion for real-time financial fraud detection: A context-aware community mining approach," Scientific Reports, 2025. Crossref
[7] Financial Action Task Force, "Money Laundering National Risk Assessment Guidance," FATF, 2024.
[8] Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, "What We Do," FinCEN, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.fincen.gov/what-we-do
[9] N. Innan et al., "Financial fraud detection using quantum graph neural networks," Quantum Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 7, 2024. Crossref
[10] International Organization for Standardization, "ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial intelligence management system," ISO/IEC, 2023.
[11] S. Islam, G. Raj Gupta, A. Chakraborty, S. Singh, A. Soni, and C. Patle, "Detecting fraudulent transactions for different patterns in financial networks using layer weighted GCN," Human-Centric Intelligent Systems, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 181–195, 2025. Crossref
[12] R. Kalakoti, S. Nõmm, and H. Bahsi, "Explainable transformer-based intrusion detection in Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) networks," in Proc. ICMLA, 2024, pp. 1164– 1169.
[13] R. Kalakoti, S. Nõmm, and H. Bahsi, "Federated learning of explainable AI (FedXAI) for deep learning-based intrusion detection in IoT networks," Computer Networks, 2025.
[14] R. Kalakoti, R. Vaarandi, H. Bahsi, and S. Nõmm, "Evaluating explainable AI for deep learning-based network intrusion detection system alert classification," arXiv:2506.07882, 2025.
[15] Z. Ke, S. Zhou, Y. Zhou, C. H. Chang, and R. Zhang, "Detection of AI deepfake and fraud in online payments using GAN-based models," in Proc. ICAACE, 2025, pp. 1786–1790.
[16] A. Khanum, K. Chaitra, B. Singh, and C. Gomathi, "Fraud detection in financial transactions: A machine learning approach vs. rule-based systems," in Proc. IITCEE, 2024.
[17] N. Koroniotis, N. Moustafa, E. Sitnikova, and B. Turnbull, "Towards the development of realistic botnet dataset in the Internet of Things for network forensic analytics: Bot-IoT dataset," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 100, pp. 779–796, 2019. Crossref
[18] G. Kou and Y. Lu, "FinTech: A literature review of emerging financial technologies and applications," Financial Innovation, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1, 2025. Crossref
[19] E. Kurshan and H. Shen, "Graph computing for financial crime and fraud detection: Trends, challenges and outlook," International Journal of Semantic Computing, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 565– 589, 2020.
[20] W. W. Lo, G. K. Kulatilleke, M. Sarhan, S. Layeghy, and M. Portmann, "Inspection-L: Self- supervised GNN node embeddings for money laundering detection in Bitcoin," Applied Intelligence, vol. 53, pp. 19406–19417, 2023. Crossref
[21] E. Lopez-Rojas, A. Elmir, and S. Axelsson, "PaySim: A financial mobile money simulator for fraud detection," in Proc. European Modelling Symposium (EMS), 2016.
[22] H. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, "Communication- efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data," in Proc. AISTATS, 2017, pp. 1273–1282.
[23] Y. Meidan, M. Bohadana, Y. Mathov, Y. Mirsky, A. Shabtai, D. Breitenbacher, and Y. Elovici, "N-BaIoT: Network-based detection of IoT botnet attacks using deep autoencoders," IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 12–22, 2018. Crossref
[24] N. Moustafa and J. Slay, "UNSW-NB15: A comprehensive data set for network intrusion detection systems," in Proc. MilCIS, 2015. Crossref
[25] S. Nayak and A. R. Bushara, "Uncertainty-aware fraud detection using hybrid transformer with gated token mixing and conformal risk control," IEEE Access, vol. 14, pp. 77557–77573, 2026.
[26] S. Nayak and R. Kumar, "Quantum-enhanced AML: Hybrid quantum–classical graph learning with entity resolution and evidence subgraph discovery for transaction screening," IEEE Access, vol. 14, pp. 74837–74850, 2026.
[27] S. Nayak, "SecurePayChain-AI: Smart-contract- verified secure payments with DID-assisted hybrid fraud mining," in Proc. 5th Asia Conf. Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning (CACML), Guangzhou, China, 2026, pp. 1–8.
[28] S. Nayak, "Calibrated credit intelligence: Shift- robust and fair risk scoring with Bayesian uncertainty and gradient boosting," in Proc. IEEE Int. Research Conf. Smart Computing and Systems Engineering (SCSE), Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2026, pp. 1–6.
[29] S. Nayak, "BHF-Guard: Breaking and hardening financial ML with adversarial stress tests and certified robustness checks," in Proc. 14th Int. Symp. Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS), Boston, MA, USA, 2026, pp. 1–7.
[30] S. Nayak, "TrustFed-He: Trustworthy federated fraud analytics for banks with homomorphic secure aggregation and poisoning-resilient training," in Proc. 14th Int. Symp. Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS), Boston, MA, USA, 2026, pp. 1–7.
[31] S. Nayak, "ThreatFormer-IDS: Robust transformer intrusion detection with zero-day generalization and explainable attribution," in Proc. 4th Cognitive Models and Artificial Intelligence Conf. (AICCONF), Prague, Czech Republic, 2026, pp. 1–8.
[32] S. Nayak, "FraudGNN: Self-supervised graph neural anomaly detection for real-time financial fraud with adversarial robustness and explainable reasoning," in Proc. IEEE 5th Int. Conf. AI in Cybersecurity (ICAIC), Houston, TX, USA, 2026, pp. 1–7.
[33] National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)," NIST AI 100-1, 2023.
[34] J. Pope et al., "Intrusion detection at the IoT edge using federated learning," in Security and Privacy in Smart Environments, LNCS vol. 14800, Springer, 2024, pp. 98–119.
[35] Z. Rouhollahi, "Towards artificial intelligence enabled financial crime detection," arXiv:2105.10866, 2021.
[36] I. Sharafaldin, A. H. Lashkari, and A. A. Ghorbani, "Toward generating a new intrusion detection dataset and intrusion traffic characterization," in Proc. ICISSP, 2018, pp. 108–116.
[37] R. Shokri, M. Stronati, C. Song, and V. Shmatikov, "Membership inference attacks against machine learning models," in Proc. IEEE Symp. Security and Privacy (S&P), 2017, pp. 3–18. Crossref
[38] N. Shone, T. N. Ngoc, V. D. Phai, and Q. Shi, "A deep learning approach to network intrusion detection," IEEE Trans. Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2018. Crossref
[39] M. Srokosz, A. Bobyk, B. Ksiezopolski, and M. Wydra, "Machine-learning-based scoring system for antifraud CISIRTs in banking environment," Electronics, vol. 12, no. 10, 2023.
[40] T. Suzumura et al., "Towards federated graph learning for collaborative financial crimes detection," arXiv:1909.12946, 2019.
[41] M. Tavallaee, E. Bagheri, W. Lu, and A. A. Ghorbani, "A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set," in Proc. IEEE CISDA, 2009, pp. 1– 6. Crossref
[42] UK Finance Limited, "Annual Fraud Report 2025," London, 2025.
[43] A. Vaswani et al., "Attention is all you need," in Proc. NeurIPS, 2017.
[44] I. Vorobyev, A. Kireev, and E. Fedulova, "Graph neural networks for financial fraud detection: A survey," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1–35, 2024.
[45] V. Vovk, A. Gammerman, and G. Shafer, Algorithmic Learning in a Random World. Springer, 2005.
[46] M. Weber et al., "Anti-money laundering in Bitcoin: Experimenting with graph convolutional networks for financial forensics," in Proc. KDD Workshop on Anomaly Detection in Finance, 2019.
[47] F. Wójcik, "An analysis of novel money laundering data using heterogeneous graph isomorphism networks: FinCEN files case study," Econometrics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 32–49, 2024.
[48] Q. Yang, Y. Liu, T. Chen, and Y. Tong, "Federated machine learning: Concept and applications," ACM Trans. Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2019. Crossref
[49] W. Yang, Y. Zhang, K. Ye, L. Li, and C. Z. Xu, "FFD: A federated learning based method for credit card fraud detection," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Big Data, 2019.
[50] Q. Yu, Z. Ke, G. Xiong, Y. Cheng, and X. Guo, "Identifying money laundering risks in digital asset transactions based on AI algorithms," in Proc. EIECC, 2024, pp. 1081–1085.
[51] H. Zhang, J. Yu, Y. Wang, J. Qi, and J. Cao, "Robust federated learning against poisoning attacks in industrial IoT," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 152, pp. 563–578, 2024.
How to cite this paper
@article{1722714,
author = {Rohit Jadav, Raj Kumar Mishra, Pankaj Rai},
title = {Trustworthy and Adversarial-Resilient AI for Financial Crime Defense: A Unified Framework for Fraud Detection, Anti-Money Laundering, Credit Risk, and Secure Payments},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {218-225},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722714.pdf},
abstract = {Financial institutions face an increasingly interconnected set of threats spanning transaction fraud, money laundering, adversarial manipulation of scoring models, payment-system exploitation, and network-level intrusions against the infrastructure that hosts these services. Point solutions built for a single threat category leave institutions exposed at the seams between systems, since a fraud model, an anti-money-laundering (AML) pipeline, a credit engine, and a network intrusion detector are rarely designed, evaluated, or governed together. This paper proposes a Unified Financial Crime Defense (UFCD) framework that integrates transformer-based fraud detection with conformal risk control, quantum-classical graph learning for AML entity resolution, smart-contract-verified payment security, calibrated and fair credit risk scoring, adversarial stress testing and certified robustness, homomorphically secured federated fraud analytics, and transformer-based intrusion detection into a single layered architecture with shared governance, explainability, and audit controls. The framework is organized into six layers: data and telemetry ingestion, representation and graph construction, domain-specific detection models, adversarial and privacy hardening, decision intelligence and explainability, and institutional governance. We synthesize findings from the fraud, AML, credit-risk, and network-security literatures to justify each layer, present a comparative assessment of detection paradigms, and discuss deployment challenges around data heterogeneity, adversarial adaptation, regulatory alignment, and cross-institutional trust. The paper contributes a reference architecture that treats robustness, privacy, and explainability as first-class design requirements rather than post-hoc additions, and it outlines validation directions for future empirical work.},
keywords = {fraud detection, anti-money laundering, adversarial robustness, federated learning, graph neural networks, credit risk, intrusion detection, financial cybersecurity, explainable ai.},
month = {September},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722714}
}