International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722714

1722714 Vol 10 · Issue 3 Download Paper

Trustworthy and Adversarial-Resilient AI for Financial Crime Defense: A Unified Framework for Fraud Detection, Anti-Money Laundering, Credit Risk, and Secure Payments

Rohit Jadav Raj Kumar Mishra Pankaj Rai

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: AI for Financial Crime Detection

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722714

Abstract

Financial institutions face an increasingly interconnected set of threats spanning transaction fraud, money laundering, adversarial manipulation of scoring models, payment-system exploitation, and network-level intrusions against the infrastructure that hosts these services. Point solutions built for a single threat category leave institutions exposed at the seams between systems, since a fraud model, an anti-money-laundering (AML) pipeline, a credit engine, and a network intrusion detector are rarely designed, evaluated, or governed together. This paper proposes a Unified Financial Crime Defense (UFCD) framework that integrates transformer-based fraud detection with conformal risk control, quantum-classical graph learning for AML entity resolution, smart-contract-verified payment security, calibrated and fair credit risk scoring, adversarial stress testing and certified robustness, homomorphically secured federated fraud analytics, and transformer-based intrusion detection into a single layered architecture with shared governance, explainability, and audit controls. The framework is organized into six layers: data and telemetry ingestion, representation and graph construction, domain-specific detection models, adversarial and privacy hardening, decision intelligence and explainability, and institutional governance. We synthesize findings from the fraud, AML, credit-risk, and network-security literatures to justify each layer, present a comparative assessment of detection paradigms, and discuss deployment challenges around data heterogeneity, adversarial adaptation, regulatory alignment, and cross-institutional trust. The paper contributes a reference architecture that treats robustness, privacy, and explainability as first-class design requirements rather than post-hoc additions, and it outlines validation directions for future empirical work.

Keywords

fraud detection, anti-money laundering, adversarial robustness, federated learning, graph neural networks, credit risk, intrusion detection, financial cybersecurity, explainable ai.

References

[1] S. A. Abdulkareem, C. H. Foh, M. Shojafar, F. Carrez, and K. Moessner, "Network intrusion detection: An IoT and non-IoT-related survey," IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 147167–147191, 2024. Crossref

[2] A. Alhasawi et al., "A federated approach to scalable and trustworthy financial fraud detection," Security and Privacy, Wiley, 2025.

[3] A. N. Angelopoulos and S. Bates, "A gentle introduction to conformal prediction and distribution-free uncertainty quantification," arXiv:2107.07511, 2021.

[4] S. Baviskar, "Adversarial robustness in financial machine learning: Defenses, economic impact, and governance evidence," arXiv:2512.15780, 2025.

[5] R. H. Chowdhury, "Advancing fraud detection through deep learning: A comprehensive review," World J. Adv. Eng. Technol. Sci., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 606–613, 2024.

[6] R. R. Devi, J. E. Raja, and Y. B. Chin, "Reinforcement learning with graph neural network (RL-GNN) fusion for real-time financial fraud detection: A context-aware community mining approach," Scientific Reports, 2025. Crossref

[7] Financial Action Task Force, "Money Laundering National Risk Assessment Guidance," FATF, 2024.

[8] Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, "What We Do," FinCEN, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.fincen.gov/what-we-do

[9] N. Innan et al., "Financial fraud detection using quantum graph neural networks," Quantum Machine Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 7, 2024. Crossref

[10] International Organization for Standardization, "ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial intelligence management system," ISO/IEC, 2023.

[11] S. Islam, G. Raj Gupta, A. Chakraborty, S. Singh, A. Soni, and C. Patle, "Detecting fraudulent transactions for different patterns in financial networks using layer weighted GCN," Human-Centric Intelligent Systems, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 181–195, 2025. Crossref

[12] R. Kalakoti, S. Nõmm, and H. Bahsi, "Explainable transformer-based intrusion detection in Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) networks," in Proc. ICMLA, 2024, pp. 1164– 1169.

[13] R. Kalakoti, S. Nõmm, and H. Bahsi, "Federated learning of explainable AI (FedXAI) for deep learning-based intrusion detection in IoT networks," Computer Networks, 2025.

[14] R. Kalakoti, R. Vaarandi, H. Bahsi, and S. Nõmm, "Evaluating explainable AI for deep learning-based network intrusion detection system alert classification," arXiv:2506.07882, 2025.

[15] Z. Ke, S. Zhou, Y. Zhou, C. H. Chang, and R. Zhang, "Detection of AI deepfake and fraud in online payments using GAN-based models," in Proc. ICAACE, 2025, pp. 1786–1790.

[16] A. Khanum, K. Chaitra, B. Singh, and C. Gomathi, "Fraud detection in financial transactions: A machine learning approach vs. rule-based systems," in Proc. IITCEE, 2024.

[17] N. Koroniotis, N. Moustafa, E. Sitnikova, and B. Turnbull, "Towards the development of realistic botnet dataset in the Internet of Things for network forensic analytics: Bot-IoT dataset," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 100, pp. 779–796, 2019. Crossref

[18] G. Kou and Y. Lu, "FinTech: A literature review of emerging financial technologies and applications," Financial Innovation, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1, 2025. Crossref

[19] E. Kurshan and H. Shen, "Graph computing for financial crime and fraud detection: Trends, challenges and outlook," International Journal of Semantic Computing, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 565– 589, 2020.

[20] W. W. Lo, G. K. Kulatilleke, M. Sarhan, S. Layeghy, and M. Portmann, "Inspection-L: Self- supervised GNN node embeddings for money laundering detection in Bitcoin," Applied Intelligence, vol. 53, pp. 19406–19417, 2023. Crossref

[21] E. Lopez-Rojas, A. Elmir, and S. Axelsson, "PaySim: A financial mobile money simulator for fraud detection," in Proc. European Modelling Symposium (EMS), 2016.

[22] H. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y Arcas, "Communication- efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data," in Proc. AISTATS, 2017, pp. 1273–1282.

[23] Y. Meidan, M. Bohadana, Y. Mathov, Y. Mirsky, A. Shabtai, D. Breitenbacher, and Y. Elovici, "N-BaIoT: Network-based detection of IoT botnet attacks using deep autoencoders," IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 12–22, 2018. Crossref

[24] N. Moustafa and J. Slay, "UNSW-NB15: A comprehensive data set for network intrusion detection systems," in Proc. MilCIS, 2015. Crossref

[25] S. Nayak and A. R. Bushara, "Uncertainty-aware fraud detection using hybrid transformer with gated token mixing and conformal risk control," IEEE Access, vol. 14, pp. 77557–77573, 2026.

[26] S. Nayak and R. Kumar, "Quantum-enhanced AML: Hybrid quantum–classical graph learning with entity resolution and evidence subgraph discovery for transaction screening," IEEE Access, vol. 14, pp. 74837–74850, 2026.

[27] S. Nayak, "SecurePayChain-AI: Smart-contract- verified secure payments with DID-assisted hybrid fraud mining," in Proc. 5th Asia Conf. Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning (CACML), Guangzhou, China, 2026, pp. 1–8.

[28] S. Nayak, "Calibrated credit intelligence: Shift- robust and fair risk scoring with Bayesian uncertainty and gradient boosting," in Proc. IEEE Int. Research Conf. Smart Computing and Systems Engineering (SCSE), Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, 2026, pp. 1–6.

[29] S. Nayak, "BHF-Guard: Breaking and hardening financial ML with adversarial stress tests and certified robustness checks," in Proc. 14th Int. Symp. Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS), Boston, MA, USA, 2026, pp. 1–7.

[30] S. Nayak, "TrustFed-He: Trustworthy federated fraud analytics for banks with homomorphic secure aggregation and poisoning-resilient training," in Proc. 14th Int. Symp. Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS), Boston, MA, USA, 2026, pp. 1–7.

[31] S. Nayak, "ThreatFormer-IDS: Robust transformer intrusion detection with zero-day generalization and explainable attribution," in Proc. 4th Cognitive Models and Artificial Intelligence Conf. (AICCONF), Prague, Czech Republic, 2026, pp. 1–8.

[32] S. Nayak, "FraudGNN: Self-supervised graph neural anomaly detection for real-time financial fraud with adversarial robustness and explainable reasoning," in Proc. IEEE 5th Int. Conf. AI in Cybersecurity (ICAIC), Houston, TX, USA, 2026, pp. 1–7.

[33] National Institute of Standards and Technology, "Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)," NIST AI 100-1, 2023.

[34] J. Pope et al., "Intrusion detection at the IoT edge using federated learning," in Security and Privacy in Smart Environments, LNCS vol. 14800, Springer, 2024, pp. 98–119.

[35] Z. Rouhollahi, "Towards artificial intelligence enabled financial crime detection," arXiv:2105.10866, 2021.

[36] I. Sharafaldin, A. H. Lashkari, and A. A. Ghorbani, "Toward generating a new intrusion detection dataset and intrusion traffic characterization," in Proc. ICISSP, 2018, pp. 108–116.

[37] R. Shokri, M. Stronati, C. Song, and V. Shmatikov, "Membership inference attacks against machine learning models," in Proc. IEEE Symp. Security and Privacy (S&P), 2017, pp. 3–18. Crossref

[38] N. Shone, T. N. Ngoc, V. D. Phai, and Q. Shi, "A deep learning approach to network intrusion detection," IEEE Trans. Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 41–50, 2018. Crossref

[39] M. Srokosz, A. Bobyk, B. Ksiezopolski, and M. Wydra, "Machine-learning-based scoring system for antifraud CISIRTs in banking environment," Electronics, vol. 12, no. 10, 2023.

[40] T. Suzumura et al., "Towards federated graph learning for collaborative financial crimes detection," arXiv:1909.12946, 2019.

[41] M. Tavallaee, E. Bagheri, W. Lu, and A. A. Ghorbani, "A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set," in Proc. IEEE CISDA, 2009, pp. 1– 6. Crossref

[42] UK Finance Limited, "Annual Fraud Report 2025," London, 2025.

[43] A. Vaswani et al., "Attention is all you need," in Proc. NeurIPS, 2017.

[44] I. Vorobyev, A. Kireev, and E. Fedulova, "Graph neural networks for financial fraud detection: A survey," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1–35, 2024.

[45] V. Vovk, A. Gammerman, and G. Shafer, Algorithmic Learning in a Random World. Springer, 2005.

[46] M. Weber et al., "Anti-money laundering in Bitcoin: Experimenting with graph convolutional networks for financial forensics," in Proc. KDD Workshop on Anomaly Detection in Finance, 2019.

[47] F. Wójcik, "An analysis of novel money laundering data using heterogeneous graph isomorphism networks: FinCEN files case study," Econometrics, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 32–49, 2024.

[48] Q. Yang, Y. Liu, T. Chen, and Y. Tong, "Federated machine learning: Concept and applications," ACM Trans. Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2019. Crossref

[49] W. Yang, Y. Zhang, K. Ye, L. Li, and C. Z. Xu, "FFD: A federated learning based method for credit card fraud detection," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Big Data, 2019.

[50] Q. Yu, Z. Ke, G. Xiong, Y. Cheng, and X. Guo, "Identifying money laundering risks in digital asset transactions based on AI algorithms," in Proc. EIECC, 2024, pp. 1081–1085.

[51] H. Zhang, J. Yu, Y. Wang, J. Qi, and J. Cao, "Robust federated learning against poisoning attacks in industrial IoT," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 152, pp. 563–578, 2024.

How to cite this paper

Rohit Jadav, Raj Kumar Mishra, Pankaj Rai "Trustworthy and Adversarial-Resilient AI for Financial Crime Defense: A Unified Framework for Fraud Detection, Anti-Money Laundering, Credit Risk, and Secure Payments" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 3 2026 Page 218-225 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722714
Rohit Jadav, Raj Kumar Mishra, Pankaj Rai "Trustworthy and Adversarial-Resilient AI for Financial Crime Defense: A Unified Framework for Fraud Detection, Anti-Money Laundering, Credit Risk, and Secure Payments" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 3, Sep. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722714
Rohit Jadav, Raj Kumar Mishra, Pankaj Rai (2026). Trustworthy and Adversarial-Resilient AI for Financial Crime Defense: A Unified Framework for Fraud Detection, Anti-Money Laundering, Credit Risk, and Secure Payments. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722714
Rohit Jadav, Raj Kumar Mishra, Pankaj Rai "Trustworthy and Adversarial-Resilient AI for Financial Crime Defense: A Unified Framework for Fraud Detection, Anti-Money Laundering, Credit Risk, and Secure Payments" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 3, Sep. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722714
@article{1722714,
      author = {Rohit Jadav, Raj Kumar Mishra, Pankaj Rai},
      title = {Trustworthy and Adversarial-Resilient AI for Financial Crime Defense: A Unified Framework for Fraud Detection, Anti-Money Laundering, Credit Risk, and Secure Payments},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {218-225},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722714.pdf},
      abstract = {Financial institutions face an increasingly interconnected set of threats spanning transaction fraud, money laundering, adversarial manipulation of scoring models, payment-system exploitation, and network-level intrusions against the infrastructure that hosts these services. Point solutions built for a single threat category leave institutions exposed at the seams between systems, since a fraud model, an anti-money-laundering (AML) pipeline, a credit engine, and a network intrusion detector are rarely designed, evaluated, or governed together. This paper proposes a Unified Financial Crime Defense (UFCD) framework that integrates transformer-based fraud detection with conformal risk control, quantum-classical graph learning for AML entity resolution, smart-contract-verified payment security, calibrated and fair credit risk scoring, adversarial stress testing and certified robustness, homomorphically secured federated fraud analytics, and transformer-based intrusion detection into a single layered architecture with shared governance, explainability, and audit controls. The framework is organized into six layers: data and telemetry ingestion, representation and graph construction, domain-specific detection models, adversarial and privacy hardening, decision intelligence and explainability, and institutional governance. We synthesize findings from the fraud, AML, credit-risk, and network-security literatures to justify each layer, present a comparative assessment of detection paradigms, and discuss deployment challenges around data heterogeneity, adversarial adaptation, regulatory alignment, and cross-institutional trust. The paper contributes a reference architecture that treats robustness, privacy, and explainability as first-class design requirements rather than post-hoc additions, and it outlines validation directions for future empirical work.},
      keywords = {fraud detection, anti-money laundering, adversarial robustness, federated learning, graph neural networks, credit risk, intrusion detection, financial cybersecurity, explainable ai.},
      month = {September},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722714}
  }