Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722738
A Comparative Legal Analysis of Deepfake Evidence in Bangladesh
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Law
Abstract
Deepfake technology, which involves the creation of synthetic audio, video, and image content through artificial intelligence to portray real individuals engaging in actions or speech that never occurred, poses a significant evidentiary challenge that the traditional digital-evidence doctrine is not equipped to handle. Bangladeshi courts are increasingly dependent on electronic records; however, the Evidence Act of 1872, even after its amendment in 2022, lacks provisions addressing AI-generated content, authentication standards specific to synthetic media, and qualification frameworks for experts required to identify such content. This study explores whether Bangladesh's evidentiary framework is sufficient to meet this challenge and, if not, what reforms are necessary to bridge this gap. Utilizing doctrinal and comparative methods, this paper analyzes the statutory and case law treatment of digital evidence in Bangladesh in comparison with the approaches adopted in the United Kingdom and Malaysia. These jurisdictions were chosen for their shared evidentiary heritage and differing regulatory styles: judicial reliability review in the UK and codified statutory presumption in Malaysia. The analysis reveals that none of the jurisdictions reviewed have established a deepfake-specific evidentiary regime, but each provides transferable doctrinal elements: Malaysia's structured certification mechanism, the UK's substantive reliability inquiry, and an emerging legislative trend, as seen in the Cyber Security Act of 2026 in Bangladesh, which considers the direct regulation of AI-generated content. This study proposes a sequential authentication framework and a series of legislative, institutional, and procedural reforms designed to be integrated within Bangladesh's current judicial infrastructure rather than relying on it alone.
Keywords
Deepfake evidence, artificial intelligence, digital evidence authentication, Evidence Act 1872, admissibility, comparative evidence law, digital forensics.
How to cite this paper
@article{1722738,
author = {MD Shamsad Hossain},
title = {A Comparative Legal Analysis of Deepfake Evidence in Bangladesh},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {249-262},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722738.pdf},
abstract = {Deepfake technology, which involves the creation of synthetic audio, video, and image content through artificial intelligence to portray real individuals engaging in actions or speech that never occurred, poses a significant evidentiary challenge that the traditional digital-evidence doctrine is not equipped to handle. Bangladeshi courts are increasingly dependent on electronic records; however, the Evidence Act of 1872, even after its amendment in 2022, lacks provisions addressing AI-generated content, authentication standards specific to synthetic media, and qualification frameworks for experts required to identify such content. This study explores whether Bangladesh's evidentiary framework is sufficient to meet this challenge and, if not, what reforms are necessary to bridge this gap. Utilizing doctrinal and comparative methods, this paper analyzes the statutory and case law treatment of digital evidence in Bangladesh in comparison with the approaches adopted in the United Kingdom and Malaysia. These jurisdictions were chosen for their shared evidentiary heritage and differing regulatory styles: judicial reliability review in the UK and codified statutory presumption in Malaysia. The analysis reveals that none of the jurisdictions reviewed have established a deepfake-specific evidentiary regime, but each provides transferable doctrinal elements: Malaysia's structured certification mechanism, the UK's substantive reliability inquiry, and an emerging legislative trend, as seen in the Cyber Security Act of 2026 in Bangladesh, which considers the direct regulation of AI-generated content. This study proposes a sequential authentication framework and a series of legislative, institutional, and procedural reforms designed to be integrated within Bangladesh's current judicial infrastructure rather than relying on it alone.},
keywords = {Deepfake evidence, artificial intelligence, digital evidence authentication, Evidence Act 1872, admissibility, comparative evidence law, digital forensics.},
month = {September},
}