Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722795
Performance Evaluation of Post-Quantum Cryptography in Satellite Security Architecture
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Cybersecurity in space technology
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I3-1722795
Abstract
Satellite systems rely on a robust yet light weight cryptographic solution for the security of ground systems, communications links, Telemetry, Tracking and Command (TT&C), payloads, onboard systems and associated subsystems. Cryptography ensures data integrity and overall security especially for satellites whose missions and data transmitted are in general and by global practices included in Critical National Infrastructures (CNIs). But emerging cybersecurity threats might render cryptographic solutions such as Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA), Diffie–Hellman (DH) and Elliptic-Curve Cryptography (ECC) ineffective in securing space assets. Quantum cryptography offers a better solution to the emerging threats of relentless and sophisticated systems and adversaries. This paper evaluates the performance of Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) when deployed. The research explored the various standards mapped out by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for PQC deployment. Current security architecture of satellite systems was compared to what the PQC solution will offer to these highly classified assets. The paper further explored algorithms in place and how effective they could be in the space industry. In the space sector, deploying PQC requires a beta analysis of its performance; which was explored in the third chapter of this work. Challenges and Deployment Considerations and Computational and Resource Constraints of PQC deployment was evaluated in the fifth and sixth sections of this work. The paper concluded by acknowledging the potential complexities in the eventual wholistic adoption and deployment of Quantum Cryptography.
Keywords
cryptography; post quantum cryptography; pqc, cybersecurity; cyber threats; critical national infrastructures (cnis); satellite systems.
References
[1] Abbasi, M., Cardoso, F., Váz, P., Silva, J., & Martin, P. (2025). A Practical Performance Benchmark of Post-Quantum Cryptography Across Heterogeneous Computing Environments. Cryptography.
[2] Badawy, W. (2025). Protocols, Technologies, and Global Deployment Challenges for Quantum Key Distribution. International Journal of Information & Digital Security , 18-36.
[3] Bakyt, M., Spada, L. L., Zeeshan, N., Moldamurat, K., Atanov, S., Konyrkhanova, A., . . . Tilenbayev, A. (2025). Advanced Cybersecurity Framework for LEO Aerospace: Integrating Quantum Cryptography, Artificial Intelligence Anomaly Detection, and Blockchain Technology. J Robot Control (JRC), 695-714.
[4] Bernstein, D. J., Chou, T., Lange, T., Maurich, I., Misoczki, R., Niederhagen, R., . . . Wang, W. (2017). Classic McEliece.
[5] Brule, J., Suloway, T., & Lightman, S. (2022). Satellite Ground Segment: Applying the Cybersecurity Framework to Satellite Command and Control. NIST.
[6] Chen, S.-J., & Tsai, Y.-H. (2025). Quantum-Safe Networks for 6G: An Integrated Survey on PQC, QKD, and Satellite QKD with Future Perspectives. Computing&AI Connect.
[7] Dalal, Y. M., Supreeth, S., Amuthabala, K., Satheesha, T. Y., Asha, P. N., & Somanath, S. (2024). Optimizing Security: A Comparative Analysis of RSA, ECC, and DH Algorithms. IEEE North Karnataka Subsection Flagship International Conference (NKCon), 1-6.
[8] Dam, D.-T., Tran, T.-H., Hoang, V.-P., Pham, C.-K., & Hoang, T.-T. (2023). A Survey of Post-Quantum Cryptography: Start of a New Race. Cryptography.
[9] Dash, J., & Ogutu, B. O. (2016). Recent advances in space-borne optical remote sensing systems for monitoring global terrestrial ecosystems. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 322-351.
[10] Faruk, J. H., Tahora, S., Tasnim, M., Shahriar, H., & Sakib, N. (2022). A Review of Quantum Cybersecurity: Threats, Risks and Opportunities. 1st International Conference on AI in Cybersecurity (ICAIC).
[11] Forouzan, B. A. (2007). Cryptography & Network Security. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
[12] Fournaris, A. P., Tasopoulos, G., Brohet, M., & Regazzoni, F. (2023). Running Longer To Slim Down: Post-Quantum Cryptography on Memory-Constrained Devices. IEEE International Conference on Omni-layer Intelligent Systems (COINS).
[13] Ghosh, T., & Nath, I. (2026). Secure Satellite Communication in the Post-Quantum Era: A Lattice-Based Cryptographic Approach. International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking, 524-543.
[14] Hanna, Y., Veksler, M., & Akkaya, K. (2026). PQ-CKEM: Efficient Quantum-Resistant Group Key Creation for Large-Scale LEO Satellite Networks. IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN).
[15] Howe, J., Pöppelmann, T., O'neill, M., O'sullivan, E., & Güneysu, T. (2015). Practical Lattice-Based Digital Signature Schemes. ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, 1-24.
[16] Hughes, R. J., Buttler, W. T., Kwait, P. G., Lamoreuax, S. K., Morgan, G. L., Nordholt, J. E., & Peterson, C. G. (2000). Quantum cryptography for secure satellite communications. IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings.
[17] Korgi, M. A., & Alsammed, S. M. (2026). A Systematic Review of Satellite Communication Security: Challenges, Motivation, and Future Directions. Engineering and Technology Journal, 1-51.
[18] Kumar, M., & Pattnaik, P. (2020). Post Quantum Cryptography(PQC) - An overview. IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC), 1-9.
[19] Lee, J. (2024). Assessing Quantum Integer Factorization Performance with Shor's Algorithm. In Quantum Computing (p. 10). CRC Press.
[20] Lomonaco, S. J., & Kauffman, L. (2007). Quantum Hidden Subgroup Algorithms: An Algorithmic Toolkit. In Mathematics of Quantum Computation and Quantum Technology (p. 44). Chapman and Hall/CRC.
[21] Meraz, R., & Vahala, L. (2020). Application of Quantum Cryptography to Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructures in Space Communications. OUR Journal: ODU Undergraduate Research Journal.
[22] Mohammed, A. (2023). Protecting Space Assets: Cybersecurity Challenges and Solutions for the Final Frontier . Baltic Journal of Engineering and Technology, 55-61.
[23] Nguyen, T.-H., Dang, T.-K., Dam, D.-T., Nguyen, K.-D., Duong, P.-P., & Pham, C.-K. (2025). An Area-Time Efficient Hardware Architecture for ML-KEM Post-Quantum Cryptography Standard. IEEE Acess, 2169-3536.
[24] Niro, F., Goryl, P., Dransfeld, S., Boccia, V., Gascon, F., Adams, J., . . . Doxani, G. (2021). European Space Agency (ESA) Calibration/Validation Strategy for Optical Land-Imaging Satellites and Pathway towards Interoperability. Remote Sensing.
[25] NIST. (2024, August 30). Post-Quantum Cryptography PQC. Retrieved from Computer Security Resource Centre (CSRC): https://csrc.nist.gov/projects/post-quantum-cryptography
[26] Peled, R., Aizikovich, E., Habler, E., Elovici, Y., & Shabtai, A. (2023). Rethinking Satellite Cybersecurity: A System-Level Taxonomy and Longitudinal Analysis. Computer Science > Cryptography and Security.
[27] Raavi, M., Whuthier, S., Chandramouli, P., Balytskyi, Y., Zhou, X., & Chang, S.-Y. (2021). Security Comparisons and Performance Analyses of Post-quantum Signature Algorithms. Applied Cryptography and Network Security, 424-447.
[28] Rey, D. G. (2026). Quantum-Risk Posture and Space Infrastructure: Post-Quantum Cryptography, Homeland Security, and Critical Infrastructure Resilience. Applied Counterterrorism and Homeland Security Analysis Portfolio.
[29] Salim, S., Moustafa, N., & Reisslein, M. (2024). Cybersecurity of Satellite Communications Systems: A Comprehensive Survey of the Space, Ground, and Links Segments. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 372 - 425.
[30] Shaheed, N. A., Mubasheer, F., & Sunad, Y. S. (2020). QUANTUM CRYPTOGRAPHY - BREAKING RSA ENCRYPTION USING QUANTUM COMPUTING WITH SHOR’S ALGORITHM . International Journal For Technological Research In Engineering .
[31] Sivaraman, S., Aswatha, P. N., Chattopadhyay, S., Prabhu, P., & Kumar, S. (2026). FPGA Implementation of Quantum Key Distribution Post-processing for a Post-Quantum Era. IEEE 6th International Conference on VLSI Systems, Architecture, Technology and Applications (VLSI SATA).
[32] Truong, Q. D., Duong, P. N., & Lee, H. (2024). Efficient Low-Latency Hardware Architecture for Module-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Standard. IEEE Access, 32395-32407.
How to cite this paper
@article{1722795,
author = {Nancy Bako Madugu, Fauziya Bawa Ibrahim, Fatimah Ahmed Almakura, Paul Ayambe Ndik, Zulaihat Mukhtar},
title = {Performance Evaluation of Post-Quantum Cryptography in Satellite Security Architecture},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {276-288},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722795.pdf},
abstract = {Satellite systems rely on a robust yet light weight cryptographic solution for the security of ground systems, communications links, Telemetry, Tracking and Command (TT&C), payloads, onboard systems and associated subsystems. Cryptography ensures data integrity and overall security especially for satellites whose missions and data transmitted are in general and by global practices included in Critical National Infrastructures (CNIs). But emerging cybersecurity threats might render cryptographic solutions such as Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA), Diffie–Hellman (DH) and Elliptic-Curve Cryptography (ECC) ineffective in securing space assets.
Quantum cryptography offers a better solution to the emerging threats of relentless and sophisticated systems and adversaries. This paper evaluates the performance of Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) when deployed. The research explored the various standards mapped out by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for PQC deployment.
Current security architecture of satellite systems was compared to what the PQC solution will offer to these highly classified assets. The paper further explored algorithms in place and how effective they could be in the space industry. In the space sector, deploying PQC requires a beta analysis of its performance; which was explored in the third chapter of this work.
Challenges and Deployment Considerations and Computational and Resource Constraints of PQC deployment was evaluated in the fifth and sixth sections of this work. The paper concluded by acknowledging the potential complexities in the eventual wholistic adoption and deployment of Quantum Cryptography.},
keywords = {cryptography; post quantum cryptography; pqc, cybersecurity; cyber threats; critical national infrastructures (cnis); satellite systems.},
month = {September},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722795}
}