Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722882
Corporate Debt Financing and Capital Structure Optimization for Large-Scale Infrastructure Investment under Saudi Vision 2030
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Debt Financing and Capital Structure
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I3-1722882
Abstract
The financing arrangements required by the major infrastructure projects described in Saudi Vision 2030 must be such as to draw in a large amount of private capital without ending up with leverage positions that weaken should there be changes in interest rates, construction costs, demand, or the circumstances under which the debt can be refinanced. This study examines how corporate debt financing and the structure of capital can be improved for the Saudi infrastructure sponsors and the project companies in question. In order to bring together the findings relating to leverage, debt maturity, project finance, sukuk and bonds, risk allocation, refinancing, and sustainability-linked finance, a systematic and integrated review of studies and evidence from Saudi institutions published between 2020 and 2025 was conducted. The evidence indicates that there is no single debt ratio which is optimal in all situations. The level of debt that can be taken on in infrastructure projects varies according to the stability and the quality of the contractual terms of the project's cash flows, the degree of construction and operating risk, the strength of the sponsor, the availability of collateral, the matching of maturities, currency exposure, and the credibility of the risk-sharing arrangements. Even though Saudi Arabia's rapidly expanding sukuk and debt markets increase the range of financing alternatives available, the growing volume of issuances also makes it more necessary to maintain disciplined debt service coverage, keep sufficient liquidity buffers, and plan for refinancing. The review proposes a dynamic optimisation framework which treats the capital structure as a decision that should be made throughout the whole lifecycle of the project rather than as a single, one-off decision regarding funding. It recommends combining specific leverage limits for each project, long-term debt, a variety of funding sources, clear risk allocation, and periodic re-optimisation. This approach will help to lower funding costs on a risk-adjusted basis while at the same time protecting the company's solidity and encouraging private sector participation in the infrastructure projects under Vision 2030.
References
[1] Alabdulkarim, N. (2023). Determinants of capital structure: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 29(7), 104-110. https://doi.org/10.9734/jemt/2023/v29i71109
[2] Alhejaili, M. O. (2024). Integrating climate change risks and sustainability goals into Saudi Arabia's financial regulation: Pathways to green finance. Sustainability, 16(10), 4159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104159
[3] Bistuer-Talavera, C., Llobet-Dalmases, J., Plana-Erta, D., & Uribe, J. M. (2024). Capital structure decisions in the energy transition: Insights from Spain. Utilities Policy, 91, 101851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2024.101851
[4] Boshnak, H. A. (2023). The impact of capital structure on firm performance: Evidence from Saudi-listed firms. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 20(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-022-00154-4
[5] Boukhatem, J. (2022). How does financial risk affect sukuk market development? Empirical evidence from ARDL approach. Heliyon, 8(5), e09453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09453
[6] Capital Market Authority. (2024a). CMA: The corporate sukuk and debt capital market growth exceeds SAR 30 billion since 2019. Capital Market Authority, Saudi Arabia.
[7] Capital Market Authority. (2024b). The Capital Market Authority approves the largest set of regulatory enhancements since the launch of the sukuk and debt instruments market in Saudi Arabia. Capital Market Authority, Saudi Arabia.
[8] Capital Market Authority. (2025). The Saudi capital market highlights growth levels, regulatory enhancements, and increased investor appeal in its 2024 annual report. Capital Market Authority, Saudi Arabia.
[9] Demirel, H. C., Leendertse, W., & Volker, L. (2022). Mechanisms for protecting returns on private investments in public infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 40(3), 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.11.008
[10] Guedes, S. S., & Pinto, J. M. (2023). Pricing of project finance bonds: A comparative analysis of primary market spreads. Journal of Corporate Finance, 82, 102429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102429
[11] Hou, W., & Ran, W. (2024). Unveiling the effects of influencing factors on PPP project capital structure in China using machine learning. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2024-0462
[12] Hou, W., & Wang, L. (2022). Research on the refinancing capital structure of highway PPP projects based on dynamic capital demand. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(5), 2047-2072. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2020-0321
[13] International Monetary Fund. (2024). Saudi Arabia: 2024 Article IV Consultation-Press Release; and Staff Report. IMF Country Report No. 24/280. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400288043.002
[14] International Monetary Fund. (2025). Saudi Arabia: 2025 Article IV Consultation-Press Release; and Staff Report. IMF Staff Country Reports, 2025(223). https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229019989.002
[15] Jiménez, A., Bayraktar, S., Lee, J. Y., & Choi, S. J. (2022). The multi-faceted impact of host country risk on the success of private participation in infrastructure projects. Multinational Business Review, 30(1), 17-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-10-2020-0195
[16] Jimmy, C., & Falianty, T. A. (2021). Managing leverage of infrastructure projects: Aggregate and sectoral risk effect. Journal of Asian Economics, 73, 101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2021.101284
[17] Kumar, A., Srivastava, V., & Tabash, M. I. (2021). Infrastructure project finance: A systematic literature review and directions for future research. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 13(3), 295-327. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-07-2020-0130
[18] Lara-Galera, A., Alcaraz-Carrillo de Albornoz, V., Molina-Millán, J., & Muñoz-Medina, B. (2025). Spread valuation and risk on transport infrastructure loans. Economics of Transportation, 41, 100392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2024.100392
[19] Lu, Q., & Wilson, C. (2024). Infrastructure financing in Africa. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 91, 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2024.101954
[20] Makni, M. S., & Dinga, A. K. (2020). Does debt policy for capital structure matter to Saudi listed firms? Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Economics and Administration, 34(1), 115-144. https://doi.org/10.4197/Eco.34-1.6
[21] Ministry of Finance. (2024). The Minister of Finance approves the 2024 Annual Borrowing Plan. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
[22] National Infrastructure Fund. (2024). National Infrastructure Fund board inauguration and financing mandate. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
[23] Public Investment Fund. (2025). PIF Annual Report 2024. Riyadh: Public Investment Fund.
[24] Richter, S., Heyde, F., Horsch, A., & Wünsche, A. (2021). Determinants of project bond prices - Insights into infrastructure and energy capital markets. Energy Economics, 97, 105175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105175
[25] Saudi Exchange. (2024). Capital Market Overview Report Q4 2024. Riyadh: Saudi Exchange.
[26] Saudi Vision 2030. (2025). Saudi Vision 2030 Annual Report 2024. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
[27] Shaddady, A. (2023). The effect of the financial structure decision and governance mechanism on shareholders' wealth: Nonlinearity evidence from a petroleum-based economy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 52(3), 436-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12400
[28] Shahzad, A., Azeem, M., Nazir, M. S., Vo, X. V., & Linh, N. T. M. (2021). The determinants of capital structure: Evidence from SAARC countries. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26, 6471-6487. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2132
[29] Shalhoob, H. (2023). Green sukuk in Saudi Arabia: Challenges and potentials of sustainability in the light of Saudi Vision 2030. Journal of Governance & Regulation, 12(4, special issue), 351-360. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv12i4siart15
[30] Spohr, J., Wikström, K., Ronikonmäki, N.-M., Lepech, M., & In, S. Y. (2024). Are private investors overcompensated in infrastructure projects? Transport Policy, 152, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.04.009
How to cite this paper
@article{1722882,
author = {Mohammad Sufian Hafiz},
title = {Corporate Debt Financing and Capital Structure Optimization for Large-Scale Infrastructure Investment under Saudi Vision 2030},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {641-654},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722882.pdf},
abstract = {The financing arrangements required by the major infrastructure projects described in Saudi Vision 2030 must be such as to draw in a large amount of private capital without ending up with leverage positions that weaken should there be changes in interest rates, construction costs, demand, or the circumstances under which the debt can be refinanced. This study examines how corporate debt financing and the structure of capital can be improved for the Saudi infrastructure sponsors and the project companies in question. In order to bring together the findings relating to leverage, debt maturity, project finance, sukuk and bonds, risk allocation, refinancing, and sustainability-linked finance, a systematic and integrated review of studies and evidence from Saudi institutions published between 2020 and 2025 was conducted. The evidence indicates that there is no single debt ratio which is optimal in all situations. The level of debt that can be taken on in infrastructure projects varies according to the stability and the quality of the contractual terms of the project's cash flows, the degree of construction and operating risk, the strength of the sponsor, the availability of collateral, the matching of maturities, currency exposure, and the credibility of the risk-sharing arrangements. Even though Saudi Arabia's rapidly expanding sukuk and debt markets increase the range of financing alternatives available, the growing volume of issuances also makes it more necessary to maintain disciplined debt service coverage, keep sufficient liquidity buffers, and plan for refinancing. The review proposes a dynamic optimisation framework which treats the capital structure as a decision that should be made throughout the whole lifecycle of the project rather than as a single, one-off decision regarding funding. It recommends combining specific leverage limits for each project, long-term debt, a variety of funding sources, clear risk allocation, and periodic re-optimisation. This approach will help to lower funding costs on a risk-adjusted basis while at the same time protecting the company's solidity and encouraging private sector participation in the infrastructure projects under Vision 2030.},
month = {September},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722882}
}