International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722972

1722972 Vol 10 · Issue 3 Download Paper

Artificial Intelligence-Based Intelligent Fertigation Recommendation Systems for Precision Agriculture

Shraddha S. Tayade Dr. Yogesh V. Chimate

Subject area: Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences  ·  Area of research: AIML, IoT, Intelligent Fertigation

DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I3-1722972

Abstract

Artificial-intelligence-enabled fertilizer and fertigation recommendation has progressed from single-task crop or fertilizer classification toward integrated decision-support architectures. However, predictive classification, agronomic dose calculation, irrigation scheduling, explainability, real-time sensing, and farmer-facing delivery are often studied separately. This paper presents a structured narrative review of these strands and an applied machine-learning case study using the publicly available Crop and Fertilizer Dataset for Western Maharashtra. The case study contains 4,513 records spanning five districts, 16 crops, and 19 fertilizer classes. Seven classifiers were compared using an 80:20 stratified train-test split with five-fold stratified cross-validation on the training set. XGBoost achieved 97.34% test accuracy and 94.21% ± 1.15% cross-validated accuracy, while Random Forest achieved 93.58% and 90.89% ± 0.80%, respectively. TreeSHAP analysis of Random Forest identified crop identity, potassium, and nitrogen as the leading predictors of the historical fertilizer class. These results are interpreted as a computational baseline rather than proof of agronomic optimality because the target label represents recorded fertilizer choices. The review also incorporates evidence on IoT/edge-cloud sensing, multilingual agricultural advisory, and federated learning. It concludes that RF/SHAP, IoT sensing, and multilingual interfaces are established capabilities; a more defensible research direction is an auditable pipeline that separates fertilizer identity, nutrient dose, and application timing, connects explainable prediction to sequential scheduling, and independently benchmarks outputs against authoritative agronomic guidance. The proposed Intelligent Fertigation Recommendation System (IFRS) is therefore presented as a research framework requiring multi-season and field validation before claims of yield, water, nutrient-use-efficiency, or adoption benefits.

Keywords

fertigation; precision agriculture; machine learning; explainable AI; SHAP; Q-learning

References

[1] M. Bouni, B. Hssina, K. Douzi, and S. Douzi, “Interpretable Machine Learning Techniques for an Advanced Crop Recommendation Model,” Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, vol. 2024, Art. no. 7405217, 2024. Crossref

[2] D. G. Pai, M. Balachandra, and R. Kamath, “Explainable AI in agriculture: review of applications, methodologies, and future directions,” Engineering Research Express, vol. 7, no. 3, Art. no. 032202, 2025. Crossref

[3] S. M. Venkateswara and J. Padmanaban, “Interpretable deep learning models for independent fertilizer and crop recommendation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 15, Art. no. 41721, 2025. Crossref

[4] M. Sunandini, K. H. Sree, R. Deepiga, and A. Gokulapriya, “Smart soil fertilizer monitoring and crop recommendation system by using IoT and machine learning technology,” International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, vol. 12, no. 3, 2023. Crossref

[5] R. Dembani, I. Karvelas, N. A. Akbar, S. Rizou, D. Tegolo, and S. Fountas, “Agricultural data privacy and federated learning: A review of challenges and opportunities,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 232, Art. no. 110048, 2025. Crossref

[6] Press Information Bureau, Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, “KISAN E-MITRA and IoT enabled systems to improve crop productivity,” Apr. 1, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2117392

[7] Digital Green and Gooey.AI, “Farmer.CHAT: An AI assistant for farmers,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.help.gooey.ai/farmerchat

[8] Press Information Bureau, Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, “Record increase in food grain production, agricultural credit reaches ₹28.69 lakh crore, AI-based ‘Bharat Vistar’ platform launched for farmers,” Mar. 12, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2238885

[9] S. S. Gholap, “Crop and Fertilizer Dataset for WesternMaharashtra,” Kaggle, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/sanchitagholap/crop-and-fertilizer-dataset-for-westernmaharashtra

[10] L. Breiman, “Random forests,” Machine Learning, vol. 45, pp. 5–32, 2001. Crossref

[11] T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system,” in Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 785–794. Crossref

[12] S. M. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A unified approach to interpreting model predictions,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, 2017, pp. 4765–4774.

[13] S. M. Lundberg, G. Erion, H. Chen, J. M. Prutkin, B. Nair, R. Katz, J. Himmelfarb, N. Bansal, and S.-I. Lee, “From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–67, 2020.

[14] Ö. Turgut, İ. Kök, and S. Özdemir, “AgroXAI: Explainable AI-Driven Crop Recommendation System for Agriculture 4.0,” in Proc. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), 2024, pp. 7208–7217. Crossref

[15] C. J. C. H. Watkins and P. Dayan, “Q-learning,” Machine Learning, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 279–292, 1992. Crossref

[16] National Informatics Centre, Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India, “Soil Health Card Portal,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://soilhealth.dac.gov.in/

[17] Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, “Good Management Practices for Fertilizer Use,” Agritech Portal. [Online]. Available: https://www.agritech.tnau.ac.in/gap_gmp_glp/gmp_fertilizer%20use.html

How to cite this paper

Shraddha S. Tayade, Dr. Yogesh V. Chimate "Artificial Intelligence-Based Intelligent Fertigation Recommendation Systems for Precision Agriculture" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 3 2026 Page 1361-1371 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722972
Shraddha S. Tayade, Dr. Yogesh V. Chimate "Artificial Intelligence-Based Intelligent Fertigation Recommendation Systems for Precision Agriculture" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 3, Sep. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722972
Shraddha S. Tayade, Dr. Yogesh V. Chimate (2026). Artificial Intelligence-Based Intelligent Fertigation Recommendation Systems for Precision Agriculture. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722972
Shraddha S. Tayade, Dr. Yogesh V. Chimate "Artificial Intelligence-Based Intelligent Fertigation Recommendation Systems for Precision Agriculture" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 3, Sep. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722972
@article{1722972,
      author = {Shraddha S. Tayade, Dr. Yogesh V. Chimate},
      title = {Artificial Intelligence-Based Intelligent Fertigation Recommendation Systems for Precision Agriculture},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {1361-1371},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722972.pdf},
      abstract = {Artificial-intelligence-enabled fertilizer and fertigation recommendation has progressed from single-task crop or fertilizer classification toward integrated decision-support architectures. However, predictive classification, agronomic dose calculation, irrigation scheduling, explainability, real-time sensing, and farmer-facing delivery are often studied separately. This paper presents a structured narrative review of these strands and an applied machine-learning case study using the publicly available Crop and Fertilizer Dataset for Western Maharashtra. The case study contains 4,513 records spanning five districts, 16 crops, and 19 fertilizer classes. Seven classifiers were compared using an 80:20 stratified train-test split with five-fold stratified cross-validation on the training set. XGBoost achieved 97.34% test accuracy and 94.21% ± 1.15% cross-validated accuracy, while Random Forest achieved 93.58% and 90.89% ± 0.80%, respectively. TreeSHAP analysis of Random Forest identified crop identity, potassium, and nitrogen as the leading predictors of the historical fertilizer class. These results are interpreted as a computational baseline rather than proof of agronomic optimality because the target label represents recorded fertilizer choices. The review also incorporates evidence on IoT/edge-cloud sensing, multilingual agricultural advisory, and federated learning. It concludes that RF/SHAP, IoT sensing, and multilingual interfaces are established capabilities; a more defensible research direction is an auditable pipeline that separates fertilizer identity, nutrient dose, and application timing, connects explainable prediction to sequential scheduling, and independently benchmarks outputs against authoritative agronomic guidance. The proposed Intelligent Fertigation Recommendation System (IFRS) is therefore presented as a research framework requiring multi-season and field validation before claims of yield, water, nutrient-use-efficiency, or adoption benefits.},
      keywords = {fertigation; precision agriculture; machine learning; explainable AI; SHAP; Q-learning},
      month = {September},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722972}
  }