Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722991
Beyond FPO Formation: Empirically Assessing CBBO Effectiveness in Driving Financial and Commercial Sustainability of Farmer Producer Organizations in India
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Financial and Commercial Sustainability
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I3-1722991
Abstract
Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) have become the principal vehicle through which the Government of India seeks to organize small and marginal farmers into viable collective enterprises. Since 2020, the Central Sector Scheme for the Formation and Promotion of 10,000 FPOs has relied on Cluster Based Business Organizations (CBBOs) to deliver five years of professional handholding to each new FPO, covering mobilization, business planning, and market linkage. Most existing research and policy discussion has concentrated on the pace of FPO formation rather than on whether CBBO-mediated support actually translates into stronger financial and commercial outcomes. This paper examines that question using officially published national and state-level data from the Press Information Bureau, the Small Farmers' Agribusiness Consortium (SFAC), and peer-reviewed secondary studies of FPO finances, since the FPO-level financial microdata held in the government's internal 10K FPO MIS portal is not publicly downloadable and could not be accessed for this study. Descriptive analysis shows that cumulative FPO registrations rose from 3,179 in 2022 to 10,000 by February 2025, while cumulative equity grant disbursement and credit guarantee coverage grew unevenly across the same period. Secondary evidence indicates that FPO paid-up capital remains heavily skewed, with roughly half of registered FPOs holding negligible capital and a small minority accounting for a disproportionate share of the sector's financial base. A recent peer-reviewed multi-level study estimates that only 16 to 30 percent of registered FPOs are financially sustainable despite near-universal formation targets being met. The paper is unable to test FPO-level regression hypotheses linking CBBO support to turnover or paid-up capital because the required linked microdata is not publicly accessible, and it states this limitation explicitly rather than substituting invented figures. Instead, it offers a transparent, evidence-based account of what is and is not known about CBBO effectiveness, and it argues that closing the FPO-level data gap is itself a precondition for credible impact evaluation of the scheme. Policy implications are drawn for CBBOs, Implementing Agencies, and the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare regarding data transparency and financial handholding design.
Keywords
farmer producer organizations; cluster-based business organizations; FPO sustainability; agricultural policy; institutional support; equity grant; India
References
[1] Anand, S., & Ghosh, S. (2023). Differential behaviour pattern of farmers at different growth stages of farmer producer organizations (FPCs) in Bihar. Journal of Community Mobilisation and Sustainable Development, 18(4), 1283-1293. Crossref
[2] Anand, S., Ghosh, S., & Mukherjee, A. (2023). Strategies for strengthening farmer producer organizations in India based on the one district one product scheme. Current Science, 125(6), 614. Crossref
[3] Anand, S., & Ghosh, S. (2026). How sustainable are the farmer producer companies (FPCs) in India? Unravelling the determinants of farmers' perceptions through multivariate analyses. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics.
[4] Asian Development Bank Institute. (n.d.). Cooperative spirit with corporate character: Farmer producer organizations in India (ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 1519), citing Neti, A., Govil, R., & Rao, N. C. (2019) and Government of India (2021), Data of registered FPOs, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Press Information Bureau.
[5] Dudekula, R., Eduru, C., Balaganoormath, L., Sangappa, S., Kurra, S. B., Bellundagi, A., Narala, A., & Satyavathi C., T. (2025). Exploring factors that drive millet farmers to join millet FPOs for sustainable development: An ISM approach. Sustainability, 17(20), 8986. Crossref
[6] Mohanasundari, T., Khangar, N. S., & Das, A. (2024). Effectiveness of FPOs: Credit performance evaluation of farmer producer companies in Tamil Nadu. International Journal of Rural Management, 20, 212. Crossref
[7] Mohanasundari, T., Shubham, & Khangar, N. S. (2022). Effectiveness of agriculture grants on the functioning of the farmer producer companies in Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Scientific Development & Research, 7(10), 217-224.
[8] Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. (2020). Central Sector Scheme for Formation and Promotion of 10,000 Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs): Operational guidelines.
[9] Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. (2022). Statewise list of empanelled Cluster Based Business Organizations (CBBOs), Central Sector Scheme for 10,000 FPOs.
[10] Muniyoor, K., & Pandey, R. (2024). Measuring performance of farmer producer organisations using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 17(1), 74-87. Crossref
[11] NABARD (2015). Farmer Producer Organisations - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs). Farm Sector Policy Department & Farm Sector Development Department, National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development, Mumbai.
[12] NABARD Consultancy Services (NABCONS) (2021). Diagnostic study of C & D graded Farmer Producer Organizations (Report submitted to the Farm Sector Development Department, NABARD Kerala Regional Office).
[13] Nalini, B., Rama, R., & Vaibhav, B. (2017). FPOs as farmer's collectives: A case study from India. Development Policy Review, 36(6), 669-687.
[14] Navaneetham, B. K., Mahendran, K., Sivakumar, S. D., & Senthilkumar, R. (2017). Status of farmer producer companies in India. Agriculture Update, 12(3), 888-892. Crossref
[15] Nikam, V., Veesam, H., Kumara, K., & Chand, P. (2023). Farmer Producer Organizations in India: Challenges and prospects (Policy Paper No. 40). ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP), New Delhi.
[16] Nikam, V., Veesam, H., Kumara, K., & Chand, P. (2024). How farmer producer organizations are functioning in India? An empirical evidence from a mixed method research synthesis. Economic & Political Weekly, 59.
[17] Nikam, V., et al. (2026). Understanding factors influencing economic viability of farmer producer organizations: Empirical evidence from India. Agribusiness. Crossref
[18] Patil, S., Mehta, M., Pancholi, G., & Saxena, A. (2025). Unveiling the dynamics of farmer producer organizations in India: A systematic review of status, challenges, and future directions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 758. Crossref
[19] Press Information Bureau (PIB), Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. (2022). Data of registered FPOs [Press release, PRID 1806232].
[20] Press Information Bureau (PIB), Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. (2024). 8,875 FPOs registered under the Central Sector Scheme [Press release, PRID 2040845].
[21] Press Information Bureau (PIB), Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. (2025). 10,000 FPOs achieved under government's flagship scheme [Press release, PRID 2106913].
[22] Singh, S., Sharma, A., Singh, A., Praveen, K. V., Singh, H., & Kumawat, P. K. (2026). What makes Farmer Producer Organizations work? A multi-level analysis of performance determinants in India. Journal of Rural Studies. Crossref
[23] Small Farmers' Agribusiness Consortium (SFAC). (2025). State wise list of registered FPOs details under Central Sector Scheme for Formation and Promotion of 10,000 FPOs by SFAC, as on 24-02-2025. https://sfacindia.com/FPOS.aspx
[24] Sustainable Bharat. (2025). Indian agriculture and the FPO model: Part 2 [Independent analysis of Ministry of Corporate Affairs filings].
[25] Thangavel, M., Khangar, N. S., Das, A., & Sengupta, A. (2025). Financial health of farmer producer companies in Tamil Nadu: Challenges and prospects. Discover Sustainability.
[26] TCI Cornell. (2024). How many FPOs are there in India? How we counted the number of Farmer Producer Organizations. Cornell Tata-Cornell Institute.
How to cite this paper
@article{1722991,
author = {Dr. Sunil Kumar Tripathi},
title = {Beyond FPO Formation: Empirically Assessing CBBO Effectiveness in Driving Financial and Commercial Sustainability of Farmer Producer Organizations in India},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {1372-1384},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722991.pdf},
abstract = {Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) have become the principal vehicle through which the Government of India seeks to organize small and marginal farmers into viable collective enterprises. Since 2020, the Central Sector Scheme for the Formation and Promotion of 10,000 FPOs has relied on Cluster Based Business Organizations (CBBOs) to deliver five years of professional handholding to each new FPO, covering mobilization, business planning, and market linkage. Most existing research and policy discussion has concentrated on the pace of FPO formation rather than on whether CBBO-mediated support actually translates into stronger financial and commercial outcomes. This paper examines that question using officially published national and state-level data from the Press Information Bureau, the Small Farmers' Agribusiness Consortium (SFAC), and peer-reviewed secondary studies of FPO finances, since the FPO-level financial microdata held in the government's internal 10K FPO MIS portal is not publicly downloadable and could not be accessed for this study. Descriptive analysis shows that cumulative FPO registrations rose from 3,179 in 2022 to 10,000 by February 2025, while cumulative equity grant disbursement and credit guarantee coverage grew unevenly across the same period. Secondary evidence indicates that FPO paid-up capital remains heavily skewed, with roughly half of registered FPOs holding negligible capital and a small minority accounting for a disproportionate share of the sector's financial base. A recent peer-reviewed multi-level study estimates that only 16 to 30 percent of registered FPOs are financially sustainable despite near-universal formation targets being met. The paper is unable to test FPO-level regression hypotheses linking CBBO support to turnover or paid-up capital because the required linked microdata is not publicly accessible, and it states this limitation explicitly rather than substituting invented figures. Instead, it offers a transparent, evidence-based account of what is and is not known about CBBO effectiveness, and it argues that closing the FPO-level data gap is itself a precondition for credible impact evaluation of the scheme. Policy implications are drawn for CBBOs, Implementing Agencies, and the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare regarding data transparency and financial handholding design.},
keywords = {farmer producer organizations; cluster-based business organizations; FPO sustainability; agricultural policy; institutional support; equity grant; India},
month = {September},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722991}
}