Gendered Sovereignty and Domestic Statecraft: Household Power in Seventeenth-Century Rajput Polities

References

[1] Ramya Sreenivasan, The Many Lives of a Rajput Queen: Heroic Pasts in India, c. 1500–1900. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2007.

[2] Varsha Joshi, Polygamy and Purdah: Women and Society among Rajputs. Jaipur: Rawat Publications, 1995.

[3] Ruby Lal, Domesticity and Power in the Early Mughal World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

[4] John F. Richards, The Mughal Empire. The New Cambridge History of India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Crossref

[5] Satish Chandra, Mughal Religious Policies, the Rajputs and the Deccan. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House, 1993.

[6] Nandita Prasad Sahai, Politics of Patronage and Protest: The State, Society, and Artisans in Early Modern Rajasthan. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2006.

[7] Robert C. Hallissey, The Rajput Rebellion Against Aurangzeb: A Study of the Mughal Empire in Seventeenth-Century India. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1977.

[8] Visheshwar Sarup Bhargava, Marwar and the Mughal Emperors. Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1966.

[9] Richard D. Saran and Norman P. Ziegler, The Mertiyo Rathors of Merto, Rajasthan: Select Translations Bearing on the History of a Rajput Family, 1462–1660. 2 vols. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Center for South Asian Studies, 2001.

[10] G. N. Sharma, Mewar and the Mughal Emperors, 1526–1707 A.D. 2nd ed. Agra: Shiva Lal Agarwala, 1962.

[11] Cynthia Talbot, “A Poetic Record of the Rajput Rebellion, c. 1680.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 28, no. 3 (2018): 461–483. Crossref

[12] Lindsey Harlan, “Aurangzeb in Mewar through the Stories of Sultan Singh.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 28, no. 3 (2018): 511–524. Crossref

[13] Ramya Sreenivasan, “Honoring the Family: Narratives and Politics of Kinship in Pre-colonial Rajasthan.” In Unfamiliar Relations: Family and History in South Asia, edited by Indrani Chatterjee. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2004.

[14] Ali Anooshahr, “The King Who Would Be Man: The Gender Roles of the Warrior King in Early Mughal History.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 18, no. 3 (2008): 327–340. Crossref

[15] Stephen P. Blake, “Returning the Household to the Patrimonial-Bureaucratic Empire: Gender, Succession, and Ritual in the Mughal, Safavid and Ottoman Empires.” In Tributary Empires in Global History, edited by Peter F. Bang and C. A. Bayly, 214–226. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

[16] Munis D. Faruqui, The Princes of the Mughal Empire, 1504–1719. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Crossref

[17] Harbans Mukhia, The Mughals of India. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.

[18] Kaviraj Shyamal Das, Vir Vinod: Mewar ka Itihas. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1986. Originally compiled in the nineteenth century.

[19] Sri Ram Sharma, Maharana Raj Singh and His Times. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1971.

[20] James Tod, Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan; or, the Central and Western Rajput States of India. Edited by William Crooke. London: Oxford University Press, 1920.

[21] Rosalind O'Hanlon, “Kingdom, Household and Body: History, Gender and Imperial Service under Akbar.” Modern Asian Studies, 2007.

@article{1722994,
      author = {Sumit Rajput},
      title = {Gendered Sovereignty and Domestic Statecraft: Household Power in Seventeenth-Century Rajput Polities},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {1112-1118},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722994.pdf},
      abstract = {The political history of seventeenth-century Rajput polities has conventionally been examined through kingship, warfare, clan honour, territorial sovereignty, and relations with the Mughal Empire. Within this historiographical framework, royal women have often been represented as symbols of honour, loyalty, sacrifice, or dynastic virtue rather than as participants in the institutional processes through which political authority was reproduced. This article reconsiders that framework by examining the Rajput royal household as a site of domestic statecraft. Focusing comparatively on Marwar and Mewar between c. 1600 and 1707, it argues that sovereignty was produced not solely through the formal authority of male rulers but also through gendered practices involving kinship, succession, ritual, patronage, and political memory. The article draws upon scholarship on Rajput political culture, Mughal-Rajput relations, royal households, gender, and vernacular historical traditions. Particular attention is given to the succession crisis following the death of Maharaja Jaswant Singh of Marwar in 1678 and to the political and cultural environment of Maharana Raj Singh's Mewar. These cases demonstrate the importance of examining royal women not simply as passive members of dynastic households but as participants in processes through which lineage and legitimacy were preserved. The article proposes that the zenana should be understood neither as an autonomous centre of political power nor as a purely private space, but as a gendered institutional environment connected to wider structures of sovereignty. By integrating gender history with political, kinship, and spatial history, the study offers a revised interpretation of early modern Rajput state formation.},
      keywords = {Domestic statecraft, gendered sovereignty, Marwar, Mewar, Rajput polity.},
      month = {September},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1722994}
  }