Freedom of Expression in the Digital Age: Assessing the Compatibility of Bangladesh’s Cyber Security Act 2026 with Constitutional Guarantees and International Human Rights Standards

References

[1] Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh. Articles 35, 39.

[2] International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Adopted December 16, 1966. 999 UNTS 171.

[3] United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. GA Res. 217A (III). UN Doc. A/810 (1948).

[4] United Nations Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 34: Article 19—Freedoms of Opinion and Expression. CCPR/C/GC/34. Geneva, 2011.

[5] United Nations Human Rights Council. The Promotion, Protection and Enjoyment of Human Rights on the Internet. A/HRC/RES/32/13. Geneva, 2016.

[6] United Nations Human Rights Council. The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age. A/HRC/RES/29/22. Geneva, 2015.

[7] United Nations Human Rights Council. The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age. A/HRC/RES/34/7. Geneva, 2017.

[8] United Nations Human Rights Council. The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age. A/HRC/RES/42/15. Geneva, 2019.

[9] Cyber Security Act 2026 (Bangladesh). Sections 2–5, 25(1), 29, 31–36, 38, 43, 44, 46, 48.

[10] Digital Security Act 2018 (Bangladesh).

[11] Information and Communication Technology Act 2006 (Bangladesh).

[12] Information and Communication Technology (Amendment) Act 2013 (Bangladesh).

[13] Anwar Hossain Chowdhury v. Bangladesh, 41 DLR (AD) 165 (1989).

[14] Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, (2015) 5 SCC 1. Paras. 83–90, 87–94.

[15] Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).

[16] New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964).

[17] Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. 98 (2017).

[18] Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844 (1997).

[19] Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 (1972).

[20] Delfi AS v. Estonia, App. No. 64569/09, Judgment of June 16, 2015.

[21] Handyside v. United Kingdom, 1 EHRR 737 (1976).

[22] Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary, App. No. 18030/11, Judgment of November 8, 2016.

[23] Roman Zakharov v. Russia, App. No. 47143/06 (2015).

[24] The Sunday Times v. United Kingdom, (1979) 2 EHRR 245.

[25] Cumpănă and Mazăre v. Romania, App. No. 33348/96 (2004).

[26] European Parliament and Council. Digital Services Act. Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market for Digital Services. Official Journal of the European Union.

[27] Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Article 11 – Freedom of expression and information.

[28] European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Article 10 – Freedom of expression.

[29] Barak, Aharon. Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

[30] Bhatia, Gautam. Offend, Shock, or Disturb. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2016.

[31] Donnelly, Jack. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2013.

[32] Land, Molly K., and Jay D. Aronson. New Technologies for Human Rights Law and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.

[33] Nowak, Manfred. U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary. 2nd ed. Kehl: N. P. Engel Publishers, 2005.

[34] Schauer, Frederick. Free Speech: A Philosophical Enquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

[35] Stone, Geoffrey R., et al. Constitutional Law. 8th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2018.

[36] Hannum, Hurst. "The Status of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in National and International Law." Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 25 (1996): 287–397.

[37] Hoque, Ridwanul. "Freedom of Expression and Digital Regulation in Bangladesh." Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law 24, no. 2 (2023): 145–168.

[38] Human Rights Law Review 12, no. 4 (2012): 627.

[39] Kaye, David. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression. A/HRC/29/32. Geneva: United Nations Human Rights Council, 2015.

[40] Kaye, David. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression. A/HRC/35/22. Geneva: United Nations Human Rights Council, 2017.

[41] Amnesty International. Repackaging Repression: The Cyber Security Act and Continuing Restrictions on Dissent in Bangladesh. London: Amnesty International, 2024.

[42] ARTICLE 19. The Global Principles on National Security and the Right to Information (The Tshwane Principles). London: ARTICLE 19, 2013.

[43] ARTICLE 19. Necessary and Proportionate: International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to Communications Surveillance. London: ARTICLE 19, 2014.

[44] Human Rights Watch. Bangladesh: Repeal Repressive Digital Security Act. New York: Human Rights Watch, 2023.

[45] International Commission of Jurists. Digital Expression and Human Rights. Geneva: International Commission of Jurists, 2020.

[46] ICT International Centre (ICNL). Bangladesh's Cyber Security Act: A Guide for Civil Society, Media and Humanitarian Organizations. November 2024.

[47] Media Defence. The Right to Freedom of Expression under International Law. London: Media Defence, 2022.

[48] Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age. 2018.

[49] Online Academic Resources

[50] Council of Europe. Convention on Cybercrime (Budapest Convention). 2001. Articles 14–21.

[51] Election.com Law. Information Technology Act 2000 (India). Sections 66A (repealed), 67, 67A.

[52] Global Freedom of Expression. "General Comment No. 34." Columbia University. https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu

[53] Global Freedom of Expression. "Online Expression Jurisprudence." Columbia University. https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu

[54] Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. "Universal Declaration of Human Rights." https://www.ohchr.org

[55] Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. "Freedom of Opinion and Expression." https://www.ohchr.org

[56] OHCHR. "Article 19 of the ICCPR." 2020. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRBodies/CCPR/GC37/ARTICLE19.docx

[57] Organization of American States (OAS). "Special Rapporteurship for Freedom of Expression." 2009. https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/expression/showarticle.asp?artID=435&lID=1

[58] Oxford University Press. Human Rights Law Review. 12, no. 4 (2012): 627–72. https://academic.oup.com/hrlr/article/12/4/627/628921

[59] Stanford Law School, Wilson International Programme on Law and Democracy (WILMAP). "General Comment No. 34 on Article 19 of the ICCPR." 2018. https://wilmap.stanford.edu/entries/general-comment-no-34-article-19-international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights

[60] Bangladesh Laws. "সাইবার সুরক্ষা অধ্যাদেশ, ২০২৫ (Cyber Security Ordinance 2025)." http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/act-details-1538.html

[61] CMS Law. "Digital Services Act: A new legal framework for the platform economy." 2021.

[62] Eurojust. "Digital Services Act factsheet." 2024. https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/sites/default/files/assets/eurojust-digital-services-act-factsheet-2024-en.pdf

[63] European Commission. "The Digital Services Act package." 2026. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-services-act

[64] European Commission. "Digital Services Act: keeping us safe online." 2025. https://commission.europa.eu/news-and-media/news/digital-services-act-keeping-us-safe-online-2025-09-22_en

[65] People of Internet. "Bangladesh's Cyber Protection Act 2026 Ratifies the Old Speech Code." 2026. https://www.peopleofinternet.com/articles/bangladesh-s-cyber-protection-act-2026-ratifies-the-old-spee.html

[66] Scribd. "Overbreadth and Vagueness in Law." 2025.

[67] Cornell Law School. "Procedural Matters and Freedom of Speech: Vagueness." 2023.

@article{1723052,
      author = {Emon Hossain Bijoy, Md. Atikur Rahman Ranga, Md. Nazmul Hasan, Mst. Erfana Fairuj Anisa, Md. Shadin},
      title = {Freedom of Expression in the Digital Age: Assessing the Compatibility of Bangladesh’s Cyber Security Act 2026 with Constitutional Guarantees and International Human Rights Standards},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {1661-1710},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723052.pdf},
      abstract = {This paper is an attempt to critically examine the Cyber Security Act 2026 of Bangladesh in the light of constitutional law, international human rights law, and comparative jurisprudence. The research makes use of doctrinal legal research and comparative analysis to review the Act with respect to Article 39 of the Constitution of Bangladesh, Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and the UN Human Rights Committee’s General Comment No. 34.

It finds that although there were legitimate reasons for the Act, several provisions pose fundamental constitutional challenges. These challenges stem from broad definitions provided in the act and ambiguous speech offenses including “defamatory online content," “false information," “cyber propaganda," and “cyber terrorism," along with wide-ranging investigative powers with no need for obtaining judicial warrants. Such provisions not only lack legality, necessity, and proportionality as required under Article 19(3) of the ICCPR but are also likely to have considerable chilling effects on online speech, thereby preventing journalists, academics, and citizens from exercising their constitutional right to participate in political debates.

Based on the jurisprudence in the US First Amendment, the European Union’s Digital Services Act, and the judgment of the Indian Supreme Court in Shreya Singhal v. Union of India, it indicates that it is possible to regulate cyberspace without disproportionately curbing constitutionally guaranteed speech. It concludes that the Act does not meet any of the five cumulative requirements for constitutionally sound cyber legislation. This study recommends five key principles of legislative reform to meet those requirements.},
      keywords = {Cyber Security Act 2026; Bangladesh; Freedom of Expression; Constitutional Law; International Human Rights Law; ICCPR Article 19; Digital Rights; Judicial Oversight; Comparative Constitutional Law; Cyber Legislation},
      month = {September},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1723052}
  }