Home / Current Issue / Paper 1723054
The Impact of Social Change Theories on Women’s Roles in Emirati Urban Society: Reassessing Modernization through the Emirati Experience
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Social Studies
Abstract
The swift transition of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) from a tribal and agrarian society into a cosmopolitan, globalized, and knowledge-based economy has resulted in significant shifts in the social, economic, educational, political, and familial roles of women. This paper will explore these changes using the theoretical framework of modernization while also taking into consideration dependency, post-colonialism, feminist, and gender theories in order to determine how far the existing theories of social change account for the experiences of Emiratis. Utilizing an integrative review of academic articles, historical sources, and UAE official policy documents, the paper will analyze the changes in women’s participation in education, workforce, entrepreneurship, political decision-making, leadership positions, family life, and urban public spaces. It will be shown that modernization theory offers considerable explanatory power when it comes to the connection between economic and social development, urbanization, education, occupational diversification, technology, and evolving gender roles (Inglehart & Norris, 2003; Inglehart & Welzel, 2005; Lerner, 1958). However, the UAE example calls into question linear models of modernization since women's empowerment has not merely been achieved through individualization brought about by market dynamics and the decline of traditional cultural values. On the contrary, the role transition of women has largely been enabled by state intervention, financial affluence due to oil resources, diversification of the economy, globalization, development of education systems, and gender-related institutional policy (Khalaf, 2006; Moghadam, 2003; United Arab Emirates Government, 2023). Moreover, contemporary studies have shown that Emirati women today practice negotiation rather than rejection of collectivist culture values, combining economic and professional power with family ties and cultural identity (Alteneiji, 2023; Thompson-Whiteside et al., 2021). This paper thus suggests a contextually developed model of Culturally Embedded State-Led Modernization (CESLM), where structural transformations, institutional intervention, and cultural negotiation interplay to transform the role of women. The paper will contribute to existing literature on gender, modernization, urbanization, and social transformation in Gulf societies, as modernization does not necessarily imply cultural values displacement but can be selectively adopted and reinterpreted.
Keywords
Emirati women; modernization theory; social change; urbanization; gender roles; United Arab Emirates; women's empowerment; globalization; Gulf societies; state-led modernization.
References
[1] Alteneiji, E. (2023). Value changes in gender roles: Perspectives from three generations of Emirati women. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), Article 2184899. Crossref
[2] Alvesson, M., & Billing, Y. D. (2009). Understanding gender and organizations (2nd ed.). SAGE.
[3] Benería, L., Berik, G., & Floro, M. S. (2015). Gender, development, and globalization: Economics as if all people mattered (2nd ed.). Routledge.
[4] Boserup, E. (1970). Woman’s role in economic development. St. Martin’s Press.
[5] Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
[6] Clingan, L. (2025). Masculinity challenged: Emotional responses to state support for women’s employment in the United Arab Emirates. Social Problems, 72(4), 1408–1423. Crossref
[7] Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
[8] Connell, R., & Pearse, R. (2015). Gender: In world perspective (3rd ed.). Polity Press.
[9] Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
[10] Davis, K., & Blake, J. (1956). Social structure and fertility: An analytic framework. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 4(3), 211– 235. Crossref
[11] Elessawy, F. M. (2021). Demographic characteristics of the female Emirati workforce in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. [Journal information should be verified before submission].
[12] Elson, D. (1995). Male bias in the development process. Manchester University Press.
[13] Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). The incomplete revolution: Adapting to women’s new roles. Polity Press.
[14] Fakih, A., & Ghazalian, P. L. (2013). Female employment in Arab countries: The role of gender, institutions, and human capital. Labour Economics, 24, 152–163. Crossref
[15] Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). University of Chicago Press.
[16] Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
[17] Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
[18] Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Linking social change and developmental change: Shifting pathways of human development. Developmental Psychology, 45(2), 401–418. Crossref
[19] Hasso, F. S. (2011). Consuming desires: Family crisis and the state in the Middle East. Stanford University Press.
[20] Hearn, J. (2015). Men of the world: Genders, globalizations, transnational times. SAGE.
[21] Hearn, J., & Blagojević, M. (2013). Rethinking transnational men: Beyond, between and within nations. In J. Hearn, M. Blagojević, & K. Harrison (Eds.), Rethinking transnational men: Beyond, between and within nations (pp. 1–20). Routledge.
[22] Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press.
[23] Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge University Press.
[24] International Labour Organization. (2022). Care at work: Investing in care leave and services for a more gender-equal world of work. International Labour Office.
[25] International Labour Organization. (2024). World employment and social outlook: Trends 2024. International Labour Office.
[26] Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2(3), 274–290. Crossref
[27] Kandiyoti, D. (1991). Women, Islam and the state. Middle East Report, 173, 9–14. Crossref
[28] Kandiyoti, D. (Ed.). (1996). Gendering the Middle East. I. B. Tauris.
[29] Karam, C. M., & Afiouni, F. (2014). Localizing women’s experiences in academia: Multilevel factors at play in the Arab Middle East and North Africa. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(4), 500–538. Crossref
[30] Kaufman, D., & English, P. (2022). Women’s economic empowerment in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. World Bank.
[31] Khalaf, S. (2006). The evolution of the Gulf city type, oil, and globalization. In Y. Elsheshtawy (Ed.), The evolving Arab city: Tradition, modernity and urban development (pp. 244– 265). Routledge.
[32] Kinninmont, J. (2015). Future trends in the Gulf. Chatham House.
[33] Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society: Modernizing the Middle East. Free Press.
[34] Lewis, S., & Humbert, A. L. (2010). Discourse or reality? “Work-life balance” policy in the UK. Gender, Work & Organization, 17(3), 299– 314. Crossref
[35] Moghadam, V. M. (1993). Modernizing women: Gender and social change in the Middle East. Lynne Rienner.
[36] Moghadam, V. M. (2003). Modernizing women: Gender and social change in the Middle East (2nd ed.). Lynne Rienner.
[37] Moghadam, V. M. (2013). Modernizing women: Gender and social change in the Middle East (3rd ed.). Lynne Rienner.
[38] Moghadam, V. M. (2020). Gender regimes in the Middle East and North Africa: The power of feminist movements. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 27(3), 1–25.
[39] Neundorf, A., & Shorrocks, R. (2022). Revisiting the impact of modernization on support for women politicians: The role of women’s political empowerment. Comparative Political Studies, 55(8), 1281–1310. Crossref
[40] O’Sullivan, A. (2008). The Gulf region: A new economic powerhouse? Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
[41] Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Free Press.
[42] Rostow, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non -communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press.
[43] Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
[44] Samier, E. (2015). Emirati women’s higher educational leadership formation under globalisation: Culture, religion, politics, and the dialectics of modernisation. Gender and Education, 27(3), 239–254. Crossref
[45] Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf.
[46] Seward, R. R., & Williamson, J. B. (1970). The growth of the modern population. Prentice-Hall.
[47] Shafik, N. (2021). What we owe each other: A new social contract for a better society. Princeton University Press.
[48] Sjoberg, L. (2013). Gendering global conflict: Toward a feminist theory of war. Columbia University Press.
[49] Thompson-Whiteside, H., Turnbull, S., & Fletcher-Brown, J. (2021). How women in the UAE enact entrepreneurial identities to build legitimacy. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 39(7), 687–708. Crossref
[50] United Arab Emirates Government. (2023). National Policy for Empowerment of Emirati Women 2023–2031.
[51] United Arab Emirates Government. (2024). Gender balance in the United Arab Emirates.
[52] United Arab Emirates Government. (2024). Women in the United Arab Emirates.
[53] United Arab Emirates Government Media Office. (2024). UAE gender balance initiatives and national development priorities.
[54] United Arab Emirates Ministry of Community Development. (2023). National strategy and policies for family cohesion and social wellbeing.
[55] United Nations. (2020). World’s women 2020: Trends and statistics. Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
[56] United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Human development report 2023/2024: Breaking the gridlock: Reimagining cooperation in a polarized world.
[57] United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia. (2020). Arab gender gap report 2020.
[58] United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia. (2022). Arab development report: Towards a new social contract.
[59] United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. (2020). Gender equality: Women’s rights in review 25 years after Beijing. UN Women.
[60] United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. (2022). Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The gender snapshot 2022. UN Women.
[61] United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. (2023). Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The gender snapshot 2023. UN Women.
[62] United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. (2024). Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The gender snapshot 2024. UN Women.
[63] United Nations Population Fund. (2021). State of world population 2021: My body is my own.
[64] UAE Gender Balance Council. (2023). Gender balance strategy 2022–2026.
[65] UAE Gender Balance Council. (2024). Mandate, initiatives, and institutional priorities.
[66] UAE Gender Balance Council. (2025). Gender balance and national gender equality initiatives.
[67] Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184. Crossref
[68] Welter, F. (2020). Contexts and entrepreneurship: An international perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(3), 1–20.
[69] World Bank. (2020). Women, business and the law 2020. World Bank.
[70] World Bank. (2022). Women, business and the law 2022. World Bank.
[71] World Bank. (2024). Women, business and the law 2024. World Bank.
[72] World Economic Forum. (2023). Global gender gap report 2023. World Economic Forum.
[73] World Economic Forum. (2024). Global gender gap report 2024. World Economic Forum.
[74] Yousef, T. M. (2004). Development, growth and policy reform in the Middle East and North Africa since 1950. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 91–116.
[75] Zahra, S. A. (2021). International entrepreneurship in the post-COVID world. Journal of World Business, 56(1), Article 101143. Crossref
[76] Zuhur, S. (Ed.). (2005). Images of enchantment: Visual and performing arts of the Middle East. American University in Cairo Press.
How to cite this paper
@article{1723054,
author = {Dr. Azza Elmadani, Dr. Abdallah Salama, Prof. Shiraz Al-ali, Dr. Wesam Nasr, Sara Almaazmi},
title = {The Impact of Social Change Theories on Women’s Roles in Emirati Urban Society: Reassessing Modernization through the Emirati Experience},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {1778-1804},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723054.pdf},
abstract = {The swift transition of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) from a tribal and agrarian society into a cosmopolitan, globalized, and knowledge-based economy has resulted in significant shifts in the social, economic, educational, political, and familial roles of women. This paper will explore these changes using the theoretical framework of modernization while also taking into consideration dependency, post-colonialism, feminist, and gender theories in order to determine how far the existing theories of social change account for the experiences of Emiratis. Utilizing an integrative review of academic articles, historical sources, and UAE official policy documents, the paper will analyze the changes in women’s participation in education, workforce, entrepreneurship, political decision-making, leadership positions, family life, and urban public spaces. It will be shown that modernization theory offers considerable explanatory power when it comes to the connection between economic and social development, urbanization, education, occupational diversification, technology, and evolving gender roles (Inglehart & Norris, 2003; Inglehart & Welzel, 2005; Lerner, 1958). However, the UAE example calls into question linear models of modernization since women's empowerment has not merely been achieved through individualization brought about by market dynamics and the decline of traditional cultural values. On the contrary, the role transition of women has largely been enabled by state intervention, financial affluence due to oil resources, diversification of the economy, globalization, development of education systems, and gender-related institutional policy (Khalaf, 2006; Moghadam, 2003; United Arab Emirates Government, 2023). Moreover, contemporary studies have shown that Emirati women today practice negotiation rather than rejection of collectivist culture values, combining economic and professional power with family ties and cultural identity (Alteneiji, 2023; Thompson-Whiteside et al., 2021). This paper thus suggests a contextually developed model of Culturally Embedded State-Led Modernization (CESLM), where structural transformations, institutional intervention, and cultural negotiation interplay to transform the role of women. The paper will contribute to existing literature on gender, modernization, urbanization, and social transformation in Gulf societies, as modernization does not necessarily imply cultural values displacement but can be selectively adopted and reinterpreted.},
keywords = {Emirati women; modernization theory; social change; urbanization; gender roles; United Arab Emirates; women's empowerment; globalization; Gulf societies; state-led modernization. },
month = {September},
}